Administrative Appeals Tribunal

List of Decisions Subject To Review*
(Jurisdiction as at 30 September 2015)

The Administrative Appeals Tribunal does not have a general power to review decisions made under Commonwealth legislation.  The Tribunal can only review a decision if an Act or other legislative instrument provides specifically that the decision is subject to review by the Tribunal.  This document sets out a list of the enactments under which decisions may be made that are subject to review by the Tribunal.  It also provides a brief description of the decisions that the Tribunal may review.

The list is arranged alphabetically by the short title of the enactment and provides the following information.

1.	The short title of the enactment under which reviewable decisions are made is in bold type.
2.	The provision of the enactment or other enactment which provides that application may be made to the Tribunal for review is underlined.  The number and year of the enactment which introduced these provisions and any enactments that have amended the provisions are noted in parentheses.
3.	The provisions of the enactment pursuant to which a reviewable decision may be made are noted in the left column.
4.	A brief description of the reviewable decisions is provided in the right column.
5.	Where the provisions of an Act or other enactment extending the Tribunal’s jurisdiction have not yet commenced, the relevant entries appear in italics.  A note at the end of the entry indicates the commencement date.
6.	Where an enactment or a provision is to be repealed, the repealed enactment or provision is underlined with an explanatory note below.  Where an enactment or a provision has been repealed, it will be underlined and italicised.  The relevant enactment or provision will generally be removed from the jurisdiction list 3 months after the date of the repeal.
7.	Other information relevant to an entry, including any variation to the standard 28-day time limit for lodging an application for review is set out in a note below the particular entry.

Example:

1`

AusCheck Regulations 2007 

2`

Regulation 12 (SLI 137 of 2007)  

3`

Section 9(1) 	
4`

The following decision of the Secretary of the Attorney-General’s Department: 
-	to include unfavourable criminal history advice in advice on the outcome of a background check on an individual under reg 9(1).	

7`

[Notes:
1.	These Regulations will cease on 1 October 2017: F2007L01570]. 

To quickly link to the relevant part of the list, click on the letter below which corresponds to the first letter of the enactment under which the decision is seeking to be reviewed:

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  V  W

The Tribunal’s Legal and Policy Section maintains this list.  Any queries in relation to the list should be sent to enquiries@aat.gov.au.  An updated version of the list is generally published on a quarterly basis.

* This list includes those enactments which provide for advisory opinions.  Advisory opinions are not decisions subject to review.

Disclaimer: This publication does not purport to be a determination of whether any matter falls within the AAT's jurisdiction. A conclusive determination as to whether the AAT is able to review a particular decision can only be made once the AAT has received an application for review.  Therefore, if you are unsure about whether a decision falls within the AAT's jurisdiction, an application for review should be lodged with the Tribunal for a determination and/or independent legal advice sought.

A

A New Tax System (Australian Business Number) Act 1999

Section 14ZZ of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 

Section 14ZY(1) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953
	The following decisions of the Registrar of the Australian Business Register in relation to which an objection has been allowed, wholly or in part, or disallowed by the Commissioner under Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 
1.	to set the date of effect of registration under s 11(1);
2.	to refuse under s 13 a person’s application for registration;
3.	to refuse under s 13 a person’s application to register details about a nominated representative;
4.	to cancel a person’s registration under s 18(1);
5.	to cancel under s 18(1A) the registration of a nominated representative;
6.	to set the date of effect of a cancellation of registration under ss 18(2) or 18(5);
7.	to refuse to cancel registration under s 18(4);
8.	to refuse not to disclose details in relation to an entity when giving a copy of an entry from the Australian Business Register under s 26(4);
9.	to refuse not to disclose details in relation to an entity when issuing a document containing the details of matter taken from the Australian Business Register or when giving a person a certified copy of, or extract from, the Australian Business Register under s 27(7).	

[Notes:
1.	Section 21 of the Act provides that a person may object against the decisions set out in the right-hand column in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953. The following Acts introduced or have amended the list of decisions in relation to which an objection may be lodged: 42 of 2009.
2.	A person dissatisfied with any of the above decisions may object against them in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.  The Commissioner will then make an objection decision from which a person can apply for review to the Tribunal.
3.	An application for review of an objection decision must be lodged with the Tribunal within 60 days after the person making the application is served with notice of the decision: s 14ZZC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
4.	If the Commissioner fails to make a decision on a taxation objection within 60 days after being given a written notice requiring the making of the objection decision, the Commissioner is deemed to have made a decision under s 14ZY(1) to disallow the objection: s 14ZYA(3) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.]

A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Act 1999

Sections 111(1) [first review], 128(1) [second review], 138(1) [single review], 142(1) and 144(1A) and (1C) of the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) (Administration) Act 1999 (81 of 1999)(60 of 2015) 

AAT First Review	
Sections 105(4),  109A(2) of the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) (Administration) Act 1999	1.	Any decision of an officer under the family assistance law that has been affirmed, varied or set aside and substituted on internal review by the Secretary of the Department of Social Services or an authorised review officer under s 105(4) or s 109A(2) of the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) (Administration) Act 1999.

2.	A decision under the family assistance law made personally by:
10.	the Secretary of the Department of Social Services personally (except a decision under Division 2 of Part 8C);
11.	by another agency head in the exercise of a delegated power;
12.	by the Chief Executive Centrelink in the exercise of a delegated power;
13.	by the Chief Executive Medicare in the exercise of a delegated power.	
The following section was repealed and replaced by the above sections with effect from 1 July 2015:	
	Any decision of an officer that has been reviewed by the Secretary of the Department of Education , the Secretary of the Department of Social Services or an authorised review officer and then by the Social Security Appeals Tribunal.	
AAT Second Review	
Section 128(1) of the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) (Administration) Act 1999 	A decision made by the AAT under s 43(1) of the AAT Act on AAT first review. 	
AAT Single Review 	
Section 57(1) of this Act 	A decision of the Secretary to determine under s 57(1) that an approved child care service is the sole provider in an area of the kind of care the service provides and the service would be likely to close if the Secretary were not to make such a determination that would be in force for a period of one or more weeks.	
The following decisions have been repealed and replaced with effect from 1 July 2015:	
	A decision: 
-	made personally by the Secretary of the Department of Education or by an agency head himself or herself in the exercise of a delegated power; or 
-	affirmed, varied or set aside on reconsideration by the Secretary or an authorised review officer under s 109A(2) of the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) (Administration) Act 1999.	

[Notes:
-	Section 105(1) of the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) (Administration) Act 1999 provides that the Secretary may review on his or her own initiative any decision of an officer under this Act.  Subsection 105(2) of that Act states that the Secretary may review the original decision even if an application has been made to the AAT.
-	Section 109A of the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) (Administration) Act 1999 provides that a person affected by any decision of an officer under this Act may apply to the Secretary for review of that decision.  Section 108(2) of that Act sets out decisions in relation to which a person may not apply to the Secretary for review.
-	A person affected by a care percentage decision may apply under s 109(1A) to the Secretary, to the Child Support Register, for review of the decision.
-	Subject to the exceptions set out in s 111(2) of the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) (Administration) Act 1999, a person may apply to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for review of a decision made under the family assistance law. 
-	Act 60 of 2015 amended the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) (Administration) Act 1999 to introduce AAT first, second and single review with effect from 1 July 2015.  The Act repealed the conferral of jurisdiction under sections 142 and 144].

A New Tax System (Family Assistance) (Administration) Act 1999

Section 110 of this Act provides a simplified outline of the paths to review:
-	If a person is dissatisfied with a decision of a decision reviewer under Division 1, the person may apply to the AAT for review of the decision (an “AAT first review”) (certain decisions are excepted).
-	If a person is dissatisfied with a decision of the AAT on AAT first review, the person may apply to the AAT for further review (an “AAT second review”).
-	Certain decisions may only be reviewed once by the AAT (an “AAT single review”).
-	The rules relating to reviews by the AAT are mainly in the AAT Act, but the operation of that Act is modified in some ways by this Division.
-	The AAT Act allows a person to appeal to a court on a question of law from a decision of the AAT on AAT second review or AAT single review.

Sections 111(1) [first review], 128(1) [second review], 138(1) [single review], and 144(1A) and (1C) (81 of 1999) (45 of 2000) (36 of 2006) (118 of 2007)(32 of 2011)(60 of 2015) 

AAT First Review	
Sections 105(4),  109A(2) 	Any decision of an officer under the family assistance law that has been affirmed, varied or set aside and substituted on internal review by the Secretary of the Department of Social Services or an authorised review officer under s 105(4) or s 109A(2) of this Act, except a decision set out in s 111(2) .

Any decision under the family assistance law made personally by:
14.	the Secretary of the Department of Social Services personally (except a decision under Division 2 of Part 8C);
15.	another agency head in the exercise of a delegated power; 
16.	the Chief Executive Centrelink in the exercise of a delegated power; 
17.	by the Chief Executive Medicare in the exercise of a delegated power.	
The following section was repealed and replaced by the above sections with effect from 1 July 2015:	
Section 113	Any decision of an officer that has been reviewed by the Secretary of the Department of Education, the Secretary of the Department of Social Services or an authorised review officer and then the Social Security Appeals Tribunal.	
AAT Second Review	
Section 128(1) 	A decision made by the AAT under s 43(1) of the AAT Act on AAT first review. 	
AAT single review	
Sections 109A(2), 195, 199(2), 200(1), 200(3), 201A(1), 201A(3), 202(2), 202(3), 202(4), 203(1)(e), 205(3)(a), 207, 207A, 210(1), 212(1), 212(3), 213(2), 214(1), 216(3), 219TSQ(1), 219TSQ(3)	Any of the decisions set out below that has been:
1.	made personally by the Secretary of the Department of Social Services  or by another agency head himself or herself in the exercise of a delegated power, or the Chief Executive Centrelink in the exercise of a delegated power, or the Chief Executive Medicare in the exercise of a delegated power; or
•	affirmed, varied or set aside and substituted by the Secretary of the Department of Social Services or an authorised review officer under s 109A(2):
1.	to refuse a child care service for the purposes of the family assistance law under s 195; 
2.	to impose another condition for the approval of an approved child care service under s 199(2); 
3.	to do one or more of the things mentioned in ss 200(1)(a) to (h) in relation to an approved child care service
4.	to revoke the suspension of the approval of an approved child care service under s 200(3)
5.	to suspend the approval of an approved child care service from a particular day under s 201A(1)
6.	to revoke the suspension of the approval of an approved child care service from a particular day under s 201A(3)
7.	to refuse to cancel an approved child care service’s approval under s 202(2)
8.	to cancel an approved child care service’s approval under s 202(3)
9.	to cancel an approved child care service’s approval under s 202(4), but only if the service made submissions under s 203(1)(e) in relation to the cancellation
10.	not to exempt a specified child care service from a specified eligibility rule under s 205(3)
11.	to refuse to allocate any child care places to an approved child care service or to refuse to allocate the number of child care places an approved child care service has applied for under s 207, unless the decision is based on the Minister’s guidelines under s 206(c)
12.	to reduce the number of child care places allocated to an approved child care service under section 207A
13.	not to approve an individual as a registered carer for the purposes of the family assistance law under s 210(1)
14.	a decision as to when the approval of an applicant as a registered carer is taken to have come into force under s 212(1)
15.	a decision as to when to approve an individual as a registered carer is taken not to have been force under s 212(3)
16.	to impose another condition for the continued approval of an individual as a registered carer under s 213(2)
17.	to do one or more of the things mentioned in s 214(1)(a) to (d) in relation to a registered carer
18.	to cancel a registered carer’s approval under s 216(3)
19.	to suspend an approved child care service’s approval under s 219TSQ(1)
20.	to revoke the suspension of the approval of an approved child care service from a particular day under s 219TSQ(3).	

[Notes:
1.	This Act sets out the review provisions for any decision made under the family assistance law which is defined in s 3 of this Act as any one or more of the following: 
o	this Act;
o	A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Act 1999, 
o	any instrument (including regulations) made under this Act or the Family Assistance Act;
o	Schedules 5 and 6 to the A New Tax System (Family Assistance and Related Measures) Act 2000.
2.	Subject to certain exceptions set out in s 104(1), s 105(1) provides that the Secretary may review on his or her own initiative any decision of an officer under the family assistance law.  Subsection 105(2) states that the Secretary may review the original decision even if an application has been made to the SSAT or AAT.
3.	Section 109A provides that a person affected by any decision of an officer under the family assistance law may apply to the Secretary for review of that decision.  Section 108(2) sets out decisions in relation to which a person may not apply to the Secretary to review.  
4.	A person affected by a care percentage decision may apply under s 109(1A) of this Act to the Secretary, or to the Child Support Registrar, for review of the decision.  If a person who has applied to the AAT for review of a decision under 109A(1) or (1A) without first applying for review to the Secretary or the Child Support Registrar, the person is taken to have applied to the Secretary or the Child Support Registrar on the on which the person applied to the AAT.
5.	Section 152A of this Act provides that, if:
1.	an application for review of a decision relates to a person’s child care benefit entitlement in respect of one or more sessions of care provided by an approved child care service to a child during a period in an income year; and 
2.	a decision has been made under s 65EA, 65EB or 65EC in relation to the person’s entitlement to child care rebate in respect of the child and the period; and 
3.	the result of the review varies or sets aside the child care benefit decision; 
the original application for review is taken to have included an application for review of the child care rebate decision.
6.	Section 152B of this Act provides that, if:
1.	an application for review of a decision relating to a person’s child care benefit entitlement by single payment/in substitution in respect of one or more sessions of care provided by an approved child care service to a child during a period; and 
2.	a decision has been made under s 65ECA in relation to the person’s entitlement to child care rebate in respect of the child and the period; and 
3.	the result of the review varies or sets aside the child care benefit decision;
the original application for review is taken to have included an application for review of the child care rebate decision.
7.	60 of 2015 amended this Act to introduce AAT first, second and single review, and repealed sections 142 to 144 with effect from 1 July 2015. 
8.	Subsection 41(2) of the AAT Act does not apply in relation to an application for first review.
9.	An application for first review, other than a decision relating to the payment of family tax benefit or the raising of debt under Division 2 of Part 2 of this Act, must be made no later than 13 weeks after the person is notified of the decision.
10.	Section 138(4) of this Act sets out the list of reviewable decisions for AAT single review.  

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999

Section 14ZZ of the Taxation Administration Act 1953

Section 14ZY(1) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953
	The following decisions of the Commissioner of Taxation in relation to which an objection has been allowed, wholly or in part, or disallowed by the Commissioner under Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 	
	to refuse to register an entity 	25-5(1)	
	to register an entity 	25-5(2)	
	to decide the date of effect of registration 	25-10	
	to refuse to cancel an entity’s registration 	25-55(1)	
	to cancel an entity’s registration 	25-55(2)	
	to cancel any entities registration, where the entity has been registered less than 12 months	25-57	
	to decide the date on which the cancellation of an entity’s registration takes effect 	25-60	
	to determine that the tax periods that apply to an entity are each individual calendar month	27-15(1)	
	to decide the date of effect of such a determination 	27-15(2)	
	to refuse under s 27-22(1) to revoke an election 	27-10	
	to determine the date of effect of a revocation of election of one month tax periods 	27-22(3)	
	to refuse under s 27-25(1) to revoke a determination made	27-15	
	to decide the date of effect of a revocation 	27-25(2)	
	to determine that a specified period is a tax period that applies to an entity 	27-30	
	to request a request for a determination 	27-37	
	to revoke under s 27-38(1) a determination 	27-37	
	to determine the date of a revocation 	27-38(2)	
	to refuse to permit an entity to account on a cash basis 	29-45(1)	
	to decide the date of effect of an entity’s permission to account on a cash basis 	29-45(2)	
	to revoke an entity’s permission to account on a cash basis 	29-50(3)	
	to decide the date of effect of the revocation of an entity’s permission to account on a cash basis 	29-50(4)	
	to refuse an application for a decision that an event is a fund-raising event 	40-165(1)(c)	
	to approve another day of effect as the day of effect of the formation of, or a change to, a GST group	48-71(1)(b)	
	to revoke an approval of a day of effect 	48-71(2)	
	to refuse an application for approval of a GST religious group 	49-5	
	to refuse an application for approval or revocation 	49-70(1)	
	to revoke an approval under Div 49 	49-70(2)	
	to refuse an application for revocation under s 49-75(1); to revoke the approval of a GST religious group 	49-75(2)	
	to decide the date of effect of any approval, or any revocation of an approval under Div 49 	49-85	
	to approve another day of effect as the day of effect of the formation of, or a change to, a GST joint venture	51-75(1)(b)	
	to revoke an approval of a day of effect 	51-75(2)	
	to refuse an application for registration as a GST branch 	54-5	
	to decide the date of effect of registration of a GST branch 	54-10	
	to refuse to cancel the registration of a GST branch 	54-75(1)	
	to cancel the registration of a GST branch 	54-75(2)	
	to decide the date of effect of the cancellation of the registration of a GST branch 	54-80	
	to cancel the registration of an Australian resident agent 	57-25(1)	
	to determine that the tax periods that apply to a resident agent are each individual month	57-35(1)	
	to decide the date of effect of a determination	57-35(2)	
	to cancel the registration of a representative of an incapacitated entity	58-25(1)	
	to direct a representative of an incapacitated entity to give to the Commissioner a GST return 	58-50(1)(b)	
	to cancel the registration of a non-profit sub-entity 	63-35(1)	
	to refuse to allow, or allow, a further period within which to make an agreement that the margin scheme is to apply	75-5(1A)(b)	
	to refuse to allow an annual apportionment election to take effect from the start of another tax period	131-10(2)(b)	
	to disallow an annual apportionment election	131-20(3)	
	to refuse a request to allow an annual tax period election to take effect from the start of another tax period	151-10(2)(b)	
	to refuse a request to be allowed to make an annual tax period election on a specified day 	151-20(3)	
	to disallow an annual tax period election 	151-25(3)	
	to disallow an election to pay GST by instalments 	162-15(2)(b)	
	to refuse a request to be allowed to make an election on a specified day	162-25(3)	
	to disallow an election to pay GST by instalments 	162-30(3)	
	to make a declaration to negate a GST benefit 	165-40	
	to make a declaration to negate or reduce a GST disadvantage	165-45(3)	
	to decide whether to grant a request for a declaration to negate or reduce a GST disadvantage.	165-45(5)	

[Notes:
1.	Subsection 110-50(1)(a) of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 provides that a person may object against the decisions set out in the right-hand column above.  The reviewable decisions are specified in s 110-50(2) of Schedule 1.  Prior to 1 July 2006, s 62(1) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 provided that a person may object against the decisions under this Act that were specified in s 62(2).
2.	The following Acts introduced, amended and repealed s 62(2) and s 110-50(2) of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 59 of 1999, 176 of 1999, 177 of 1999, 92 of 2000, 156 of 2000, 73 of 2001, 134 of 2004, 78 of 2005, 73 of 2006, 118 of 2009 and 74 of 2010.
3.	A person dissatisfied with any of the above decisions may object against them in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.  The Commissioner will then make an objection decision from which a person can apply for review to the Tribunal.
4.	An application for review of an objection decision must be lodged with the Tribunal within 60 days after the person making the application is served with notice of the decision: s 14ZZC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
5.	If the Commissioner fails to make a decision on a taxation objection within 60 days after being given a written notice requiring the making of the objection decision, the Commissioner is deemed to have made a decision under s 14ZY(1) to disallow the objection: s 14ZYA(3) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.]

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Regulations 1999

Section 14ZZ of the Taxation Administration Act 1953

Section 14ZY(1) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953	The following decisions of the Commissioner of Taxation that have been allowed, wholly or in part, or disallowed by the Commissioner under Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 
-	to refuse an application by the entity under reg 33-15.03
-	to require the entity to provide a bank guarantee under reg 33-15.04
-	to revoke an approval of the entity under reg 33-15.08.	

[Notes:  
1.	Subregulation 33-15.09 of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 provides that a person may object against the decision set out in the right-hand column above.  The following Regulations have introduced or amended that provision: 89 of 2000.
2.	A person dissatisfied with any of the above decisions may object against them in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.  The Commissioner will then make an objection decision from which a person can apply for review to the Tribunal.
3.	An application for review of an objection decision must be lodged with the Tribunal within 60 days after the person making the application is served with notice of the decision: s 14ZZC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
4.	If the Commissioner fails to make a decision on a taxation objection within 60 days after being given a written notice requiring the making of the objection decision, the Commissioner is deemed to have made a decision under s 14ZY(1) to disallow the objection: s 14ZYA(3) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.]

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax Transition) Act 1999

Section 14ZZ of the Taxation Administration Act 1953

Section 14ZY(1) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953	The following decision of the Commissioner of Taxation that has been allowed, wholly or in part, or disallowed by the Commissioner under Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 
-	to refuse an application for a determination relating to rounding under s 24B.	

[Notes:  
1.	Subsection 110-50(1)(b) of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 provides that a person may object against the decision set out in the right-hand column above.  The reviewable decision is specified in s 110-50(3) of Schedule 1.  Prior to 1 July 2006, it was s 62(1) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 which provided that a person may object against the decisions under this Act that were specified in s 62(3A) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
2.	The following Acts have introduced, amended or repealed s 62(3A) and s 110-50(3) of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 92 of 2000 and 73 of 2006.
3.	A person dissatisfied with any of the above decisions may object against them in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.  The Commissioner will then make an objection decision from which a person can apply for review to the Tribunal.
4.	An application for review of an objection decision must be lodged with the Tribunal within 60 days after the person making the application is served with notice of the decision: s 14ZZC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
5.	If the Commissioner fails to make a decision on a taxation objection within 60 days after being given a written notice requiring the making of the objection decision, the Commissioner is deemed to have made a decision under s 14ZY(1) to disallow the objection: s 14ZYA(3) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.]

A New Tax System (Wine Equalisation Tax) Act 1999

Section 14ZZ of the Taxation Administration Act 1953

Section 14ZY(1) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953	The following decisions of the Commissioner of Taxation in relation to which an objection has been allowed, wholly or in part, or disallowed by the Commissioner under Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 
-	to disallow the whole or part of a claim for a wine tax credit under s 17-45
-	to decide the date of effect of approval of a person as a New Zealand participant under s 19-7
-	to refuse to approve a person as a New Zealand participant under s 19-7
-	to revoke a person’s approval as a New Zealand participant under s 19-8
-	to decide the date of effect of revocation of a person’s approval as a New Zealand participant under s 19-8.	

[Notes:
1.	Subsection 111-50(1) of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 provides that a person may object against the decisions set out in the right-hand column above.  The decisions are specified in s 111-50(2) of Schedule 1. Prior to 1 July 2006, it was s 62(1) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 which provided that a person may object against the decisions under this Act that were specified in s 62(2A) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
2.	The following Acts introduced, amended or repealed s 62(2A) and s 111-50(2) of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 59 of 1999, 176 of 1999, 160 of 2005 and 73 of 2006.
3.	A person dissatisfied with any of the above decisions may object against them in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.  The Commissioner will then make an objection decision from which a person can apply for review to the Tribunal.
4.	An application for review of an objection decision must be lodged with the Tribunal within 60 days after the person making the application is served with notice of the decision: s 14ZZC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
5.	If the Commissioner fails to make a decision on a taxation objection within 60 days after being given a written notice requiring the making of the objection decision, the Commissioner is deemed to have made a decision under s 14ZY(1) to disallow the objection: s 14ZYA(3) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.]

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Act 2005

Sections 181B, 196A (150 of 1989) (1 of 1994) (40 of 2002) (32 of 2005)

Sections 142F, 142G, 142H(1), 142H(3), 143R(1), 143R(1A).	The following decisions of the Torres Strait Regional Authority:
-	to refuse a loan to an individual under s 142F
-	to refuse to give a guarantee in respect of a loan to an individual under s 142G
-	to give a notice that the person or body has failed to fulfil a condition of a grant or loan under s 142H
-	to make a declaration that the member of the Authority does not live in the Torres Strait area and has not lived in the area for the preceding six months under s 143R(1)
-	to make a declaration that a member of the Authority does not live in a ward and has not lived in the ward at all during the immediately preceding 6 months under s 143R(1A)
-	any other decisions of the TSRA declared to be reviewable by regulation.
	
Section 181B	A decision of Indigenous Business Australia to refuse a housing loan from the New Housing Fund to an individual.	

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission Amendment Act 2005

Sections 208(1) (32 of 2005)

Sections 199(1), 199(3) 	A decision of the Minister or a delegate of the Minister on reconsideration of a decision made by another delegate of the decision to give notice to a person or body under subitem 199(1) or 199(3).
	
Section 199(6)	A decision made by Indigenous Business Australia to give notice to a person or body under subitem 199(6).
	
Section 199(9)	A decision made by the Indigenous Land Corporation to give notice to a person or body under subitem 199(9).	

Adelaide Airport Curfew Act 2000

Sections 9(7) and 11(7) (29 of 2000)

Sections 9(7)(a), 9(7)(b), 11(7)(a), 11(7)(b).	The following decision of the Minister: 
-	to grant or refuse to grant permission to the operator of an international aircraft to take-off from, or land at, Adelaide Airport during a curfew shoulder period under s 9(4)
-	to grant permission subject to conditions to the operator of an international aircraft to take-off from, or land at, Adelaide Airport during a curfew shoulder period under s 9(5)
-	to grant or refuse to grant permission to the operator of a low noise heavy freight aircraft of a type specified in the regulations to take off from, or land at Adelaide Airport during a curfew period under s 11(4)
-	to grant permission subject to conditions to the operator of a low noise heavy freight aircraft of a type specified in the regulations to take off from, or land at Adelaide Airport during a curfew period under s 11(5).	

Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975

Section 69A(2) (175 of 1995)(60 of 2015)

Section 69A(1)	The following decision of the Tribunal or an officer of the Tribunal: to determine the taxed amount of costs under s 69A(1).	

[Notes:
1.	Section 69A was amended by 60 of 2015 with effect from 1 July 2015.]

Administrative Appeals Tribunal Regulations 1976 (repealed)

Regulation 20 (SR 23 of 1987) (SR 64 of 1993) (SR 156 of 1997) (SR 17 of 2000) (SR 241 of 2010) 

Regulations 
19(5), 19(6A), 19AA(5), 19AA(6B)(a), 19AA(6B)(b)(i).	The following decisions of the Registrar a District Registrar or a Deputy Registrar: 
-	to refuse to order under reg 19(5) that only 1 fee is payable in relation to 2 or more applications for which the same fee is payable;
-	to not order that a fee of $100 is payable under reg 19(6A);
-	to refuse to order under reg 19AA(5) that only 1 fee is payable in relation to 2 or more applications for which the same fee is payable;
-	to not order that a fee of $100 is payable under reg 19AA(6B)(a);
-	to not order that a fee of $100 is payable under reg 19AA(6B)(a);
-	to not order that an amount equal to the difference between the lower application fee and $100 is payable under reg 19AA(6B)(b)(i).	

[Notes:
1.	These regulations were amended by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 1) (SLI 7 of 2012) to provide for review of certain decisions made under Norfolk Island legislation. A list of the decisions subject to review by the Tribunal can be found in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Jurisdiction List – Norfolk Island.
2.	These Regulations were repealed by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Regulation 2015 with effect from 1 July 2015].

Administrative Appeals Tribunal Regulation 2015

Regulation 28 (SLI 94 of 2015) 

Regulations 
21(h), 23	The following decisions of the Registrar: 
-	not to make an order under r 21(h) that the payment of an amount has caused or would cause financial hardship;
-	not to order that only one fee is payable under r 23.	

[Notes:
1.	This Regulation commenced on 1 July 2015.
2.	Section 9 provides the list of Norfolk Island enactment decisions subject to review by the Tribunal ].

Adult Disability Assessment Determination 1999

Section 179(1) of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999

Section 149 of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999	The following decisions made by an officer that have been reviewed by the Secretary of the Department of Social Services or an authorised review officer and then by the Social Security Appeals Tribunal: 
-	to approve, or refuse to approve, a person as a treating health professional under s 1.5(1)
-	to approve, or refuse to approve, a class of persons as treating health professionals under s 1.5(2)
-	to ask for a replacement questionnaire to be completed by another treating health professional if the Secretary is not satisfied that the questionnaire completed is an accurate reflection of a person’s disability, emotional state, behaviour and special care needs under s. 2.2(3).	

[Notes:
1.	Section 3.1 of the Determination provides that the decisions identified above are taken to be decisions of an officer under the Social Security Act 1991 for the purposes of the review provisions.]

Age Discrimination Act 2004

Section 45 (68 of 2004)

Section 44	The following decision of the Australian Human Rights Commission: 
-	to grant or refuse to grant an exemption under s 44..

Aged Care Act 1997

Section 85-8 (112 of 1997)
Section 179(1) of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999

Sections 85-4(4) or 85-5(5)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Health that have been confirmed, varied or set aside on reconsideration:
	
	to reject an application for approval as an approved provider	s 8-1 (1)	
	to revoke an approval as a provider of aged care	s 10-3(1)	
	to reject an application for a determination under s. 15-1 (when allocations take effect)	s 15-3(3)	
	to vary or revoke a provisional allocation of places to a person if a condition has not been met	s 15-4(1)	
	to reject an application for a variation of a provisional allocation of places	s 15-5(4)	
	to extend a provisional allocation period	s 15-7(5)	
	to reject an application for extension of a provisional allocation	s 15-7(5)	
	to reject an application for transfer of allocated places, other than provisionally allocated places	s 16-5(1)	
	to approve a day as a transfer day for the transfer of allocated places, other than provisionally allocated places	s 16-7(3)	
	to reject an application to approve a day as a transfer day for the transfer of allocated places, other than provisionally allocated places	s 16-7(3)	
	to reject an application for transfer of provisionally allocated places	16-17(1)	
	to approve a day as a transfer day for the transfer of provisionally allocated places	16-19(3)	
	to reject an application to approve a day as a transfer day for the transfer of provisionally allocated places	16-19(3)	
	to determine a period for making an application to vary the conditions to which an allocation is subject	s 17-2(5)	
	to refuse to determine a period for making an application to vary the conditions to which an allocation is subject	s 17-2(5)	
	to reject an application for variation of conditions to which an allocation of places is subject	s 17-5	
	to approve a day as a variation day for conditions to which an allocation of places is subject	s 17-7(3)	
	to reject an application to approve a day as a variation day	s 17-7(3)	
	to revoke an unused allocation of a place	s 18-5(1)	
	to reject an application to approve a person as a care recipient	s 22-1(2)	
	to limit a person's approval as a care recipient	s 22-2(1)	
	to limit a person's approval as a care recipient to one or more levels of care 	s 22-2(3)	
	to vary a limitation on a person's approval as a care recipient	s 22-2(4)	
	as to when a person urgently needed care and when it was practicable to apply for approval	s 22-5(2)(b)	
	to extend the period during which an application for approval as a care recipient can be made	s 22-5(3)	
	to reject an application to extend the period during which an application for approval as a care recipient can be made	s 22-5(3)	
	to revoke an approval of a person as a care recipient	s 23-4(1)	
	to suspend an approved provider from making appraisals under s 25-3 and reappraisals under section 27-5 (appraisals of the level of care needed)	s 25-4(1)	
	to refuse to lift a suspension of an approved provider from making appraisals and reappraisals	s 25-4C(1)	
	that the Secretary is not satisfied an appraisal under s 25-3 (appraisals of the level of care needed) was sent in sufficient time	s 26-2(2)	
	to refuse to renew the classification of a care recipient	s 27-6(1)	
	that the Secretary is not satisfied that a reappraisal under s 27-5 (reappraisal of the level of care needed) was sent in sufficient time	s 27-8(2)	
	to change the classification of a care recipient	s 29-1(1)	
	to reject an application for approval of extra service fees	s 35-1(2)	
	to reject an application for certification of a residential care service	s 38-1(2)	
	to revoke the certification of a residential care service	s 39-3(3A)	
	to impose conditions on revocation of the certification of a residential care service	s 39-5(5)	
	to refuse to make a determination that a residential care service is taken to meet its accreditation requirement	s 42-5(1)	
	to specify a period or event at the end of which, or on the occurrence of which, a determination under s. 42-5(1) ceases to be in force.	s 42-5(4)	
	to revoke a determination that exceptional circumstances apply	s 42-6(1)	
	to extend the period within which a variation of a claim for residential care subsidy can be made 	s 43-4A
	
	to refuse to extend the period within which a variation of a claim for residential care subsidy can be made	s 43-4A	
	to grant or refuse an application for a determination described in s 44-7(1A) or 44-8(1A) which is relevant to a person’s status as a concessional resident or an assisted resident	s  44-8AA(1)	
	to revoke a determination described in s 44-7(1A) or 44-8(1A)	s 44-8AA(6)	
	to determine the value of a person’s assets	s 44-8AB(1)	
	to revoke a determination of the value of a person’s assets	s 44-8AB(4)	
	to refuse to make a determination that a care recipient is eligible for an oxygen supplement	s 44-13(2)	
	to refuse to make a determination that a care recipient is eligible for an enteral feeding supplement	s 44-14(2)	
	to determine that a judgment or settlement is to be treated as having taken into account the cost of providing residential care	s 44-20(5)	
	to determine that a part of the compensation under a settlement is to be treated as relating to the future costs of providing residential care	s 44-20(6)	
	to refuse to make a determination that the daily income tested reduction is zero	s 44-22(2)	
	to specify a period at the end of which a determination that the daily income tested reduction is zero ceases to be in force	s 44-22(3)	
	to make a determination for the purposes of working out a care recipient's total assessable income	ss 44-24(1), (2)(b), (3)(b) or (4)(b)	
	to refuse to make a determination about viability supplement	s 44-29(2)	
	to refuse to make a determination that a care recipient is eligible for a hardship supplement	s 44-31(1)	
	to specify a period or event at the end of which, or on the occurrence of which, a determination under s. 44-31 will cease to be in force 	s 44-31(3)
	
	to extend the period within which a variation of a claim for home care subsidy can be made 	s 47-4A	
	to refuse to extend the period within which a variation of a claim for home care subsidy can be made	s 47-4A	
	to refuse to make a determination that paying an accommodation bond would cause financial hardship	s 57-14(1)(a)	
	to refuse to make a determination that paying an accommodation bond of more than a specified maximum amount would cause financial hardship, or to specify a particular maximum amount under such a determination	s 57-14(1)(b)	
	to specify a period or event at the end of which, or on the occurrence of which, a determination under subsection 57-14(1) ceases to be in force	s 57-14(3)	
	to revoke a determination that paying an accommodation bond would cause financial hardship	s 57-15(1)	
	to refuse to make a determination that paying an accommodation charge would cause financial hardship 	s 57A-9(1)(a)	
	to refuse to make a determination that paying an accommodation charge of more than a specified maximum daily amount would cause financial hardship, or to specify a particular maximum daily amount under such a determination	s 57A-9(1)(b)	
	to specify, in a determination that paying an accommodation charge would cause financial hardship, a period or event at the end of which or, on the occurrence of which, the determination will cease to be in force 	s 57A-9(3)	
	to revoke a determination that paying an accommodation charge would cause financial hardship 	s 57A-10(1)	
	to impose a sanction on an approved provider	s 65-1	
	to refuse to lift a sanction	s 68-3	
	to vary or revoke an allocation of a residential care grant	s 73-4(1)	
	to vary an allocation of a residential care grant	s 73-5(4)	
	to vary an allocation of a residential care grant	s 73-5(5)	
	to reject an application to vary an allocation of a residential care grant	S 73-5(5)	
	a decision under Principles made under section 96-1 that is specified in the Principles concerned to be a decision reviewable under this section	the provision specified in the Principles as the provision under which the decision is made	

[Notes:
1.	The list of decisions in relation to which a person may request reconsideration is set out in s 85-1 of the Act.  The following Acts introduced or have amended the list of reviewable decisions under the Act: 112 of 1997; 132 of 1999; 50 of 2004; 22 of 2005, 59 of 2005, 28 of 2006, 109 of 2007, 1 of 2008, 140 of 2008, 5 of 2011, and 76 of 2013.
2.	Where a person requests reconsideration of a decision under s 85-5(1) and the Secretary has not given notice of a decision with 90 days of receiving a person’s request, the Secretary is taken to have confirmed the decision: s 85-5(7).
3.	The Secretary of the Department of Social Services can delegate functions for the purposes of working out a care recipient’s total assessable income under s 44-24 of the Act.  Where a decision is made under s 44-24 by the Secretary of the Department of Social Services a person must seek review pursuant to the provisions of Part 4 of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999 (191 of 1999).  See the entry under that Act.
4.	The Tribunal also has jurisdiction to review certain decisions made under the Sanctions Principles 2014 and the Subsidy Principles 2014 which have been made under the Aged Care Act 1997.  See the entry for each of those enactments for further detail.]

Aged Care (Transitional Provisions) Act 1997

Section 85-5 (223 of 1997)

Sections 85-4(4) or 85-5(5)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Health that have been confirmed, varied or set aside on reconsideration:
	
	to extend the period within which a variation of a claim for residential care subsidy can be made	s 43-4A	
	to refuse to extend the period within which a variation of a claim for residential care subsidy can be made	s 43-4A	
	to grant or refuse to an application for a determination described in s 44-7(1A) or 44-8(1A)	s 44-8AA(1)	
	to revoke a determination described in s 44-7(1A) or 44-8(1A)	s 44-8AA(6)	
	to determine the value of a person’s assets	s 44-8AB(1)	
	to revoke a determination of the value of a person’s assets	s 44-8AB(4)	
	to refuse to make a determination that a care recipient is eligible for an oxygen supplement	s 44-13(2)	
	to refuse to make a determination that a care recipient is eligible for an enteral feeding supplement	s 44-14(2)	
	to determine that a judgment or settlement is to be treated as having taken into account the cost of providing residential care	s 44-20(5)	
	to determine that a part of the compensation under a settlement is to be treated as relating to the future costs of providing residential care	s 44-20(6)	
	to refuse to make a determination that the daily income tested reduction is zero	s 44-22(2)	
	to specify a period at the end of which a determination that the daily income tested reduction is zero ceases to be in force	s 44-22(3)	
	to make a determination for the purposes of working out a care recipient’s total assessable income	s 44-24(1)  or 44-24(2)(b), (3)(b) or (4)(b)	
	to refuse to make a determination about viability supplement	s 44-29(2)	
	to specify a period or event at the end of which, or on the occurrence of which, a determination under s 44-31 will cease to be in force	s 44-31(3)	
	to extend the period within which a variation of a claim for home care subsidy can be made 	s 47-4A	
	to refuse to extend the period within which a variation of a claim for home subsidy can be made	s 47-4A	
	to refuse to make a determination that paying an accommodation bond would cause financial hardship	s 57-14(1)(a)	
	to refuse to make a determination that paying an accommodation bond of more than a specified maximum amount would cause financial hardship, or specify a particular maximum amount under such a determination	s 57-14(1)(b)	
	to specify a period or event at the end of which, or on the occurrence of which, a determination under s 57-14(1) ceases to be in force	s 57-14(3)	
	to revoke a determination that paying an accommodation bond would cause financial hardship	s 57-15(1)	
	to refuse to make a determination that paying an accommodation charge would cause financial hardship	s 57A-9(1)(a)	
	to refuse to make a determination that paying an accommodation charge of more than a specified maximum daily amount would cause financial hardship, or to specify a particular maximum daily amount under such determination	s 57A-9(1)(b)	
	to specify a period or event at the end of which, or on the occurrence of which, a determination under s 57A-9(1) ceases to be in force	s 57A-9(3)	
	to revoke a determination that paying an accommodation charge would cause financial hardship	s 57A-10(1)	
	a decision under the Aged Care (Transitional Provisions) Principles made under s 96-1 that is specified in the Principles to be a decision reviewable under this section.	The provision specified in the Principles as the provision under which the decision is made.	

Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Act 1992

Section 69D(1B) (59 of 1996) (79 of 2004)

Section 69D(1)	The following decision of the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority: 
-	to refuse to give a certificate for the export of chemical products.	

Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Regulations 1995

Regulation 3.520 (SR242 of 2004)

Regulation 3.510(3)	The following decisions of an authorised officer that have been reconsidered by the Minister for Agriculture and Water Resources: 
-	to refuse to grant a permission or permit under Part 3; to revoke, vary or suspend a permission or permit under Part 3.	

[Notes:  
1.	The list of decisions that may be reconsidered is set out in reg 3.510(1).  The following instruments introduced or have amended the list of reviewable decisions: SLI 242 of 2004.]

Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code Act 1994

Section 167 of the Schedule (47 of 1994) (13 of 2003) (120 of 2004) (113 of 2010) (125 of 2013)(91 of 2014)

Sections 14(1), 14(2), 8A(a), 8A(b), 26C(2), 29(2), 29D(3), 29G(1), 34A(1), 34AF(3), 34J(3), 34G, 34AA, 48(3), 59(2)(d), 74(2), 75(2), 76(2), 78(2), 81(3), 99, 111(1)(b)(iii), 118, 119, 119A, 119B, 122(1), 126(1), 126(2), 127, 162(3)(d), 163, 164(8), 
	The following decisions of the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority: 
-	a decision under subs 14(1) to approve or register a constituent, product or label; (i) with an instruction or relevant particular other than an instruction or particular set out in the application for the approval or registration; or (ii) subject to particular conditions; 
-	a decision under subs 14(2) to refuse an application for approval or registration, other than a decision based only on requirements set out in para 8A(a) or (b); 
-	a decision under subs 26C(2) to refuse an application for approval or registration, other than a decision based only on requirements set out in para 8A(a) or (b);
-	a decision under subs 29(2) to refuse an application to vary relevant particulars or conditions, other than a decision based only on requirements set out in para 8A(a) or (b); 
-	a decision under subs 34A(1) or 34AF(3) to vary relevant particulars or conditions; 
-	a decision (the information decision) under subs 34J(3) that the APVMA is satisfied that it is in the public interest to use information that s 34G would otherwise prohibit the APVMA from using for making a decision (the substantive decision); 
-	a decision under s 34AA or Division 5 of Part 2 to suspend or cancel the approval of an active constituent for a proposed or existing chemical product, the registration of a chemical product or the approval of a label for containers for a chemical product; 
-	a decision under subs 48(3) refusing to accept a late application; 
-	a decision to use protected information under para 59(2)(d); 
-	a decision under subs 74(2), 75(2), 76(2) or 78(2) extending, or refusing to extend, a period; 
-	a decision under subs 81(3) shortening, or extending or refusing to extend, a period;
-	a decision under s 99 to issue a notice; 
-	a decision to issue a recall notice;  
-	a decision under Part 7 to refuse an application for a permit other than a decision based only on requirements set out in para 8A(a) or (b) or a requirement made by the APVMA under subpara 111(1)(b)(iii); 
-	a decision under Part 7 to issue a permit subject to particular conditions or for a particular period only;  
-	a decision under Part 7 to refuse to extend a permit other than a decision based only on requirements set out in para 8A(a) or (b); 
-	a decision under s 118, 119, 119A or 119B to suspend or cancel a permit; 
-	a decision under Part 8 to refuse an application for a licence other than a decision based only on requirements set out in subs 122(1); 
-	a decision under Part 8 to issue a licence subject to particular conditions referred to in subs 126(1);
-	a decision under subs 126(2) to impose a new condition on a licence or varying an existing condition;  
-	a decision under s 127 to suspend or cancel a licence; 
-	a decision to disclose information to an authority or organisation under para 162(3)(d) without the consent of the applicant or holder concerned; 
-	a decision to disclose information under s 163;
-	a decision under subs 164(8) to refuse to waive or remit the whole or a part of a fee; 
-	a decision under this Code prescribed by the regulations	

[Notes: 
1.	Where one of the decisions set out above has been made by a member of the staff of APVMA, the person may request the APVMA to reconsider the decision under s 166(2).  The decision on the reconsideration is taken to be a fresh decision on the relevant matter and the person may apply to the Tribunal for review of that decision: s 166(5).  There is no requirement to seek reconsideration before making an application to the Tribunal. 
2.	Despite s 167(1)(ea), an application may not be made to the AAT for review of the information decision if the APVMA stated in the notice of that decision given under s 34E that the APVMA believed it was necessary to make the substantive decision before the end of 28 days after giving the notice, to prevent imminent risk to public health or occupational health or safety.
3.	The list of reviewable decisions was amended by 125 of 2013 with effect from 1 July 2014.]

Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code Regulations 1995

Regulation 47AB (SR 264 of 1997) (SR 353 of 2004) (SR 179 of 2013) (SLI 5 of 2015)

Regulation 47A(2)	A decision of the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority withdrawing an assigned notification number after a specified period.	
Regulation 78C	For para 167(1)(y) of the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code Act 1994, the following decisions are prescribed:
-	a decision to refuse an application under subs 8L(3) of the Code; 
-	a decision to refuse an application under subs 8M(3) of the Code; 
-	a decision to refuse an application under subs 8P(3) of the Code; 
-	a decision to refuse an application under subclause 10(4) of Schedule 3AA.	

[Notes: 
1.	Regulation 78C inserted by SR 179 of 2013. These changes commenced on 1 July 2014.
2.	The list of reviewable decisions was amended by SLI 5 of 2015 with effect from 5 March 2015.]

Agricultural and Veterinary Chemical Products (Collection of Levy) Act 1994

Sections 18(7), 33 (41 of 1994) (42 of 2005) (125 of 2013)

Sections 6(1)(a), 14(2), 14A(3), 18(1)	The following decisions of the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority: 
-	the determination of an amount under s 6(1)(a); 
-	to remit, or refuse to remit, the whole or part of an amount of late payment penalty or understatement penalty under ss 14(2) or 14A(3); 
-	to allow, or refuse to allow, a further period for the making of a request to reconsider an assessment under s 18(1).	
Sections 6(1)(a), 14(2), 14A(3), 18(1)	The following decisions of a specified collecting agency: 
-	the determination of an amount under s 6(1)(a); 
-	to remit, or refuse to remit, the whole or part of an amount of late payment penalty or understatement penalty under ss 14(2) or 14A(3); 
-	to allow, or refuse to allow, a further period for the making of a request to reconsider an assessment under s 18(1).	
Section 18(3)	The following decision of the APVMA that has been confirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	to make an assessment as to whether any levy is payable in respect of leviable disposals of a particular chemical product during a particular period.	

[Notes: 
-	Pursuant to subs 18(8), if, as a result of an application made under para 33(b), the AAT has reviewed a determination made by the APVMA under para 6(1)(a) in relation to a chemical product as at a particular time, the Tribunal is not entitled to alter the determination as so reviewed by it when it is reviewing an assessment to which the determination is relevant.
-	Section 33 provides for review of decisions of a collection agency that has been specified by the Minister in an instrument under s 3A.]

Air Navigation Act 1920

Section 23A (89 of 1995) (30 of 1997) (95 of 1998) (9 of 2004)

Sections 15D(1), 15D(2)(c), 15E(4), 15F(1), 17(1)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development: to refuse a permission under s 15D(1); 
-	to grant a permission subject to a condition under s 15D(2)(c); 
-	to refuse an application under s. 15E(4); 
-	to vary, suspend or cancel a permission under s 15F(1); 
-	to refuse a permission under s 17(1).	

[Notes:
-	Section 23A(1)(aa) of the Act provides that an application may be made to the Tribunal for review of any of the following decisions of the Secretary made under the regulations: to refuse to grant an international airline licence; to impose a condition on an international airline licence; to vary, refuse to vary, suspend or cancel an international airline licence.  See the entry for the Air Navigation Regulations 1947 in relation to these decisions.]

Air Navigation (Aircraft Engine Emissions) Regulations 

Regulation 9 (SR 277 of 1995) (SR 80 of 1997)

Regulations 6(2), 6(3), 6(4)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development or an authorised officer: to refuse to give a permit or to revoke a permit under reg 6(2); to impose a condition on a permit under reg 6(3); a decision under reg 6(4) about the permitted air navigation specified in the permit or the period specified in the permit during which an aircraft may be engaged in a permitted air navigation.	

Air Navigation (Aircraft Noise) Regulations 1984

Regulation 13 (SR 428 of 1991) (SR 305 of 1994) (SR 209 of 1996) (SLI 39 of 2010)

Regulations 6(1), 6A(1), 9A(2), 9A(3)(a), 9A(3)(b), 9A(6), 9AA(2), 9AA(3)(a), 9AA(3)(b), 9AA(4), 9AB(2), 9AB(3)(a), 9AB(3)(b), 9AB(5), 10(2), 10(3A). 	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development: 
-	to refuse to issue a noise certificate under reg 6(1) or 6A(1); 
-	to refuse to give permission for an aircraft to engage in air navigation under reg 9A(2), 9AA(2) or 9AB(2); 
-	to specify the period during which an aircraft may engage in air navigation under reg 9A(3)(a), 9AA(3)(a) or 9AB(3)(a); 
-	to impose conditions under reg 9A(3)(b); 
-	to impose, or vary, a condition under reg 9AA(3)(b) or 9AB(3)(b); 
-	to revoke a permission under reg 9A(6), 9AA(4) or 9AB(5); 
-	to revoke a noise certificate under reg 10(2) or (3A).	

Air Navigation (Aviation Security Status Checking) Regulations 2004 (repealed)

Regulation 8 (SR 207 of 2004)(SLI 143 of 2015)

Regulation 5	The following decisions of the Secretary: 
-	that a person has an adverse aviation security status under regulation 5.	

[Notes:
•	These regulations were repealed by the Air Navigation (Aviation Security Status Checking) Repeal Regulation 2015 (F2015L01302), which commenced on 22 August 2015.]

Air Navigation (Coolangatta Airport Curfew) Regulations 1999

Regulation 24 (SR 352 of 1999)

Regulations 11, 12, 15	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development: 
-	to grant, revoke or refuse to grant a domestic passenger jet aircraft movement permit under regs 11 or 12; 
-	to grant or refuse to grant a freight jet aircraft movement permit under reg 15.	

Air Navigation (Essendon Airport) Regulations 2001

Regulation 17 (SR 125 of 2001)

Regulations 15	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development: 
-	to grant, or refuse to grant, under reg 15 a dispensation from reg 6.	

Air Navigation (Fuel Spillage) Regulations 1999

Regulation 16(2) (SR 91 of 1999) (SR 73 of 2001)

Regulations 9, 12	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development:  
-	to issue a grounding notice for an aircraft to the aircraft's operator under reg 9; 
-	to withdraw or not to withdraw a grounding notice under reg 12; 
-	to give or not to give permission to start a flight under reg 14.	

Air Navigation Regulations 1947

Section 23A(1)(aa) of the Air Navigation Act 1920 

Regulations 17A(2), 17A(5), 18E(1)
	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development : 
-	to refuse to grant an international airline licence under reg 17A(2); 
-	to impose a condition on an international airline licence under reg 17A(5); 
-	to vary, refuse to vary, suspend or cancel an international airline licence under reg 18E(1).	

[Notes: 
1.	Section 23A(1)(aa) of the Air Navigation Act 1920 provides that an application may be made to the Tribunal for review of any of the following decisions of the Secretary made under the regulations: to refuse to grant an international airline licence; to impose a condition on an international airline licence; to vary, refuse to vary, suspend or cancel an international airline licence.]

Air Services Act 1995

Section 73(6) (81 of 1995)

Section 73(4)
	The following decision of the Board of Airservices Australia or an employee of Airservices Australia that has been affirmed or varied by Airservices Australia on reconsideration: 
-	to remit, or refuse to remit, the whole or a part of a service charge or late payment penalty under s 58.
	
	The following decisions of an authorised employee that have been affirmed or varied by Airservices Australia on reconsideration: 
-	to impose a statutory lien on an aircraft by directing the Registrar to make an entry in the Register under subs 59(1); 
-	to direct that a statutory lien is to cease to have effect under para 62(1)(c); 
-	to seize and keep possession of an aircraft under subs 65(2) until all outstanding amounts covered by the statutory lien are paid.
	
	A decision of Airservices Australia that has been affirmed or varied by Airservices Australia on reconsideration: 
-	to sell an aircraft under subs 67(2) where an amount remains outstanding after 9 months.	

Air Services Regulations 1995

Regulation 7.02(6) (SR 223 of 1995)

Regulation 7.02(4)	The following decisions of Airservices Australia that have been affirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	to pay compensation in whole or in part, or to refuse to pay compensation, in respect of loss sustained by the owner of a requisitioned aircraft or a person engaged to operate such an aircraft under reg 3.07; 
-	to pay, or to refuse to pay, compensation for wake vortices damage under reg 5.04; 
-	to approve in whole or in part, or to refuse to approve, a claim in respect of a security interest following the sale of an aircraft under reg 6.09.	

[Notes
-	The list of decisions in relation to which a person may request reconsideration is set out in reg 7.02(1). The following instruments introduced or have amended the list: SR 223 of 1995 and SR 8 of 1998.]

Aircraft Noise Levy Collection Act 1995

Section 10(2) (98 of 1995)

Section 10(1)	A decision of the Secretary of the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development  
-	to remit, or refuse to remit, part or all of a late payment penalty.	

Airports Act 1996

Section 242(1) (42 of 1996) (30 of 1997)

Sections 29(1)(d), 29(1A), 56(1)(g), 65(1), 65(2), 66(2), 75(1)(d), 78(2), 81(2), 81(8), 84(2), 86(2), 94(2), 95(2), 96(2), 120(1), 123(2), 126(2), 126(8), 129(2), 131(2), 233, 250	The following decisions of the Minister for Infrastructure and Regional Development: 
-	to specify or not to specify under s 29(1)(d) a period longer than 90 days within which a person who has acquired an airport lease by way of the enforcement of a loan security must transfer an airport lease to a qualified company
-	to specify or not to specify under s 29(1A) a period longer than 90 days within which a lender who enters into possession of the leased land by way of enforcement of a loan security must transfer the lease to a qualified company
-	to allow or not to allow under s 56(1)(g) a period longer than 90 days after receiving a declaration under s 55 for compliance with steps to ensure ss 56(1)(d) and (e) apply to one member of a pair of airport-operator companies
-	to give a direction to a person under s 65(1) to dispose of an asset within a specified time where the asset was acquired as a result of a scheme the sole or dominant purpose of which was to avoid the application of a provision of Pt 2 or 3
-	to give a direction to a person under s 65(2) to cease holding a stake in an airport-operator company within a specified time where that person’s stake in an airport-operator company was increased as a result of a scheme the sole or dominant purpose of which was to avoid the application of a provision of Pt 2 or 3
-	to terminate an airport-management agreement between a person and an airport-lessee company under s 66(2) where the agreement was entered into as a result of a scheme the sole or dominant purpose of which was to avoid the application of a provision of Pt 2 or 3
-	to allow or not to allow under s 75(1)(d) a period longer than 12 months within which a company which has acquired or is granted an airport lease must give the Minister a draft master plan for the airport
-	to direct an airport-lessee company under s 78(2) to give the Minister a draft master plan that is expressed to replace the original plan
-	to allow or not to allow under s 78(2)(b) a period longer than 180 days within which a company must comply with a direction to give the Minister a draft master plan under s 78(2)
-	to approve, or refuse to approve, a draft master plan under s 81(2)
-	to direct an airport-lessee company to give the Minister a fresh draft master plan under s 81(8)
-	to allow or not to allow a period longer than 180 days within which a company must comply with a direction to give the Minister a fresh draft master plan under s 81(8)(b)
-	to approve, or to refuse to approve a draft variation of a final master plan under s 84(2)
-	to allow or not to allow a period longer than 90 days within which an airport-lessee company must comply with s 86(2)
-	to approve, or to refuse to approve, a draft major development plan under s 94(2)
-	to approve, or to refuse to approve, a draft variation of a major development plan under s 95(2)
-	to allow or not to allow a period longer than 90 days within which an airport-lessee company must comply with s 96(2)
-	to allow or not to allow under s. 120(1) a period longer than 12 months within which a company which has acquired or is granted an airport lease must give the Minister a draft environment strategy for the airport
-	to direct an airport-lessee company under s 123(2) to give the Minister a draft environment strategy that is expressed to replace the original strategy
-	to allow or not to allow under s 123(2)(b) a period longer than 180 days within which a company must comply with a direction to give the Minister a draft environment strategy under s 123(2)
-	to approve, or refuse to approve, a draft environment strategy under s 126(2)
-	to direct an airport-lessee company to give the Minister a fresh draft environment strategy under s 126(8)
-	to allow or not to allow under s 126(8)(b) a period longer than 180 days within which a company must comply with a direction to give the Minister a fresh draft environment strategy under s 126(8)
-	to approve, or to refuse to approve a draft variation of a final environment strategy under s 129(2)
-	to allow or not to allow under s 131(2)(b) a period longer than 90 days within which an airport-lessee company must comply with s 131(2)
-	to make a written determination that a specified person is an authorised officer for the purposes of Pt 18
-	to make a written determination that a specified authorised officer does not have such powers as are specified in the determination
-	to make a written determination that the powers conferred on a specified authorised officer are subject to specified limitations, to require that access or priority of access be given to specified kinds of airport services for specified kinds of defence-related purposes.	

[Notes: 
-	Section 242(1) provides that application may be made to the Tribunal for review of any decision of the Minister under the Act.  Subsection 242(2) of the Act specifies certain decisions that are not subject to review by the AAT.]

Airports (Building Control) Regulations 1996

Regulation 6.01 (SR 292 of 1996) (SR 114 of 1997) (SR 201 of 1997) (SR 52 of 1999) (SLI 118 of 2009)

Regulations 2.03(4), 2.03(6)	The following decisions of an airport-lessee company: 
-	to refuse to grant consent, or to impose a condition on a grant of consent under reg 2.03(4); 
-	to fail to grant consent to an application under reg 2.03(6).
	
Regulations 2.11(1), 2.11(6),  2.11(7), 2.11(8), 2.13(2)(b), 2.16, 2.18(1), 2.18(2), 2.19(2), 2.20, 3.02(2)(a), 3.04(2), 3.10(1), 3.10(1A)(a), 3.12(1), 3.14(1), 5.04(1), 5.05(2), 5.06(3)	The following decisions of an airport building controller: 
-	to refuse to approve a building activity, to impose a condition on a building approval or to give a direction in relation to a building approval under reg 2.11(1)
-	a deemed refusal to approve a building activity under reg 2.11(6), (7) or (8)
-	to refuse to approve non-compliance with Australian building standards under reg 2.13(2)(b)
-	to refuse to grant a varied building approval under reg 2.16
-	to impose a condition on a building approval under reg 2.18(1)
-	to issue a stop work order on a building approval under reg 2.18(2)
-	to refuse to extend the duration of a building approval under reg 2.19(2)
-	to revoke a building approval (except at the request of the holder) under reg 2.20
-	to give an estimate of the time that will be taken to investigate a building or structure for the issue of a certificate of compliance under reg 3.02(2)(a)
-	to refuse to issue a certificate of compliance for a building or works under reg 3.04(2)
-	to impose a condition on a certificate of compliance under reg 3.04(2)
-	to vary a certificate of compliance under reg 3.10(l)
-	to give an estimate of time that will be taken to investigate a building or structure for the variation of a certificate of compliance under reg 3.10(1A)(a)
-	to refuse to vary a certificate of fitness under 3.10(1)
-	to revoke a certificate of compliance under reg 3.12(1)
-	to refuse to issue a certified copy of a certificate of compliance under reg 3.14(1)
-	to refuse to grant a period of time for payment of an infringement notice penalty under reg 5.04(1)
-	to refuse to make an arrangement for periodical payment of an infringement notice penalty under reg 5.05(23)
-	to refuse to withdraw an infringement notice under reg 5.06(3).	

[Notes:
-	The person who may seek review of each of the decisions specified in the right-hand column above is set out in reg 6.01.]

Airports (Control of On-Airport Activities) Regulations 1997

Regulations 4CN, 135, 139G and 139K (SR 57 of 1997) (SR 77 of 1999) (SR 291 of 1999) (SR 286 of 2001)

Regulations 125, 127, 133, 134	The following decisions of an airport-operator company: to give, or refuse to give, authority to drive airside under reg 125
1.	to give, or refuse to give, authority for use airside under reg 127
2.	to withdraw an authority to drive airside under reg 133
3.	to withdraw an authority for use airside under reg 134.
	
Regulations 4AL, 4AP, 4AS, 4AT, 4AW, 4AX, 4BC, 4BE, 4BH, 4BR, 139A, 139C, 139D(4), 139H, 139I, 139J	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development that have been reviewed by the Secretary: 
1.	to refuse to grant a licence under reg 4AL
2.	to impose, vary or refuse to vary a licence condition under regs 4AP, 4AS, and 4AT, respectively
3.	to refuse to transfer a licence under reg 4AW
4.	to suspend or cancel a licence under reg 4AX
5.	to refuse to approve the nomination of a nominee or alternative nominee under reg 4BC, or to approve a nominee or alternative nominee subject to conditions under reg 4BE
6.	to suspend or withdraw the approval of a nominee or alternative nominee under reg 4BH
7.	to suspend or cancel a sub-licence under reg. 4BR
8.	to give or refuse to give permission to a person to engage in a gambling activity under reg 139A
9.	to refuse to give permission to a person to engage in a gambling activity under reg 139C
10.	to impose a condition on a gambling permission under reg 139D(4)
11.	to give a holder of a continued gambling authority or gambling permission a show cause notice under reg 139H
12.	to cancel a continued gambling authority or gambling permission under regs 139I or 139J.	

Airports (Environment Protection) Regulations 1997

Regulation 9.06 (SR 13 of 1997)

Regulations 6.05(3), 8.04(1), 8.05(2), 8.06(3)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development: 
1.	to direct an occupier under reg 6.05(3) to comply with reg 6.05(1) or (2)
2.	to refuse to grant a period of time for payment of an infringement notice penalty under reg 8.04(1)
3.	to refuse to make an arrangement for periodical payment of an infringement notice penalty under reg 8.05(2)
4.	to refuse to withdraw an infringement notice under reg 8.06(3).
	
Regulation 9.02(1)
	The following decisions of an airport environment officer that have been reconsidered by the Secretary: 
1.	to grant, refuse or grant conditionally an authorisation under reg 5.09(1)
2.	to revoke, vary or refuse to vary an authorisation under reg 5.16(1)
3.	to determine that assignment of an authorisation is not permitted under reg 5.19(2)
4.	to direct an occupier to give a copy of information under reg 6.01(2)
5.	to direct an occupier to submit a remedial plan under reg 6.14(1)
6.	to refuse to approve a remedial plan under reg 6.14(3)
7.	to direct a person to carry out remedial work under reg 6.18
8.	to direct compliance under reg 7.01(1) with a duty under reg 4.01
9.	to direct compliance under reg. 7.02(1) with a duty under reg 4.04
10.	to direct compliance under reg 7.03(1) with a duty under reg 4.06
11.	to direct compliance with a condition of an authorisation, or to direct compliance in a particular way under reg 7.06(1)
12.	to direct implementation of a remedial plan under reg 7.07(1).	

Airports (Ownership - Interests in Shares) Regulations 1996

Regulation 12 (SR 341 of 1996) (SR 92 of 2001)

Regulations 7(4), 10(4), 10C(4), 11(1)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development: 
1.	to make, or refuse to make, a declaration under reg 7(4) as to a fund’s eligibility to be declared a substantially Australian investment fund
2.	to make, or refuse to make, a declaration under reg 10(4) as to a fund’s eligibility to be declared a distanced investment fund
3.	to declare a person is prescribed for the purposes of para 9(1)(c) under reg 10C(4)
-	to revoke either of these declarations under reg 11(1).	

Airports (Protection of Airspace) Regulations 1996

Regulation 17 (SR 293 of 1996)

Regulations 5, 14, 16	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development: 
-	to make, or refuse to make, a declaration as to the preservation of airspace under reg 5;
-	to approve, approve subject to conditions or refuse a proposal under reg 14;
-	to revoke, impose a condition on, or vary a condition of, a proposal under reg 16.	

[Notes:  
1.	Applications for review of decisions under regs 14 or 16 may be made by the proponent, the airport-operator company or the building authority concerned.]

Airports Regulations 1997

Regulation 2.20 (SR 113 of 1997) (SR 177 of 1997)

Regulations 2.05(1), 2.06(4), 2.07(1), 2.11(2), 2.13(1), 2.14(4), 2.15(1), 2.19(2)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development: 
-	not to make a declaration under reg 2.05(1)
-	to revoke a declaration that a sublease is not prohibited under reg 2.06(4)
-	not to approve a sublease to a State or Territory government under reg 2.07(1)
-	not to make a declaration about a proposed dealing with a sublease under reg 2.11(2)
-	not to make a declaration under reg 2.13(1)
-	to revoke a declaration that a specified licence is not prohibited under reg 2.14(4)
-	not to approve a licence to a State or Territory government under reg 2.15(1)
-	not to make a declaration about a proposed dealing with a licence under reg 2.19(2).	

Antarctic Marine Living Resources Conservation Act 1981 

Section 23 (30 of 1981)

Sections 9, 11, 12
	The following decisions of the Minister for the Environment : 
-	to grant, or refuse to grant, a permit under subs 9(1)
-	to impose, vary or revoke a condition to which a permit is subject under subs 9(5)
-	to suspend, or refuse to revoke the suspension of, a permit under s 11
-	to cancel a permit under s 12.	

Antarctic Marine Living Resources Conservation Regulations 1994

Regulation 10 (SR 345 of 1994)

Regulations 6(1), 6(3)(b), 7(2), 8(1)(a), 8(1)(b), 8(1)(c), 8(1)(d), 8(1)(e), 8(1)(f), 9
	The following decisions of the Minister for the Environment: 
-	to refuse to give an entry permit under reg 6(1)
-	a decision relating to the number of CEMP sites identified under reg 6(3)(b) in an entry permit
-	to impose conditions on an entry permit under reg 7(2)
-	to add, vary or revoke the conditions to which an entry permit is subject under reg 8(1)(a) or 8(1)(b)
-	to vary the list of persons to whom a permit applies under reg 8(1)(c)
-	to vary the number of sites that an individual may enter under reg 8(1)(d)
-	to vary the activities to which a permit applies under reg 8(1)(e)
-	to vary the period for which a permit is in force under reg 8(1)(f)
-	to suspend or revoke an entry permit under reg 9.	

Antarctic Treaty (Environment Protection) Act 1980 

Section 28 (103 of 1980) (156 of 1992) (90 of 2012)

Sections 9, 10, 11, 12, 12E, 12F, 12H, 12J, 12L, 12N, 12P, 	The following decisions of the Minister for the Environment: 
-	any decision about granting or renewing a permit to carry on one or more specified activities during a specified period under s 9
-	any decision made under s 10 in relation to restrictions applicable to s 9 permits
-	to vary, suspend or revoke a permit under s 11
-	to vary or revoke conditions to which a permit is subject or impose further conditions under s 12
-	to determine the likely impact of an activity on the environment under s 12E or 12H
-	to authorise, or authorise subject to conditions the proponent of an activity to carry on the activity under s 12F or 12J
-	to authorise, authorise subject to conditions or refuse to authorise the carrying on of an activity under s 12L
-	to vary,  refuse to vary, suspend or revoke an authorisation to carry on an activity under s 12N
-	to vary or revoke conditions or impose further conditions on an authorisation under s 12P	
Not yet commenced (see Note 1):	
13AC(1), 13AF(1)(a) 13AF(1)(b), 13AG(1) 13AG(4) 13AH(1), 13BC(1), 13BF(1)(a), 13BF(1)(b), 13BG(1), 13BG(4), 13BH(1).	-	to refuse to grant a safety approval under s 13AC(1)
-	to impose, or refuse to impose, conditions on a safety approval under s 13AF(1)(a)
-	to vary or revoke, or refuse to vary or revoke, conditions imposed on a safety approval under s 13AF(1)(b)
-	to vary a safety approval under s 13AG(1)
-	to refuse to vary a safety approval under s 13AG(4)
-	to suspend or revoke a safety approval under s13AH(1)
-	to refuse to grant an environmental protection approval under s 13BC(1)
-	to impose, or refuse to impose, conditions on an environmental protection approval under s 13BF(1)(a)
-	to vary or revoke, or refuse to vary or revoke , conditions imposed on an environmental protection approval under s 13BF(1)(b)
-	to vary an environmental protection approval under 13BG(4)
-	to suspend or revoke an environmental protection approval under s 13BH(1).	

[Notes:
1.	The Tribunal’s jurisdiction under this Act was amended by the Antarctic Treaty (Environment Protection) Amendment Act 2012 (90 of 2012). These amendments commence on a single day to be fixed by proclamation and the entering into force of relevant treaty obligations. The Minister must announce by notice in the Gazette the day the Annex comes into force for Australia.
2.	Section 28(1A) provides that the Tribunal may not make an order under s 41(2) of the AAT Act staying, or otherwise affecting the operation or implementation of, a decision under s 12N(1), 12N(3) or 12P(1) where the Minister has determined that irrevocable environmental damage would be likely to occur if the relevant action did not take effect immediately.] 

Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006

Section 233F (74 of 2013)

Sections 75B(6), 75C, 75E, 75G, 161(2), 161(2)(d)(ii), 191(2), 233E	The following decisions made personally by the AUSTRAC CEO or that have been affirmed, varied or revoked on reconsideration under s 233E by the AUSTRAC CEO:	
	to refuse to register a person as:
(a)	a remittance network provider; or
(b)	an independent remittance dealer; or
(c)	a remittance affiliate of a registered remittance network provider.	s 75B(6) or 75C 	
	to impose conditions to which a person’s registration is subject.	s 75 E	
	to cancel a person’s registration.	s 75G	
	to require certain things of a reporting entity.	s 161(2)	
	not to allow a longer period.	s 161(2)(d)(ii)	
	to give a reporting entity a direction.	s 191(2)	

[Notes
1.	The list of reviewable decisions is set out in section 233B.]

Archives Act 1983

Section 43(1) (79 of 1983)

Sections 40(8), 40(10)	The following decision of the Director-General, National Archives of Australia: 
-	a deemed refusal to grant access to a record on the ground that the record is an exempt record.
	
Section  42(2)	The following decisions of the Director-General, National Archives of Australia that have been reconsidered: 
-	to refuse to grant access to a record on the ground that the record is an exempt record or is a Commonwealth record to which Div 3 of Pt V of the Act does not apply
-	to refuse to grant an extension of partial access to a record on the ground that the record is an exempt record and it is not practicable to make arrangements for giving the further access desired by the applicant in a form that would not disclose information or matter by reason of which the record is an exempt record
-	to refuse to grant access to a record on the ground that the record has been withheld from public access pending examination of the record under s 35 of the Act
-	to refuse to grant access to a record in a particular form by reason of para 36(4)(a), 36(4)(b) or 36(4)(d)
-	to refuse to grant access to a record on the ground that a determination has been made under s 37 of the Act that the record is to be withheld from public access
-	to refuse to grant access to a record otherwise than on specified conditions determined under s 37
-	to refuse to allow a further period for making an application under subs 42 (1) for a reconsideration of a decision.	

[Notes:
1.	Subsection 40(8) of the Act provides that, where a person has applied for access, or for an extension of partial access to a record in accordance with s 40(1) and has not received notice of a decision within 90 days after the day on which the application was received by the National Archives of Australia, it is deemed to have made a decision refusing to grant access to the record on the last day of that period.  
2.	Subsection 40(10) of the Act provides that, where a complaint is made to the Ombudsman concerning failure to make and notify a decision on an application in accordance with s 40(1) before the expiration of the  90 day period, the Ombudsman may grant the applicant a certificate stating that there has been unreasonable delay.  A decision refusing to grant access to the record is deemed to have been made on the day on which the certificate is granted.
3.	Subsection 43(2) of the Act provides that, where a person is entitled to apply under s 42 for reconsideration of a decision, the person is not entitled to make an application to the Tribunal unless the decision has been reconsidered.  
4.	If a person is not informed of the decision on a request for reconsideration within a period of 14 days after the application for reconsideration was made, the person may apply to the Tribunal for review of the primary decision: s 43(3).
5.	Subsection 43(4) of the Act modifies s 29 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 to provide that an application for review of a decision or a deemed decision must be lodged within 60 days.  An application for review lodged following a deemed refusal of a reconsideration decision may be treated by the Tribunal as having been made within time if it appears there was no unreasonable delay in making the application: s 43(3).
6.	Where a complaint is made to the Ombudsman concerning a failure to make a decision or in relation to a decision made under the Act, an application may not be made to the Tribunal before the Ombudsman has informed the applicant of the result of the complaint: ss 40(9) and 55(4).   Subsection 43(4) provides that, where a complaint has been made in relation to a decision, the time limit for applying for review is 60 days after the day on which the person is informed of the result.]

AusCheck Regulations 2007

Regulation 12 (SLI 137 of 2007)

Section 9(1)	The following decision of the Secretary of the Attorney-General’s Department: 
-	to include unfavourable criminal history advice in advice on the outcome of a background check on an individual under reg 9(1).	

[Notes:
-	These Regulations will cease on 1 October 2017: F2007L01570]. 

Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission Act 2012

Sections 160-10(7) and 160-25(1)(a) (168 of 2012)

Section 160-15(1)	The following decisions of the Commissioner of the Australian Charities and Not-for-Profits Commission in relation to which an objection has been allowed, wholly or in part, or disallowed by the Commissioner: 
-	to refuse an application for registration as a type or subtype of not-for-profit entity under s 30-20
-	to revoke or not revoke a registration as a type or subtype of not-for-profit entity under s 35-10
-	to give a direction under s 85-5
-	to vary a direction under 85-20(1)
-	to not vary or revoke a direction after considering whether to vary or revoke it in accordance with s 85-20(6)
-	to suspend a responsible entity under s 100-10(1)
-	to change the time a suspension of a responsible entity ends under s 100-10(7)
-	to remove a responsible entity under s 100-15(1)
-	to refuse to remit all or part of an administrative penalty under s 175-60(1).	
Section 160-10(4)	The following decision of the Commissioner of the Australian Charities and Not-for-Profits Commission: 
-	to refuse to allow an entity to lodge an objection after the review period has passed under s 160-10(4). 	

[Notes:
1.	An application for review of an objection decision must be lodged with the Tribunal within 60 days after the person making the application is served with notice of the decision: s 160-15.
2.	If the Commissioner fails to make an objection decision within 60 days after being given a written notice requiring the making of the objection decision, the Commissioner is deemed to have made a decision under s 160-15(1) to disallow the objection: s 160-20(3).]

Australian Citizenship Act 2007

Section 52 (20 of 2007) (57 of 2013)

Sections 17, 19D, 24, 25, 30, 33, 34, 36(1)	The following decisions of the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection: 
-	to refuse under s 17, 19D or 24 to approve a person becoming an Australian citizen; 
-	to cancel under s 25 an approval given to a person under s 24 to become an Australian citizen; 
-	to refuse under s 30 to approve a person becoming an Australian citizen again; 
-	to refuse under s 33 to approve a person renouncing his or her Australian citizenship (other than a refusal because of the operation of s 33(5); 
-	to revoke a person’s Australian citizenship under s 34 or 36(1).	

[Notes:  
1.	If the Minister decides under s 24 to refuse to approve a person becoming an Australian citizen, the Minister’s reasons did not refer to the eligibility ground relating to statelessness and the person was 18 or over at the time of applying to become an Australian citizen, the person cannot apply for review of that decision unless the person is a permanent resident: s 52(2).
2.	This Act was amended by the Australian Citizenship Amendment (Special Residence Requirements) Act 2013. This inserted s 52(3) which sets out that for the purposes of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal reviewing a decision under s 24 where an Applicant has been refused approval to become an Australian citizen, the Tribunal must not exercise the power under subsection 22A(1A) or 22B(1A), and  it must not review any exercise of the power or any failure to exercise the power]

Australian Education Act 2013

Section 122 (67 of 2013)

Sections 10(2), 15(3), 26(4), 52(3), 73(1), 73(3), 73(5), 80, 81(1)(a), 81(1)(b), 81(1)(d), 80(4), 81(5), 83(1), 83(3), 83(4), 87, 88(1), 87(4), 88(5), 91(1), 91(2), 91(3), 95, 96(1), 95(4), 96(4), 105, 110	The following decisions made personally by the Minister for Education or the Secretary of the Department of Education:	
	to refuse to determine that a person receives primary education or secondary education at a school	s 10(2)	
	to determine a different level of education for a special school, special assistance school or student at a special school or special assistance school	s 15(3)	
	to determine a total entitlement for a school for a year if the amount of financial assistance to which the determination relates is payable under Division 2 or 5 of Part 3	s 26(4)	
	to determine a school’s SES score	s 52(3)	
	to refuse to approve a person as an approved authority for a school	s 73(1)	
	to refuse to approve a person as an approved authority for 
a location of a school or a level of education at a location of a school	s 73(1)	
	to make an approval of an approved authority subject to conditions	s 73(3)	
	to specify a day on and after which an approval of an approved authority is in force	s 73(5)	
	to vary or revoke an approval of an approved authority for one or more schools (other than in accordance with an application by the authority or under paragraph 81(1)(c))	s 80, or 81(1)(a), (b) or (d)	
	to refuse to vary or revoke an approval of an approved authority	s 80	
	to specify in a variation or revocation of an approval of an approved authority a day on which the variation or revocation takes effect that is earlier than the day the Minister varies or revokes the approval	s 80(4) or 81(5)	
	to refuse to approve a person as a block grant authority for a school	s 83(1)	
	to make an approval of a block grant authority subject to conditions	s 83(3)	
	to specify a day on and after which an approval of a block grant authority is in force	s 83(4)	
	to vary or revoke an approval of a block grant authority for one or more schools (other than in accordance with an application by the authority).	s 87 or s 88(1)	
	to refuse to vary or revoke an approval of a block grant authority	s 87	
	to specify in a variation or revocation of an approval of a block grant authority a day on which the variation or revocation takes effect that is earlier than the day the Minister varies or revokes the approval	s 87(4) or 88(5)	
	to refuse to approve a person as a non-government representative body for a non-government school	s 91(1)	
	to make an approval of a non-government representative body subject to conditions	s 91(2)	
	to specify a day on and after which an approval of a non-government representative body is in force	s 91(3)	
	to vary or revoke an approval of a non-government representative body (other than in accordance with an application by the body)	s 95 or  96(1)	
	to refuse to vary or revoke an approval of a non-government representative body	s 95	
	to specify in a variation or revocation of an approval of a non-government representative body a day on which the variation or revocation takes effect that is earlier than the day the Minister varies or revokes the approval	s 95(4) or 96(4)	
	to give a direction to an approved authority in relation to an implementation plan	s 105	
	to take action in relation to a State or Territory (including to reduce the amount payable to the State or Territory for a school for a year).	s 110	
	to reduce the amount payable to a State or Territory for a year for a school or an approved authority for a school	s 110	
	to reduce the amount payable to a State or Territory for a year for a capital grants authority, a block grant authority or a non-government representative body	s 110	
120(5)	Decisions that have been affirmed, varied or set aside on internal review by the Secretary or his or her delegate under s 120		

[Notes:  
1.	A list of reviewable decisions under the Act is set out in s 118.
2.	The Administrative Appeals Tribunal also has the power under s 122(1)(b) to review a decision made by a Secretary or internal reviewer pursuant to Section 120 that relates to a reviewable decision.
3.	An application  may not be made to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for review of a decision to determine a total entitlement for an approved authority for a year if the amount of financial assistance to which the determination relates is payable under Division 5 of Part 3.
4.	An application for review by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal may only be made by, or on behalf of the relevant person for the reviewable decision.]

Australian Grape and Wine Authority Act 2013

Sections 8(2E), 40Y(1) and 40ZAH (161 of 1980) (93 of 1993) (120 of 2004)

Sections 8(2)(aa), 8(2)(ac), 8(2)(ad) 	The following decisions of the Wine Australia Corporation:
-	to determine any conditions of use that are to be applicable to any registered geographical indications and any registered translations of such indications under s 8(2)(aa); 
-	to determine in relation to a foreign country any traditional expressions that are to be registered in relation to wines originating in that country under s 8(2)(ac)(i); 
-	to determine in relation to a foreign country any conditions of use that are to be applicable to traditional expressions under s 8(2)(ac)(ii); 
-	to determine  in relation to Australia any terms that are to be registered as additional terms in relation to wines originating in Australia under s 8(2)(ad)(i); 
-	to determine in relation to a foreign country any terms that are to be registered as additional terms in relation to wines originating in that country s 8(2)(ad)(ii); 
-	to determine in relation to a particular wine (regardless of origin) any terms that are to be registered as additional terms in relation to that wine under s 8(2)(ad)(iii); 
-	to determine any conditions of use that are to be applicable to any or all of the terms referred to in subparagraphs (i) to (iii) under s 8(2)(ad)(iv); 	
Section 40W, 40ZAF	The following decisions of the Geographical Indications Committee: 
-	a final determination under s 40W as to the names and boundaries of a geographical indication; 
-	a determination under s 40ZAF whether to omit the Australian GI on the grounds that the GI is not in use.

[Notes: 
1.	This Act was formerly known as the Wine Australia Corporation Act 1980. The title of the Act was changed by the Grape and Wine Legislation Amendment (Australian Grape and Wine Authority) Act 2013 (136 of 2013) on 1 July 2014.
2.	This Act was also formerly known as the Australian Wine and Brandy Corporation Act 1980.  The title of the Act was changed by the Financial Framework Legislation Amendment Act 2010 (148 of 2010) on 18 December 2010. 
3.	An application for review of a determination made under paragraph (8)(2)(aa), (ac) or (ad) must be made within 28 days after notice of the determination is published in accordance with s 8(2B): s 8(2F).
4.	An application for review of a determination under s 40W must be lodged within 28 days after notice of a final determination has been published in accordance with s 40X: s 40Y(2)
5.	An application for review of a determination under s 40ZAF must be lodged within 28 days after notice of a final determination has been published in accordance with s 40ZAG: s 40ZAH(2).]

Australia Grape and Wine Authority Regulations 1981

Regulations 10, 94(1), 102(1) (SR 156 of 1981) (SR 374 of 1993) (SR 39 of 2005) (SLI 245 of 2005) (SLI 217 of 2010) (SLI 70 of 2014)

Regulations 5(1), 6A(2), 7(6), 7(7), 9	The following decisions of the Wine Australia Corporation: 
-	to refuse to grant a licence under reg 5(1); 
-	to approve or refuse to approve the export of a grape product that does not comply with the Food Standards Code under reg 6A(2); 
-	to refuse to issue an export certificate under reg 7(6); 
-	to revoke an export certificate under reg 7(7); 
-	to suspend or cancel a licence under reg 9. 	
Regulations 92, 100	The following decisions of the Geographical Indications Committee: 
-	to make a final determination under reg 92; 
-	to determine whether or not to omit an item from the register under reg 100.	

[Notes:
-	These Regulations were formerly the Wine Australia Corporation Regulations 1981. They were renamed on 1 July 2014 under SLI 70 of 2014 (F2014L00707).
-	An application for review of a final determination under reg 92 must be made within 28 days after notice of the determination is published in accordance with reg 93: reg 94(2)
-	An application for review of a determination made under reg 100 must be made within 28 days after notice of the determination is published in accordance with reg 101: reg 102(2).] 

Australian Hearing Services Act 1991

Section 65(3) (169 of 1991) (82 of 1997)

Sections 8(1)(aa), 8(1)(ab), 8(1)(ac), 8(1)(ad), 62(2)	The following decisions of the Managing Director of the Australian Hearing Services Authority: 
-	to refuse to provide hearing services to a young Australian under para 8(1)(aa), to a referred Comcare client under para 8(1)(ab), 
-	to a referred Commonwealth employee under para 8(1)(ac) or to a designated person under para 8(1)(ad); 
-	to impose, or not to impose, or to reduce the amount of, a charge on any such person for provision of services under subs 62(2).
	
Section 64(6)	The following decisions of the Authority that have been reconsidered: 
-	to refuse to provide hearing services to a young Australian under para 8(1)(aa), to a referred Comcare client under para 8(1)(ab), 
-	to a referred Commonwealth employee under para 8(1)(ac) or to a designated person under para 8(1)(ad); 
-	to impose, or not to impose, or to reduce the amount of, a charge on any such person for provision of services under subs 62(2).	

[Notes: 
1.	A decision as to the treatment that a person should receive for a hearing impairment is not a reviewable decision within the meaning of s 4(1) of the Act.]

Australian Jobs Act 2013

Section 112 (69 of 2013)

Sections 8(5), 9(3), 9(5), 10(2), 13(1)(c), 17(1)(b), 18, 19, 20, 25(4), 57(2), 57(3), 57(4), 57(5)	The following decisions made the Authority:	
	a decision to make a determination 	s 8(5)	
	a decision to make a declaration	s 9(3) or 9(5)	
	a decision to make a determination	s 10(2)	
	a decision to refuse to specify a day	s 13(1)(c)	
	a decision to specify a day	s 13(1)(c)	
	a decision to refuse to specify a later time	s 17(1)(b)	
	a decision to specify a later time	s 17(1)(b)	
	a decision to refuse to approve a draft AIP plan	s 18,19 or 20	
	a decision to make a determination 	s 25(4)	
	a decision to give a notice	s 57(2) or 57(3)	
	a decision to name a person in a report 	s 57(4)	
	a decision to name a person	s 57(5)	

Australian Meat and Live-stock Industry Act 1997

Sections 14(1), 20(2), 22(9), 23(8), 24(4), 30(a), 30(b) (207 of 1997)

Sections 10(1), 17(1), 22(2), 23(4), 24(1), 28(1), 28(2)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources: 
-	to refuse to grant an application for an export licence under s 10(1)
•	to give written directions to be complied with by the holder of an export licence under s 17(1)
•	to suspend an export licence under s 23(4)
•	to cancel an export licence, determine that a licence not be renewed, suspend or further suspend a licence or reprimand the holder of a licence under s 24(1)
•	to cancel a quota or part of a quota under s 28(1)
•	to vary a quota, or refuse to vary a quota on application by the holder of the quota under s 28(2).	

Australian Meat and Live-stock Industry (Beef Export to the USA—Quota Years 2015-2021) Order 2014

Section 17 (F2014L01527)

Subsections 8(2), 16(2)	A decision of the Secretary to vary or not to vary a US beef quota certificate granted to an exporter.	

[Notes:
1.	This Order commenced on 18 November 2014 and ceases 31 December 2021.]

Australian Meat and Live-stock Industry (Export Licensing) Regulations 1998

Regulation 19(6) (SR 286 of 2004)

Regulation 19	The following decision of the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources: 
-	to refuse to approve a variation of a licence under reg 19.	

Australian National Registry of Emissions Units Act 2011

Section 86 (99 of 2011) (83 of 2014)

Sections 10(1), 16(1), 19, 20, 28B(8), 28C(12), 28D(11), 36, 47(5), 84	Any of the decisions set out below that:
-	has been affirmed or varied on reconsideration by the Clean Energy Regulator under s 84; or
-	was made personally by the Clean Energy Regulator 
-	to refuse, pursuant to regulations made for the purposes of s 10(1), to open a Registry account; 
-	to refuse, pursuant to regulations made for the purposes of s 16(1), to close a Registry account; to alter, or refuse to alter, the Registry under s 19; 
-	to make, or refuse to make an alteration to the Registry under s 20, 
-	to continue to refuse to give effect to a transfer instruction under s 28B(8)
-	not to revoke an instrument imposing conditions restricting or limiting the operation of a Registry account under s 28C(12)
-	not to vary an instrument imposing conditions restricting or limiting the operation of a Registry account under s 28C(12)
-	not to revoke an instrument suspending a Registry account under s 28D(11)
-	not to vary an instrument suspending a Registry account under s 28D(11)
-	to refuse to make an entry in a Registry account s 36; 
-	to refuse to extend a period under s 47(5).	

[Notes:
1.	The list of reviewable decisions under the Act is set out in s 82.
2.	If a person requests reconsideration of a reviewable decision and the Regulator does not inform the applicant of his or her decision within 90 days after the request is received, the Regulator is taken to have affirmed the decision: s 85(2)]
3.	On 1 July 2014, Section 21 was repealed by the Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Act 2014 (83 of 2014).

Australian Participants in British Nuclear Tests (Treatment) Act 2006

Section 29 (135 of 2006)

Section 25	The following decisions of the Repatriation Commission that have been affirmed or set aside and substituted under section 25: 
-	any decision under s 10(1) in relation to a claim under s 8 for a determination that a person is eligible to be provided with treatment under the Act; 
-	to revoke a determination that a person is an eligible person under s 11(1); 
-	any decision under s 23(1) in relation to a claim under s 21 for a determination that a person is entitled to travel expenses under Part 3.	

[Notes:
1.	The list of decisions that are subject to reconsideration under the Act are set out in s 24(1).  Act 135 of 20016 introduced this provision.]

Australian Passports Act 2005

Section 50(1) (5 of 2005)(122 of 2015)

Sections 7(1), 9(1), 11(1), 13(2), 14(2), 15, 16(2), 17(1), 22(1), 23(1)(a), 23(1)(b), 24, 25, 49(2), 49(4)	Any of the decisions set out below that has been:
•	made personally by the Minister for Foreign Affairs; or
•	affirmed, varied or set aside on reconsideration by the Minister or a delegate of the Minister: 
-	to issue an Australian passport to a person other than a child under s 7(1); 
-	to issue, or refuse to issue, a travel-related document under s 9(1);
-	to refuse to issue an Australian passport to a child  under s 11(1) except where the Minister has made a declaration under s 11(3);
-	to refuse to issue an Australian passport under s 13(2), 14(2), 15, 16(2) or 17(1);
-	to cancel an Australian passport or travel-related document under s 22(1);
-	to determine for the purposes of s 23(1)(a) that an Australian passport or travel-related document has been obtained by means of a false or misleading statement, false or misleading information or a false or misleading document;
-	to determine for the purposes of s 23(1)(b) that an Australian passport or travel-related document has been used in the commission of an offence against the Act;
-	to demand under s 24 or 25 the surrender of a cancelled or invalid Australian passport or travel-related document;
-	to extend, or not to extend, under s 49(2) the time for making an application under s 49.	
The following reviewable decisions take effect on 10 October 2015.	
	Any decision made by the Minister or by a delegate under subs 49(4) to:
-	to issue an Australian travel document, other than
-	a decision made under paragraph 9(1A)(b); or 
-	a decision to issue an Australian travel document to a child;
1.	to refuse to issue an Australian travel document (other than a decision in relation to which a declaration under subsection 11(3) has been made or a decision made because of subsection 12(2));
2.	to cancel an Australian travel document;
3.	to refuse to process an application for an Australian travel document;
4.	that an Australian travel document is one to which paragraph 23(1)(a) or (b) applies;
5.	under section 24 to demand the surrender of a cancelled Australian travel document, other than an Australian travel document cancelled because of paragraph 22(2)(d);
6.	under section 24 to demand the surrender of an invalid Australian travel document;
7.	under section 25 to demand the surrender of an Australian travel document;
8.	under subsection 49(4);
9.	under subsection 53(4) to refuse a name or a signature;
10.	not to waive an application fee imposed under the Australian Passports (Application Fees) Act 2005;
11.	not to refund an application fee imposed under the Australian Passports (Application Fees) Act 2005;
12.	to refund part of an application fee imposed under the Australian Passports (Application Fees) Act 2005.	

[Notes:
1.	The list of ‘reviewable decisions’ under the Act are set out in s 48. 
2.	The Minister may certify under s 50(2) that a decision to cancel an Australian passport in response to a refusal/cancellation request under s 13(1) or 14(1) involved matters of international relations or criminal intelligence.  Where such a certificate is given, the AAT on reviewing that decision may only make a decision:
-	affirming the Minister’s decision; or
-	remitting the decision to the Minister for reconsideration in accordance with any directions or recommendations of the Tribunal.
3.	This Act also provides for the review of decisions made by a delegate of the Minister or the Minister under the Australian Passports Determination 2005.  See the entry for that enactment for further details.
4.	Section 48 has been substantially amended by No 122 of 2015, taking effect from 10 October 2015.  
5.	A decision under 9(1A)(b) includes a decision on the Minister’s own initiative to issue a travel-related document to:
-	remove, deport or extradite a person from Australia; or
-	to facilitate the deportation of the person to Australia; or
-	to extradite the person to Australia; or
-	if the person is a prisoner—to effect the transfer of the person.
6.	Sections 9, 11, 14 and 22 were amended by the Passports Legislation Amendment (Integrity) Act 2015 No. 122 of 2015. Minor changes were also made to sections 13 and 16.]

Australian Passports (Application Fees) Act 2005

Section 50 of the Australian Passports Act 2005 

Section 7	Any of the decisions set out below that has been:
•	made personally by the Minister for Foreign Affairs; or
•	affirmed, varied or set aside on reconsideration by the Minister or a delegate of the Minister.	
	1.	a decision not to waive an application fee;
2.	a decision not to refund an application fee;
3.	a decision to refund part of an application fee.	

Australian Passports Determination 2005

Section 50(1) of the Australian Passports Act 2005

Section 8.2, 8.3, 9.1(8), 9.1(9), 9.1(10) or 49(4) of the Australian Passports Act 2005	Any of the decisions set out below that has been:
•	made personally by the Minister for Foreign Affairs; or
affirmed, varied or set aside on reconsideration by the Minister or a delegate of the Minister;
-	to waive, or refuse to, waive a fee under s 8.2;
-	to refund, to refund part of, or refuse to refund, a fee under s 8.3;
-	to determine, or refuse to determine, under s 9.1(8) or (9) that it would be desirable for another name to appear on a travel document;
-	to determine under s 9.1(10) that a name would be unacceptable to appear on a travel document.

[Notes:	
1.	Section 10.2 of the Determination provides that the decisions specified above are reviewable in accordance with the procedures set out in ss 49 and 50 of the Australian Passports Act 2005 as if the decisions were reviewable decisions under s 48 of the Act.
2.	The instruments with the following FRLI numbers introduced or have amended the provisions relating to the review of decisions under the Determination: F2005L01508.]

Australian Postal Corporation Regulations 1996

Regulation 34 (SR 72 of 1996) 

Regulation 30(1)	The following decision of the Minister for Communications and the Arts: 
-	to give, or not to give, a direction under reg 30(1) that Australia Post act in accordance with a recommendation made in a report by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.	

Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Act 1998

Sections 40(5), 42(5) (133 of 1998)

Sections 40(3), 42(3)	The following decisions of the Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency that the Minister for Health has confirmed, varied or set aside on reconsideration: 
-	to refuse to grant a licence under ss 32(1) or 33(1); to impose conditions on a licence under ss 32(1), 33(1) or 36(2); 
-	to amend a licence under s 36(1); to suspend or cancel a licence under s 38(1); 
-	not to approve the surrender of a licence under s 39; 
-	to give written directions to a person under s 41(2) requiring the person to take such steps as the CEO considers appropriate to protect the health and safety of people or to avoid damage to the environment.	

Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Regulations 1999

Regulation 66(5) (SR 306 of 2000)(SLI 73 of 2015)

Regulation 66(3)	The following decisions of the Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency which the Minister for Health has confirmed, varied or set aside on reconsideration: 
-	to refuse to declare under r 4(3)  that an apparatus covered by r 4(2) is not a controlled apparatus under that subregulation; 
-	to refuse to declare that a facility is not a prescribed radiation facility under reg 6(3); 
-	to refuse to declare under reg 37(1) that particular kinds of conduct by a specified controlled person in relation to a specified controlled facility does not, or will not pose, an unacceptable potential hazard to the health and safety of people or to the environment; 
-	to refuse to make a declaration under reg 38(3), 38(5) or 38(6).	

[Notes:
1.	If a person requests reconsideration of one of the decisions set out above and the Minister does not give written notice of his or her decision within 60 days after the request is received, the Minister is taken to have confirmed the CEO's decision: reg 66(4).
2.	These Regulations were amended by SLI 73 of 2015 with effect from 1 July 2015].

Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001

Section 244(2) (90 of 1989) (51 of 2001)

Sections 72, 73, 74, 75(1)	The following decisions of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission: 
-	to make an order in relation to securities of a body corporate under s 72, securities generally under s 73 or futures contracts where there has been non-compliance with Part 3 under s 74; 
-	to vary an order in force under Div 8 of Part 3 or to refuse to vary or revoke an order in force under Div 8 of Part 3 under s 75(1).	

Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979

Section 54(1), 54(2) (175 of 1995) (35 of 2004)

Section 37(1)	The following decision of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation: 
-	an adverse or qualified security assessment under s 37(1).
	
Section 43(1) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975	Following the completion of a review of a security assessment by the Tribunal, application may be made for review of the Tribunal’s findings on the ground that the applicant has fresh evidence of material significance that was not available at the time of the previous review.	

[Notes: 
-	Special provisions of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 apply to the review of decisions under this Act.  The Tribunal’s powers of review may only be exercised in the Security Appeals Division of the Tribunal.  See the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 for further detail.
-	The Minister may refer certain assessments to the Tribunal for review under s. 65 of the Act.  The Tribunal is required to report its findings to the Minister.]

Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority Regulations 2006

Sections 14(4) of the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority Act 2006 (6 of 2006) (113 of 2009) (121 of 2014) ,and item 4.12 to Schedule 1 to the Regulations (SLI 47 of 2006) (F2008L03530)

The following decisions are reviewable from 1 January 2015:	
Item 4.09(5) of Schedule 1 of the Regulations	The following decision of the Anti-Doping Rule Violation Panel (the ADRVP):
-	to make an assertion relating to an investigation of a possible violation of the anti-doping rules by an athlete or support person, in accordance with items 4.08, 4.09 and 4.10 of the Schedule 1 of the Regulations.	

[Notes: 
1.	Section 9 of the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority Act 2006 requires the regulations to prescribe a National Anti-Doping Scheme (NAD Scheme).  The NAD Scheme is Schedule 1 to the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority Regulations 2006.  The NAD scheme can be amended by the CEO of Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority: s 10.
2.	Section 14(4) of the Act was amended by 121 of 2014 with effect from 1 January 2015.  The amendment of s14(4) does not apply in relation to a decision of the ADRVP before 1 January 2015 (121 of 2014).]

Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre Industry Contribution (Collection) Act 2011

Section 15 (55 of 2011)

Section 14(4)	The following decision of the AUSTRAC CEO that has been confirmed, varied or revoked: 
-	to waive the payment of the whole or part or of a levy or late payment penalty or both under s 11.	

[Notes:
•	Section 14(5) of the Act provides that if the person reviewing the decision does not confirm, revoke or vary the decision within 42 days after the request for reconsideration, he or she is taken to have confirmed the decision.
•	112 of 2014 amended the title of this Act with effect from 22 October 2014. The Act was formerly named Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre Supervisory Cost Recovery Levy (Collection) Act 2011.]

Automotive Transformation Scheme Regulations 2010

Regulations 5.2(6), 5.3 and 5.6 (SLI 82 of 2010)

Regulations 1.29, 1.30, 3.8, 3.15, 3.13, 3.16, 4.3(1),
2.2, 2.10, 2.10(4), 2.15, 2.16, 2.28, 4.4(3), 4.5, 4.6	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science: 
-	that a person was a party to a transaction that was not at arm’s length under reg 1.29; 
-	a decision  about the production value or sales value of the motor vehicles, engines, or engine components or other goods and services to which a transaction that has been determined as not being at arm’s length relates under reg 1.30;
-	that registering the applicant would not further the object set out in s 3(1) of the Automotive Transformation Scheme Act 2009 under reg 2.2;
-	to refuse permission to a group of companies to seek registration as an ATS participant as if it were a single person under reg 2.10;
-	to impose conditions on the grant of permission to a group of companies to seek registration as an ATS participant as if it were a single person under reg 2.10(4);
-	to refuse to register a person as an MVP an ACP, an AMTP or an ASP under reg 2.15;
-	that a person is not a fit and proper person under reg 2.16;
-	to deregister an ATS participant under reg 2.28;
-	to refuse payment of assistance to an ATS participant under reg 3.8 or 3.15;
-	that an ATS participant is not entitled to be paid an amount of assistance in relation to a period covered by a quarterly return under reg 3.13;
-	that an ATS participant was not entitled to a payment under the Scheme under reg 3.16;
-	that a person is liable to pay an amount of Scheme debt under reg 4.3(1);
-	that the payment of interest would not cause the ATS  participant financial hardship under reg 4.4(3);
-	to refuse an application for an extension of time for the payment of a Scheme debt or to grant a lesser extension than applied for under reg 4.5;
-	to direct a third party who owes, or may later owe, money to an ATS participant to pay some or all of the available money to the Commonwealth under reg 4.6.  	
Regulation 5.2(2)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science that have been reconsidered: 
-	that a person was a party to a transaction that was not at arm’s length under reg 1.29;
-	a decision  about the production value or sales value of the motor vehicles, engines, or engine components or other goods and services to which a transaction that has been determined as not being at arm’s length relates under reg 1.30;
-	that registering the applicant would not further the object set out in s 3(1) of the Automotive Transformation Scheme Act 2009 under reg 2.2;
-	to refuse permission to a group of companies to seek registration as an ATS participant as if it were a single person under reg 2.10;
-	to impose conditions on the grant of permission to a group of companies to seek registration as an ATS participant as if it were a single person under reg 2.10(4);
-	to refuse to register a person as an MVP an ACP, an AMTP or an ASP under reg 2.15;
-	that a person is not a fit and proper person under reg 2.16;
-	to deregister an ATS participant under reg 2.28;
-	to refuse payment of assistance to an ATS participant under reg 3.8 or 3.15;
-	that an ATS participant is not entitled to be paid an amount of assistance in relation to a period covered by a quarterly return under reg 3.13;
-	that an ATS participant was not entitled to a payment under the Scheme under reg 3.16;
-	that a person is liable to pay an amount of Scheme debt under reg 4.3(1);
-	that the payment of interest would not cause the ATS  participant financial hardship under reg 4.4(3);
-	to refuse an application for an extension of time for the payment of a Scheme debt or to grant a lesser extension than applied for under reg 4.5;
-	to direct a third party who owes, or may later owe, money to an ATS participant to pay some or all of the available money to the Commonwealth under reg 4.6.

[Notes:
1.	The list of decisions that are subject to reconsideration under the Regulations are set out in regulations 5.3 and 5.6.  The following instruments introduced and have amended this provision: 82 of 2010 and 329 of 2010.
2.	A person may request the Secretary to reconsider a decision of the kind mentioned in reg 5.3 or 5.6: reg 5.1(3). If the Secretary does not confirm, revoke or vary the decision within 30 days after the day on which the Secretary receives the request, the Secretary is taken to have confirmed the decision: reg 5.2(3).]

Aviation Transport Security Act 2004

Section 126 (8 of 2004) (149 of 2004) (97 of 2006) (41 of 2010)

Sections 19, 21, 23, 23A, 25, 26, 28(2), 28(6), 74G(1)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development: 
1.	to refuse to approve a transport security program under s 19; to direct a participant to vary a program under s 21;
2.	to direct a participant to revise a program under s 23;
3.	to refuse to approve alterations of a transport security program under s 23A;
4.	to cancel a transport security program under s 25 or 26;
5.	to declare that a particular airport, or a part of a particular airport, is a security controlled airport under s 28(2);
6.	to assign a category to a particular security controlled airport under s 28(6);
7.	that a person has an adverse aviation security status under s 74G(1).	

[Notes
-	If an aviation industry participant gives the Secretary a transport security program and the Secretary does not approve, or refuse to approve, the program within the consideration period as defined, the Secretary is taken to have refused to approve the program at the end of that period: s 19(4) of the Act.]

Aviation Transport Security Regulations 2005

Regulation 8.02, 8.03, 8.04, 8.05 and 8.06 (SLI 18 of 2005) (SLI 289 of 2005) (SLI 45 of 2006) (SLI 100 of 2006) (SLI 190 of 2008) (SLI 298 of 2010) (SLI 61 of 2011)(SLI 123 of 2015)

Regulations 3.08(3), 3.08(6), 4.43(4),  4.44(1), 4.50(2), 4.51A(1), 4.51D,  6.07(6), 6.07(10), 6.09(1), 6.10(3), 6.16(2), 6.16(7), 6.19(1), 6.19(2), 6.19(3), 6.19A, 6.20(1), 6.22(1), 6.22(4), 6.27A, 6.29(3), 6.29(6),  6.31(3), 6.35(1), 6.35(2), 6.35(2A), 6.36(1), 6.36(2), 6.36(3), 6.36(4), 6.36(5) 6.36(7), 6.37F, 6.39A(4), 6.42A(1),  6.43B, 6.43C, 6.43D, 6.58(4)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development:
-	to refuse to exempt somebody from displaying a valid ASIC in a secure area or part of such an area under reg 3.08(3);
-	to impose a condition on such an exemption under reg 3.08(6);
-	to refuse to designate an applicant as a RACA under reg 4.43(4);
-	to revoke the designation of a person as a RACA under reg 4.44(1);
-	to refuse under 4.50(2) a request to amend an accredited air cargo agent (AACA) security program;
-	to refuse to accredit an applicant as an AACA under 4.51A(1);
-	to revoke accreditation of a person as an AACA under 4.51D;
-	to refuse to exempt an issuing body from giving effect to its ASIC program in a particular case or respect under reg 6.07(6);
-	to impose a condition on an exemption under reg 6.07(10);
-	to direct an issuing body to vary its ASIC program under reg 6.09(1);
-	to refuse to approve a variation of an issuing body’s ASIC program under reg 6.10(3) or 6.39A(4);
-	to refuse to authorise a person as an issuing body under reg 6.16(2);
-	to impose a condition on an issuing body under reg 6.16(7);
-	to revoke or refuse to revoke an issuing body’s authorisation under reg 6.19(1), 6.19(2), 6.19(3), 6.19A or 6.20(2);
-	to authorise, or refuse to authorise, a person to perform the functions or exercise the powers of an issuing body under reg 6.22(1);
-	to authorise a person to perform the functions or exercise the powers of a issuing body subject to a condition under reg 6.22(4);
-	to grant, or refuse to grant, an issuing body an exemption from needing the relevant airport operator’s approval to issue an airport-specific ASIC to a person for an airport under reg 6.27A;
-	to give the issuing body for an ASIC a direction under reg 6.31(3);
-	to refuse to approve the issue of an ASIC under reg 6.29(3);
-	to impose a condition on an ASIC under reg 6.29(6);
-	to refuse to issue a replacement ASIC under reg 6.35(1), 6.35(2) or 6.35(2A);
-	to refuse to issue a temporary ASIC under reg 6.36(1), 6.36(2). 6.36(3), 6.36(4), 6.36(5) or 6.36(7);
-	to not approve an aircraft operator as a VIC issuer under reg 6.37F;
-	to direct the suspension of an ASIC under reg 6.42A(1);
-	to refuse to set aside the cancellation of an ASIC under reg 6.43B or 6.43C;
-	to set aside the cancellation of an ASIC subject to a condition under reg 6.43D;
-	to determine that on the basis of a qualified security assessment a person has an adverse aviation security status under reg 6.58(4).
	
Regulations 6.28(1), 6.28(5), 6.43(2), 6.43(3), 6.43(4), 6.47(2) 	The following decisions of an issuing body: 
-	to refuse to issue an ASIC to somebody under reg 6.28(1);
-	to issue an ASIC subject to a condition under reg 6.28(5);
-	to cancel an ASIC under reg 6.43(2), 6.43(3), 6.43(4) or 6.47(2). 	

[Notes:
1.	The Secretary is required to make a decision in relation to a range of applications under these Regulations within a specified period:  regs 4.50(2), 4.51D(5)(b), 6.07(6), 6.10(3), 6.16(2); 6.29(3),6.37F(5), 6.39A(4), 6.43B and 6.43C. The application is taken to have been refused where a decision is not made within the specified period: regs 4.50(3), 4.51D(6), 6.07(7), 6.10(4), 6.16(3), 6.29(4), 6.37F(6), 6.39A(5), 6.43B(6) and 6.43C(4).]

B

Banking Act 1959 

Section 51C(1) (116 of 2003) 

Sections 51B(3) 	The following decisions of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority that have been confirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	to refuse an application for authority to carry on banking business in Australia under s 9;
-	to impose conditions or additional conditions on an authority under s 9;
-	to vary conditions imposed on an authority under s 9;
-	to refuse under s 9A to revoke a body corporate’s s 9 authority;
-	to revoke under s 9A a body corporate’s section 9 authority (unless APRA has determined, under s 9A(4), that the procedures in s 9A(3) do not apply);
-	to refuse to determine that one or more provisions of the Act do not apply to a particular person under s 11;
-	to vary or revoke an order that applies to a particular person under s 11;
-	to refuse an application for an authority to be a non-operating holding company under s 11AA;
-	to impose conditions or additional conditions on an authority under s 11AA;
-	to vary conditions imposed on an authority under s 11AA;
-	to refuse under s 11AB to revoke a non-operating holding company authority granted to a body corporate;
-	to revoke under s 11AB a non-operating holding company authority granted to a body corporate (unless APRA has determined, under s 11AB(4), that the procedures in s 11AB(3) do not apply);
-	to determine or vary a prudential standard referred to in s 11AF(1)(d) under s 11AF;
-	to give a direction under s 11CA(1) as a result of a ground referred to in s 11CA(1)(a) (b) (c) (d) or (e);
-	to refuse to certify an industry support contract under s 11CB;
-	to give or vary a direction to parties to comply with an industry support contract under s 11CC;
-	to revoke under s 11CC the certification of an industry support contract;
-	to direct an authorised deposit-taking institution under s 17(2) to remove a person as an auditor;
-	to direct an authorised deposit-taking institution or authorised non-operating holding company under s 23(2) to remove a person from being a director of senior manager of an authorised deposit-taking institution, a senior manager of the Australian operations of a foreign authorised deposit-taking institution or a director or senior manager of an authorised non-operating holding company;
-	to refuse consent to a particular person under s 66;
-	to impose conditions or additional conditions on a consent that applies to a particular person under s 66;
-	to vary conditions imposed on a consent under s 66;
-	to revoke a consent that applies to a particular person under s 66;
-	to refuse consent under s 67;
-	to impose conditions or additional conditions on a consent under s 67;
-	to vary conditions imposed on a consent under s 67;
-	to revoke a consent under s 67.	

[Notes:
-	A person may request reconsideration of any decision of APRA to which Part VI of the Act applies. The following provisions provide that Part VI of the Act applies to a decision: 9(9), 9A(8), 11(5), 11AA(8), 11AB(8), 11AF(7C), 11CA(5A), 11CB(2), 11CC(7), 17(8), 23(8), 66(2C) and 67(5).  
-	The following Acts have introduced amended or repealed provisions which provide that Part VI applies to a particular decision: 116 of 2003 and 25 of 2008.
-	If APRA does not confirm, revoke or vary a decision before the end of the period of 21 days after the day on which the request to reconsider the decision was received, the decision is taken to have been confirmed at the end of that period: s 51B(4).
-	If a person requests reconsideration of a reviewable decision under s 51B(1), s 41 of the AAT Act applies as if the making of the request were the making of an application to the Tribunal for review of that decision: s 51C(3).  A person may seek an order relating to the implementation of the reviewable decision under s 41 of the AAT Act.]

Bankruptcy Act 1966

Sections 55(3AC), 57(3AC), 128H(7), 128H(8), 139ZF, 139ZIT, 149Q, 155A(7), 155I(5), 185E(4), 185ED(4), 185MD(4), 185PD(4), 186C(8), 186C(11), 186H(6), 186K(8), 186L(8), 186LB(9), 186M(6), 282(2)(d), 283(2)(d) (9 of 1992) (44 of 1996) (11 of 1997) (131 of 2002) (20 of 2005) (44 of 2007) (57 of 2007)

Sections 55(3AA), 57(3AA), 128H(3), 185E(2), 185E(2AA), 185E(2A), 185E(2B), 185E(2C), 185E(3), 185ED(2), 185MD(2), 185PD(2)	The following decisions of the Official Receiver: 
-	to reject a debtor's petition under s. 55(3AA);
-	to reject a joint debtor's petition under s 57(3AA);
-	to give a consent, or refuse to give a consent, to the trustee of an eligible superannuation plan under s 128H(3) for the cashing, debiting, roll-over, transfer or forfeiture, in whole or in part, of a member’s superannuation interest;
-	to accept, or refuse to accept, a debt agreement proposal for processing under s 185E(2), (2AA), (2A), (2B), (2C) or (3);
-	to cancel the acceptance of the debt agreement proposal for processing under s 185ED(2);
-	to declare in writing under s 185MD(2) that a proposal to vary a debt agreement given under s 185M is withdrawn;
-	to declare in writing under s 185PD(2) that a proposal to terminate a debt agreement given under s 185P is withdrawn.
	
Sections 139ZA(5)(a), 139ZD, 139ZIO(5)(a); 139ZIR(1); 149K(5)(a); 149N(1), 149N(3), 186C(1), 186C(9), 186H(3), 186K(2), 186K(4), 186L(2), 186L(4), 186LB(2)(c), 186M(3), 282(1), 283(1)	The following decisions of the Inspector-General in Bankruptcy: 
•	to refuse under s 139ZA(5)(a) a request by a bankrupt to review a decision of a trustee under s 139T or 139W; 
•	a  decision under s 139ZD on the review of one of the following decisions of a trustee: a decision under s 139T to make, or refuse to make, a determination increasing the actual income threshold amount for the bankrupt for a contribution assessment period; a decision to make an assessment under s 139W(1) or 139W(2) of the income that is likely to be derived, or was derived, by a bankrupt during a contribution assessment period, the actual income threshold amount that is applicable in relation to the bankrupt and the contribution that the bankrupt is liable to pay; 
•	to refuse under s 139ZIO(5)(a) a request by a bankrupt to review a decision of a trustee relating to the supervised account regime; 
•	a decision under s 139ZIR(1) on the review of one of the following decisions of a trustee: to make a s 139ZIC(1) determination; to refuse to revoke a s 139ZIC(1) determination; to specify a period in a supervised account notice for the purposes of s 139ZIE(1)(a)(ii); to specify requirements in a supervised account notice for the purposes of s 139ZIE(1)(a)(ix); to refuse to exercise the powers conferred by s 139ZIEA(1); to refuse to give consent under s 139ZIG(3), 139ZIH(5), 139ZIHA(5) or 139ZII(3); to vary, to refuse to vary or to revoke a consent give under s 139ZIG(3), 139ZIH(5), 139ZIHA(5) or 139ZII(3);
•	to refuse under s 149K(5)(a) a request by a bankrupt to review a decision of a trustee under s 149B(1);
•	a decision under s 149N on the review of the following decision of a trustee: to file a notice objecting to the discharge of a bankrupt under s. 149B(1);
•	to approve, or refuse to approve, under s 186C(1) to register an individual or a company as a debt agreement administrator;
•	to decide under s 186C(9) that an applicant’s registration as a debt agreement administrator is subject to specified conditions;
•	to decide under s 186H(3) that the conditions on a person’s registration as a debt agreement administrator should not be changed or removed or that specified modifications should be made to those conditions;
•	to cancel an individual’s registration as a debt agreement administrator under s 186K(2) on the basis that the individual no longer passes the basic eligibility test;
•	to cancel an individual’s registration as a debt agreement administrator under s 186K(4);
•	to cancel a company’s registration as a debt agreement administrator under s 186L(2) on the basis that the individual no longer passes the basic eligibility test;
•	to cancel a company’s registration as a debt agreement administrator under s 186L(4);
•	to refuse to give consent under s 186LB(2)(c) directing a bank to make, or permit the making of, a withdrawal from an account in certain circumstances;
•	to declare under s 186M(3) that a person is ineligible, for a period of 3 years, to act as an administrator of debt agreements;
•	to refuse under s 282(1) an application to extend the time for payment of interest charge or realisations charge, or to grant a lesser extension than was applied for;
•	to refuse under s 283(1) an application to remit an amount of interest charge, realisations charge or late payment penalty, or to remit a lesser amount than was applied for.
	
Sections 155A(1), 155A(7)
	The following decisions of a committee convened to consider an application to be registered as a trustee: 
-	to determine that an applicant should be, or should not be, registered as a trustee under s 155A(1); 
-	to decide that specified conditions should apply to an applicant’s practice as a registered trustee under s 155A(7).
	
Sections 155I(1), 155I(2), 155I(3)	The following decisions of a committee convened to consider whether a trustee should continue to be registered: 
-	to decide that a trustee should continue, or should cease, to be registered as a trustee under s 155I(1); 
-	to decide that a trustee should continue to be registered subject to conditions under s 155I(2); 
-	to decide that a trustee should cease to be registered if the trustee fails to meet specified conditions under s 155I(3).	

[Notes:
-	Subsection 139ZE(6) provides that, if the Inspector-General in Bankruptcy has not given the bankrupt notice of his or her decision on a request under s 139ZA for review of a trustee’s decision within 60 days, the Inspector-General in Bankruptcy is taken to have reviewed the decision and confirmed it under s 139ZD(a).
-	Subsection 139ZIS(6) provides that, if the Inspector-General in Bankruptcy has not given the bankrupt notice of his or her decision on a request under s 139ZIO for review of a trustee’s decision within 60 days, the Inspector-General in Bankruptcy is taken to have reviewed the decision and confirmed it under s 139ZIR(1)(a).
-	Subsection 149P(6) provides that, if the Inspector-General in Bankruptcy has not given the bankrupt notice of his or her decision on a request under s 149K for review of a trustee’s decision within 60 days, the Inspector-General in Bankruptcy is taken to have reviewed the decision and confirmed it under s 149N(3)]

Bankruptcy Regulations 1996

Regulations 8.36, 13.05 and 16.12 (SR 263 of 1996) (SR 76 of 1997) (SR 255 of 2002) (SR 76 of 2003) (SR 256 of 2004) (SLI 4 of 2006) (SLI 137 of 2006)

Regulations 8.35, 13.04(3)(a), 16.11(1)	The following decisions of the Inspector-General in Bankruptcy: 
-	to determine under reg. 8.35(2) that a person who is, or has been, a controlling trustee has failed to properly exercise the powers, or carry out the duties of, a controlling trustee including meeting a standard applicable to a controlling trustee set out in Schedule 4A;
-	to determine under reg. 8.35(2) that a person who is, or has been, a controlling trustee has refused or failed to cooperate with the Inspector-General in an inquiry or investigation under paragraph 12(1)(b) of the Act;
-	to decide under reg. 13.04(3)(a) whether or not information in respect of a person who is a debtor or bankrupt should be entered, removed or corrected on the National Personal Insolvency Index;
-	to refuse under reg 16.11(1) to waive or remit the whole or part of any part of the fees payable under the provisions specified in the note below.	

[Notes: 
1.	Subregulation 16.11(1) provides that the Inspector-General in Bankruptcy may waive or remit the whole or any part of the fees payable under the following provisions: 
•	reg 16.09; 
•	item 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 11, 12 or 13 of the table following cl 2.01(1) of the Bankruptcy (Fees and Remuneration) Determination 2006; 
•	cl 2.01(2) for making copies of, or taking extracts from, a document mentioned in column 3 of item 1, 2, 3, 4, 11 or 13 of the table following cl 2.01(1) of the Bankruptcy (Fees and Remuneration) Determination 2006; or 
•	cl 2.02, 2.07 or 2.08 of the Bankruptcy (Fees and Remuneration) Determination 2006.]

Biological Control Act 1984

Section 56(1) (139 of 1984)

Sections 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 30,  31, 33, 53	The following decisions of the Commonwealth Biological Control Authority: 
-	a decision for the purposes of ss 19, 28 or 33 not to hold an inquiry;
-	a decision for the purposes of ss 20 or 31, being a decision that is inconsistent with a finding or recommendation of a Commission referred to in Part VII or the Industries Assistance Commission;
-	a decision for the purposes of ss 29, being a decision that is inconsistent with a finding or recommendation of a Commission referred to in Part VII or the Productivity Commission;
-	a decision not to publish a notice in any newspaper or journal under s 26;a decision for the purposes of s 30;
-	to revoke a declaration under s 53.	

Biosecurity Act 2015

Section 76, 578 (61 of 2015)

Sections 72(5)(a), 136(2), 179(1), 180(1), 180(2), 181(1)(a), 181(1)(b), 181(1)(c), 210(2), 273(2), 278(2), 280(2), 287, 290, 303(2), 304(1), 342(2), 343(2), 344(3), 406(1), 406(3), 413(1)(a), 413(1)(b), 417(4), 418(1), 420(3), 423(1), 597, 576

	The following decisions of the Director of Human Biosecurity: 
-	to direct an individual to comply with an isolation measure or a traveller movement measure  under s 72(5)(a).

The following decisions made by the Director of Biosecurity or the Director of Human Biosecurity personally, or on reconsideration by the Director of Biosecurity or internal reviewer:
-	to give approval for requiring high-value goods to be destroyed under s 136(2);
-	to refuse to grant a permit authorising goods to be brought or imported into Australian territory under s 179(1);
-	to impose a condition on a permit authorising goods to be brought or imported into Australian territory under s 180(1) and (2);
-	to vary a condition imposed on a permit authorising goods to be brought or imported into Australian territory under s 180(2);
-	to vary, or refuse to vary, a permit authorising goods to be brought or imported into Australian territory under s 181(1)(a);
-	to suspend a permit authorising goods to be brought or imported into Australian territory under s 181(1)(b);
-	to revoke a permit authorising goods to be brought or imported into Australian territory under s 181(1)(c);
-	to give approval for requiring conveyance to be destroyed under s 210(2);
-	to refuse to approve a method of ballast water management under s 273(2);
-	to refuse to approve a discharge of ballast water to a ballast water reception facility under s 278(2);
-	to refuse to grant an exemption for a discharge of ballast water under s 280(2);
-	to grant an exemption for a discharge of ballast water subject to conditions under s 280(2);
-	to vary or revoke an exemption for a discharge of ballast water under s 281;
-	to refuse to approve a ballast water management plan or an amendment of a ballast water management plan under s 287; 
-	to cancel the approval of a ballast water management plan under s 287;
-	to refuse to issue, endorse or amend a ballast water management certificate, or to refuse to extend the period during which such a certificate is in force under s 290;
-	to withdraw a ballast water management certificate under s 290;
-	to give a direction relating to a vessel under s 303(2);
-	to refuse to vary or revoke a direction relating to a vessel under s 304(1);
-	to give approval for requiring high-value goods to be destroyed under s 342(2);
-	to give approval for requiring a conveyance to be destroyed under s 343(2);
-	to give approval for requiring premises to be destroyed under s 344(3);
-	to refuse to approve a proposed arrangement under s 406(1);
-	to refuse to approve a varied arrangement under s 406(1);
-	to approve a proposed arrangement subject to conditions under s 406(3);
-	to vary the conditions of an approved arrangement under s 413(1)(a);
-	to require a biosecurity industry participant to vary an approved arrangement under s 413(1)(b);
-	to refuse to suspend a part of an approved arrangement under s 417(4);
-	to suspend an approved arrangement or a part of an approved arrangement under s 418(1);
-	to extend the period during which an approved arrangement or a part of an approved arrangement is suspended under s 420(3);
-	to revoke and approved arrangement under s 423(1);
-	to suspend or revoke a permit, authorisation or permission because of an unpaid cost-recovery charge under s 597.
A decision of the Director of Biosecurity, or internal reviewer, under s 576 that relates to a reviewable decision	

[Notes:
1.	This Act will commence on a single day to be fixed by Proclamation and not later than 17 June 2016. 
2.	Section 574 lists the reviewable decisions.
3.	Section 72(2) provides that an application for review of a decision of the Director of Human Biosecurity to give a direction under s 72(5)(a).]

Broadcasting Services Act 1992

Sections 204(1), clauses 62(5), (7) and (9) of Schedule 4, clauses 92(1) and (3) of Schedule 5, clause 58 of Schedule 6  and clauses 113(1), (3), (5), (7), (9) and (11) of Schedule 7 (110 of 1992) (216 of 1992) (139 of 1995) (119 of 1997) (143 of 1997) (99 of 1998) (90 of 1999) (197 of 1999) (198 of 1999) (108 of 2000) (172 of 2000) (71 of 2006) (128 of 2006) (129 of 2006) (68 of 2007) (124 of 2007) (94 of 2010) (83 of 2012) (22 of 2015)

Sections 35D(2), 38A, 38C(15), 40(1), 41(2), 43(1), 59(3), 59(4), 59(4A), 59(4B), 61AJ(4), 61AK(2), 61AMC(4),  61AMD(2), 61AP(2), 67(4), 68(2), 71(3), 83(2), 87(1), 91A, 92D(2), 92J, 96(1), 98(2), 99(2), 120(1), 121FC(1), 121FK(1), 121FLC, 121FLG, 121FLH, 123(4), 130ZUA, 130ZY, 143, 146D(4), 205B(2), 205C(2), 205D(4)

The following clauses of Schedule 2:  7(2A), 8(3), 9(2A) 

The following clauses of Schedule 4: 45(5), 45A(6), 46(5)

The following clauses of Schedule 5: 40(1)(c), 47, 62, 66, 83  

The following clauses of Schedule 6: 7, 8, 9(1), 23B(1), 25(3), 26(1), 27B, 28(6), 45, 47, 53, 54

The following clauses of Schedule 7: 47(1)(c), 47(1)(d), 47(1)(e), 47(2)(c), 47(2)(d), 47(3)(d), 47(3)(e), 47(4)(b), 47(4)(c), 47(4)(d), 52, 56(1)(c), 56(1)(d), 56(2)(d), 56(2)(e), 56(3)(d), 56(3)(e), 56(4)(b), 56(4)(c), 59A; 62(1)(d), 62(1)(e), 62(1)(f), 62(2)(c), 62(2)(d), 62(3)(d), 62(3)(e), 62(4)(b), 62(4)(c), 62(4)(d), 67, 85, 89, 108	The following decisions of the Australian Communications and Media Authority: 
1.	to make a determination under s 35D(2) in relation to a commercial radio broadcasting licence;
2.	to refuse to allocate an additional commercial television broadcasting licence under s 38A;
3.	to refuse to allocate an additional commercial television broadcasting licence under s 38B;
4.	to cancel a commercial television broadcasting licence under s 38C(15);
5.	to refuse to allocate a commercial television or radio broadcasting licence under s 40(1);
6.	to determine that a person is not a suitable applicant or licensee for a commercial licence under s 41(2);
7.	to vary a commercial licence condition or impose a new condition on a commercial licence under s 43(1);
8.	to enter a newspaper in the Associated Newspaper Register under ss 59(3) or 59(4A);
9.	to refuse to remove a newspaper from the Register under ss 59(4) or 59(4B);
10.	to refuse under s 61AJ(4) to approve a transaction that would result in an unacceptable media diversity situation coming into existence;
11.	to determine under s 61AJ(4)(d) the period within which action must be taken in relation to an unacceptable media diversity situation;
12.	to refuse under s 61AK(2) to grant an extension of the period specified in a notice given under s 61AJ(4)(d);
13.	to refuse under s 61AMC(4) to approve a transaction that would result in an unacceptable 3-way control situation coming into existence;
14.	to determine under s 61AMC(4)(d) the period within which action must be taken in relation to an unacceptable 3-way control situation;
15.	to refuse under s 61AMD(2) to grant an extension of the period specified in a notice given under s 61AMC(4)(s);
16.	to refuse under s 61AP(2) to grant an extension of the period within which a person must comply with a direction given under s 61AN(1) in relation to an unacceptable media diversity situation or a direction given under s 61ANA(1) in relation to an unacceptable 3-way control situation;
17.	to refuse under s 67(4) to approve a temporary breach;
18.	to determine under s 67(4) a period during which action must be taken to ensure a temporary breach ceases;
19.	to refuse under s 68(2) to extend the period specified in a notice given under s 67(4);
20.	to refuse under s 71(3) to grant an extension of the period within which a person must comply with a direction given under s 70(1) in relation to a breach;
21.	to determine that a person is not a suitable applicant or licensee for a community licence under s 83(2);
22.	to vary a community licence condition or impose a new condition on a community licence under s 87(1);
23.	to refuse to approve the transfer of a community broadcasting licence under s 91A;
24.	to determine that a person is not a suitable applicant or licensee for a temporary community licence under s 92D(2);
25.	to vary a temporary community licence condition, impose a new condition on a temporary community licence or vary a licence period under s 92J;
26.	to refuse to allocate an additional subscription television licence under s 96(1);
27.	to determine that a person is not a suitable applicant or licensee for a subscription television licence under s 98(2);
28.	to vary a subscription television licence condition or impose a new condition on a subscription television licence under s 99(2);
29.	to vary the conditions of a class of licence or impose new conditions on a class of licence under s 120(1);
30.	to refuse permission to a subscription television broadcasting licensee or related body corporate under s 121E(1);
31.	to grant permission to a commercial television broadcasting licensee any part of whose licence area is included in the regional area under s 121E(1);
32.	to determine that a company is unsuitable under s 121FC(1);
33.	to cancel an international broadcasting licence under s 121FK(1);
34.	to refuse to make a nominated broadcaster declaration under s 121FLC;
35.	to revoke a nominated broadcaster declaration under s 121FLG;
36.	to cancel an international broadcasting licence under s 121FLH;
37.	to refuse to include a Code of Practice in the Register of codes of practice under s 123(4);
38.	to make or refuse to make an exemption order or target reduction order under s 130ZUA or 130ZY;
39.	to suspend or cancel a licence under s 143;
40.	to declare that a person is a program supplier of a commercial television broadcasting licensee under s 146D(4);
41.	to refuse to permit an accounting period ending on a day other than 30 June under s 205B(2);
42.	to issue a notice relating to the amount of licence fee paid under s 205C(2);
43.	to determine that no additional fee be remitted or that part only of the additional fee be remitted under s 205D(4);
44.	to grant, or to refuse, permission to provide commercial television broadcasting services outside a licence area under cl 7(2A) of Sch 2;
45.	to grant, or to refuse, permission to provide commercial radio broadcasting services outside a licence area under cl 8(3) of Sch 2;
46.	to grant, or to refuse, permission to provide community broadcasting services outside a licence area under cl 9(2A) of Sch 2;
47.	to issue, or refuse to issue, a certificate under cl 45(5), 45A(6) or 46(5) of Sch 4 stating that to give a digital broadcaster or datacaster access in relation to a particular transmission tower is not technically feasible;
48.	to give an internet service provider a standard access-prevention notice under cl 40(1)(c) of Sch 5;
49.	to give an internet service provider a special access-prevention notice under cl 47 of Sch 5;
50.	to give a direction to an internet service provider or to vary or refuse to revoke a direction that is applicable to an internet service provider under cl 66 or cl 83 of Sch 5;
51.	to refuse to register a code of practice under cl 62 of Sch 5;
52.	to refuse to allocate a datacasting licence under cl 7 or 8 of Sch 6;
53.	to determine that a person is not a suitable applicant under cl 9(1) of Sch 6;
54.	to determine that an internet carriage service is a declared internet carriage service under cl 23B(1) of Sch 6;
55.	to determine that a person is not a suitable licensee under cl 25(3) of Sch 6;
56.	to vary datacasting licence conditions or impose new conditions under cl 26(1) of Sch 6;
57.	to refuse to make an exemption order under cl 27B of Sch. 6;
58.	to refuse to include a code of practice in the Register under cl 28(6) of Sch 6;
59.	to refuse to make a nominated datacaster declaration under cl 45 of Sch 6;
60.	to revoke a nominated datacaster declaration under cl 47;
61.	to give or vary, or to refuse to revoke, a direction under cl 53 of Sch 6;
62.	to suspend or cancel a datacasting licence under cl 54 of Sch 6;
63.	to give a hosting service provider a final take-down notice under cl 47(1)(c), 47(1)(d), 47(1)(e), 47(4)(b), 47(4)(c) or 47(4)(d) of Sch 7;
64.	to give a hosting service provider an interim take-down notice under cl 47(2)(c) or 47(3)(d) of Sch 7;
65.	to apply to the Classification Board under cl 47(2)(d) or 47(3)(e) for classification of content hosted by a hosting service provider;
66.	to give a hosting service provider a special take-down notice under cl 52 of Sch 7;
67.	to give a live content service provider a final service-cessation notice under cl 56(1)(c), 56(1)(d), 56(4)(b) or 56(4)(c) of Sch 7;
68.	to give a live content service provider an interim service-cessation notice under cl 56(2)(e) or 56(3)(e) of Sch 7;
69.	to apply to the Classification Board under cl 56(2)(d) or 56(3)(e) for classification of content provided by a live content service provider;
70.	to give a live service provider a special service-cessation notice under cl 59A of Sch 7;
71.	to give a links content service provider a final link-deletion notice under cl 62(1)(d), 62(1)(e), 62(1)(f), 62(4)(b), 62(4)(c) or 62(4)(d) of Sch 7;
72.	to give a links service provider an interim link-deletion notice under cl 62(2)(c) or 62(3)(d) of Sch 7;
73.	to apply to the Classification Board under cl 62(2)(d) or 62(3)(e) for classification of content that can be accessed using a link provided by a links service;
74.	to give a links service provider a special link-deletion notice under cl 67 of Sch 7;
75.	to refuse to register a code under cl 85 of Sch 7;
76.	to give a direction to a designated content/hosting service provider under cl 89;
77.	to vary, or refuse to revoke, under cl 89 a direction that is applicable to a designated content/hosting service provider;
78.	to give a direction to a designated content/hosting service provider under cl 108;
79.	to vary, or refuse to revoke, under cl 108 a direction that is applicable to a designated content/hosting service provider.
	
Section 61AZF(5) or 61AZF(10)	The following decisions of the Australian Communications and Media Authority that have been affirmed or revoked on reconsideration: 
•	to confirm or cancel on review under s 61AZE(1) the entry of a media group in the Register of Controlled Media Groups under s 61AY(1) or 61AZ(1), the removal of a media group’s entry from the Register of Controlled Media Groups under s 61AZA(1) or an alteration of a media group’s entry in the Register of Controlled Media Groups under s 61AZB(1) or 61AZC(1).
	
Section 40(7) 	The following decision of the Minister for Communications and the Arts: 
•	to direct the ACMA under s 40(7) not to allocate a commercial television broadcasting licence to an applicant under s 40(1).	

[Notes:  
1.	Section  204(1), cll 62(6), (8) and (10) of Schedule 4, cll 92(2) and 92(4) of Schedule 5, cl 58 of Schedule 6 and cll 113(2), (4), (6), (8), (10) and (12) of Schedule 7 specify the persons who may apply for review in relation to each reviewable decision.
2.	Subsection 204(2) provides that application may be made to the Tribunal for review of certain decisions relating to reception certificates under a conditional access scheme registered under section 130ZCA of the Act.  No such schemes have yet been made.
3.	Paragraphs 62(1) and (3) of Schedule 4 to the Act provide that application may be made to the Tribunal for review of certain decisions made under the Commercial Television Conversion Scheme and the National Television Conversion Scheme.  See the entries for those enactments for more detail.
4.	Paragraph 92(1)(h) of Schedule 5 to the Act provides that application may be made to the Tribunal for review of any decision made under an online provider determination determined under cl 80 of Sch 5 where the decision relates to an internet service provider or internet content host. 
5.	Paragraph 113(11)(a) of Schedule 7 to the Act provides that application may be made to the Tribunal for review of any decision made under a designated content/hosting service provider determination determined under cl 104(5) where the decision relates to a designated content/hosting service provider.
6.	The amendment of s 204(1) to remove the table item dealing with refusal to allocate licence under section 38C does not apply in relation to a decision made before 19 March 2015: 22 of 2015].

Building Energy Efficiency Disclosure Act 2010

Section 69 (67 of 2010) (1 of 2015)  

Sections 13A, 17(3), 17(5), 18(10), 18(12), 25, 27(2), 27(4), 28(1), 29(1), 29(2), 30, 68(4)	Any of the decisions set out below that has either been:
-	made personally by the Secretary of the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science; or 
-	affirmed, varied or set aside on reconsideration by the Secretary under s 68(4):
•	to refuse to issue a building energy efficiency certificate under s 13A
•	to issue a building energy efficiency certificate with a start day other than the start day included in the application for the certificate under s 13A(2)(c)
•	to refuse to grant an exemption from the operation of section 11, 12 or 15 under s 17(3);
•	to revoke or vary the grant of an exemption from  the operation of section 11, 12 or 15 under s 17(5);
•	to grant or refuse to grant an exemption from s 18 under s 18(10);
•	to revoke or vary, or refuse to revoke or vary, the grant of an exemption from s 18 under s 18(12);
•	to refuse to accredit a person as an assessor under s 25;
•	to impose additional conditions on the accreditation of an assessor under s 27(2);
•	to vary or revoke a condition on the accreditation of an assessor under s 27(4);
•	to suspend the accreditation of a person as an assessor under s 28(1);
•	to refuse to lift the suspension of accreditation of a person as an assessor under s 29(1);
•	to refuse to waive under s 29(2) all or a specified part of the requirement under para 24(2)(b) to produce information or under para 24(2)(c) to pay a fee;
•	to revoke the accreditation of a person as an assessor under s 30. 	

[Notes:
-	The list of ‘reviewable decisions’ that may be reconsidered under the Act is set out in section 67.  The following Acts introduced or have amended the list of reviewable decisions: 67 of 2010, 1 of 2015.
-	Building Energy Disclosure Amendment Act 2015 (1 of 2015) introduced s 13A, repealed s 18(10)-(12) and amended s 17(3) and (5), with effect from 1 July 2015].

Business Names Registration Act 2011

Sections 58(1) and (3) (126 of 2011)

Sections 27(2),  28(2)	The following decisions made personally by the Treasurer:
-	a refusal to determine, or the revocation of a determination, that a business name of a kind that is undesirable is available to an entity under s 27(2); 
-	a determination that a word or expression specified in the determination is restricted in relation to a specified entity or specified business unless a condition or conditions specified in the determination are met under s 28(2).	
Section 57(6) 	Any of the following decisions;

1.	made by ASIC other than as a delegate of the Treasurer that has been reconsidered by ASIC; or:
2.	made by an ASIC member or staff as a delegate of the Treasurer that has been reconsidered by the Treasurer:

-	to register, or refuse to register, a business name to an entity under s 24; 
-	to refuse to determine, or to revoke a determination, that a business name of a kind that is undesirable is available to an entity under s 27(2); 
-	a determination that a word or expression specified in the determination is restricted in relation to a specified entity or specified business unless a condition or conditions specified in the determination are met under s 28(2); 
-	a determination of a longer review period, or the refusal to determine a longer review period, for review of registration decisions under s 29(5); 
-	to refuse to determine that an entity that would otherwise be disqualified is not to be disqualified under s 32(3);
-	to refuse to determine an alternative registration period in relation to the registration of a business name to an entity under s 33(3) or (4);
-	the deletion, refusal to include, correction or annotation of information in relation to a business name on the Business Names Register under s 37(6) or (7);
-	to refuse to enter an entity’s name on the Business Names Register as a notified successor in relation to a business name under s 40(5);
-	to cancel the registration of a business name to an entity under s 43, 47 or 48;
-	to refuse to determine a longer review period for reviewing cancellation decisions under s 54(3);
-	to revoke a determination of an alternative registration period in relation to the renewal of the registration of a business name to an entity under s 55(4) or (5);
-	to refuse to decide that it is appropriate to an entity from disclosure under s 60(6);
-	to refuse to receive a document submitted by an entity under s 69(1) or (5).	

[Notes:
-	A list of reviewable decisions and who may apply for reconsideration is set out in s 56.
-	Section 58(4) provides who may apply for review of decisions made by the Treasurer personally.
-	If a request for reconsideration made to ASIC is not decided within 28 days  after the application is lodged the applicant may at any time give the review body written notice that it wishes to treat the decision as affirmed: s 57(8)(a).
-	If a request for reconsideration made to the Treasurer is not decided within 60 days  after the application is lodged the applicant may at any time give the review body written notice that it wishes to treat the decision as affirmed: s 57(8)(b).]

Business Names Registration (Transitional and Consequential Provisions) Act 2011

Items 29(1) and (3) of Schedule 1 (127 of 2011)

Item 11(4) of Schedule 1	The following decision made personally by the Treasurer: to cancel the registration of a business name to an entity under item 11(4).	
Item 28(6) of Schedule 1 	Any of the following decisions;

-	made by ASIC other than as a delegate of the Treasurer that has been reconsidered by ASIC; or:
-	made by and ASIC member or staff member as a delegate of the Treasurer that has been reconsidered by the Treasurer:

1.	that a person carries on, or intends to carry on, a business alone under a business name, rather than in association with other persons under items 2(1)(b) or 7(1)(a) of Schedule 1;
2.	that a person carries on, or intends to carry on, a business under a business name in association with one or more other persons under item 3(1)(b) or 7(1)(b) of Schedule 1;
3.	to reject an alternative word or expression to distinguish an entity under item 18(9) of Schedule 1;
4.	to specify a word or expression to distinguish an entity under item 18(10)(b) of Schedule 1;
5.	to remove a word or expression to distinguish an entity on the Business Names Register under item 20(3) of Schedule 1.	

[Notes:
1.	A list of reviewable decisions and who may apply for reconsideration is set out in item 27 of Schedule 1.
2.	Item 29(4) of Schedule 1 provides who may apply for review of decisions made by the Treasurer personally.
3.	If a request for reconsideration made to ASIC is not decided within 28days  after the application is lodged the applicant may at any time give the review body written notice that it wishes to treat the decision as affirmed: item 28(8)(a) of Schedule 1.
4.	If a request for reconsideration made to the Treasurer is not decided within 60 days  after the application is lodged the applicant may at any time give the review body written notice that it wishes to treat the decision as affirmed: item 28(8)(b) of Schedule 1.]

C

Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Act 2011

Section 244 (101 of 2011) (119 of 2014)

Sections 57,  64, 65, 74, 88, 89, 90, 91, 95, 97(2), 98, 99, 130, 153(5), 169, 180(2), 242	Any of the decisions set out below that:

-	Has been affirmed or varied by the Clean Energy Regulator under s 242; or
-	was made personally by the Clean Energy Regulator: 

-	to refuse to issue a certificate under s 15;
-	to state under s 15(3) that a specified number is the unit entitlements in respect of a certificate of entitlement;
-	to refuse to declare that an offsets project is an eligible offsets project under s 27;
-	to vary an eligible offsets project declaration under regulations made for the purposes of s 29(1);
-	refuse to vary an eligible offsets project declaration under regulations made for the purposes of ss 29(1), 30(1) or 31(2);
-	to revoke an eligible offsets project declaration under regulations made for the purposes of ss 32(1), 33(1), 34(1), 35(1), 36(1), 37(1), 38(1), 139(1);
-	to refuse to revoke an eligible offsets project declaration under regulations made for the purposes of ss 32(1) and s 33(1);
-	to make a determination under regulations made for the purposes of s 57;
-	to refuse to recognise  a person as a recognised offsets entity under s 64;
-	to cancel a person’s recognition as a recognised offsets entity under s 65;
-	to determine, or refuse to determine,  a subsequent crediting period for an eligible offsets project under s 74;
-	to require a person to relinquish a specified number of Australian carbon credit units under s 88, 89, 90 or 91;
-	to refuse to make a determination under s 95;
-	to make a declaration under s 97(2);
-	to vary, or refuse to vary, a carbon maintenance obligation declaration under s 98;
-	to refuse to revoke a carbon maintenance obligation under s 99;
-	to refuse to approve the application of a methodology determination to an eligible offsets project under s 130;
-	to refuse to extend  a period under s 153(5);
-	 to refuse a request not to set out the project area or project areas for an eligible offsets project in the Emissions Reduction Fund Register under 169;
-	to refuse to remit the whole or part of an amount under s 180(2).  	
Sections 112, 120	The following decisions of the Domestic Offsets Integrity Committee: 
to refuse to endorse a proposal for a methodology determination under s 112;
to refuse to endorse a proposal for the variation of a methodology determination under s 120	

[Notes:
1.	The list of the Administrator’s reviewable decisions under the Act is set out in s 240. The following Acts introduced or have amended this list of decisions: 101 of 2011, 108 of 2012 and 119 of 2014.
2.	Section 58, 64, 65 , 74 and 95 were repealed by 119 of 2014, with effect from 13 December 2014.
3.	If a person requests reconsideration of a reviewable decision and the Regulator does not inform the applicant of his or her decision within 90 days after the request is received, the Regulator is taken to have affirmed the decision: s 243(2).]

Chemical Weapons (Prohibition) Act 1994

Section 27 (26 of 1994) (9 of 1998)

Sections 18(1), 18(3), 20, 23, 24, 25	The following decisions of the Minister for Foreign Affairs in relation to permits to operate a facility where scheduled chemicals are produced, acquired, retained, used at or transferred from: 
-	to refuse to grant a permit under s 18(1); 
-	to specify, or not to specify, the day a permit comes into force under s 18(3); 
-	to refuse to renew a permit under s 20; 
-	to impose a condition on a permit; to vary a permit under s 23; 
-	to refuse to transfer a permit under s 24; to revoke a permit under s 25.	

Child Care Benefit (Eligibility of Child Care Services for Approval and Continued Approval) Determination 2000

Section 142(1) of the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) (Administration) Act 1999

Various sections	A decision of an officer under this Determination, other than a decision under s 12(3), 21 or 21A, that has been reviewed by the Secretary of the Department of Education or an authorised review officer and then by the Social Security Appeals Tribunal.	

[Notes:  
1.	This Determination was made under the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) (Administration) Act 1999.
2.	Section 5 of the Determination provides that Part 5 of the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) (Administration) Act 1999 which deals with merits review of decisions applies to decisions of an officer under this Determination.]

Child Disability Assessment Determination 2001

Section 179(1) of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999

Section 149 of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999	The following decisions of the Secretary to the Department of Social Services that have been reviewed by the Secretary, the Chief Executive Centrelink or an authorised review officer and then by the Social Security Appeals Tribunal: 
-	to approve, or refuse to approve, a person as a treating health professional under s 1.6(1); 
-	to approve, or refuse to approve, a class of persons as treating health professionals under s 1.6(2); 
-	to ask for a replacement questionnaire to be completed by another treating health professional if the Secretary is not satisfied that the questionnaire completed is an accurate reflection of a person’s functional ability, behaviour and special care needs under s. 2.2(3).	

[Notes: 
1.	Section 4.1 of the Determination provides that the decisions identified above are taken to be decisions of an officer under the Social Security Act 1991 for the purposes of the review provisions in the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999.]

Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989

Sections 103VA, 89, 96A of the Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988 (146 of 2006) (60 of 2015) 
Regulation 12 of the Child Support Reform (New Formula and Other Measures) Regulations 2007 (SLI 363 of 2007) 

AAT first review	
Sections 30(1), 30(2), 63AD(1), 63AE(1), 64AH, 80G(1)(d), 80G(1)(e), 92, 98U, Part 6A, 35D(2) of the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Act 1999	The following decisions of the Child Support Registrar in relation to which an objection has been made and which have been reviewed under s 87 of the Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988:
-	 to accept an application for administrative assessment of child support for a child under s 30(1);
-	to refuse to accept an application for administrative assessment under s 30(2);
-	as to the particulars of an administrative assessment;
-	to refuse under s 63AD(1) to accept an election made by a parent under s 63AC(1);
-	to make a determination in relation to a parent under s 63AE(1);
-	a decision in relation to the remission of a penalty under s 64AH;
-	to terminate a child support agreement under s 80G(1)(d) or (e);
-	to accept or to refuse to accept an agreement in relation to a child under s 92 or s 98U;
-	as to the particulars of a notional assessment;
-	to make or to refuse to make a determination under Part 6A; 
-	to determine a party’s percentage of care for a child under Part 5, Division 4, Subdivision B  (sections 49-54E).	
AAT second review:	
Section 96A(b)	A decision made by the AAT under s 43(1) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 on AAT first review of a percentage of care decision made under Subdivision B of Division 4 of Part 5.	
The following type of decision was repealed and replaced with effect from 1 July 2015:	
Section 103S of the Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988	The following decision of the Child Support Registrar in relation to which an objection decision has been made and which has been reviewed by the Social Security Appeals Tribunal: 
•	to determine a party’s percentage of care for a child under Division 4 of Part 5.	

[Notes: 
1.	Regulation 12 of the Child Support Reform (New Formula and Other Measures) Regulations 2007 was repealed by the Tribunal Legislation Amendment (Amalgamation) Regulation 2015 (SLI 95 of 2015) with effect from 1 July 2015. (The Child Support Reform (New Formula and Other Measures) Regulations 2007 commenced on 1 January 2008.  They enabled decisions to be made under the amended provisions of the Act before they entered into force on 1 July 2008.  The review provisions as they would operate on and from 1 July 2008 applied in relation to these decisions.  Pursuant to reg 12, a person could apply to the Tribunal for review of a decision of the SSAT determining a party’s percentage of care for a child.  Any decision of the Tribunal would have effect on and from 1 July 2008 as if it had been made under the amended provisions.)
2.	Act 60 of 2015 amended this Act to introduce AAT first review, and repeal and replace s 103AS and 103VA of the Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988 with effect from 1 July 2015.
3.	Sections 80 (items 9 to 15) and 80A of the Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988 list the decisions made under the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 against which objections may be lodged.
4.	Section 35D(2) of the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Act 1999 provides that the Secretary may make a determination of a new percentage of care as it relates to Part 5, Division 4, Subdivision B of this Act.]

Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988

Sections 72T [Single review], 89 [first review] and 96A [second review] and 103VA(1B) (3 of 1988) (163 of 1989) (75 of 2001) (146 of 2006) (65 of 2010)(60 of 2015)

AAT first review	
Sections 71, 71A, 71C, 54(1), 54(2), 68, 83(1), 87AA(2), 110Y(3),  110Z(3) 	The following decisions of the Child Support Registrar in relation to which an objection has been lodged with the Registrar under s 80, and which have been reviewed by the Registrar under s 87(1):
-	to register a registrable maintenance liability;
-	as to particulars entered in the Child Support Register in relation to a registrable maintenance liability;
-	as to particulars varied in the Child Support Register in relation to a registrable maintenance liability;
-	to delete an entry from the Child Support Registrar in relation to a registrable maintenance liability;
-	to credit, under s 71, 71A or 71C, an amount received by the payee of a registrable maintenance liability, or third party, against the amount payable under the liability;
-	to make an appealable refusal decision in relation to a registrable maintenance liability;
-	to make an appealable collection refusal decision in relation to a registrable maintenance liability;
-	in relation to the remission of a penalty under s 54(1) or (2) or s 68.

The following decisions of the Child Support Registrar:
-	a care percentage decision in relation to which an objection has been lodged under s 80A, and which has been reviewed by the Registrar under s 87(1);
-	a decision under s 83(1) on an application for extension of time;
-	a decision to make, or not to make, a determination under s 87AA(2);
-	a decision to make, or not to make, a determination  under s 110Y(3) or 110Z(3).	
AAT Second Review	
Sections 92, 43(1) of AAT Act, 95N(2) 	The following decisions of the AAT:
-	a decision under s 92 to refuse an extension application;
-	a decision under s 43(1) of the AAT Act on AAT first review of a care percentage decision; 
-	a decision under s 95N(2) to make, or not to make, a determination	
Section 103V(4)	The following decision of the AAT: 
-	to make or not make a determination in relation to a person under s 103V(4). 	
AAT Single Review	
Sections 72I, 72L, 72M	The following decisions of the Child Support Registrar: 
-	to revoke or vary a departure prohibition order under s 72I; 
-	to grant, or refuse to grant a departure authorisation certificate under s 72L; 
-	to determine the amount of security and date of a person’s return to Australia under s 72M.	

[Notes:
1.	Section 80 sets out the decisions against which objections may be lodged with the Registrar.
2.	Act 60 of 2015 amended the Act to introduce AAT first and second review, and repealed s 103V(4) with effect from 1 July 2015.]

City Area Leases Ordinance 1936

Sections 11B(1), 18B(7), 20(5) 

Sections 11A(9), 18B(1), 18B(3), 20(2)	The following decisions of the Minister under the City Area Leases Ordinance 1936:
1.	a determination made under s 11A(9);
2.	to refuse to allow an extension of  the period under s 18B(1);
3.	to confirm a variation or set aside that variation and substitute such other variation under s 18B(3);
4.	a determination of the value of improvements under s 20(2).	

[Note:
1.	Section 5 of the National Land Ordinance 1989 gives effect to the City Area Leases Ordinance 1936 with respect to National Land on and after ACT self-government day (11 May 1989).  Section 4 of the National Land Ordinance 1989 provides that, with the Attorney-General’s approval, the National Capital Authority is to manage National Land designated in writing by the Attorney-General as land required for the special purposes of Canberra as the National Capital.
2.	Application for review by the Tribunal must be made within 30 days after the payment of the premium by the lessee or within such further period as the Tribunal allows: s 11B(2)]. 

Civil Aviation Act 1988

Section 31(2) (63 of 1988) (105 of 2003)

Various sections	The following decisions of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority: 
-	to refuse to grant or issue a certificate, permit or licence under the Act or the Regulations;
-	to cancel, suspend or vary a certificate, permit or licence, granted or issued under the Act or the Regulations;
-	to impose or vary a condition contained a certificate, permission, permit or licence granted or issued under the Act or the Regulations;
-	to cancel, suspend or vary an authorisation, contained in such certificate, permission, permit or licence granted or issued under the Act or the Regulations, but not suspend an authorisation under s 30DC, or suspend or cancel an authorisation under Division 3D;
-	 to reinstate under s 30EF(3) a civil aviation authorisation that has been suspended or cancelled under Division 3D.	

Civil Aviation (Buildings Control) Regulations 1988

Regulation 9(1) (SR 161 of 1988) (SR 103 of 1993)

Regulations 8(2), 8(3)	The following decisions of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) or an authorised person: 
-	to refuse or grant subject to conditions an application for approval to construct a building or structure under reg 8(2);
-	to impose, vary or revoke conditions subject to which an approval was given or with respect to the marking or lighting of a building or structure under reg 8(3).
	
Regulation 11(1)	The following decision of CASA: to give directions under reg 11(1).	

Civil Aviation Regulations 1988

Regulation 297A (SR 158 of 1988) (SLI 80 of 2013) (SLI 274 of 2013)

Regulations 30A, 33B, 33D, 33G, 33H, 33I, 42M, 42R, 42ZG, 42ZK, 42ZS, 42ZW, 42ZX, 5.14, 5.20, 5.21, 5.24, 5.34, 5.36, 5.38,  5.58, 5.215, 135A, 181G, 181I, 181J, 181M, 181O, 181P, 262AN, 265, 269, 298A(4)	The following decisions made by CASA:	
	refusing to approve a change to a certificate of approval	30A	
	refusing to issue an airworthiness authority;
or issuing an airworthiness authority subject to conditions	33B	
	refusing to grant an aircraft welding authority	33D	
	refusing to renew an aircraft welding authority	33G	
	refusing to approve a change to an aircraft welding authority	33H	
	imposing a condition on an aircraft welding authority	33I	
	refusing to approve a system of maintenance	42M	
	refusing to approve a change to an approved system of maintenance	42R	
	modifying a change to an approved system of maintenance and approving the modified change	42R	
	refusing to approve a system of certification of completion of maintenance	42ZG	
	refusing to approve a change to a system of certification of completion of maintenance	42ZK	
	refusing to grant an exemption from, or a variation of, a requirement to which Division 7 of Part 4A applies; or granting or approving the exemption or variation subject to conditions	42ZS	
	refusing to approve the appointment of a person as a maintenance controller; or approving the appointment of a person as a maintenance controller subject to conditions	42ZW	
	suspending or cancelling the approval of a person’s appointment as a maintenance controller	42ZX	
	refusing to issue or renew a balloon flight crew rating	5.14	
	revoking a person’s approval to give balloon flying training for the issue of a balloon flight crew rating, or a grade of flight crew rating	5.20	
	refusing to issue an aircraft a balloon class endorsement (within the meaning given by subregulation 5.01(1))	5.23	
	revoking an  approval of a person’s appointment as a chief  balloon flying instructor	5.58	
	refusing to issue a special flight authorisation	135A	
	refusing to approve an application for an RVSM airworthiness approval	181G	
	suspending an RVSM airworthiness approval	181I	
	cancelling an RVSM airworthiness approval	181J	
	refusing to approve an application for an RVSM operational approval	181M	
	suspending an RVSM operational approval	181O	
	cancelling an RVSM operational approval	181P	
	refusing to approve an organisation to administer the operation of limited category aircraft engaged in special purpose operation mentioned in subregulation 21.189(3) of CASR	262AN	
	suspending a license or authority (within the meaning given by subregulation 263(1))	265	
	varying, suspending or cancelling an approval, authority, certificate or license (within the meaning given by subregulation 263(1))	269	
	that CASA is satisfied that a person has committed an act mentioned in subregulation 298A(1)	298A(4)	
Regulation 297A(2)	Application may be made to the AAT for review of a decision that is mentioned in items 7,8,11 or 12 of table 297A(1), and is made by a person who is an authorised person for the provision under which the decision is made.		

[Notes:
1.	The list of reviewable decisions is set out in reg 297A(1).  The following instruments have introduced or  amended the list of reviewable decisions: SR 158 of 1988; SR 410 of 1991; SR 487 of 1991; SR 174 of 1992; SR 279 of 1992; SR 325 of 1992; SR 380 of 1992; SR 93 of 1994; SR 187 of 1994; SR 224 of 1995; SR 111 of 1997; SR 166 of 1999; SR 8 of 2000; SR 221 of 2002; SR 319 of 2002; SR 350 of 2002; SR 105 of 2003; SR 232 of 2003; SR 134 of 2004; SR 345 of 2004; SLI 273 of 2008; SLI 76 of 2011,SLI 77 of 2011; SLI 80 of 2013 and SLI 274 of 2013.
2.	The list of reviewable decisions has also been further amended by SLI 274 of 2013. These changes commenced on 1 September 2014.
3.	These regulations also provide that a decision under reg 99.415 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 is a reviewable decision.]

Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998

Regulation 201.004 (SR 237 of 1998) (SR 166 of 1999) (SR 262 of 1999) (SR 204 of 2000) (SR 227 of 2000) (SR 350 of 2002) (SR 58 of 2003) (SR 189 of 2003) (SR 232 of 2003) (SR 134 of 2004) (SR 345 of 2004) (SLI 41 of 2007) (SLI 64 of 2009) (SLI 277 of 2010) (SLI 328 of 2010)(SLI 77 of 2011)(265 of 2011) (SLI 80 of 2013) (SLI 274 of 2013) (SLI 275 of 2013)
Regulation 297A(2) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988

Regulations 11.F.1, 11.F.2, 21.043, 21.855, 21.870, 39.004(2), 39.004(3), 39.007, 	The following decisions made by CASA:	
	under a provision of these Regulations refusing to grant or issue, or cancelling, suspending or varying, an authorisation 

under a provision of these Regulations:
(a)	Refusing to grant or issue an authorisation; or
(b)	Cancelling or suspending an authorisation otherwise than on the application of the authorisation-holder; or
(c)	Refusing to vary an authorisation		
	under a provision of these Regulations imposing a condition on, or varying a condition of, an authorisation

under a provision of these Regulations imposing a condition on, or varying a condition of, an authorisation otherwise than on the application of the authorisation-holder		
	refusing, because of regulation 47.131B, to cancel the registration of an aircraft	Subpart 11.D	
	refusing to grant an exemption	Div 11.F.1, 11.F.2	
	refusing to consider an application for a type certificate	r 21.043	
	refusing approval to remove or alter information on a critical part	21.855	
	agreeing that it is impractical to mark information on a part	21.870	
	refusing to issue an instrument of approval or exclusion	39.004(2), 39.004(3)	
	refusing to revoke or amend an Australian airworthiness directive	39.007	
	directing that an authorisation  issued by a continuing airworthiness management organisation to a pilot licence holder can be changed or cancelled	42.640	

45.090, 45.105, 45.150, 45.155, 47.130, 47.175, 67.B, 67.095, 	refusing approval to place a design, mark or symbol on an aircraft	45.090	
	directing where to place an aircraft’s markings	45.105	
	directing where to place an aircraft’s aircraft registration identification plate; or
refusing to give such a direction	45.150	
	refusing approval to:
remove an aircraft’s aircraft registration identification plate; or
remove or alter marking on such a plate	45.155	
	refusing, because of subregulation 47.110(9), to amend the Australian Civil Aircraft Register and give a certificate of registration	47.110	
	suspending the registration of an aircraft	47.131A(1)	
	cancelling the registration of an aircraft if the registration holder does not, within 3 months after the day the aircraft’s registration was suspended under r 47.131A(1), give a notice under r 47.100(5) appointing an eligible person as the aircraft’s registered operator	47.131A(3)	
	cancelling the registration of an aircraft on other grounds	47.132	
	assigning fewer dealer’s marks to an aircraft dealer than were applied for by the dealer	47.175	
	refusing to appoint a person as a DAME or DAO	67.B	
	cancelling the appointment of a person as a DAME or DAO	67.095	
90.010, 137.040, 137.045(6), 137.045(1), 137.045(4), 137.045(5), 137.080, 137.085, 137.090, 139.145, 139.252, 139.C, 202.343, 202.344, 202.345	refusing to excuse an aircraft or aeronautical product from the operation of a provision of Part 90	90.010	
	refusing to approve a standard operations manual	137.040	
	refusing to accept
an application for an AOC submitted later than required under subregulation 137.045(1); or
a manual or schedule of differences that is submitted later than required under subregulation 137.045(4); or
an application for the variation of an AOC submitted later than required under subregulation 137.045(5)	137.045(6)	
	refusing to approve a proposed amendment to an operations manual	137.080	
	refusing to approve a proposed amendment to a schedule of differences	137.085	
	refusing to approve a proposed amendment to a standard operations manual	137.090	
	giving a direction	139.145	
	designating, or refusing to designate, an aerodrome as an aerodrome to which A-SMGCS applies	139.252	
	refusing to register an aerodrome; or
suspending or cancelling the registration of an aerodrome	subpart 139.C	
	determining that CASA would not have issued an aircraft maintenance engineer licence (within the meaning given by regulation 202.340) to a person	202.343, 202.344	
	determining that CASA would not have issued a CAO 100.66 maintenance authority (within the meaning given by regulation 202.340) to a person	202.345	
Regulation 201.004(3)	Application may be made to the AAT for review of a decision that is mentioned in items 1 or 2 of table 201.004 and is made by a person who is an authorised person for the provision under which the decision is made

Applications may be made to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for review of a decision mentioned in reg 201.004(5) that is made: (a) under a provision of these Regulations; and (b) by a person mentioned in reg 201.004(4) that may make the decision under the provision. 
	
Regulation 201.004(5)	For the purposes of reg 201.004(3), the decisions include the following; (a) a decision refusing to grant or issue an authorisation; (b) a decision varying an authorisation otherwise than on the application of the authorisation-holder; (c) a decision refusing to vary an authorisation; (d) a decision imposing a condition on, or varying a condition of, an authorisation otherwise than on the application of the authorisation-holder.	

[Notes:
1.	Regulation 297A(2) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 provides that application may be made to the Tribunal for review of a decision under reg 99.415 of these Regulations.
2.	Regulation 297A(2) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 has been amended by SLI 274 and 275 of 2013. SLI 275 commenced on 18 December 2013 and SLI 274 of 2013 will commence on 1 September 2014.
3.	Regulation 202.344 will cease on 26 June 2015:  reg 202.344(5)
4.	SLI 204 of 2014 introduced r 47.131A and substituted the old 47.132  These amendments commence(d) immediately after the commencement of section 3 of the International Interests in Mobile Equipment (Cape Town Convention) Act 2013   

Classification (Publications, Films and Computer Games) Act 1995

Sections 6H(6), 17D, 22G, 22J, 91(5) (7 of 1995) (13 of 2001) (27 of 2007) (99 of 2014)

Section 6H(1)	The following decisions of the Director:
1.	to exempt a particular publication film, computer game, event or organisation from any or all provisions of this Division or of the conditional cultural exemption rules under s 6H(1)	
Sections 17A, 17B, 17C	The following decisions of the Director:
2.	to revoke an authorisation given to a person under s 17A; to give a barring notice to a person under s 17B; to give a barring notice to a person under s 17C.	
Sections 22E(1), 22F(1), 22H(1), 91(1)	The following decisions of the Director of the Classification Board: 
3.	to revoke an authorisation in relation an additional content assessor under s 22E(1); 
4.	to give under s 22F(1) a barring notice to an additional content assessor; 
5.	to give under s 22H(1) a barring notice to a person who may apply for classification of a film; 
6.	to waive, or refuse to waive all or part of, the payment of fees under s 91(1).	
Section 91(1)	The following decision of the Convenor of the Classification Review Board: 
1.	to waive, or refuse to waive all or part of, the payment of fees under s 91(1).	

Clean Energy Advances for Approved Care Organisations Administrative Scheme Determination 2012

Section 142 of the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) (Administration) Act 1999

Section 133 of the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) (Administration) Act 1999 	Any decision of an officer under the Scheme in relation to a clean energy advance for an approved care organisation that has been reviewed by the Secretary of the Department of Social Services or an authorised review officer and then made by the AAT under 43(1) of the AAT Act on first review.	

[Notes:
1.	Section 13 of the Determination provides that Part 5 of the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) (Administration ) Act 1999 applies, as far as it is capable of doing so, to a decision under this determination in relation to a clean energy advance for an approved care organisation as if the decision were a decision relating to a clean energy advance for an individual under the family assistance law.]

Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Act 2014

Section 357(3) (83 of 2014)

Section 357(2)	The following decision of the Regulator to: 
2.	refuse to remit the whole or part of a late payment penalty under s 357(2).	

Clothing and Household Textile (Building Innovative Capability) Scheme 2010

Section 7.2(6) (F2010L01383)

Section  7.2(2)	Subject to the exceptions set out in note 2 below, any decision of the Secretary for the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science that has been, or is taken to have been, confirmed or varied on reconsideration under s 7.2(2).	

[Notes:  
1.	This scheme is made under the Textile, Clothing and Footwear Investment and Innovation Programs Act 1999.
2.	Subject to the exceptions set out in s 7.1(2), an entity dissatisfied with a decision of the Secretary under the scheme may request that the Secretary reconsider the decision under s 7.1.  Subection 7.1(1) does not apply to any decision arising from the application of:
3.	s 6.13, 6.19, 6.22 or 6.23 in relation to the entitlement to be paid an innovation grant, or to the amount of an innovation grant; or 
4.	s 5.8 or 5.15 in relation to the eligibility for an advance of an innovation grant, or to the amount of an advance.
3.	If the Secretary does not confirm, revoke or vary a decision in respect of which a reconsideration request is made under s 7.1 before the end of the period of 30 days after receiving the application, the Secretary is taken to have confirmed the decision: s 7.2(3).]

Coal Mining Industry (Long Service Leave) Payroll Levy Collection Act 1992

Section 8(7) (61 of 1992)

Section 8(2)	The following decision of the Coal Mining Industry (Long Service Leave Funding) Corporation: 
•	to remit, or refuse to remit, additional levy or part thereof under s 8(2).	

Coastal Trading (Revitalising Australian Shipping) Act 2012 

Sections 107 (55 of 2012)

Sections 11, 12, 25(3), 35, 36, 39, 55, 56, 58, 59(3), 	The following decisions of the Minister for Infrastructure and Regional Development: 
-	to exempt a particular vessel or a particular person from this Act, or to grant an exemption subject to conditions, under s 11;
-	to refuse to make a declaration in relation to a vessel under s 12;
-	to cancel a general licence under s 25(3);
-	to grant an application for a temporary licence, where the holder of a general licence has given the Minister a notice, under s 35;
-	 to have been taken to have granted an application for a temporary licence, where the holder of a general licence has given the Minister a notice, under s 36;
-	to refuse to an application for a temporary licence under s 39;
-	to grant an application for a variation of a temporary licence, where the holder of a general licence has given the Minister a notice, under s 55;
-	 to have been taken to have granted an application for a variation of a temporary licence, where the holder of a general licence has given the Minister a notice, under s 56;
-	to refuse an application for a variation of a temporary licence under s 58;
-	to cancel a temporary licence under 59(3).	

[Notes:
1.	Where an application for review has been made for a decision made under ss 35, 36, 39, 55, 56, or 58, the application must be made within 20 business days after the day the person is notified of the decision: ss 107(6) and 107(7).
2.	The Minister may delegate all or any of his or her functions and powers under the Act: s 111(1).]

Commerce (Trade Descriptions) Act 1905

Section 15(1) (61 of 1981) (48 of 1982) (85 of 1995)

Sections 7(3), 10(3), 11(3), 13(3)
	The following decisions of the Chief Executive Officer of Customs: 
-	a determination under s 7(3) as to whether a failure to apply a trade description to imported goods was intentional or reckless;
-	to require the owner or importer of certain goods to apply a prescribed trade description or to export the goods under s 7(3);
-	a determination under s 10(3) as to whether the application of a false trade description to imported goods was intentional or reckless;
-	to require the owner or importer of certain goods to correct a false trade description under s 10(3);
-	a determination under s 11(3) as to whether a failure to apply a trade description to goods that are entered for export, put on board any ship for export or brought to any wharf or place for export was intentional or reckless;
-	to require the owner or exporter of certain goods to apply a prescribed trade description to the goods before the exportation of the goods or to withdraw the relevant entry, to remove the goods from a ship or to remove the goods from that wharf or place under s 11(3);
-	a determination under s 13(3) as to whether the application of a false trade description to goods that are entered for export, put on board any ship for export or brought to any wharf or place for export was intentional or reckless;
-	to require the owner or exporter to correct a false trade description before the exportation of goods or to withdraw an entry, to remove the goods from a ship or to remove the goods from that wharf or place under s 13(3).	

Commercial Television Conversion Scheme 1999

Sections 66(5), 82(3), 84(6), 85(6), 86(7), 87(4), 140(4), 141(6), 142(6), 156(5) and 172(3) of the Scheme and cl 62(1) of Schedule 4 to the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (F2005B00534) (F2007L04259)

Sections 24(1), 32(2), 41(2), 50(1), 51(4), 52(4), 53(4), 66(4), 82(2), 84(2)(c), 85(2)(c), 86(3)(c), 87(2)(b), 111(2), 123(2), 140(1), 141(4), 142(4), 143(4), 156(4), 172(2)	The following decisions made by the Australian Communications and Media Authority: 
-	to refuse to approve the submission of a series of implementation plans for 1 licence area under s 24(1);
-	to refuse to approve an implementation plan under s 32(2);
-	to refuse to approve a variation of an implementation plan under s 41(2);
-	to decide under s 50(1), 51(4) or 52(4) that there were no exceptional circumstances in relation to aspects of digital transmission;
-	to refuse to arrange for the issue of a replacement transmitter licence to the holder of a commercial television broadcasting licence under s 53(4);
-	to refuse to approve an application to transmit on a test basis under s 66(4);
-	to refuse to approve an application to transmit a commercial television broadcasting service in digital mode before the start of the simulcast period for an area under s 82(2);
-	to decide not to vary, renew or issue a transmitter licence under s 84(2)(c), 85(2)(c) or 86(3)(c);
-	to decide not to vary the date of effect of a transmitter licence under s 87(2)(b);
-	to refuse to approve an implementation plan under s 111(2);
-	to refuse to approve a variation of an implementation plan under s 123(2);
-	to decide under s 140(1), 141(4) or 142(4) that there were no exceptional circumstances in relation to digital transmission;
-	to refuse to arrange for the issue of a replacement transmitter licence to the holder of a commercial television broadcasting licence  under s 143(4);
-	to refuse to approve an application to transmit on a test basis under s 156(4);
-	to refuse to approve an application to transmit a commercial television broadcasting service in digital mode before the start of the simulcast period for an area under s 172(2).	

[Notes:  
1.	This Instrument was made under cl 6(1) of Schedule 4 to the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 
2.	 Clause 62(1) of Schedule 4 to the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 confers jurisdiction on the Tribunal to review certain decisions made under the Scheme.  The Scheme also confers jurisdiction in respect of certain other decisions.
3.	The list of reviewable decisions has been amended by the following instruments: Commercial Television Conversion Scheme Variation 2003 (No. 1) and Commercial Television Conversion Scheme Variation 2007 (No. 1).]

Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918

Sections 121(1), 141(5) (144 of 1983) (24 of 1990) (94 of 1998) (34 of 2001) (78 of 2004) (109 of 2010)(110 of 2012)(111 of 2012)

Sections 93A, 94A(1), 95(1), 96(1), 98A, 102, 104(1) or (2), 105, 116, 118, 185, 185C	The following decisions made by the Electoral Commissioner personally or by a delegate of the Electoral Commissioner who is the Deputy Electoral Commissioner or an Australian Electoral Officer: 
-	to refuse to include in a Roll a person’s name under s 93A;
-	to refuse an application made under s 94A(1) for enrolment from outside Australia under s 94A;
-	to refuse an application under made s 95(1) to place the name of a spouse, de facto partner or child of an eligible overseas elector on a Roll and be treated as an eligible overseas elector under s 95;
-	to refuse an application made under s 96(1) for enrolment as an itinerant elector under s 96;
-	to refuse to include in a Roll, or transfer to a Roll, a person’s name under s 98A;
-	to reject a claim for enrolment, for transfer of enrolment or for age 16 enrolment under s 102;
-	to refuse a request made under s 104(1) that a person’s address not be entered on a Roll under s 104;
-	to refuse a request made under s 104(2) that a person’s address be deleted from a Roll under s 104;
-	to determine that a person’s address should be entered on a Roll under s 104(8);
-	to alter a Roll (including adding or removing a person’s name from the Roll) under s 105;
-	to dismiss an objection or not to determine an objection because of s 118(1A), under s 116 or 118;
-	to remove an elector’s name from a Roll pursuant to an objection under s 118;
-	to refuse an application made under s 184A(1) to register a person as a general postal voter under s 185;
-	to cancel a person’s registration as a postal voter under s 185C.
	
Section 120(5)	The following decisions made by a delegate of the Electoral Commissioner, other than the Deputy Electoral Commissioner or an Australian Electoral Officer, that have been confirmed, varied or set aside and substituted by the Electoral Commissioner on internal review: 
-	to refuse to include in a Roll a person’s name under s 93A;
-	to refuse an application under made s 95(1) to place the name of a spouse, de facto partner or child of an eligible overseas elector on a Roll and be treated as an eligible overseas elector under s 95;
-	to refuse to include in a Roll, or transfer to a Roll, a person’s name under s 98A;
-	to reject a claim for enrolment, for transfer of enrolment or for age 16 enrolment under s 102;
-	to take action to update or transfer a person’s enrolment under s 103A(3) or (4);
-	to take action to enrol a person under s 103B(3) or (4);
-	to refuse a request made under s 104(1) that a person’s address not be entered on a Roll under s 104(4); to refuse a request made under s 104(2) that a person’s address be deleted from a Roll under s 104(4);
-	 to determine that a person’s address should be entered on a Roll under s 104(8);
-	 to alter a Roll (including adding or removing a person’s name from the Roll) under s 105;
-	 to dismiss an objection or not to determine an objection because of s 118(1A), under s 116 or 118;
-	 to remove an elector’s name from a Roll pursuant to an objection under s 118;
-	 to refuse an application made under s 184A(1) to register a person as a general postal voter under s 185;
-	 to cancel a person’s registration as a postal voter under s 185C.
	
Sections 126(3), 134(3), 134A(1), 137(6), 141(2)	The following decisions of the Australian Electoral Commission: 
-	to register a political party, or to refuse an application for registration of a political party, under Part XI;
-	 to grant, or to refuse to grant, an application to change the register under s 134(1);
-	 to uphold, or refuse to uphold, an objection to the continued use of a name under s 134A(1);
-	 to deregister a political party under s 137(6);
-	 to refuse to extend the time for making an application for review of a decision of a delegate of the Electoral Commission under s 141(2).	
Section 141(4)	The following decisions of a delegate of the Australian Electoral Commission that have been affirmed, varied or set aside by the Australian Electoral Commission on reconsideration: 
-	to register a political party, or to refuse an application for registration of a political party, under Part XI; 
-	to grant, or to refuse to grant, an application to change the register under s 134(1); 
-	to uphold, or refuse to uphold, an objection to the continued use of a name under s 134A(1); to deregister a political party under s 137(6).	

[Notes:
-	The list of decisions that are subject to internal review are set out in s 120(2) of the Act.  The following Acts introduced or amended these provisions: 109 of 2010, 110 of 2012 and 111 of 2012.]

Compensation (Japanese Internment) Act 2001

Section 7(2) (41 of 2001) 

Section 7(1)	Any decisions of the Repatriation Commission in relation to a claim for a compensation payment under this Act.	

Competition and Consumer Act 2010

Section 10.84, 95ZC(6) (34 of 1989) (134 of 2003)

Part X	Decisions of the Registrar under Part X other than decisions to provisionally or finally register a conference agreement or as to the form of a register.
	
95ZC(5)	Decisions of the Commission to refuse to exclude confidential information from a document to be placed on the register in relation to a locality notice under 95ZC(5).	

[Notes:
1.	This Act was formerly the Trade Practices Act 1974 and was renamed by Act 103 of 2010. This change took effect on 1 January 2011.]

Continence Aids Payment Scheme 2010

Sections 14(5) and 15(5) of the National Health Act 1953 (68 of 2010)

Sections 14(4) and 15(4) of the National Health Act 1953	The following decisions of the Chief Executive Medicare that have been reviewed by the Chief Executive Medicare under section 14: 
-	to decide that a person is not eligible to participate in the Scheme under s 5(2); 
-	to decide that a person is not eligible to participate in this Scheme and the date the person ceased to be eligible under s 7.	

[Notes:
1.	Sections 14 and 15 of the National Health Act 1953 provide for the reconsideration of decisions by the Chief Executive Medicare under the scheme and the review of such decisions by the Tribunal.]

Copyright Act 1968

Section 195B(5) (32 of 1989)

Sections 10A(1), 10A(2), 135P(1A)(b), 135Q(2)(a), 135ZZB(1A)(b), 135ZZC(2)(a), 135ZZT(1A)(b), 135ZZU(2)(a), 135ZZZO(2)(b), 135ZZZP(2)(a)
	The following decisions of the Attorney-General: 
-	to refuse to declare an institution to be an institution assisting persons with a print disability or an institution assisting persons with an intellectual disability under s 10A(1); 
-	to revoke a declaration that an institution is an institution assisting persons with a print disability or an institution assisting person with an intellectual disability under s 10A(2); to refuse to declare that a body is a collecting society under s 135P(1A)(b), 13ZZB(1A)(a), 135ZZT(1A)(b) or 135ZZZO(2)(b); 
-	to revoke a declaration that a body is a collecting society under s 135Q(2)(a), 135ZZC(2)(a), 135ZZU(2)(a) or 135ZZZP(2)(a).
	
Sections 135(6A), 135AA(1), 135AA(2), 135AD(1), 135AJ(1)
	The following decisions of the Chief Executive Officer of Customs: 
-	to declare a notice given under s 135(2) to be ineffective;
-	to refuse under s 135AA(1) or (2) to seize copies of copyright material under s 135(7);
-	to refuse to give permission to an objector or importer to inspect seized copies under s 135AD(1);
-	to refuse under s 135AJ(1) to seize copies of copyright material under s 135(7).	

[Notes:
1.	The list of reviewable decisions under this Act is set out s 195B(1).  The following Acts have introduced or amended the list of reviewable decisions: 32 of 1989, 107 of 1993, 149 of 1994, 104 of 1998, 158 of 2006 and 94 of 2010.]

Copyright Regulations 1969

Regulation 23W(6) (SLI 328 of 2006)

Regulation 23W(3)	The following decision of the person specified in the infringement notice as the nominated person: 
-	to refuse to withdraw an infringement notice under reg 23W(3).	

[Notes:  
1.	If the nominated person has not withdrawn, or refused to withdraw, an infringement notice within 14 days after the application for withdrawal is received, the nominated person is taken to have refused to withdraw the notice: reg 23W(5).]

Corporations Act 2001

Section 1317B (109 of 1989) (110 of 1991) (210 of 1992) (104 of 1994) (61 of 1998) (50 of 2001) (26 of 2010) (118 of 2012) (178 of 2012)

Various sections	Any decision of the Treasurer, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission or the Companies Auditors and Liquidators Disciplinary Board made under the Act other than a decision specified in s 1317C.	

[Notes:  

1.	Section 1317C sets out those decisions under the Corporations Act 2001 to which s 1317B does not apply: 
•	where appeal or review is expressly otherwise provided for in the Act; 
•	where a decision is declared by the Act to be conclusive or final or is embodied in a document declared by the Act to be conclusive evidence of an act, matter or thing;
•	a decision of ASIC to order winding up of a company under s 489EA;
•	a decision of ASIC not to consent to a referral of a financial report to the Financial Reporting Panel under Subdivision C of Division 9 of Part 2M.3;
•	a decision by ASIC in the performance of a function, or in the exercise of a power, under ss 601CC or 601CL or Chapter 5A;
•	a decision by ASIC in the refusal to exercise a power under ss 601CC or 601CL or Chapter 5A;
•	a decision to apply under ss 596A or 596B for the Court to summon a person for examination about a corporation's examinable affairs; 
•	a decision to apply under s 597A for the Court to require a person to file an affidavit about a corporation's examinable affairs; 
•	a decision of ASIC under s 655A; 
•	a decision of ASIC under s 673 in relation to securities of the target of a takeover bid during the bid period; 
•	a decision by ASIC whether to make an application under ss 657C, 657G, 659B, 1325A, 1325B, or 1325C;
•	a decision by ASIC to make market integrity rules under section 798G;
•	a decision by the Minister to consent to the making of a market integrity rule, or to direct ASIC to revoke or amend a market rule;
•	a decision by ASIC to do or not to do anything under regulations made for the purposes of section 798K (alternatives to civil proceedings)
•	a decision of the Minister under Division 1 of Part 7.4 to limit control of certain licensees;
•	a decision of the Minister to make a determination under s 901B, or to amend or revoke such a determination;
•	a decision of the Minister to consent, under s 901K or 903H, to the making of a derivative transaction rule or a derivative trade repository rule, or to consent to the variation or revocation of such a rule;
•	a decision of the Minister to direct ASIC, under s 901L or 903J to amend or revoke a derivative transaction rule or a derivative trade repository rule;
•	a decision by ASIC to make derivative transaction rules or derivative trade repository rules under s 901A or 903A, or to vary or revoke such rules;
•	a decision by ASIC to do or not to do anything under regulations made for the purpose of s 901F or 903E;
•	a decision to make a determination under subs 1317D(3);
•	a decision of ASIC under section 1101A in relation to approved codes of conduct;
•	a decision of ASIC to issue an infringement notice under section 1317DAC for alleged contravention of the obligation of continuous disclosure;
•	a decision of ASIC to withdrew, or not to withdraw, an infringement notice under section 1317DAI.]

Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Act 2006

Section 623-1 (124 of 2006)

Sections 620-1(3) or 620-5(5)	The following decisions of the Registrar of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Corporations that have been affirmed, varied, or set aside on reconsideration: 
-	to treat an application for registration as being withdrawn under s 21-10(3), 22-10(3) or 23-10(3); 
-	to refuse to grant an application for registration as an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation under s 26-1(1);
-	 to alter the registration of an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation that is registered as a small corporation under s 37-5(1);
-	 to alter the registration of an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation that is registered as a medium corporation under s 37-5(2);
-	 to alter the registration of an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation that is registered as a large corporation under s 37-5(3);
-	 to make, or refuse to make, a direction about persons who would otherwise be disqualified from administering a compromise or arrangement under s 411(7)(f) of the Corporations Act 2001 as applied by s 45-1;
-	 to refuse to register a constitutional change lodged under s 69-20 by the corporation under s 69-30(1);
-	 to register, or refuse to register, a constitutional change lodged under s 69-25 by a special administrator under s 69-30(1);
-	 to change an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation’s constitution where internal governance rules requirements are not being met under s 69-35(2);
-	 to change an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation’s constitution where there has been oppressive conduct under s 69-35(3);
-	 to refuse to grant an exemption from the requirement to have at least 5 members under s 77-10;
-	 to allow an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation to have a different minimum number of members to the number requested under s 77-15;
-	 to refuse a name being available to an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation under s 85-5(2);
-	 to consent to a name being available to an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation under s 85-5(2);
-	 to impose conditions on an agreement to a name being available to an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation under s 85-5(3);
-	 to direct an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation to change its name under s 88-5(1);
-	 to direct an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation to change its document access address under s 115-15(1);
-	 to refuse to make a determination exempting an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation, or its directors, from an exemptible provision of Chapter 4 under s 187-5(1);
-	 to revoke, vary or suspend a determination exempting an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation, or its directors, from an exemptible provision of Chapter 4 under s 187-5(5);
-	 to grant an application by directors seeking to deny a request by members to call a general meeting under s 201-10(4);
-	 to refuse an application by directors seeking to deny a request by members to call a general meeting under s 201-10(4), to extend, or refuse to extend, the period in which an AGM may be held under s 201-155(2);
-	 to refuse to make a determination exempting an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation, or its directors, from provisions of Chapter 5 under s 225-5(1);
-	 to revoke;
-	 to revoke, vary or suspend a determination exempting an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation, or its directors, from provisions of Chapter 5 under s 225-5(4);
-	 to disqualify a person from managing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation under s 279-30(1);
-	 to refuse to give a person permission to manage an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation under s 279-30(7);
-	 to impose conditions or exceptions on the grant of permission to allow a person to manage an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation under s 279-30(7);
-	 to make a declaration in relation to voting on a proposed resolution by or on behalf of a related party under s 290-35(4);
-	 to refuse to make a determination concerning a person’s residential address under s 304-15(2)(b);
-	 to refuse to make a determination exempting an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation, or its directors,  from an exemptible provision of Chapter 6 under s 310-5(1);
-	 to revoke, vary or suspend a determination exempting an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation, or its directors, from an exemptible provision of Chapter 6 under s 310-5(5);
-	 to determine that an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation prepare a report under s 336-1(1)(a);
-	 to determine that an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation provide particular information under s 336-1(1)(b);
-	 to determine that extra requirements be met in respect of a financial report under s 336-1(7);
-	 to refuse to exempt an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation, its directors or its auditor from record-keeping and/or reporting requirements under s 353-3(1);
-	 to revoke, vary or suspend a determination exempting an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation, its directors or auditor from record-keeping and/or reporting requirements under s 353-3(4);
-	 to certify and grant leave to relodge lost or destroyed registered documents under s 404-15(4);
-	 to refuse to certify and grant leave to relodge lost or destroyed registered documents under s 404-15(4);
-	 to refuse to receive or register a document submitted for lodgement under s 407-1;
-	 to issue a notice requiring directors of an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation to take the action specified in the notice to comply with the Act or the company’s constitution under s 439-20(1);
-	 to issue a notice requiring directors of an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation to take the action specified in the notice to cause particular circumstances to cease to exist under s 439-20(3);
-	 to issue a notice requiring directors of an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation to take the action specified in the notice to prevent particular circumstances from occurring or developing under s 439-20(5);
-	 to determine that an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation be under special administration under s 487-1(1);
-	 to extend the period for which an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander corporation is under special administration under s 487-15(1);
-	 to terminate the appointment of a special administrator for a reason specified in s 505-5(b), (c) or (d) under s 505-1(4);
-	 to make, or refuse to make, a direction persons who are not to act as receivers under s 418(1)(f) of the Corporations Act 2001 as applied by s 516-1;
-	 to make, or refuse to make, a direction about persons who are not taken to be connected with an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation under s 448C(3)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 as applied by s 521-1 or s 532(6)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 as applied by s 526-35;
-	 to refuse a claim of entitlement to be paid money that is unclaimed property under s 551-15(2).	

[Notes:
1.	The list of reviewable decisions that may be reconsidered under the Act is set out in s 617-1.  The following Acts introduced or have amended the list of reviewable decisions: 124 of 2006.
2.	A person whose interests are affected by a reviewable decision may request reconsideration of that decision under s 620-5(1).  The Registrar may reconsider a reviewable decision on its own motion under s 620-1(1) even if an application has been lodged with the Tribunal: s 620-1(2)(b).
3.	Where a person has requested reconsideration of a reviewable decision under s 620-5(1), the decision is taken to have been affirmed if the person does not receive notice of a decision within 90 days after the reconsideration request was received: s 620-1(7).]

Criminal Code Act 1995

Sections 72.30 and 105.51(5) of the Criminal Code (144 of 2005) (3 of 2007)

Sections 72.18(1), 72.19(1), 72.20(1), 72.21(2)	The following decisions of the Attorney-General or the Minister for Defence: 
-	to refuse to give an authorisation relating to unmarked plastic explosives under s 72.18(1), 72.19(1), 72.20(1) or 72.21(2); 
-	to specify a condition or restriction in an authorisation under s 72.18(1), 72.19(1), 72.20(1) or  72.21(2).
	
Sections 105.8(1), 105.10(3), 105.12(1), 105.14(4)	The following decisions of an issuing authority: 
-	to make an initial preventative detention order under s 105.8(1); 
-	to extend, or further extend, under s 105.10(3) the period for which an initial preventative detention order is in force; 
-	to make a continued preventative detention order under s 105.12(1); 
-	to extend, or further extend, under s 105.14(4) the period for which a continued preventative detention order is in force.	

[Notes:
1.	An application for review of a decision to specify a condition or restriction in an authorisation under s 72.18(1), 72.19(1), 72.20(1) or 72.21(2) may only be made by a person to whom the authorisation applies: s 72.30 of the Criminal Code.
2.	An application for review of a decision relating to a preventative detention order cannot be made while a preventative detention order is in force: s 105.51(5) of the Criminal Code. 
3.	Applications for review of decisions relating to preventative detention orders must be dealt with in the Tribunal’s Security Appeals Division: s 105.51(6) of the Criminal Code.
4.	Provisions of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 may be modified by regulations made under the Criminal Code Act 1995: s 105.51(7) of the Criminal Code.]

Cultural Bequests Program Guidelines (No. 1) 1997

Clause 15 (7/1/98)

Cl. 5(2)(b)(ii)	The following decision of the Minister for the Arts: to agree, or not to agree, with the decision of a recipient of a testamentary gift to refuse to accept the gift.	

[Notes:  
1.	These Guidelines were made under the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997.]

Customs Act 1901

Section 273GA (110 of 1980) (157 of 1981) (81 of 1982) (108 of 1982) (19 of 1983) (72 of 1984) (39 of 1985) (175 of 1985) (81 of 1987) (104 of 1987) (23 of 1989) (24 of 1989) (78 of 1989) (111 of 1990) (34 of 1992) (89 of 1992) (209 of 1992) (85 of 1995) (15 of 1996) (30 of 1996) (3 of 1997) (97 of 1997) (7 of 2000) (84 of 2000) (25 of 2001) (95 of 2001) (82 of 2002) (136 of 2003) (25 of 2004) (119 of 2006) (75 of 2008) (63 of 2011) (37 of 2012) (33 of 2013) (52 of 2013)

Sections 28(2), 28(3), 58A(6)(c), 67ED, 67EK, 67EM, 67G, 67J, 67K, 69, 77G, 77J, 77LA(1), 77LA(3), 77P, 77Q, 77V, 77VC, 105(2)(a), 114B, 119, 132B, 132C, 161J(2), 164B, 165(3),  269H(1), 269HA, 269L(3), 269L(4), 269SA(1), 269SA(2), 269SD(1), 269SD(1AB), 269SD(1A), 269SD(2), 269SD(5)	The following decisions of the Chief Executive Officer of Customs: 
-	a determination for the purposes of s 28(2); a determination for the purposes of s 28(3);
-	 to refuse to authorise a journey for the purposes of s 58A(6)(c);
-	 to refuse to register a person as a special reporter under s 67ED;
-	 to refuse to renew a person’s registration as a special reporter under s 67EK;
-	 to cancel the registration of a special reporter generally or in relation to low value cargo of a particular kind under s 67EM;
-	 to refuse to register a person or a partnership as a re-mail reporter under s 67G;
-	 to impose a condition on a re-mail reporter's registration under s 67G or 67J;
-	 to vary a condition of a re-mail reporter's registration under s 67J;
-	 to cancel a re-mail reporter's registration under s 67K;
-	 to impose a condition on a permission to deliver into home consumption like customable goods or excise equivalent goods under s 69;
-	 to cancel the allocation to a registered COMPILE user of a PIN number or numbers under s 77A;
-	 to refuse to grant a depot licence under s 77G;
-	 to refuse to extend the period within which further information concerning a depot licence application is to be supplied under s 77J;
-	 not to vary a deport license under s 77LA(1);
-	 not to allow a further period under 77LA(3);
-	 to refuse to grant an extension of time under s 77P;
-	 to vary the conditions of a depot licence under s 77Q;
-	 to revoke a depot licence under s 77V;
-	 to cancel a depot licence under s 77VC;
-	 to approve, or refuse to give approval under para 105(2)(a) relating to the capacity of containers;
-	 to refuse to grant, cancel, or modify  a person’s confirming exporter status under s 114B;
-	 to refuse to grant a Certificate of Clearance under s 119;
-	 to make a quota order under s 132B;
-	 to revoke or vary a quota order under s 132C;
-	 to specify a rate of exchange under s 161J(2);
-	 a decision under s 164B in relation to the refund of export duty;
-	 to make a demand under s 165(3) for payment of an amount of drawback, refund or rebate of duty that was overpaid;
-	 to reject an application for a tariff concession order (TCO) under s 269H(1);
-	 to reject a TCO application under s 269HA;
-	 a decision under s 269L(4) to the effect that the CEO is not satisfied that a proposed amendment of a description of goods to be covered by a TCO does not contravene s 269L(3);
-	 a decision under ss 269SA(1) or 269SA(2);
-	 to make an order revoking a TCO under s 269SD(1AB), 269SD(1) or 269SD(1A);
-	 to make an order under s 269SD(2) or 269SD(2A) revoking a TCO and making a new TCO in respect of the good with effect from the revocation;
-	 to make an order revoking a TCO under 269SD(5).
	
Section 269SH
	The following decisions of the CEO of Customs that have been reconsidered: 
-	to decide under s 269P(1) whether or not the CEO is satisfied that an application for a TCO meets the core criteria;
-	 to decide under s 269Q(1) whether or not the CEO is satisfied that there is no one in Australia capable of repairing certain goods in the ordinary course of business in respect of goods sent out of Australia for repair;
-	 to decide under s 269C(1) whether or not the CEO is satisfied that a person requesting the revocation of a TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the order and that the CEO would not have made the TCO if the application had been lodged on the day of lodgement of the revocation request;
-	 to decide under s 269SC(4) to revoke a TCO and make a narrower TCO in its place.
	
Sections 35A, 126, 163, 167, 168	The following decisions of a Collector: 
-	to make a demand under s 35A;
-	 to refuse to allow the export of goods under s 126;
-	 a decision in relation to the an application for a refund, rebate or remission of duty under s 163;
-	 to demand the payment of duty which is paid under protest under s 167;
-	 a decision under s 168 in relation to an application for a drawback of duty.
	
Sections 69, 70, 71, 71AAAC, 71AAAM, 71AAAN,  71C, 71DE, 71DJ, 71E, 114C
	The following decisions of an officer of Customs: 
-	to refuse to grant, or to revoke, a permission under s 69;
-	to refuse to grant, or to revoke, a permission under s 70;
-	to refuse to authorise the delivery of goods into home consumption under s 71;
-	to suspend an authority to deliver goods into home consumption under s 71;
-	to suspend an authority to deliver goods into home consumption under ss 71AAAC or 71AAAM, to cancel an authority to deliver goods into home consumption under s 71AAAN;
-	to cancel or suspend an authority to deal with goods under ss 71C, 71DE or 71DJ;
-	to refuse an application of a permission to move goods under s 71E;
-	to specify under s 77D(4) conditions to which a permission under s 77D is subject;
-	to specify under s 77E(4) conditions to which a permission under s 77E is subject;
-	to cancel or suspend an authority to deal with goods under s 114C.
	
Part V	Decisions of the CEO or a Collector for the purposes of Part V which deals with warehouses.
	
Part XI	Decisions of the Minister for Home Affairs, the CEO or a Collector for the purposes of Part XI which deals with agents and customs brokers.	

[Notes:

1.	The Tribunal’s jurisdiction under this Act was amended as indicated above by the Customs Amendment (Miscellaneous Measures) Act 2013. The changes commenced 31 March 2013. Further amendments were made by the Customs and Auscheck Legislation Amendment (Organised Crime and Other Measures) Act 2013. These changes commenced 28 May 2013.
2.	An application for review of a decision relating to a demand paid under protest under s. 167 of the Act must be made within 6 months after the date of the payment or, in case the sum is paid as the duty payable under a Customs Tariff or Customs Tariff alteration proposed in Parliament, within 6 months after the date of assent to the Act by which the Customs Tariff or Customs Tariff alternation proposed in Parliament is made law: s 273GA(5) of the Act.
3.	Subsection 119(3) does not apply where a Certificate of Clearance is granted to the ship or aircraft referred to in that subsection as a result of a review by the Tribunal: s 273GA(3).
4.	A person may not make an application to the Tribunal in respect of a decision made under s 269SH on a reconsideration of a decision of the CEO under s 269P(1), 269Q(1) or 269SC(1) or (4) unless the person is an affected person within the meaning of s 269SH and is adversely affected by the decision on the reconsideration: s 273GA(6A).
5.	If a person applies for reconsideration of a decision on a TCO application under s 269P(1) or 269Q(1) and the CEO of Customs fails to make a decision within 90 days after receiving the application for reconsideration, the CEO is taken to have affirmed the original decision: s 269SH(6).  If a person applies for reconsideration of a decision under s 269C(1) or 269C(4) in relation to an application to revoke a TCO and the CEO of Customs fails to make a decision within 60 days after receiving the application for reconsideration, the CEO is taken to have affirmed the original decision: s 269SH(6).]

Customs (International Obligations) Regulation 2015 

Regulation 21(2) (SLI 32 of 2015)

Regulation 21(1)	The following decisions of a Collector:
-	to refuse to give consent under reg 21(1).	

[Notes:
1.	This Regulation commenced on 1 April 2015: SLI 32 of 2015.]

Customs (Prohibited Exports) Regulations 1958

Regulations 3(8), 8(8), 8A(6), 9AB(11), 10F (SR 288 of 1991) (SR 381 of 1997) (SR 139 of 2002) (SR 141 of 2004) (SLI 187 of 2009)

Regulations 3(4), 3(6), 3(7)
	The following decisions of the Attorney-General or a person authorised by the Attorney-General:  
-	to refuse to give a permission to export a good to which reg 3 applies under reg 3(4); 
-	to give a permission subject to conditions under reg 3(6); 
-	to revoke a permission under reg 3(7).
	
Regulations 9AB(11)(a), 9AB(11)(b), 9AB(11)(c) 	The following decisions of the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection or of an authorised person:  
-	not to grant a permission to export cat fur, dog fur or a fur product under reg 9AB(3); 
-	to grant a permission to export cat fur, dog fur or a fur product subject to a condition or requirement under reg.9AB(8); 
-	to revoke a permission to export cat fur, dog fur or a fur product under reg 9AB(9).
	
Regulations 8(3), 8(7), 10(1)(a)(ii), 10AB(4)(b), 10A(2), 10A(2A), 10A(4), 10A(4B)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Health or an authorised person: 
-	to refuse to grant permission for the exportation of goods specified in Schedule 6 under reg 8(3);
-	 to grant permission for the exportation of goods specified in Schedule 6 specifying a condition or requirement under reg 8(3);
-	 to revoke a permission for the exportation of goods specified in Schedule 6 under reg 8(7);
-	 to refuse to grant a permission for a licensed exporter to export a drug specified in Schedule 8 under reg 10(1)(a)(ii);
-	 not to allow the export of a precursor substance under reg 10AB(4)(b);
-	 to refuse to grant a licence to act as an exporter under reg 10A(2) or 10A(2A);
-	 to revoke a licence to act as an exporter under reg 10A(4) or 10A(4B).
	
Regulations 8A(2), 8A(3), 8A(4)	The following decisions of the Minister for Health and or an authorised person: 
-	to refuse to grant permission to export viable material derived from human embryo clones under reg 8A(2); 
-	to grant a permission specifying a condition or requirement under reg 8A(3); 
-	to revoke a permission under reg 8A(4).	

[Notes:
1.	Pursuant to reg 3(9) the Attorney-General may certify that a decision to give or refuse to give permission should be made solely by the Attorney-General and should not be reviewable by the Tribunal.  While such a certificate is in force, reg 3(8) does not apply to the permission or the refusal.]

Customs (Prohibited Imports) Regulations 1956

Regulations 4A(4), 4W(11), 5HA(8), 5L(6) (SR 39 of 1990) (SR 23 of 1991) (SR 402 of 1995) (SR 165 of 1999) (SR 142 of 2004) (SLI 188 of 2009)
Section 14ZZ of the Taxation Administration Act 1953

Regulation 4A(2)	The following decisions of the Attorney-General: 
-	to refuse to give a permission to import a good to which reg 4A applies under reg 4A(2); 
-	to grant a permission subject to conditions under reg 4A(2).
	
Section 14ZY(1) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953
	The following decisions of the Commissioner of Taxation in relation to which an objection has been allowed, wholly or in part, or disallowed by the Commissioner under Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 
-	not to grant permission to import unmanufactured tobacco leaf under reg 4D(4); 
-	to specify a condition for a permission under reg 4D(5); to revoke a permission under reg 4D(6).
	
Regulations 4W(11)(a), 4W(11)(b), 4W(11)(c)	The following decisions of the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection or of an authorised person: 
-	not to grant a permission to import cat fur, dog fur or a cat or dog fur product under reg 4W(3); 
-	to grant a permission to import cat fur, dog fur or a cat or dog fur product subject to a condition or requirement under reg 4W(8); 
-	to revoke a permission to import cat fur, dog fur or a cat or dog fur product under reg 4W(9).
	
Regulation 5HA(3)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Health or an authorised person that have been confirmed or revoked by the Minister for Health on reconsideration: 
-	to grant, or refuse to grant, a licence or permission to import a drug under reg 5(5);
-	 to specify conditions or requirements on the permission to import under reg 5(13);
-	 to vary the period during which a drug may be imported under reg 5(15);
-	 to revoke a licence under reg 5(17);
-	 to revoke a permission under reg 5(18);
-	 to grant, or refuse to grant, a permission to import antibiotic substances under reg 5A(1);
-	 to impose conditions on a permission under reg 5A(4);
-	 to revoke a permission under reg 5A(6);
-	 to grant, or refuse to grant, permission to import goods specified in Sch 8 to the Regulations under reg 5H(2);
-	 to revoke a permission under reg 5H(4).
	
Regulation 5L(2), 5L(3), 5L(4)	The following decisions of the Minister for Mental Health or an authorised person: 
-	to refuse to grant permission to import viable material derived from human embryo clones under reg 5L(2);
-	to grant a permission specifying a condition or requirement under reg 5L(3);
-	to revoke a permission under reg 5L(4).	

[Notes:
1.	Pursuant to reg 4A(5) the Attorney-General may certify that a decision to give or refuse to give a permission should be made solely by the Attorney-General and should not be reviewable by the Tribunal.  While such a certificate is in force, reg 4A(4) does not apply to the permission or the refusal.
2.	Subregulation 4D(9) of the Customs (Prohibited Imports) Regulations 1956 provides that a person may object against the decisions under regulation 4D specified in the right-hand column in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953. The following Regulations introduced reg 4D(9): SLI 261 of 2004.
3.	A person dissatisfied with a decision under reg 4D may object against it in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.  The Commissioner will then make an objection decision from which a person can apply for review to the Tribunal.
4.	An application for review of an objection decision must be lodged with the Tribunal within 60 days after the person making the application is served with notice of the decision: s 14ZZC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
5.	If the Commissioner fails to make a decision on a taxation objection within 60 days after being given a written notice requiring the making of the objection decision, the Commissioner is deemed to have made a decision under s 14ZY(1) to disallow the objection: s 14ZYA(3) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.]

Customs Tariff Act 1995

Section 273H of the Customs Act 1901 (115 of 1982) (76 of 1987) (8 of 1994) (85 of 1995) (15 of 1996)

Section 9
	The following decision of the Chief Executive Officer of Customs: 
-	to determine under s 9 the proportion of the value of goods that is the value of a part, component or ingredient of any goods for the purposes of the Act.	

D

Dairy Adjustment Levy Collection Regulations 2000

Regulation 19(5) (SR 98 of 2000)

Regulations 11(5), 17(3)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources: 
-	to refuse to enter into an agreement under reg 11(5); 
-	to refuse to make a refund of levy under reg 17(3).
	
Regulations 11(5), 17(3)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources which have been revoked, confirmed or substituted by the Secretary on reconsideration: 
-	to refuse to enter into an agreement under reg 11(5); 
-	to refuse to make a refund of levy under reg 17(3).	

Dairy Produce Act 1986

Subclause 130(5) of Schedule 2 (54 of 1986) (162 of 1987) (25 of 1991) (26 of 1991) (94 of 1993) (4 of 1999) (22 of 2000) (32 of 2003)

Subclause 130(3) of Schedule 2	The following decision of the Secretary of Agriculture and Water Resources that has been reconsidered: 
-	to refuse to extinguish a person’s liability for the whole or part of an amount of late payment penalty under subcl 107(3).	

[Notes:  
1.	Subclause 130(9) of Schedule 2 to the Act provides that a decision under subcl 107(3) is subject to reconsideration.
2.	The Secretary must reconsider the decision within 45 days after receiving a request for reconsideration under subcl 130(1) of Schedule 2.
3.	Various Schemes are made pursuant to this Act, including the Dairy Structural Adjustment Program Scheme 2000 and the Supplementary Dairy Assistance Scheme 2001.  These Schemes contain reviewable decisions — see the entry for these Schemes in this list.]

Dairy Produce Regulations 1986

Regulation 2.41 (SR 276 of 2003) (SLI 252 of 2009)

Regulations 2.10(5), 2.15, 2.25(5), 2.24, 2.30(1), 2.37(1), 2.40	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources: 
-	to impose condition on an allocation of quota under regs 2.15(b) or 2.24(b); 
-	to impose a condition on an approval to export a consignment under reg 2.30(1)(c) or 2.37(1)(b); 
-	not to allocate quota because of reg 2.10(5) or 2.21(5); 
-	to vary or revoke an allocation or approval under reg 2.40.	

[Notes: 
1.	The following regulations have introduced or amended the list of reviewable decisions: SLI 276 of 2003; SLI 252 of 2009.] 

Defence Act 1903

Section 61CZB, 72TM (91 of 1992) (95 of 1993) (95 of 2014)

Section 61CC(1)	The following decision of a Conscientious Objection Tribunal: 
-	to determine whether a person is exempt from service because of conscientious beliefs under s 61CC(1).	
Section 72TF	The following decision of the Minister: 
-	to give, or not to give written permission for a person to be at a place in the Woomera Prohibited Area under s 72TF.	

Defence (Areas Control) Regulations 1989

Regulation 20(1) (SR 337 of 1989)

Regulations 10(1), 10(2), 10(3), 13(1), 17(4), 17(7), 17(9), 18(2)	The following decisions of the Minister for Defence: 
-	to refuse to grant approval to construct a building under reg 10(1);
-	 to impose a condition subject to which a building may be constructed under reg 10(2);
-	 to impose or vary a condition with respect to the marking of a building under reg 10(3);
-	 a direction to remove a building or object or with respect to the marking of a building or object under reg 13(1);
-	 to refuse to approve the extension of the period for furnishing an application for compensation under reg 17(4);
-	 to impose a condition subject to which a building may be constructed under reg 17(7);
-	 to determine under regs 17(9) or 18(2) that no compensation is payable to a person or as to the amount of compensation payable to that person.	

Defence Determination 2005/15

Clause 11.2.25 (Determination 2005/15)

Clause 11.2.24(2)
	The following decision of the Secretary of the Department of Defence that has been confirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	to authorise, or not to authorise, under cl 11.2.22(1) payment of an amount of severe injury adjustment (SIA) or additional death benefit (ADB) payable in relation to a member.	

[Notes
1.	This determination was made under s 58B of the Defence Act 1903.]

Defence Force (Home Loans Assistance) Act 1990

Section 34(3) (14 of 1991)

Section 33(6)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Defence that have been affirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	to refuse to make a determination under s 4(1A);
-	 to refuse to issue an entitlement certificate under s 11(1);
-	 to cancel an entitlement certificate under s 13(1);
-	 to refuse to grant approval in relation to a loan increase under ss 15 or 18;
-	 to determine that subsidy is not payable under s 20(2);
-	 to give a notice under s 27 that subsidy will not be paid on a loan on or after the date of the notice;
-	to refuse an application to reduce an amount owed to the Commonwealth under s 31;
-	to refuse under s 32 to write off or waive an amount owed to the Commonwealth or to allow a person to pay the due amount by instalments;
-	to revoke an approval;
-	 to refuse to extend the period for making an application for reconsideration of a decision under s 33(3).	

[Notes:
1.	The list of ‘reviewable decisions’ that may be reconsidered under the Act is set out in s 3.  The following Acts introduced or have amended the list of reviewable decisions: 14 of 1991 and 135 of  2003.]

Defence Force Regulations 1952

Regulations 57A(10), 71(2) (SR 131 of 1985) (SR 113 of 1987)

Regulation 57A(3) 
	The following decision of the Secretary of the Department of Defence: 
-	to refuse to extend time for lodging an application for review of a decision made under reg 57 relating to compensation.
	
Regulation 57A(6)	The following decisions that have been affirmed, varied or set aside by a reviewing authority: 
-	to refuse to pay compensation under reg 57; 
-	a decision with respect to the amount of compensation paid or offered to be paid under reg 57.
	
Regulation 70(1)	The following decision of the Minister for Defence: 
-	to order that salary and allowances of a member who died while absent without leave and had no reasonable excuse for absence be forfeited under reg 70(1).	

Defence Force Retirement and Death Benefits Act 1973

Section 107 (33 of 1976)(58 of 2011)

Sections 99(4A)(a), 99(4A)(b)	Any decision of the Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation or a delegate of the Corporation that has been confirmed or varied by the Corporation on reconsideration.	
Section 102(1)(a)	Any decision of the Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation or a delegate of the Corporation that has been confirmed or varied by the Defence Force Case Assessment Panel on reconsideration.	
Sections 106(1)(c), 106(1)(d)	Any decision of the Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation or a delegate of the Corporation that has been confirmed or varied by the Corporation on reconsideration, following a recommendation of the Defence Force Case Assessment Panel	

[Notes:. 
1.	A decision of the Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation is defined as a decision of the Corporation or a delegate of the Corporation under this Act, the Defence Force Retirements Benefits Act 1948 or any other Act that relates to retirement benefits for members of the Defence Force and modifies or affects the provisions of the Defence Force Retirements Benefits Act 1948: s 3.
2.	Section 99(4) of the Act provides that after receiving a reconsideration request the CSC may: itself reconsider the decision; refer the decision to the Defence Force Case Assessment Panel for reconsideration or; refer the decision to the Panel for it to make for a recommendation to the CSC in relation to the decision. 
3.	Item 15(2) of Schedule 2 to the Superannuation Legislation (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Act 2011 provides that despite the amendment to s 99 of the Defence Force Retirement and Death Benefits Act 1973 an application may be made to the Tribunal for review of a decision made by the Authority, or a delegate of the Authority before 1 July 2011, provided the period for making an application for review has not ended.]

Defence Force (Superannuation) (Productivity Benefit) Determination 1988

Clause 12 (Determination 1 of 1993; Gazette GN5, 1993)

Clause 11(3)	The following decision of the Commissioner for Superannuation that has been reconsidered under cl 11(3): 
-	to determine under cl 6(3) whether a person is unlikely to work again in gainful employment for which the person is reasonably qualified by education, training or experience.	

[Notes: 
1.	This Determination was made under s 52 of the Defence Act 1903.
2.	The decision subject to reconsideration is identified in cl 11(1) of the Determination. The following Determinations introduced or have amended this provision: 1 of 1993 and 1 of 2009 (F2009L01472).]

Defence Home Ownership Assistance Scheme Act 2008

Section 76 (27 of 2008)

Section 75(2)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Defence that have been reconsidered by the Minister for Defence or the Secretary: 
-	to refuse to consider an application for a subsidy certificate under s 15(2);
-	to refuse to give a subsidy certificate under s 16(3);
-	to vary a subsidy certificate under s 24(1);
-	to cancel a subsidy certificate under s 25;
-	to refuse to authorise the payment of subsidy under s 27(2);
-	to refuse to authorise the continued payment of monthly subsidy under s 27(4);
-	to state in a notice under s 43 a day for subsidy to stop being payable to a person that is later than the day requested by the person under s 43(3);
-	to revoke an authorisation of the payment of subsidy under s 44(2);
-	to vary an authorisation of the payment of subsidy (when this Act applies as if a subsidised borrower has not been a member of the Reserves) under s 45(2);
-	to determine the end of a period of warlike service under s 48(3);
-	to recover a due amount in the way provided by s 68 under s 68(1);
-	to refuse to extend the time for making an application for review of a decision under s 74(3).	

[Notes:
1.	The list of reviewable decisions under the Act is set out in s 71.  The following Acts introduced or have amended this list: 27 of 2008.  
2.	A declared loan provider is not entitled to apply to the Tribunal for review of a decision under the Act: s 76(2).
3.	This Act also sets out the review mechanism for decisions made under the Defence Home Ownership Assistance Scheme Regulations 2008 that have been declared by those regulations to be reviewable decisions: see item 13 of the list of reviewable decisions set out in s 71.  See the separate entry for the Regulations for further information.]

Defence Home Ownership Assistance Scheme Regulations 2008

Section 76 of the Defence Home Ownership Assistance Scheme Act 2008

Section 75(2) of the Act	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Defence that have been reconsidered by the Minister for Defence or by the Secretary: 
-	to determine a person’s effective service under Part 2 of the Regulations;
-	to decide under reg 20(1) to treat, or not to treat, a member’s service as effective service;
-	to be satisfied, or not satisfied, under reg 25(3)(b) that an old scheme member’s compensable disability, under s 3 of Defence Force (Home Loans Assistance) Act 1990, caused or contributed to the old scheme member’s failure to apply for an entitlement certificate before 30 June 2010.	

[Notes:
1.	Regulation 29 provides that the decisions set out in the right-hand column are declared to be reviewable decisions under section 71 of the Act.  The following Regulations introduced or have amended that provision: SLI 139 of 2008.]

Defence (Prohibited Words and Letters) Regulations 1957

Regulation 4(5) (SR 278 or 2002)

Regulation 4

	The following decisions of the Minister for Defence: 
-	to refuse an application for consent, or a decision relating to a condition, to use certain words or letters in the course of trade.	

Defence Reserve Service (Protection) Act 2001

Section 71 (11 of 2001)

Section 66
	Decisions of the “prescribed authority” (i.e. the Office of Reserve Service Protection) to refuse to make a loan or give a guarantee under s 66.	

[Notes: 
1.	The “prescribed authority” is defined as the Office of Reserve Service Protection under the Defence Reserve Service (Protection) Regulations 2001.]

Defence Service Homes Act 1918

Section 44(3) (124 of 1988) (2 of 1991) (70 of 1992) (128 of 1995) 

Section 43(6)
	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Veterans’ Affairs that have been affirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	a decision for the purposes of s 4(2)(d);
-	 to refuse to issue a notice of eligibility under s. 16;
-	 to refuse to issue a certificate of entitlement under ss 17, 17A, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 or 23;
-	 to refuse to issue a certificate of assignment under s 23A;
-	 to determine the maximum amount for which subsidy is payable under s 25;
-	 to cancel a subsidy under s 26;
-	 to give the Bank a notice of intended cancellation of subsidy under s 27;
-	 to cancel a subsidy under s 27A;
-	 to require a person to pay an amount under s 29;
-	 to determine a maximum term under s 36;
-	 to refuse to extend the period for making an application for review under s 43;
-	 to give, or refuse to give, an approval under s 45A.	

Defence Trade Controls Act 2012

Section 65 (153 of 2012) (31 of 2015)

Sections  11(3), 11(8), 11(7), 12(1), 12(2), 14(1), 14A(4), 14A(7), 14A(8), 14B(1), 14C(1), 15A(1), 15B(1), 16(3), 16(7), 16(8), 17(1), 17(2), 20(1), 20(7), 21, 22(1), 22(2), 23, 27, 28(1)(a), 28(2), 28(3), 29, 30, 35, 64(6)	Any of the decisions set out below that has been:
1.	made by the Minister of Defence; or
2.	made by a delegate of the Minister and has been affirmed, varied or revoked on reconsideration by the Minister under s 64(6):
-	to refuse to give a person a permit for a supply covered by [an] the person’s application for a permit under s 11(3); 
-	to revoke a permit under s 11(8); 
-	to impose a permit condition under s 11(7) or 12(1);
-	to vary a permit condition under s 12(2);
-	to give a person notice under s 14(1);
-	to refuse to give a person an approval under s 14A(4);
-	to impose an approval condition under s 14A(7);
-	to revoke an approval under s 14A(8);
-	to give a person a notice under s 14B(1);
-	a decision of the Secretary to give a person notice under s 14C(1);
-	to give a person a notice under s 15A(1);
-	to give a person a notice under s 15B(1);
-	to refuse to give a person a permit for an arrangement covered by the person’s application for a permit under s 16(3);
-	to revoke a permit under s 16(8);
-	to impose a permit condition under s 16(7) or 17(1);
-	to vary a permit condition under s 17(2);
-	to refuse to register a person as a broker under s 20(1); 
-	to refuse to renew a person’s registration as a broker under s 21;
-	to impose a registration condition under s 20(7) or 22(1);
-	to vary a registration condition under s 22(2);
-	to cancel a person’s registration as a broker under s 23;
-	to refuse to approve a person as a member of the Australian Community under s 27;
-	to impose an approval condition under s 28(1)(a) or s 28(2);
-	to vary an approval condition under 28(3);
-	to suspend an approval under s 29;
-	to cancel an approval under s 30;
-	to refuse to give a person a notice under s 35.	

[Notes:
1.	This Act commenced on 6 June 2013.
2.	A list of reviewable decisions is set out in s 63 of this Act. The following Acts have introduced or amended this list: 31 of 2015. 
3.	Where a person has requested reconsideration of a reviewable decision under s 64, the decision is taken to have been affirmed by the Minister if the person does not receive notice of the decision within 90 days after the person requested the Minister review the decision: s 64(8).
4.	Amendments made by 31 of 2015 to introduce reviewable decisions under sections 14(1) to 15B(1) will commence on 2 April 2016.]

Defence Trade Controls Regulation 2013

Regulation 22 (SLI 93 of 2013)

Regulations 20(6), 21(1), 22(5)
	The following decisions made by the Minister: 
-	to refuse to approve a person as an intermediate consignee under regulation 20(6); 
-	to cancel, by writing, a person’s approval as an approved intermediate consignee under regulation 21(1); 
-	to affirm, vary, or revoke the decision to refuse to approve a person as an approved intermediate consignee or to cancel approval and make such other decision as the Minister thinks appropriate under regulation 22(5).	

Designs Act 2003 

Section 136(1)(a)-(g) (147 of 2003)

Sections 24(2), 29, 30, 43, 59, 108, 137	The following decisions of the Registrar of Designs:
-	to refuse an application that does not meet the minimum filing requirements under s 24(2); 
-	to make or refuse to make a determination under s 29; 
-	to refuse an application  under s 30 for a design application to proceed in a person’s name; 
-	to refuse to register a design  under s 43: to refuse to publish a design under s.59;
-	 to prohibit or restrict the publication of information about the subject matter of a design application under s108; 
-	to refuse an application under s137 for an extension of time	

Designs Regulations 2004

Regulation 11.31(2) (SR 117 of 2004) 

Regulation 9.05(5)(c)(ii)	The following decision of the Registrar of Designs: 
-	to amend an entry in the register under reg. 9.05(5)(c)(ii).	

Development Allowance Authority Act 1992

Section 120(1) (99 of 1992) (163 of 1994) 

Section 119(3)

	Any decision of the Development Allowance Authority under Parts 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 of Chapter 2, Part 3 of Chapter 3 and Part 4 of Chapter 4 that have been confirmed or varied on reconsideration.	

[Notes:
-	Section 119(1) of the Act provides that a person may request reconsideration of a ‘reviewable decision’.  ‘Reviewable decision’ is defined in s 93AA to mean a decision of the Authority under Part 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 8 of Chapter 2, Part 3 of Chapter 3 or Part 4 of Chapter 4.]

Disability (Access to Premises – Buildings) Standards 2010

Clause 5.4 (F2010L00668)

Clause 5.1	The following decisions of the Australian Human Rights Commission: 
-	to grant or refuse to grant under cl 5.1an exemption from compliance with some or all of Pt H2 of the Access Code for Buildings. 	

Disability Discrimination Act 1992

Section 56 (135 of 1992)

Section 55(1), 55(2)	The following decisions of the Australian Human Rights Commission: 
-	to grant, or refuse to grant, under s 55(1) an exemption from the operation of a provision of Division 1 or 2 of Part 2 of the Act; 
-	to grant, or refuse to grant a further exemption under s 55(2).	

Disability Services Act 1986

Section 26(6) (129 of 1986)

Section 26(4)
	Any decision of the Secretary of the Department of Social Services under Part III of the Act (which relates to the provision of rehabilitation services) that has been affirmed or varied on reconsideration.	

Disability Standards for Accessible Public Transport 2002

Section 33A.4 

	Decision of the Commission to grant exemptions from compliance with some or all of these Standards under s 33A.1	

E

Eastern Tuna and Billfish Fishery Management Plan 2010

Section 165(7) of the Fisheries Management Act 1991
  
Section 165(5) of the Fisheries Management Act 1991	The following decisions of the Australian Fisheries Management Authority that have been reconsidered under s 165(5) of the Fisheries Management Act 1991: 
-	to register a person as an eligible person for a grant of a fishing right under cl 4.7.	

[Notes:  
1.	This Plan was made under subsection 17(1) of the Fisheries Management Act 1991.  Refer to the entry in this list for the Act for other relevant information.
2.	Note 1 of the Plan provides that a decision under cl 4.7 is a decision under s 26 of the Fisheries Management Act 1991, which after reconsideration by AFMA, is reviewable under s 165 of that Act.]

Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000

Section 176 (164 of 2000) (101 of 2002) (143 of 2006) (10 of 2010)(11 of 2011)(9 of 2012)

Section 9AB, 9AC, 9AD, 9AE, 9AG
	The following decision of the Secretary of the Department Education:  
-	that an approved provider should not be registered under s 9AB; 
-	that an approved provider be registered for a specified period, or a decision to vary that period under s 9AC; 
-	to impose a condition on a provider’s registration under s 9AD or 9AE; 
-	that a course at a location should not be added to a provider’s registration under s 9AG.	
Section 9AF	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Education or the Minister for Education: 
-	to vary a condition under s 9AF.	
Sections 46A(4), 83, , 89(2), 89A(2), 95(3).	The following decisions of the Minister for Education: 
-	not to notify a registered provider under s 46A(4); 
-	to impose sanctions for non-compliance against a registered provider under s 83; 
-	not to give notice under s 89(2) or 89A(2) to remove a provider’s suspension on payment of the associated reinstatement fee; 
-	not to give a notice under s 95(3) as to the effect of suspension of a provider’s registration.	
Section 53A	The following decision of the TPS Director: 
-	to determine an amount of TPS levy to be paid by a provider under s 53A	

[Notes:
1.	Item 96(8) of  Schedule 2 to the Education Services for Overseas Students Legislation Amendment (Tuition Protection Service and Other Measures) Act 2012 provides that for the following decisions,  the Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000 applies as if s 176 of that Act included a reference to these decisions:
-	to refuse to amalgamate all of the provider’s registrations into one registration under Item 96(4) of Schedule 2
-	to choose which registration is to become the provider’s single registration under Item 95(5) of Schedule 2.
2.	Item 95(6) of  Schedule 2 to the Education Services for Overseas Students Legislation Amendment (Tuition Protection Service and Other Measures) Act 2012 provides that for the following decisions,  the Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000 applies as if s 176 of that Act included a reference to these decisions:
-	to determine the location or locations at which the provider is to be registered to provide the course where a recommendation has been made by a registered authority prior to the commencement of Item 95 of Schedule 2 of the amending Act and the Secretary had not yet decided whether to register the provider for that course for the State under Item 95(3).
-	To choose which registration to add a new course to under Item 95(4) of Schedule 2.]

Enhancing Online Safety for Children Act 2015

Section 88 (24 of 2015)

Sections 23(5), 25, 35, 42	The following decisions of the Children’s e-Safety Commissioner: 
-	to refuse to make a declaration of a social media service as a tier 1 social media service under s 23(5);
-	to revoke a declaration  made under s 23(4) that a social media service is a tier 1 social media service under s 25;
-	to give or refuse to give a social media service notice to the provider of a social media service under s 35;
-	to give an end-user notice under s 42.	

[Notes:
1.	This Act commenced on 1 July 2015.]

Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 

Sections 206A(1), 221A(1), 243A(1), 263A(1), 303GJ(1), 473(1) (91 of 1999) (82 of 2001) (165 of 2006)

Sections 201(1), 202(1), 202(2)(a), 202(2)(b), 205, 206, 216(1), 217(1), 217(2)(a), 217(2)(b), 220, 221, 238(1), 239(1), 239(2)(a), 239(2)(b), 242, 243, 258(1), 259(1), 259(2)(a), 259(2)(b), 262, 263, 303CC(5), 303CG(1), 303DG(1), 303EN(1), 303FN(2), 303FO(2), 303FP(2), 303FT(6), 303FT(7), 303FT(9), 303FT(10), 303GB(1), 303GC(2), 303GD(5), 303GE(2), 303GE(3)(a), 303GE(3)(b), 303GH(2), 303GI(2), 471(3)(b)	The following decisions of a delegate of the Minister for the Environment: 
-	to issue, or refuse to issue, a permit relating to listed threatened species or ecological communities under s 201(1);
-	to specify a condition of a permit relating to listed threatened species or ecological communities under s 202(1);
-	to vary or revoke a condition of a permit relating to listed threatened species and ecological communities under s 202(2)(a);
-	to impose a further condition on a permit relating to listed threatened species or ecological communities under s 202(2)(b);
-	to transfer, or refuse to transfer, a permit relating to listed threatened species or ecological communities under s 205;
-	to suspend or cancel a permit relating to listed threatened species or ecological communities under s 206;
-	to issue, or refuse to issue, a permit relating to migratory species under s 216(1);
-	to specify a condition of a permit relating to migratory species under s 217(1);
-	to vary or revoke a condition of a permit relating to migratory species under s 217(2)(a);
-	to impose a further condition on a permit relating to migratory species under s 217(2)(b);
-	to transfer, or refuse to transfer, a permit relating to migratory species under s 220;
-	to suspend or cancel a permit relating to migratory species under s 221;
-	to issue, or refuse to issue, a permit relating to whales or other cetaceans under s 238(1);
-	to specify a condition of a permit relating to whales or other cetaceans under s 239(1);
-	to vary or revoke a condition of a permit relating to whales or other cetaceans under s 239(2)(a);
-	to impose a further condition on a permit relating to whales or other cetaceans under s 239(2)(b);
-	to transfer, or refuse to transfer, a permit relating to whales or other cetaceans under s 242;
-	to suspend or cancel a permit relating to whales or other cetaceans under s 243;
-	to issue, or refuse to issue, a permit relating to listed marine species under s 258(1);
-	to specify a condition of a permit relating to listed marine species under s 259(1);
-	to vary or revoke a condition of a permit relating to listed marine species under s 259(2)(a);
-	to impose a further condition on a permit relating to listed marine species under s 259(2)(b);
-	to transfer, or refuse to transfer, a permit relating to listed marine species under s 262;
-	to suspend or cancel a permit relating to listed marine species under s 263;
-	to issue, or refuse to issue, a certificate under s 303CC(5) that a specimen was acquired before the provisions of CITES applies to the specimen;
-	to issue, or refuse to issue, a permit relating to the international movement of wildlife specimens under s 303CG(1), 303DG(1), 303EN(1), 303GB(1), 303GC(2) or 303GD(5);
-	to make, or refuse to make, a declaration under s 303FN(2), 303FO(2) or 303FP(3);
-	to vary under s 303FT(7) a declaration made under 303FN(2), 303FO(2) or 303FP(3);
-	to revoke under s 303FT(6), (9) or (10) a declaration made under s 303FN(2), 303FO(2) or 303FP(3);
-	to specify a condition of a permit relating to the international movement of wildlife specimens under s 303GE(2);
-	to vary or revoke a condition of a permit relating to the international movement of wildlife specimens under s 303GE(3)(a);
-	to impose a further condition on a permit relating to the international movement of wildlife specimens under s 303GE(3)(b);
-	to transfer, or refuse to transfer, a permit relating to the international movement of wildlife specimens under s 303GH(2);
-	to suspend or cancel a permit relating to the international movement of wildlife specimens under s 303GI(2);
-	to give advice regarding whether a person’s actions would contravene a particular conservation order under s 471(3)(b).	

[Notes:
-	If a person applies for a permit relating to a CITES species under s 303CE, 303DE, 303EL and a decision has not been made within 40 business days after:
-	receipt of the application;
-	the receipt of further information from the applicant or certain other events relating to controlled action and non-Part 13A permits;
a decision is taken to have been made to refuse the application: s 303CI, 303DH and 303EO of this Act and s 25(5) of the AAT Act.
2.	A Commonwealth agency may not apply for review of a decision of the Minister under s 471(3)(b): s 473(2).
3.	Section 303GJ(1)(g) provides that the Tribunal has jurisdiction to review any decision made by the Secretary of the Department of the Environment under a determination made under s 303EU which relates to the marking of specified kinds of specimens for the purposes of identification.]

Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2000

Regulation 14.16(8) (SR 181 of 2000)

Regulation 14.16(6)
	The following decisions of the Director of National Parks that have been reconsidered by the Director: any decision under Part 17 about a permit other than decisions under reg 17.09(2) or 17.12(4). 	

Environment Protection and Management Ordinance 1987

Section 23 (1 of 1987)

Sections 15, 19, 22(3), 22(6)		The following decisions: to refuse to issue a permit under s 15, to suspend or revoke a permit under s 19, to seize an aircraft under s 22(3);
to order the forfeiture of an aircraft under s 22(6).	

[Notes:
1.	This ordinance was made under the Heard Island and McDonald Islands Act 1953.]

Environment Protection (Sea Dumping) Act 1981

Section 24(1) (101 of 1981) (16 of 1994) (92 of 1999) (107 of 2000)

Sections 19, 20, 21, 23
	The following decisions of the Minister for the Environment: 
-	to grant, or refuse to grant, a permit under s 19; 
-	to vary, suspend or revoke a permit under s 20; 
-	to impose conditions in respect of a permit under s 21; 
-	to revoke, suspend or vary a condition or cancel a suspension of a condition under s 21; 
-	to vary a permit or revoke, suspend or vary a condition of a permit or cancel a suspension of a condition under s 23.	

[Notes:  
1.	Subsection 24(2) provides that an application may not be made in relation to the following decisions:
•	a decision of the Minister under s 19 in connection with an application for a permit where an inquiry has been held under Part 8 of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 in relation to the conduct in respect of which the application is made;
•	a decision of the Minister under s 19(7) granting, or refusing to grant, a permit.]

ETR Payments Administrative Scheme (FaHCSIA) Determination 2012

Section 142 of the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) (Administration) Act 1999

Section 113 of the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) (Administration) Act 1999 	Any decision of an officer under the Determination in relation to an ETR payment for a person that has been reviewed by the Secretary of the Department of Social Services or an authorised review officer and then the Social Security Appeals Tribunal.	

[Notes:
1.	Section 6.01 of the Determination provides that Part 5 of the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) (Administration) Act 1999 applies, as far as it is capable of doing so, to a decision under this determination in relation to an ETR payment for a person as if the decision were a decision relating to an ETR payment for an individual under the family assistance law.]

Excise Act 1901

Section 14ZZ of the Taxation Administration Act 1953

Section 14ZY(1) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953	The following decisions of the Collector of Customs in relation to which an objection has been allowed, wholly or in part, or disallowed by the Commissioner of Taxation under Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 
-	to grant, or refuse to grant, a licence under s 39A;
-	to specify conditions in a licence under s 39D(3);
-	to vary or revoke a condition on a licence or impose an additional condition on a licence under s 39D(4) or 39DA(1);
-	to renew a licence under s 39F(1);
-	to renew a licence with conditions different from the original licence under s 39F(2);
-	to refuse to renew a licence under  s 39F(3);
-	to suspend a licence under s 39G;
-	to revoke the suspension of a licence under s 39J;
-	to take certain action in relation to a period during which a licence is suspended under s 39K(6);
-	to cancel a licence under s 39L;
-	to require a person to pay duty payable in relation to goods and to remove the goods to another place under s 39L(4);
-	to remove goods, to sell or otherwise dispose of goods under s 39N;
-	to make a demand made under s 60;
-	to make a decision under s 61D in relation to outwards duty free shops;
-	to make a decision under s 61E in relation to inwards duty free shops;
-	to make a demand under s 77AA or 77FH;
-	to make a decision under s 78 in relation to a remission, refund or rebate of excise duty;
-	to refuse to pay a rebate under s 78A;
-	to make a decision under s 79 in relation to a drawback of excise duty;
-	to demand the payment of duty which is paid under protest under s 154.
	
Section 14ZY(1) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 	The following decisions of the Chief Executive Officer of Customs in relation to which an objection has been allowed, wholly or in part, or disallowed by the Commissioner of Taxation under Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 
-	to give an approval, or refuse to give an approval, under s 58(5)(a); 
-	to make a quota order under s 59A; to vary a quota order under s 59B; 
-	to refuse to give an approval under s 77FD or 77FF; 
-	to specify conditions in an approval given under s 77FD or 77FF; 
-	to demand the repayment of the whole, or a part, of a rebate of duty under s 80(2); 
-	to make a decision under s 165A as to the amount of duty shortpaid or overpaid.	

[Notes:
1.	Sections 39Q and 162C(1) and (2) of this Act provide that a person may object against the decisions specified in the right-hand column above in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
2.	The following Act introduced s 39Q of this Act: 115 of 2000.  The following Acts have amended ss 162C(1) and (2) of this Act in relation to the operation of Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 25 of 2001, 54 of 2003 and 74 of 2006.
3.	A person dissatisfied with any of the above decisions may object against them in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.  The Commissioner will then make an objection decision from which a person can apply for review to the Tribunal. 
4.	An objection in relation to a demand to pay duty which the owner of the goods has deposited under s 154 of the Act must be made within 6 months after the date of the deposit: s 162C(3) of the Act
5.	An application for review of an objection decision must be lodged with the Tribunal within 60 days after the person making the application is served with notice of the decision: s 14ZZC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
6.	If the Commissioner fails to make a decision on a taxation objection within 60 days after being given a written notice requiring the making of the objection decision, the Commissioner is deemed to have made a decision under s 14ZY(1) to disallow the objection: s 14ZYA(3) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.]

Excise Regulation 2015

Section 14ZZ of the Taxation Administration Act 1953

Section 14ZY(1) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953	The following decisions of the Chief Executive of Customs in relation to which an objection has been allowed, wholly or in part, or disallowed by the Commissioner under Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953:
-	not to approve payment of drawback for goods under reg 14(3). 	

[Notes: 
1.	This Regulation commenced on 1 April 2015: SLI 38 of 2015.
2.	A person dissatisfied with any of the above decisions may object to them in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953. The Commissioner will then make an objection decision from which a person can apply for review to the Tribunal.
3.	An application for review of an objective decision must be lodged with the Tribunal within 60 days after the person making the application is served the notice of the decision: s 14ZZC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953
4.	If the Commissioner has not made an objection decision on a taxation objection by the end of the period of 60 days after being given a written notice requiring the Commissioner to make an objection decision, then the Commissioner is taken to have made a decision under s 14ZY(1) to disallow the taxation objection.
5.	This Regulation will sunset on 1 April 2025].

Explosives Transport Regulations 2002 

Regulation 19 (SR 92 of 2002)

Regulation 16	The following decisions of the Competent Authority: 
-	to grant, refuse to grant, or impose a particular condition on an exemption under reg 16 from compliance with a provision of these Regulations.	

Export Charges (Collection) Act 2015

Section 19 (92 of 2015)

Section 12(2)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources: to suspend or revoke an export control instrument of a person under s 12(2);	
Section 17	The following decisions of the internal reviewer: to make a decision under s 17 that relates to a decision to suspend or revoke an export control instrument of a person under s 12(2).	

[Notes:
1.	This Act commenced on 30 June 2015: 92 of 2015]. 

Export Control (Animals) Order 2004

Section 6.03 of this Order and Section 16.05 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005 (Gazette S483, 1/12/04) (F2005L01806, 29/6/05)

Section 16.03 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005	Decisions made by the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources an authorised officer under these Orders (other than a decision to grant an export permit or a government certificate) that have been reconsidered by the Secretary under s 16.03 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005.	

[Notes:
1.	This Order is made under the Export Control (Orders) Regulations 1982.
2.	Section 6.03 provides that Part 16 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005, which provides for the review of decisions, applies to decisions made under these Orders.  See the entry for the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005.]

Export Control (Eggs and Egg Products) Orders 2005

Order 90 of these Orders and Section 16.05 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005 (F2005L02703, 22/9/05)

Section 16.03 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005	Decisions made by the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources or a delegate of the Secretary under these Orders that have been reconsidered by the Secretary under s 16.03 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005 other than decisions set out in Note 2.	

[Notes:
1.	These Orders are made under the Export Control (Orders) Regulations 1982.
2.	The following decisions are not reviewable:
-	Division VI of Part 2 which deals with exemptions from compliance with these Orders; 
-	orders 78 and 79 which deal with regulatory arrangements for alternative compliance; 
-	order 87 which deals with reconsideration decisions of an authorized officer’s decision to give a notice requiring action to be taken; 
-	Part 2 of Schedule 1 which deals with exemptions from the need to be registered; 
-	cll 13, 14, 17 and 19 of Schedule 9 which deal with export permits; 
-	Part 2 of Schedule 9 which deals with government certificates.
3.	Order 90 provides that Part 16 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005, which provides for the review of decisions, applies to decisions made under these Orders other than those specified in Order 91.  See the entry for the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005.]

Export Control (Fees) Orders 2001

Order 53 of these Orders and Section 16.05 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005 (Gazette GN40, 10/10/01) (F2005L01816, 29/6/05)

Section 16.03 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005	Decisions made by the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources under these Orders (other than a decision to grant an export permit or a government certificate) that have been reconsidered by the Secretary under s 16.03 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005.	

[Notes:

1.	These Orders are made under the Export Control (Orders) Regulations 1982.
2.	Order 53 provides that Part 16 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005, which provides for the review of decisions, applies to decisions made under these Orders.  See the entry for the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005.]

Export Control (Fish and Fish Products) Orders 2005

Order 96 of these Orders and Section 16.05 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005 (F2005L02705, 21/10/05)

Section 16.03 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005	Decisions made by the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources under these Orders that have been reconsidered by the Secretary under s 16.03 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005 other than decisions set out in Note 2.

[Notes:

1.	These Orders are made under the Export Control (Orders) Regulations 1982.
2.	Decisions under the following provisions are not reviewable:
-	Division VI of Part 2 which deals with exemptions from compliance with these Orders; orders 84 and 85 which deal with regulatory arrangements for alternative compliance; 
-	order 93 which deals with reconsideration decisions of an authorized officer’s decision to give a notice requiring action to be taken; 
-	Part 2 of Schedule 1 which deals with exemptions from the need to be registered; 
-	clauses 13, 14, 17 and 19 of Schedule 9 which deal with export permits; 
-	Part 2 of Schedule 9 which deals with government certificates.
3.	Order 96 provides that Part 16 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005, which provides for the review of decisions, applies to decisions made under these Orders.  See the entry for the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005.]

Export Control (Hardwood Wood Chips) Regulations 1996

Regulation 37(1) (SR 206 of 1996) (SR 54 of 1998)

Regulations 9, 12, 12A, 14(2), 15, 17, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 30, 31, 33	The following decisions of the Minister for Agriculture and Water Resources: 
-	to grant, or refuse to grant,  a transitional licence under reg 9;
-	to impose conditions or restrictions on a transitional licence under reg 12;
-	to reduce under reg 12A the authorised export mass for a transitional licence which was granted before a Regional Forest Agreement came into force for that region;
-	to approve, or refuse to approve, a person under s 14(2) to provide a report to the Minister for the purposes of an application for a degraded forest licence;
-	to grant, or refuse to grant, a degraded forest licence under reg 15;
-	to impose conditions or restrictions on a degraded forest licence under reg 17;
-	to grant, or refuse to grant, a regional forest agreement licence under reg 21;
-	to impose conditions or restrictions on a regional forest agreement licence under reg 23;
-	to grant, or refuse to grant, a restricted shipment licence under reg 25;
-	to impose conditions or restrictions on a restricted shipment licence under reg 27;
-	to consent, or refuse to consent, to the surrender and exchange of a licence under reg 29;
-	to consent, or refuse to consent, to the surrender of a licence in exchange for more than 1 licence under reg 30;
-	to consent, or refuse to consent, to the assignment of a licence under reg 31;
-	to revoke a licence under reg 33.
	
Regulation 36(2)(a)(ii)	The following decision of the Minister for Agriculture and Water Resources or a delegate of the Minister: 
-	to allow, or refuse to allow an extended period within which to seek reconsideration under reg 36(2)(a)(ii).
	
Regulation 36(5)	Any decision of a delegate of the Minister for the Agriculture and Water Resources under reg 9, 12, 12A, 14(2), 15, 17, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 30, 31 or 33 that has been confirmed, varied or set aside by the Minister or another delegate of the Minister on reconsideration.	

[Notes:  
1.	Regulation 37(2) modifies the operation of s 27 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 to specify the persons who may lodge an application for review of certain decisions as follows:
-	regs 9, 12, 15, 17, 21, 23, 25 or 27 — the person who was the applicant for the licence to which the decision relates;
-	reg 14(2) — the person to whom the approval to which the decision relates was to have been given;
-	reg 29 or 30 — the person who applied to surrender and exchange the licence to which the decision relates;
-	reg 31 — the person to whom the licence to which the decision relates was to have been assigned;
-	reg 33 — the holder of the licence to which the decision relates;
-	reg 36(2)(a) — the person at whose request the Minister or delegate made the decision.]

Export Control (Meat and Meat Products) Orders 2005

Orders 86 and Clauses 13.1 and 27 of Schedule 10 (F2005L00154, 3/2/05)

Order 83	Decisions made by the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources or a delegate of the Secretary under these Orders that have been reconsidered by the Secretary under Order 83 other than decisions set out in Note  2. 
	
Clause 11.1 or 24.3 of Schedule 10	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture: 
-	to determine the allocation of inspection services for the occupier’s registered establishment under Order 11.1 or 24.3 of Schedule 10.	

[Notes:  
1.	These Orders are made under reg 3 of the Export Control (Orders) Regulations 1982.
2.	Decisions made under the following provisions are not reviewable:
-	Division IV of Part 2 which provides for exemptions; 
-	Part 9 which provides for regulatory arrangements; 
-	Division III of Schedule 8 which deals with export permits; 
-	Part 2 of Schedule 9 which deals with government certificates.]

Export Control (Milk and Milk Products) Orders 2005

Order 90 of these Orders and s 16.05 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods - General) Orders 2005 (F2005L02871, 23/9/05)

Section 16.03 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005	Decisions made by the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources or a delegate of the Secretary under these Orders that have been reconsidered by the Secretary under s 16.03 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005 other than decisions set out in Note 2.	

[Notes:
1.	These Orders are made under the Export Control (Orders) Regulations 1982.
2.	Decisions made under the following provisions are not reviewable:
-	Division VI of Part 2 which deals with exemptions from compliance with these Orders; 
-	orders 78 and 79 which deal with regulatory arrangements for alternative compliance; 
-	order 87 which deals with reconsideration decisions of an authorized officer’s decision to give a notice requiring action to be taken; 
-	Part 2 of Schedule 1 which deals with exemptions from the need to be registered; 
-	clauses 13, 14, 17 and 19 of Schedule 9 which deal with export permits; 
-	and Part 2 of Schedule 9 which deals with government certificates.
3.	Order 90 provides that Part 16 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005, which provides for the review of decisions, applies to decisions made under these Orders other than those specified in Order 91.  See the entry for the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005.]

Export Control (Organic Produce Certification) Orders

Order 4.01 of these Orders and s 16.05 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods - General) Orders 2005 (Gazette GN42, 22/10/97) (F2005L01834)
Order 4.02  (Gazette GN42, 22/10/97)

Section 16.03 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005
	Decisions made by an authorised officer under the following provisions that have been reconsidered by the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources under s 16.03 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005: 
-	Orders 2.03, 2.04(1), 3.04(1), 3.04(2), 3.08(1), 3.08(2), 3.10(2), 3.11(3), 3.17(1), 3.17(3) and 3.18(1).	
Orders 2.02, 2.04	The following decisions of an approved certifying organisation: 
-	to issue, or refuse to issue, an organic produce certificate under order 2.02; 
-	to revoke an organic produce certificate under order 2.04(1).	

[Notes:
1.	These Orders are made under the Export Control (Orders) Regulations 1982.
2.	Order 4.01 provides that Part 16 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005, which relates to the review of decisions, applies to decisions made by the Secretary under these Orders.  See the entry for the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005.
3.	An application for review of a decision of an approved certifying organisation may be made directly to the Tribunal.]

Export Control (Plants and Plant Products) Order 2011

Order 4 of these Orders and s 16.05 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods - General) Orders 2005 

Section 16.03 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005	Decisions made by the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources or a delegate of the Secretary under these Orders (other than a decision to grant an export permit or a government certificate) that have been reconsidered by the Secretary under s 16.03 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005.	

[Notes:
-	Order 4 provides that this Order is to be read as one with the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005. This includes Part 16 which provides for reconsideration and review of decisions made under this Order.  See the entry for the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005.]

Export Control (Poultry Meat and Poultry Meat Products) Orders 2010

Orders 10.06 and items 13 and 27 of Schedule 10 (F2010L03051)

Order 10.03	Decisions by the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources under these Orders that have been reconsidered by the Secretary under Order 10.03 other than decisions set out in Note 2.

Items 11.1 and  24.3 of Schedule 10	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources: to determine the allocation of inspection services under cl 11.1; to determine the allocation of inspection services under cl. 24.3.	

[Notes:
-	This Order is made under the Export Control (Orders) Regulations 1982.
-	Decisions made under the following provisions are not reviewable:
1.	Division 2.5 which provides for exemptions, 
2.	Part 9 which provides for alternative regulatory arrangements, 
3.	Division 1.3 of Schedule 8 which provides for export permits 
4.	Part 2 of Schedule 8 which provides for government certificates.]

Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005

Section 16.05 (F2005L00144, 3/2/05)

Section 16.03	Decisions made by the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources or a delegate under these Orders (other than a decision to grant an export permit or a government certificate) that have been reconsidered by the Secretary under s 16.03.	

[Notes:
1.	This Order is made under the Export Control (Orders) Regulations 1982.
2.	Section 1.03 provides that the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005, and therefore its review provisions, is to be read as one with each other Order made under regulation 3 of the Export Control (Orders) Regulations 1982.
3.	The following orders made under the Export Control (Orders) Regulations 1982 expressly provide that the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005 or Part 16 of this Order applies to those orders: Export Control (Animal) Order 2004, Export Control (Eggs and Egg Products) Orders 2005, Export Control (Fees) Orders 2001, Export Control (Fish and Fish Products) Orders 2005, Export Control (Hay and Straw) Orders 2005, Export Control (Organic Produce Certification) Orders and the Export Control (Plants and Plant Products) Orders 2005.  Refer to the entry for these Orders in this list for further information.]

Export Control (Rabbit and Ratite Meat) Orders 1985

Order 3 of these Orders and s 16.05 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods - General) Orders 2005

Section 16.03 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005	Decisions made by the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources or a delegate of the Secretary under these Orders (other than a decision to grant an export permit or a government certificate) that have been reconsidered by the Secretary under s 16.03 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005.

[Notes:
1.	These Orders are made under the Export Control (Orders) Regulations 1982.  
2.	Section 3 provides that these Orders shall be read as one with the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005. Part 16 of the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005, which relates to the review of decisions, applies to decisions made by the Secretary under these Orders.  See the entry for the Export Control (Prescribed Goods — General) Order 2005.
3.	These Orders were formerly known as the Game, Poultry and Rabbit Meat Orders 1985.  The name was changed with effect from 1 December 2010: F2010L03053]

Export Control (Unprocessed Wood) Regulations

Regulation 16(6) (SR 79 of 1986) (SR 338 of 1996)

Regulations 4B, 4C,  8, 9, 11(3), 11(4), 12(1), 15 
	The following decisions of the Minister for Agriculture and Water Resources: 
-	to approve, or refuse to approve, a State’s code of practice under reg 4B;
-	to revoke the approval of a State’s code of practice under reg 4C;
-	to grant, or refuse to grant, an export licence under reg 8;
-	to specify conditions or restrictions on a licence under reg 9;
-	to consent, or refuse to consent, to the surrender and exchange of a licence under reg 11(3);
-	to specify conditions or restrictions on a new licence under reg 11(4);
-	to consent, or refuse to consent, to the assignment of a licence under reg 12(1);
-	to revoke a licence under reg 15.
	
Regulation 16(3)(a)(ii)	The following decision of the Minister for Agriculture or a delegate of the Minister: 
-	to allow, or refuse to allow an extended period within which to seek reconsideration under reg 16(3)(a)(ii).
	
Regulation 16(4)	Decisions of a delegate of the Minister for Agriculture and Water Resources under regs 4B, 4C, 8, 9, 11(3), 11(4), 12(1) or 15 that have been confirmed, varied or set aside by the Minister or another delegate of the Minister on reconsideration.	

[Notes:  
1.	Subregulation 16(7) modifies the operation of s 27 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 to specify the persons who may lodge an application for review of certain decisions as follows:
•	reg 4B or 4C — the State to which the decision relates;
•	reg 8 or 9 — the person who was the applicant for the licence to which the decision relates;
•	reg 11(3), 11(4), 12(1) or 15 — the holder of the licence to which the decision relates;
•	reg 16(3)(a)(ii) — the person at whose request the Minister or delegate made the decision.]

Export Control (Wild Game Meat and Wild Game Meat Products) Orders 2010

Order 10.06 and items 13 and 27 of Schedule 10 (F2010L03050)

Order 10.03	Decisions by the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources under these Orders that have been reconsidered by the Secretary under Order 10.03 other than decisions under any of the following provisions of these Orders: 
-	Division 2.5 which provides for exemptions, Part 9 which provides for alternative regulatory arrangements, Division 1.3 of Schedule 8 which provides for export permits or Part 2 of Schedule 8 which provides for government certificates.
	
Items 11.1 and 24.3 of Schedule 10	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources: 
-	to determine the allocation of inspection services under cl 11.1; 
-	to determine the allocation of inspection services under cl. 24.3.	

[Notes:
1.	This Order is made under the Export Control (Orders) Regulations 1982.]

Export Inspection and Meat Charges Collection Act 1985 

Section 16(6) (27 of 1985) (101 of 1993)

Section 11(2)	The following decisions of the Minister for Agriculture and Water Resources: 
-	to remit, or refuse to remit, the whole or part of a non-payment penalty under s 11(2).	
Section 16(4)	The following decision of an authorized person that has been reconsidered by the Minister:
-	to remit, or refuse to remit, the whole or part of a non-payment penalty under s 11(2).
	
Section 16(4)	The following decision of the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources that has been reconsidered by the Minister: 
-	to direct under s 12A that specified services provided under the Meat Inspection Act 1983 or its regulations or orders not be provided by authorised officers.	

Export Market Development Grants Act 1997 

Section 99 (57 of 1997)

Section 98(4)	The following decisions of the CEO of Austrade that have been confirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	to decide under section 9 that a person did not meet the Australian net benefit requirements in relation to a grant year;
-	to decide under s 20 that a person did not meet the grants entry requirements;
-	any decision under Part 4 relating to eligible products;
-	any decision relating to an application for a grant;
-	to form the opinion under s 87AA that a person is not a fit and proper person to receive a grant or that a person has an associate who is not a fit and proper person to receive a grant;
-	to refuse an application for approval as an approved body or to vary or cancel such an approval under Division 1 of Part 8;
-	to refuse a person’s application for approval as a trading house or to vary or cancel such an approval under Division 1 of Part 8;
-	to refuse a group’s application for approval as a joint venture or to vary or cancel such an approval under Division 1 of Part 8;
-	to specify under s 89(3) one or more conditions to which a person’s approval as an approved body is subject;
-	to specify under s 89(3) one or more conditions to which a person’s approval as a trading house is subject;
-	to specify under s 89(3) one or more conditions to which a group’s approval as a joint venture is subject.	

[Notes:
1.	The list of ‘reviewable decisions’ that may be reconsidered under the Act is set out in s 97.  The following Acts introduced or have amended the list of reviewable decisions: 57 of 1997, 100 of 1999, 71 of 2004 and 33 of 2008.
2.	This Act also sets out the review mechanism for decisions made under: 
–	a scheme determined under s 100 to refuse to accredit an export market development grants consultant or to vary or cancel such an accreditation;
–	an instrument in force under s 63(3)(f) which relates to the calculation of an applicant’s provisional grant amount.
3.	Decisions under these instruments are reviewable decisions for the purposes of s 97 and therefore subject to reconsideration and review by the Tribunal. No such instruments have been made.] 

F

Fair Entitlements Guarantee Act 2012

Section 40 (159 of 2012)

Section 39(1)	The following decisions that have been reconsidered by the Secretary, Department of Employment: 
-	to determine whether a person is eligible for an advance under s 15(1); 
-	to determine the amount of an advance the person is eligible for under s 15(2)	

[Notes:
1.	Where an application before the Tribunal is for review of a decision on the amount of an advance a person is eligible for and the decision involved the exercise of the power under s 17 to reduce that amount the Tribunal cannot review the exercise of the power to reduce that amount: s 41.
2.	If, after the person has applied for review, the Secretary varies or substitutes the decision under s 37(4), the application is taken to be for review of the decision as varied or the new decision: s 40(3).
3.	The Fair Entitlements Guarantee Regulation 2012 creates a scheme for the application of the Fair Entitlements Guarantee Act 2012 to TCF contract outworkers. The Regulation confers on the Tribunal comparable jurisdiction to review decisions made under the scheme.]

Fair Work (Building Industry – Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005

Regulation 22 (SLI 305 of 2005)

Regulation 20(7)	The following decisions of the Federal Safety Commissioner that have been affirmed, varied or set aside on reconsideration:  
-	to refuse to accredit a person under reg 12(1); 
-	to determine a period of accreditation of not longer than 6 years under reg 12(1); 
-	to impose a condition of accreditation under reg 15(1) or 17(1)(a); 
-	to suspend an accredited person’s accreditation under reg 17(1)(b); 
-	to revoke an accredited person’s accreditation under reg 17(1)(c) or 17(2).	

[Notes:
1.	These regulations were formerly the Building and Construction Industry Improvement (Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005. They were renamed by SLI 80 of 2012.
2.	The list of ‘reviewable decisions’ that may be reconsidered under the Act is set out in reg 19.  The following instruments introduced or have amended the list of reviewable decisions: SLI 305 of 2005, SLI 198 of 2006 and SLI 189 of 2014. 
3.	Where a person has requested reconsideration of a reviewable decision under reg 20(1), the decision is taken to have been affirmed if the person does not receive notice of the decision within 90 days after receiving the person’s request: reg 20(9).]

Family Assistance Legislation Amendment (Child Care Budget and Other Measures) Act 2008

Section 142 of the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) (Administration) Act 1999

Section 113 of the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) (Administration) Act 1999	The following decision of an officer that has been reviewed by the Secretary of the Department of Social Services or an authorised review officer and then by the Social Security Appeals Tribunal: 
-	to vary the determination of a claimant’s CCB % under item 64(1) of Schedule 1 to the Act.

[Notes:
1.	Subitem 64(4) of Schedule 1 to the Act provides that the decision referred to above is taken to be a decision of an officer under the family assistance law for the purposes of Part 5 of the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) (Administration) Act 1999.
2.	A decision under subitem 64(1) could only be made between 25 June 2008, the date on which the provision commenced, and 6 July 2008: see subitem 64(3) of Schedule to the Family Assistance Legislation Amendment (Child Care Budget and Other Measures) Act 2008.]

Family Law (Family Dispute Resolution Practitioners) Regulations 2008

Regulation 24 (SLI 183 of 2008)

Regulations 11(1), 16(1), 17, 18

	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Attorney-General’s Department: 
-	a decision under reg 11(1) that a person does not meet accreditation criteria; 
-	to add, vary or revoke a condition to an accredited family dispute resolution practitioner’s accreditation under reg 16(1); 
-	to suspend or cancel the accreditation of an accredited family dispute resolution practitioner under reg 17 or 18.	

Family Law (Fees) Regulation 2012

Regulation 2.14(5) (SLI 279 of 2012)

Regulations 2.05, 2.06(2), 2.10, 2.12(7)
	The following decisions of a Registrar or authorised officer of the Family Court:  
-	to exempt, or not exempt, an individual from paying a fee under reg 2.05; 
-	to determine an individual may, or may not, pay a reduced fee under reg 2.06(2); 
-	to defer, or not defer, the payment of a fee under reg 2.10; 
-	to refund, or not refund a fee under reg 2.12(7). 	

[Notes:
1.	Regulation 2.05 amended by SLI 136 of 2013 to exempt independent children’s lawyer from paying the fees prescribed in items 9 and 19 of Schedule 1.] 

Farm Household Support Act 2014

Section 179 of Social Security (Administration) Act 2014

Section 149 of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999	Any decision of an officer under the Farm Household Support Act 2014 that has been reviewed by the Secretary of the Department of Social Services, the Chief Executive Centrelink or an authorised review officer and then by the Social Security Appeals Tribunal.	

[Notes:
1.	Section 4 of the Farm Household Support Act 2014 states that provisions for the review of decisions under the Act are found in the Social Security Act 1991 and the Social Security Administration Act 1991.
2.	The relevant provisions of this Act commenced 1 July 2014.]

Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999

Clauses 9A(3), 9D(10), 9E(9) and 9F(2) of Schedule 1 to the Act (163 of 2007)

The following clauses of Schedule 1: 9A(2), 9D(6), 9D(7), 9D(9)(b), 9E(4)(c), 9E(5)(b)(ii), 9E(8), 9F(1)(b)(ii), 9F(1)(b)(iii)

	The following decisions of the Attorney-General: 
•	to refuse to certify under cl 9A(2) of Schedule 1 that a Judge is a retired disabled Judge; 
•	to determine under cl 9D(6) of Schedule 1 the proportion of the death benefit to be paid to each of the Judge’s beneficiaries; 
•	to give a direction under cl 9D(7) of Schedule 1; 
•	to refuse under cl 9D(9)(b) of Schedule 1 to give a direction under cl 9D(7) of Schedule 1; 
•	to be satisfied, or not satisfied, for the purposes of cl 9E(4)(c) that a person was wholly or substantially dependent upon a Judge at the time of the Judge’s death; 
•	to be satisfied, or not satisfied, for the purposes of cl 9E(5)(b)(ii) that a person ordinarily lived with another person as that person’s husband or wife or partner on a permanent and bona fide domestic basis at the relevant time; 
•	to be satisfied, or not satisfied, for the purposes of cl 9E(8) that a person would have been living with another person except for a period of temporary absence or absence because of special circumstances; 
•	to be satisfied, or not satisfied, for the purposes of cl 9F(1)(b)(ii) that a child was wholly or substantially dependent upon a Judge at the time of the Judge’s death; 
-	to be satisfied, or not satisfied, for the purposes of cl 9F(1)(b)(iii) that a child would have been wholly or substantially dependent upon a Judge but for the Judge’s death.	

Federal Court and Federal Circuit Court Regulation 2012

Regulation 2.21(5) (SLI 280 of 2012)

Regulations 2.06, 2.08(4), 2.15, 2.15(5), 2.19(7)	The following decisions of the Registrar or an authorised officer: 
-	to exempt, or not exempt an individual from paying a fee under reg 2.06; 
-	to determine whether a fee is payable under reg 2.08(4); 
-	to determine whether to defer a fee under reg 2.15; 
-	to determine whether to impose conditions on the deferral of the payment of a fee reg 2.15(5); 
-	to determine whether to refund a hearing fee under reg 2.19(7).	
 
Financial Institutions Supervisory Levies Collection Act 1998

Section 27(6) (53 of 1998)

Section 27(4)	The following decision of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority that has been confirmed, varied or revoked on reconsideration: 
-	to waive, or refuse to waive, the payment of the whole or a part of an amount of levy or late payment penalty under s 12.	
Section 27(4)	The following decision of the Treasurer that has been confirmed, varied or revoked on reconsideration: 
-	to waive, or refuse to waive, the payment of the whole or a part of an amount of late payment penalty under s 22.	

[Notes: 

1.	The list of ‘reviewable decisions’ that may be reconsidered under the Act is set out in s 27(10).  The following Acts introduced or have amended the list of reviewable decisions: 53 of 1998.  
2.	If APRA or the Minister do not confirm, revoke or vary a decision before the end of the period of 21 days after the day on which the request to reconsider the decision was received, the decision is taken to have been confirmed at the end of that period: s 27(4).  A person has 28 days from the day on which the decision is taken to have been confirmed to lodge an application for review with the AAT: s 27(7). 
3.	Section 27(9) of the Act provides that any hearing is to take place in private.
4.	If a person requests reconsideration of a reviewable decision under s 27(1), s 41 of the AAT Act applies as if the making of the request were the making of an application to the Tribunal for review of that decision: s 27(8).  A person may seek an order relating to the implementation of the reviewable decision under s 41 of the AAT Act.]

Financial Sector (Business Transfer and Group Restructure) Act 1999

Section 45 (45 of 1999) (117 of 2007)

Sections 11, 16(1), 16(3), 18, 20(2), 27(2), 31(3), 33, 36M, 36P, 36Q(3)	The following decisions of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority: 
-	to refuse to approve a voluntary transfer of business under s 11;
-	to impose conditions on a voluntary transfer of business under s 16(1);
-	to refuse to vary or revoke conditions on a voluntary transfer of business under s 16(3);
-	to refuse to issue a certificate of transfer under s 18;
-	to refuse to approve a statement in relation to the voluntary transfer of business provided under s 20(1);
-	to refuse to agree under s 27(2) to a consent being withdrawn by the board of directors of the receiving body;
-	to refuse to vary or revoke conditions on a compulsory transfer under s 31(3);
-	to refuse to issue a certificate of transfer under s 33;
-	to refuse under s 39M to issue an internal transfer certificate applied for in an application for a restructure approval or to issue an internal transfer certificate in terms that are different from those applied for in such an application;
-	to refuse under s 36P to amend an internal transfer certificate;
-	to refuse under s 36Q(3) to approve a later time for an internal transfer certificate to come into force.	

Financial Sector (Collection of Data) Act 2001

Section 25D(1) (25 of 2008)

Section 25C(1)	The following decisions of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority that have been confirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	to decide under s 7(2)(j) not to exempt an organisation from an obligation to register under the Act; 
-	to decide under s 9(3) not to allow a longer period for giving documents under that section; 
-	to decide to include (including by transfer) a registered entity in a particular category under s 11; 
-	to determine a reporting standard for a particular financial sector entity under s 13; 
-	to vary a reporting standard determined for a particular financial sector entity under s 13.	

[Notes
1.	The list of ‘reviewable decisions’ that are subject to reconsideration under this Act are set out in s 31.  The following Acts introduced or have amended that provision: 25 of 2008.
2.	If APRA does not confirm, revoke or vary a decision before the end of the period of 21 days after the day on which the request to reconsider the decision was received, the decision is taken to have been confirmed at the end of that period: s 25C(2).  A person has 28 days from the day on which the decision is taken to have been confirmed to lodge an application for review with the AAT: s 25D(2).
3.	If a person requests reconsideration of a reviewable decision under s 25B(1), s 41 of the AAT Act applies as if the making of the request were the making of an application to the Tribunal for review of that decision: s 25D(3).  A person may seek an order relating to the implementation of the reviewable decision under s 41 of the AAT Act.]

First Home Saver Accounts Act 2008 (repealed)

Section 75(7) (44 of 2008)(70 of 2015)

Section 75(4)	The following decisions of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority that have been confirmed or varied under s 75(4): 
-	to make a Prudential Standard referred to in s 121(1)(c);
-	to vary or revoke a Prudential Standard referred to in s 121(1)(c);
-	to decide under s 90(2) to treat an application for an authorisation as a first home saver account (FHSA) provider as having been withdrawn;
-	to refuse an application for an authorisation as an FHSA provider under s 92(2);
-	to impose any additional conditions on an authorisation as an FHSA provider under s 98(1);
-	to decide under s 101(2) to treat an application for variation or revocation of a condition imposed on an authorisation as an FHSA provider as having been withdrawn;
-	to refuse to vary or revoke under s 103(1) any conditions imposed on an authorisation as an FHSA provider;
-	to vary or revoke under s 104(1) any conditions imposed on an authorisation as an FHSA provider;
-	to cancel under s 107(1) an authorisation as an FHSA provider.	

[Notes:
1.	The list of ‘reviewable decisions’ that are subject to reconsideration under the Act is set out in s 74.  The following Act introduced or have amended this list: 44 of 2008.
2.	If a person makes a request for APRA to reconsider a reviewable decision and APRA does not confirm, revoke or vary the decision before the end of the period of 60 days after the day on which APRA received the request, APRA is taken to have confirmed the decision: s 75(5).
3.	If APRA is taken to have confirmed a decision pursuant to s 75(5), an application to the Tribunal must be made within a period of 28 days beginning on the day on which the decision is taken to be confirmed: s 75(8).
4.	This Act is repealed by Tax and Superannuation Laws Amendment (2015 Measures No. 1) Act 2015 (70 of 2015) with effect from 1 July 2015.]

Fisheries Management Act 1991

Section 165(7) (162 of 1991)

Section 165(5)	The following decisions of the Australian Fisheries Management Authority that have been reconsidered: 
-	to declare that a boat is to be taken to be a Australian boat under s 4(2);
-	to revoke such a declaration under s 4(3);
-	to extend, or refuse to extend, under s 4(3) the period  for which such a declaration is to remain in force;
-	to vary or revoke a condition on a fishing right or specify a condition or a further condition to which the fishing right is to be subject under s 22(5);
-	to register, or refuse to register, a person as an eligible person for a grant of a fishing right under s 26(2);
-	to grant, or refuse to grant, a fishing right under s 31 other than a decision following an auction or tender;
-	to determine whether the description of a fishery in a new plan of management is the same or substantially the same as the description of the fishery to which a former plan applied under s 31B(1)(b);
-	to determine the rights of an option holder to classes of statutory fishing rights where a new plan of management has some features in common with the former plan under s 31C;
-	to refuse to register a dealing creating, assigning, transmitting or extinguishing an interest in a fishing rights option under s 31F(7);
-	to grant, or refuse to grant, a fishing permit authorising the use of a specified boat by a person in a specified area under s 32(1);
-	to vary or revoke a condition of a permit or specify a condition or a further condition to which a permit is to be subject under s 32(8);
-	to grant, or refuse to grant, a scientific permit in respect of a boat for scientific research purposes under s 33(1);
-	to revoke a permit, to vary or revoke a condition of a permit or specify a condition or a further condition to which a permit is to be subject under s 33(6);
-	to impose, vary  or revoke a condition in a foreign fishing licence under s 34(9);
-	to suspend a fishing concession under s 38(1);
-	to revoke, or refuse to revoke, the suspension of a fishing concession under s 38(2);
-	to suspend a fishing concession under s 38(3);
-	to cancel a fishing concession under s 39;
-	to vary or revoke conditions in a foreign master fishing licence or to specify a condition or further condition to which a licence is subject under s 40(5);
-	to cancel a licence under s 40(8);
-	to declare under s 91(1) a specified fishery to be a fishery to which Division 2 of Part 6 applies;
-	to grant, or refuse to grant, a fish receiver permit under s 91(2);
-	to vary or revoke conditions in a fish receiver permit or to specify a condition or further condition to which a permit is subject under s 91(6);
-	to renew, or refuse to renew, a permit under s 91(10).	

[Notes:

1.	The list of ‘relevant decisions’ in relation to which a person may request reconsideration is set out in s 165(1) of the Act.  The following Acts introduced or have amended the list of relevant decisions under the Act: 94 of 1993, 120 of 1997, 99 of 2005 and 39 of 2010.
2.	Section 165(8) of the Act provides that an application to the Tribunal for review of a reviewable decision where the primary decision was made under s 26(2) must be lodged within 14 days of the person receiving notice of the reviewable decision.  
3.	Section 165(9) modifies s 37 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 to provide that a decision maker must lodge the material documents with the Tribunal within 14 days of receiving notice of the application for review.
4.	Various Plans have been made under s 17(1) of the Act including the Eastern Tuna and Billfish Fishery Management Plan 2005, the Macquarie Island Toothfish Fishery Management Plan 2006, the Northern Prawn Fishery Management Plan 1995, the Small Pelagic Fishery Management Plan 2009, the Southern Bluefin Tuna Fishery Management Plan 1995, the Southern Squid Jig Fishery Management Plan 2005, and the Western Tuna and Billfish Fishery Management Plan 2005.  The Plans provide that certain decisions are taken to be ‘relevant decisions’ for the purposes of s 165 of the Act and are reviewable.  Refer to the separate entries for these plans.]

Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991

Section 143(1) (118 of 1991) (201 of 1997) (81 of 2001) (98 of 2007)

Sections 26(1)(b), 30(1)(b), 47(1)(b), 56(1), 60(b), 96(1)(b), 96(2)(b), 112	The following decisions of Food Standards Australia New Zealand: 
•	to reject under s 26(1)(b) an application for the development or variation of a food regulatory measure (other than a decision to reject the application because it does not comply with s 22(2));
•	to reject an application for the development or variation of a food regulatory measure under s 30(1)(b);
•	to reject under s 47(1)(b) an application for the variation of the Nutrition, Health and Related Claims Standard that is a high level health claims variation (other than a decision to reject the application because it does not comply with s 22(2));
•	to abandon a proposal for the development or variation of a food regulatory measure under s 56(1) and 60(b);
•	to reject an urgent application for the development or variation of a food regulatory measure under s 96(1)(b);
•	to abandon an urgent proposal for the development or variation of a food regulatory measure under s 96(2)(b);
•	to decide under s 112 not to do something that the Authority is required to do under Part 3 of the Act in relation to an application or proposal for the development or variation of a food regulatory measure because the Authority considers that doing the thing would be a duplication of work already done, or a process already gone through, by another government agency. 	

[Notes:  
1.	An application for review of a decision under s 26(1)(b), 30(1)(b), 47(1)(b) or 96(1)(b) may only be made by the applicant for the development or variation of a standard: s 143(1)(a).]

Foreign Passports (Law Enforcement and Security) Act 2005

Section 23(1) (168 of 1984) (125 of 2004) (7 of 2005)

Section 16	The following decision of the Minister for Foreign Affairs: to order surrender of a person’s foreign travel documents under s 16.	

[Notes: 
1.	This Act was formerly known as the Passports Act 1938.
2.	For the purposes of s 27 of the AAT Act, the only person whose interests are taken to be affected by a decision under s 16 is the person whose foreign travel documents are ordered to be surrendered.]

Freedom of Information Act 1982

Sections 57A and 89N (51 of 2010)

Various sections, including s 55K	The following decisions of an agency or a Minister: 
-	that have been affirmed, varied or set aside by the Australian Information  Commissioner on review under s 55K, or
-	in relation to which the Australian Information Commissioner  has decided not to undertake, or not to continue to undertake, an IC review under s 54W(b)
-	to refuse to give access to a document in accordance with a request;
-	to give access to a document but not give, in accordance with a request, access to all documents to which the request relates;
-	to purport to give, in accordance with a request, access to all documents to which the request relates, but not actually give that access;
-	to defer the provision of access to a document under s 21; 
-	a decision under s 29 relating to the imposition of a charge or the amount of a charge;
-	where a request requires consultation with a State under s 26A or with the Commonwealth or a State under 26AA, to decide to give the applicant access to a document because the document is not conditionally exempt under s 47B or access would not be contrary to the public interest;
-	where section 27 applies in relation to business information in a document, to decide to give the applicant  access to a document because the document is neither exempt under s 47 nor conditionally exempt under s 47G or access would not be contrary to the public interest;
-	where section 27A applies in relation to personal information in a document, to decide to give the applicant access to the document because the document is not conditionally exempt under s 47F or access would not be contrary to the public interest;
-	to give access to a document to a qualified person under s 47F(5);
-	to refuse to amend a record of personal information in accordance with an application under s 48;
-	to refuse to annotate a record of personal information under s 51 in accordance with an application under s 48;
-	to refuse to allow a further period for making an application for internal review of an access refusal decision under s 54B.
	
Section 89K	The following decision of the Australian Information Commissioner: to declare a person to be a vexatious applicant under s 89K.	

[Notes:

1.	Section 57A(2) of the Act modifies s 29 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 to provide that, if the Australian Information Commissioner has decided not to review, or to continue to review a decision under s 54W(b), an application to the Tribunal for review of that decision must be made within 28 days after the day on which the person receives notice of the Australian Information Commissioner’s decision under s 54W(b).]  

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986

Section 14ZZ of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (216 of 1991) (34 of 1997)

Section 14ZY(1) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953	The following decisions of the Commissioner of Taxation in relation to which an objection has been allowed, wholly or in part, or disallowed by the Commissioner under Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 
-	to determine under s 67(1)(d) that appropriate adjustments be made to the aggregate fringe benefits amount of the eligible employer in respect of another year of tax or of another employer in respect of any year of tax where the employer has made a request under s 67(4); 
-	to make an assessment of the fringe benefits taxable amount of an employer and the amount of tax payable on that fringe benefits taxable amount under ss 72 or 73.	

[Notes:
1.	Sections 67(6) and 78A of this Act provide that a person may object against the decisions specified in the right-hand column above in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.  The following Acts have introduced, amended or repealed provisions in relation to the operation of Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 216 of 1991 and 179 of 1999.
2.	A person dissatisfied with any of the above decisions may object against them in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.  The Commissioner will then make an objection decision from which a person can apply for review to the Tribunal. 
3.	An objection in relation to a demand to pay duty which the owner of the goods has deposited under s 154 of the Act must be made within 6 months after the date of the deposit: s 162C(3) of the Act
4.	An application for review of an objection decision must be lodged with the Tribunal within 60 days after the person making the application is served with notice of the decision: s 14ZZC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
5.	If the Commissioner fails to make a decision on a taxation objection within 60 days after being given a written notice requiring the making of the objection decision, the Commissioner is deemed to have made a decision under s 14ZY(1) to disallow the objection: s 14ZYA(3) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.]

Fuel Quality Standards Act 2000

Sections 70 (153 of 2000) (107 of 2009)

Sections 13, 16, 17C, 17D, 17E, 17F, 17G, 34
	The following decisions of the Minister for the Environment:  
-	to refuse to grant an approval under s 13; 
-	to grant an approval under s 13 that is different from the approval applied for; 
-	to specify a condition in an approval under s 16;  
-	to vary an approval under s 17C, 17D or 17F; 
-	to refuse to vary an approval under s 17E; 
-	to revoke an approval under s 17G; 
-	to enter, or not to enter, a fuel additive, or a class of fuel additives, in the Register under s 34; 
-	to remove, or not to remove, a fuel additive, or a class of fuel additive, from the Register under s 34.	

[Notes:
1.	Subsections 70(3) and (4) extend the meaning of the term “person whose interests are affected” in s 27 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975.]

Fuel Quality Standards Regulations 2001

Regulation 6(5), 6A(6) (SR 236 of 2001) (SR 116 of 2002)

Regulations 6(3)(a), 6A(3)(a)	The following decisions of the Minister for the Environment: 
-	to decide whether to exempt the applicant from the payment of the whole or part of the application fee under reg 6(3)(a); 
-	to refuse to refund an application fee under reg 6A(3)(a).	

[Notes:
1.	The Tribunal’s jurisdiction was amended by the Fuel Quality Standards Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 1) (259 of 2012). These amendments commenced 28 November 2012.] 

Fuel Tax Act 2006

Section 14ZZ of the Taxation Administration Act 1953

Section 14ZY(1) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953	The following decisions of the Commissioner of Taxation in relation to which an objection has been allowed, wholly or in part, or disallowed by the Commissioner under Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 
-	to negate a fuel tax benefit under s 75-40; 
-	to make a declaration to negate or reduce a fuel tax disadvantage under s 75-45(3); 
-	to decide whether or not to grant a request to negate or reduce a fuel tax disadvantage under s 75-45(5).	

[Notes:
1.	Subsection 112-50(1) of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 provides that a person may object against the decisions set out in the right-hand column above.  The decisions are specified in s 112-50(2) of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953.  The following Acts introduced or amended s 112-50(2) of Schedule 1 of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 73 of 2006.
2.	A person dissatisfied with any of the above decisions may object against them in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.  The Commissioner will then make an objection decision from which a person can apply for review to the Tribunal.
3.	An application for review of an objection decision must be lodged with the Tribunal within 60 days after the person making the application is served with notice of the decision: s 14ZZC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
4.	If the Commissioner fails to make a decision on a taxation objection within 60 days after being given a written notice requiring the making of the objection decision, the Commissioner is deemed to have made a decision under s 14ZY(1) to disallow the objection: s 14ZYA(3) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.]

G

Gene Technology Act 2000

Sections 183(1) (169 of 2000)

Sections 43(2)(f), 55, 68, 70, 71, 84, 86, 87,
88, 89A, 92, 94, 95, 96, 181(2), 185, 186 or 181(4)	Any of the following decisions that have been:
-	made by the Gene Technology Regulator personally: or
-	affirmed, varied or revoked on reconsideration by the Gene Technology Regulator personally under s 181(4);
-	to refuse under s 43(2)(f) to consider an application on the basis that the applicant is not a suitable person to hold a licence;
-	to refuse to issue a licence under s 55;
-	to impose a licence condition under s 55;
-	to suspend or cancel a licence under s 68;
-	to refuse to transfer a licence under s 70;
-	to vary a licence under s 71;
-	to refuse to vary a licence under s 71;
-	to refuse to certify a facility under s 84;
-	to specify a condition of a certification under s. 86;
-	to vary a certification under s 87;
-	to suspend or cancel a certification under s 88;
-	to refuse to transfer a certification under s 89A;
-	to refuse to accredit an organisation under s 92;
-	to specify a condition of an accreditation under s 94;
-	to vary an accreditation under s 95;
-	 to suspend or cancel an accreditation under s 96;
-	to allow, or refuse to allow, an applicant further time to lodge an application for internal review under s 181(2);
-	to refuse to declare information to be confidential commercial information under s 185;
-	to revoke a declaration that information is confidential commercial information under s 186.	

[Notes: 
1.	The list of reviewable decisions for the purposes of internal review and review by the Tribunal is set out in s 179 of this Act.  This provision also sets out who may seek internal review and review by the Tribunal in relation to each reviewable decision.  The following Acts introduced or have amended this provision: 169 of 2000 and 99 of 2007.
2.	If a period is specified under the Act or the Regulations for giving notice of a decision that may be reviewed, the Regulator is taken to have made a decision to reject the application if the Regulator has not notified the applicant of the decision within that period and may seek internal of the decision under s 181: s 182.
3.	Regulation 15 of the Gene Technology Regulations 2001 provides that, if an applicant for certification fails to provide information required under s 85(1) of the Act within the period specified in a notice given under s 85(2) of the Act and gives no reasonable explanation for the failure, the Regulator may refuse to certify the facility that is the subject of the application. Regulation 17 of the Gene Technology Regulations 2001 provides that, if an applicant for accreditation fails to provide information required under s 93(1) of the Act within the period specified in a notice given under s 93(2) of the Act and gives no reasonable explanation for the failure, the Regulator may refuse to accredit the organisation that is the subject of the application. The decisions are subject to review in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Act.
4.	Section 19 of the Act provides that application may be made to the Tribunal for review of decision made by the Gene Technology Regulator in the performance of a function, or the exercise of a power, conferred by a “corresponding State law” if the law under which the decision is made provides for review by the AAT and the decision is declared by the regulations to be a reviewable decision for the purposes of this section.  Corresponding State law is defined in s 12(1) of the Act to be a law of a state or territory that is declared by the Minister to correspond to this Act and the regulations.  A number of State Acts and Regulations have been declared to be corresponding State laws.  However, no decisions have been declared under the regulations to be reviewable decisions for the purposes of s 19 of the Act.]
5.	Section 71(2B) of this Act was amended by Gene Technology Amendment Act 2015 No 121 of 2015 and comes into effect on date of proclamation or not later than 11 March 2016.]

Gene Technology Regulations 2001

Regulation 38 (SR 106 of 2001) (SLI 128 of 2007)

Regulation 21	The following decision of the Minister for Health: 
-	to terminate under reg 21 the appointment of a member of the Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee, an expert adviser or the Ethics and Community Committee.	

[Notes:
-	Regulation 31 provides that the provisions in Division 1 of Part 4 relating to the conditions of appointment of a member of the Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee apply to a member of the Ethics and Community Committee.  The Minister may therefore terminate the appointment of a member of these committees under reg 21.]

Governor-General Act 1974

Section 4B (185 of 1992) (143 of 2012)

Sections 2B(3)(b), 2B(5), 2C(b)(iii), 4A(1), 4AC(3)(b)(i), 4AC(4), 4AC(6)(b)	The following decisions of the Finance Secretary: 
-	to determine whether a person ordinarily lived with a deceased Governor-General as his or her husband or wife or partner on a permanent and bona fide basis under s 2B(3)(b);
-	to determine whether a person would have been living with a deceased Governor-General except for a period of temporary absence or absence because of special circumstances under s 2B(5);
-	to determine whether a person was wholly or substantially dependent on a deceased Governor-General at the time of his or her death under s 2C(b)(iii);
-	to allocate, or refuse to allocate, payments to more than one spouse of a deceased Governor-General under s 4A(1);
-	to determine the day on which a spouse became permanently incapacitated under s 4AC(3)(b)(i);
-	to determine that a spouse is unlikely to engage in gainful employment for which they are reasonably qualified under s4AC(4);
-	to determine an individual or individuals to whom allowance orders must be paid under s 4AC(6)(b).	

[Notes:
1.	Item 15(3) of Schedule 2 to the Superannuation Legislation (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Act 2011 provides that an application may be made to the Tribunal for review of a decision made by the Commissioner of Superannuation before 1 July 2011 provided the period for making an application for review has not ended.

Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Act 1975 

Sections 39M, 59G(2), 64A (121 of 1991) (13 of 1993) (125 of 2008) 

Section 39L(3)	The following decision of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority that has been confirmed, revoked or varied on reconsideration: 
-	not to remit, or to remit part only of, an amount of late payment penalty under s 39G(2).
	
Section 59F	The following decision of the Minister for the Environment: 
-	to refuse to grant an exemption from the requirement to navigate with a pilot in the compulsory pilotage area.	
Section 64(4)	The following decisions of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority that have been affirmed, varied or substituted on reconsideration: 
-	to make an emergency direction under subsection 61ACA(2) or to vary such a direction; 
-	a decision prescribed by the regulations for the purposes of paragraph 64(3)(d).
	
	The following decisions of the Minister for the Environment that have been affirmed, varied or substituted on reconsideration: 
-	to make a direction under subsection 61AEA(2) (directions limiting access to the Marine Park), 
-	or to vary such a direction; a decision by the Minister prescribed by the regulations for the purposes of paragraph 64(3)(c).	

[Notes:
-	The list of reviewable decisions that are subject to reconsideration under the Act are set out in ss 39L(1) and s 64(3).  The following Acts introduced or have amended the list of reviewable decisions: 13 of 1993 and 125 of 2008.
-	If a person requests reconsideration of a decision under s 39G(2) and the Authority does not confirm, revoke or vary a decision before the end of the period of 40 days after the day on which the Authority received the request, the Authority is taken, at the end of that period, to have confirmed the decision: s 39L(4).
-	Section 64(5) provides that the regulations may prescribe the following matters in relation to requests for reconsideration and decisions under section 64: time limits for making requests; matters to be included in requests; time limits for reconsidering decisions; when a decision on reconsideration takes effect.]

Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (Aquaculture) Regulations 2000 

Regulation 57 (SR 6 of 2000)

Regulation 55(3)

	The following decisions of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority that have been confirmed, amended or substituted on reconsideration: 
-	that an aquaculture operation should no longer be treated as a concessional aquaculture operation under reg 15(1); 
-	to direct the operation of an aquaculture facility to cease discharging aquaculture waste from the facility under reg 15(4) or 17(4); 
-	on an application for a permission; to cancel a permission under; 
-	to amend a condition or impose a condition on a permission without the consent of the permission holder; 
-	to refuse to approve a transfer of a permission, or to impose a condition or additional condition on the transfer of a permission; 
-	to amend a permission by imposing a limitation on it.	

[Notes:  
1.	The list of decision subject to reconsideration under these Regulations is set out in reg 51.  The following Regulations introduced or have amended that provision: SR 6 of 2000.
2.	Regulation 57 provides that a person may apply to the Tribunal within 21 days after the publication of the notice in the Gazette of the Authority’s reconsideration decision.]

Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Regulations 1983

Regulation 187 (SR 262 of 1983) (SR 326 of 1997) (SR 252 of 1999) (SR 39 of 2004)

Regulation 186(2)
	The following decisions of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority that have been affirmed, varied or substituted on reconsideration: 
-	to treat an application for special permission as having been made before the expiry of the special permission under reg 88H(2); 
-	on an application for the grant of a permission under Part 2A; 
-	to suspend or revoke a permission under Part 2A; 
-	to modify a condition or permission under Part 2A; 
-	on an application for approval to transfer a permission under Part 2A; 
-	to impose a condition on a permission under Part 2A; 
-	on an application for accreditation of a TUMRA under Part 2B; 
-	on an application to modify an accredited TUMRA or to modify a condition of a TUMRA’s accreditation under Part 2B; 
-	to suspend or revoke the accreditation of an accredited TUMRA under Part 2B; 
-	to modify a condition of accreditation of an accredited TUMRA under Part 2B; 
-	to impose a condition on the accreditation of an accredited TUMRA under Part 2B; 
-	on an application for an exemption from a provision, or provisions, of Part 4A relating to interacting with cetaceans under s 117K(1); 
-	to determine that a service or proposed service is not, or will not be, a secondary service under reg 137.	

[Notes:

-	The list of decisions in relation to which reconsideration may be sought under the Regulations is set out in reg 185 which must be read in conjunction with reg 183.  The following Regulations introduced or have amended the list of reviewable decisions: SR 169 of 1985, SR 247 of 1987, SR 269 of 1989, SR 367 of 1989, SR 368 of 1989, SR 326 of 1997, SR 252 of 1999, SR 5 of 2000, SR 12 of 2001, SR 178 of 2001, SR 72 of 2002, SR 39 of 2004, SLI 309 of 2005, SLI 132 of 2006, SLI 262 of 2008 and SLI 304 of 2009.
-	A ‘TUMRA’ is defined in reg 3(1) as an acronym for traditional use of marine resources agreement.
-	A person may not make a request for reconsideration of a decision under Part 2A or 2B that relates to: 
1.	An application for permission to camp on a Commonwealth island: regs 185(1)(a)(iii) and 185(1)(b);
2.	A referral under s 37AB(1) of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority Act 1975 that is taken to be an application for a permission in accordance with the Regulations: regs 185(1)(a)(iv) and 185(1)(b).
-	The Regulations impose restrictions on who may request reconsideration of the following decisions:  
-	A decision on an application for the grant of a permission to use or enter the Mission Beach Leader Prawn Broodstock Capture Area for the purpose of collecting leader prawn broodstock for aquaculture operations - the person who applied for the permission: reg 185(3);
-	A decision on an application for the grant of a permission to conduct a tourist program that includes, as part of the program, swimming-with-whales activities in the Cairns Planning Area - the person who applied for the permission: reg 185(4);
-	A decision under reg 117K(1) about an application for an exemption from Part 4A relating to interacting with cetaceans - the person who applied for the exemption: reg 185(4A);
-	A decision under reg 83 on an application for an authorisation - the person who applied under reg 80 for the authorisation: reg 185(5);
-	A decision under Part 2A about the transfer of a permission - the proposed transferor or proposed transferee of the permission: reg 185(6);
-	A decision under reg 137 that a service or proposed service is not, or will not be, a secondary service - the operator or intending operator of the service: reg 185(7).
-	The Authority must reconsider a decision within 30 business days after receiving the request for reconsideration: reg 186(1).]

Greenhouse and Energy Minimum Standards Act 2012

Section 167(1) (132 of 2012)

Sections 43, 45, 46, 47, 48(4), 49, 52, 53, 54(1), 166(4)
	Any of the decisions set out below that has been:

-	made by the GEMS regulator personally; or
-	affirmed, varied or  revoked on reconsideration by the GEMS regulator under s 166(4):

1.	to refuse to register the  model under s 45;
2.	to impose conditions, or to vary the conditions imposed, on the registration under s 45;
3.	to refuse to vary the registration to cover one or more additional models of GEMS products under s 46;
4.	to refuse to vary the registration to specify the new registrant as the registrant for the registration under s 47;
5.	to specify an earlier day on which the registration period for the registration ends under s 48(4);
6.	to suspend the registration under s 49;
7.	to impose conditions on a suspension of the registration under s 52;
8.	to vary, or refuse to vary, a suspension notice in relation to the registration under s 53;
9.	to cancel the registration under s 54(1).	

[Notes:
1.	Despite s 27(1) of the AAT Act, an application for review to the Tribunal may only be made by a ‘person affected by a reviewable decision’: ss 167(2) and (3).
2.	Section 164 sets out a table outlining each reviewable decision and the corresponding definition of a ‘person affected’ by that decision.]

H

Hazardous Waste (Regulation of Exports and Imports) Act 1989

Section 57 (6 of 1990) (7 of 1996) 

Sections 4A(2), 4A(3), 4A(5), 4A(6), 4B(3), 13B(2), 13B(3), 13E, 13F, 17, 17A, 18A, 18B, 22(1), 22(2), 24, 26, 30, 32(5), 34, 35, 35A, 36, 38, 41B, 41C(3), 41C(5)	The following decisions of the Minister for the Environment: 
-	to declare, or refuse to declare, that a substance or object is hazardous waste under s. 4A(2);
-	to declare, or refuse to declare, that waste is hazardous waste under s. 4A(3);
-	to revoke a s. 4A(2) declaration under s. 4A(5);
-	to revoke a s. 4A(3) declaration under s. 4A(6);
-	to make, or refuse to make, a declaration under s. 4B(3) extending the time for carrying out a transit proposal;
-	to make, or refuse to make, a determination under s. 13B(2) or 13B(3) that the Act is to have effect as if an application for a Basel or special permit had been an application for the corresponding type of Basel or special permit;
-	to grant, or refuse to grant, a special permit under s. 13E or 13F;
-	to grant, or refuse to grant, a Basel import permit or a Basel export permit under s. 17;
-	to grant, or refuse to grant, a Basel transit permit under s. 17A;
-	to refuse to grant a Basel export permit under s. 18A;
-	to refuse to grant Basel import permit or a Basel transit permit under s. 18B;
-	to impose conditions on a Basel permit under s. 22(1);
-	to specify the day on or before which the holder of a Basel permit must comply with a condition under s. 22(2);
-	to revoke a Basel permit under s. 24;
-	to vary, or refuse to vary, a Basel permit under s. 26 or 30;
-	to determine, or refuse to determine, under s. 32(5) that the prescribed fee payable in relation to a specified application or notice is reduced by a specified amount;
-	to order a person to deal with waste in a specified way under s. 34, 35 or 35A;
-	to order a person to take steps to remedy or mitigate damage under s. 36;
-	to make, or refuse to make, an order under s. 38 authorising a person to import waste;
-	to approve, or refuse to approve, under s. 41B the transportation of notifiable substances through transit countries;
-	to declare, or refuse to declare, under s. 41C(3) that a substance or object is a notifiable substance in relation to a transit country; 
-	to revoke a s. 41C(3) declaration under s. 41C(5).	

Hazardous Waste (Regulation of Exports and Imports) (OECD Decision) Regulations 1996

Regulation 43 and section 57 of the Hazardous Waste (Regulation of Exports and Imports) Act 1989 (SR 283 of 1996)

Regulations 8, 16, 17, 23, 24, 29, 30, 33(1)(a), 33(1)(b), 34, 35, 39, 41, 42
	The following decisions of the Minister for the Environment: 
-	to determine that particular amber list hazardous waste should be taken to be red list hazardous waste for a special permit application under reg 8; 
-	to grant, or refuse to grant, a special import permit under reg 16; 
-	to grant a special import permit for less than a year under reg 17;
-	to grant, or refuse to grant, a special export permit under reg. 23;
-	to grant a special export permit for less than a year under reg. 24;
-	to grant, or refuse to grant, a special transit permit under reg 29;
-	to grant a special transit permit for less than a year under reg 30;
-	to impose conditions on a special permit under reg 33(1)(a);
-	to specify the day on or before which the holder of a special permit must comply with a condition under reg 33(1)(b);
-	to revoke a special permit under reg 34;
-	to vary, or refuse to vary, a special permit under reg 39 or 41;
-	to refuse to approve a facility under reg 42.	

Hazardous Waste (Regulation of Exports and Imports) Regulations 1996

Regulation 8 (SR 284 of 1996) (SR 203 of 2001)

Regulation 7
	The following decision of the Minister for the Environment: 
-	to refuse to approve a facility for the purpose of carrying out recovery operations under reg 7.	

Health and Other Services (Compensation) Act 1995

Section 18(10), 23D(1) (150 of 2001) (43 of 2006)

Section 18(9E)	The following decision of the Chief Executive Medicare that has been reconsidered:
-	to refuse to give a notice to a claimant under s 18(7).
	
Section 23B	The following decisions of the Chief Executive Medicare: 
-	to give a claimant a written notice under s 23B(1) that a statement under ss 18 or 23A, or an amended statement, is not substantially correct.	

Healthcare Identifiers Act 2010

Section 9C(8) (72 of 2010)

Section 9C(6) 	The following decision of the Chief Executive Officer of Medicare Australia that has been reconsidered: to not assign a healthcare identifier to a healthcare provider under s 9(1)(a).	

Health Insurance Act 1973

Sections 3AAB, 19AC(6), 19CA(8), 20AD(5), 21C(2), 22B(2), 23DAA, 23DO(5), 23DZD, 23DZZE, 23DZZZD, 23EB, 124R (167 of 1985) (75 of 1986) (94 of 1986) (85 of 1988) (141 of 1990) (171 of 1991) (172 of 1991) (193 of 1991) (88 of 1992) (76 of 1993) (12 of 1994) (116 of 1994) (164 of 1995) (75 of 1996) (129 of 1997) (37 of 1998) (93 of 2001) (76 of 2002) (130 of 2002) (33 of 2003) (117 of 2004) (32 of 2007) (88 of 2007) (29 of 2010)
Section 179(1) of Social Security (Administration) Act 1999 

Sections 3AAA
21B(2), 22A(2), 23B(1)(b), 23DC(1)(c), 23DF(1)(c), 23DL(6), 23DN(1), 23DN(2), 23DX, 23DXA, 
23DY(1), 23DYA(1), 23DYA(3), 23DY(3),  23DY(5), 23DY(3), 23DY(5), 23DZ(1), 23DZC, 23DZZA, 23DZZC, 23DZZZ, 23DZZZB	The following decisions of the Minister for Health: 
-	to accredit, or to refuse to accredit, a podiatrist under s 3AAA;
-	to refuse to accept an undertaking given by an eligible midwife under s 21B(2);
-	to refuse to accept an undertaking given by an eligible nurse practitioner under s 22A(2);
-	to refuse to accept an undertaking given by a person who wishes to become a participating optometrist under s 23B(1)(b);
-	to determine the period for which an undertaking is to have effect under ss 23DC(1)(c) or 23DF(1)(c);
-	to suspend an undertaking pending the outcome of proceedings before a Medicare Participation Review Committee under s 23DL(6);
-	to approve in principle, or to refuse to approve, premises as an accredited pathology laboratory under s 23DN(1);
-	to vary or revoke an approval in relation to an accredited pathology laboratory under s 23DN(2);
-	to restrict a remote area exemption to certain R-type diagnostic imaging services under s 23DY(1);
-	to refuse an application for a restriction on a remote area exemption to be removed or the scope of such a restriction to be reduced under s 23DY(3);
-	to reduce the scope of a remote area exemption under s 23DY(5);
-	to refuse to grant a remote area exemption under s 23DZ(1);
-	to revoke a remote area exemption under s 23DZC;
-	under s 23DY(1) to restrict a remote area exemption under s 23DX to certain R-type diagnostic imaging services;
-	under s 23DYA(1) to restrict a remote area exemption under s 23DXA to the station of equipment of a particular kind, or an employee with qualifications to perform services of a particular kind, at the premises of another practitioner;
-	under s 23DY(5) reducing the scope of a remote area exemption under s 23DX or 23DXA;
-	refusing to grant a remote area exemption under s 23DX or 23DXA;
-	refusing an application under s 23DY(3) for i)  a restriction on a remote area exemption under s 23DX to be removed, or ii) the scope of such a restriction to be reduced;
-	under s 23DZC revoking a remote area exemption under s 23DX or 23DXA;
-	to cancel the registration of diagnostic imaging/radiation oncology premises or a base for mobile diagnostic imaging equipment/mobile radiation oncology equipment under s 23DZZA or 23DZZZ;
-	not to permit a proprietor to apply for registration of diagnostic imaging premises/radiation oncology premises or a base for mobile diagnostic imaging equipment/mobile radiation oncology equipment under s 23DZZC or 23DZZZB.
	
Sections 19AC(1), 19AC(3), 19CA(4), 23DO(2), 23DO(2D), 23DO(2DB), 23DO(2H)	The following decisions of the Minister for Health that have been reconsidered by the Minister: 
-	to refuse under s 19AB(3) to grant an exemption in relation to payment of a Medicare benefit in respect of a professional service rendered by, or on behalf of, an overseas trained doctor or a former overseas medical student;
-	to impose under s 19AB(4) one or more conditions on an exemption under s 19AB(3);
-	to refuse to direct under s 19C(3) that a Medicare benefit is payable in respect of a professional service rendered by a medical practitioner who is not authorised under a licence to render the particular professional service;
-	to refuse to direct under 19C(4) that a Medicare benefit is payable in respect of a professional service rendered by a medical practitioner in circumstances that are not authorised under a practitioner's licence;
-	to refuse to accept an undertaking under s 23DC(1) or 23DF(1);
-	not to backdate the day on which an undertaking given by a pathology practitioner or pathology authority or an approval in respect of a pathology laboratory is taken to have come into force in accordance with s 23DDA, 23DNAAA or 23DGA;
-	to approve in principle or refuse to approve premises as an accredited pathology laboratory for the purposes of the Act under s 23DN(1);
-	to vary or revoke an approval of premises as an accredited pathology laboratory under s 23DN(2);
-	to approve or refuse to approve an approved pathology authority to be an eligible collection centre under s 23DNBA;
-	to revoke an approval granted to a an approved pathology authority under s 23DNG.
	
Sections 20AD(2)(a), 20AD(3)(a)	The following decisions of the Chief Executive Medicare that have been affirmed on reconsideration by the Chief Executive Medicare: 
-	to refuse to approve a person or body as a billing agent under s 20AB; 
-	to revoke the approval of a person as a billing agent under s 20AC.
	
Sections 124F, 124FA, 124FAA, 124FB, 124FC, 124FE, 124FF, 124G(2)
	Determinations of a Medicare Participation Review Committee.
	
Section 149 of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999	The following decisions under the Health Insurance Act 1973 that have been reviewed by the Secretary of the Department of Social Services, the Chief Executive Centrelink or an authorised review officer and then by the Social Security Appeals Tribunal:  
-	to revoke a declaration under s 5A; 
-	to declare or refuse to declare a person a disadvantaged person under s 5B; 
-	to revoke a s 5B declaration under s 5C; 
-	to declare a person a disadvantaged person under s 5D; 
-	to declare a person a disadvantaged person under s 5DA; 
-	to declare a person a disadvantaged person under s 5E; 
-	to declare a person a disadvantaged person under s 5EA; 
-	to declare a person a disadvantaged person under s 5EB.	

[Notes:
1.	The Tribunal’s jurisdiction was amended by the Health Insurance Amendment (Professional Services Review) Act 2012. This amendment will take effect on a day to be fixed by proclamation.
2.	If a person applies under s 19AC(1) of (3) for reconsideration of a decision under s 19AB(3) or (4) and the Minister has not informed the person of the decision on the reconsideration within 28 days after receiving the application, the Minister is taken to have confirmed the decision: s 19AC(5).
3.	Section 129 of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999 provides that a person affected by a decision under s 5A, 5B, 5C, 5D, 5DA, 5DB, 5E, 5EA or 5EB of the Health Insurance Act 1973 may apply to the Secretary of the Department of Social Services  or the CEO of Centrelink for review of the decision.  Decisions made by the Secretary of the Department of Health under or in relation to the social security law are not reviewable in this way: s 129(4)(e) of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999.  Section 142 of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999 provides that application may be made to the Social Security Appeals Tribunal for review of a decision of the Secretary, the CEO of Centrelink or an authorised review officer made under ss 126 or 135.]

Health Insurance (Eligible Collection Centres) Approval Principles 2010

Section 8(2) (F2010L01765)

Section 5(3)(a)	The following decision of the Minister for Health:  
1.	to accept, or refuse to accept, under s 5(3)(a) that compliance with some, or all, of the provisions of the Collection Centre Guidelines is not reasonably practicable.	

[Notes:
1.	An application for review of a decision can only be made by an applicant for approval of an ECC: s 8(2).]

Hearing Service Providers Accreditation Scheme 1997

Section 35 of the Hearing Services Administration Act 1997

Section 32(1) of the Hearing Services Administration Act 1997	The following decisions of the Minister for Health that have been affirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	to accredit, or refuse to accredit, an entity under s 6(1); 
-	to accredit an entity subject to one or more conditions under s 6(1); 
-	give written notice to an accredited service provider under s 9(1) that the Minister thinks the provider may have contravened a condition of its accreditation; 
-	to revoke or vary conditions of accreditation, to impose further conditions of accreditation or to cancel the accreditation under s 10(2); 
-	to cancel under s 11 the accreditation of a provider whose contract with the Office of Hearing Services is terminated.	

[Notes:
1.	Section 29 of the Hearing Services Administration Act 1997 provides that an application may be made to the Minister for reconsideration under the Act of any decision of the Minister under the accreditation scheme formulated under s 15(1) of the Act or under a condition of accreditation.]

Hearing Services Administration Act 1997

Section 35 (81 of 1997)

Section 32(1)	The following decisions of the Minister for Health that have been affirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	to refuse to issue a voucher to a participant in the voucher system under s 10; 
-	to refuse to accredit an individual, a body corporate or a partnership under ss 19(1), 19(2) or 19(3); 
-	to cancel the accreditation of an entity under s 19(4).	

[Notes:  
1.	The list of decisions under the Act in relation to which a person may request reconsideration are set out s 29.  The following Acts introduced or have amended the list of reviewable decisions:  81 of 1997.
2.	The Act also provides the mechanism for review of decisions made pursuant to the following legislative instruments:
•	voucher rules formulated under s 11(1);
•	the accreditation scheme formulated under s 15(1) or a condition of accreditation;
•	rules of conduct formulated under s 17(1).
3.	Refer to the entries for the Hearing Service Providers Accreditation Scheme 1997, the Hearing Services Voucher Rules and the Hearing Services Rules of Conduct 2005 for further information on reviewable decisions under these instruments.]

Hearing Services Rules of Conduct 2012

Section 35 of the Hearing Services Administration Act 1997	

Section 32(1) of the Hearing Services Administration Act 1997	Any decision of the Minister for Health made under the Rules which has been affirmed or varied on reconsideration.	

[Notes: 
1.	These Rules were made under s 17(1) of the Hearing Services Administration Act 1997.
2.	Section 29 of the Hearing Services Administration Act 1997 provides that an application may be made to the Minister for reconsideration under the Act of any decision of the Minister under the rules of conduct formulated under s 17(1) of the Act.]

Hearing Services Voucher Rules 1997

Section 35 of the Hearing Services Administration Act 1997

Section 32(1) of the Hearing Services Administration Act 1997	The following decisions made by the Minister for Health under the Rules which have been affirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	to issue, or refuse to issue, a voucher under s 7; 
-	to issue, or refuse to issue, a replacement voucher under s 8; 
-	to authorise, or refuse to authorise, a contracted service provider to use a voucher to replace a hearing device under s 10(2); 
-	to revalidate, or refuse to revalidate, a voucher under s 12.	

[Notes: 
1.	These Rules were made under s 11(1) of the Hearing Services Administration Act 1997.
2.	Section 29 of the Hearing Services Administration Act 1997 provides that an application may be made to the Minister for reconsideration under the Act of any decision of the Minister under the voucher rules formulated under s 11(1) of the Act.]

High Court of Australia (Fees) Regulation 2012

Regulation 17(4) (SLI 282 of 2012)

Regulation 12	The following decision of the Registrar of the High Court: 
-	to determine whether a person may pay the financial hardship fee under reg 12	

Higher Education Funding Act 1988

Sections 50(1), 106M(6), 106U, 106X (2 of 1989) (158 of 1992) (116 of 1993) (72 of 1996) (78 of 2002) (112 of 2002)

Sections 42(3), 44, 46, 47, 106W(1), 106W(3)	The following decisions of the Commissioner of Taxation: 
-	to give a notice under s 42(3); 
-	to refuse an application for issue of tax file number under ss 44 or 46; 
-	to cancel a tax file number under s 47; 
-	to defer making an assessment of the amount of accumulated debt or the amount required to be paid in respect of that debt under s 106W(1); 
-	to refuse to amend an assessment under s 106W(3).	
Section 106M(3)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Education that have been confirmed, varied or revoked on reconsideration: 
-	not to remit, or to remit part only of, a HEC semester debt or open learning study period debt.
	
Section 106T	The following decision of the Commissioner of Taxation that has been reviewed pursuant to Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 
-	to make an assessment under s 106T of the amount of a person’s accumulated HEC debt and the amount required to be paid in respect of that debt.
	
Section 106ZR	The following decisions of the Minister for Education: 
-	to refuse to approve a person as a self-accrediting entity under s 106ZQ(4); 
-	to refuse to accredit a course leading to a higher education award under s 106ZQ(5); 
-	to amend or revoke an approval of a person as a self-accrediting entity under s 106ZQ(8); 
-	to amend or revoke an accreditation of a course as a course leading to a higher education award under s 106ZQ(9).	

[Notes: 
1.	Section 106U provides that Part IV and Div 1 of Part VI of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 apply in relation to a HEC assessment debt as if it were income tax assessed to be payable by a taxpayer by an assessment made under Part IV of that Act.
2.	Assessments made under s 106T are reviewed in the same way as assessments of income tax in accordance with the procedures set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.  A person who is dissatisfied with a decision under s 106T must object against that decision.  The Tribunal may only review a decision to allow, wholly or in part, or to disallow a taxation objection.  
3.	An application for review of an objection decision must be lodged with the Tribunal within 60 days after the person making the application is served with notice of the decision: s 14ZZC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
4.	If the Commissioner fails to make a decision on a taxation objection within 60 days after being given a written notice requiring the making of the objection decision, the Commissioner is deemed to have made a decision under s 14ZY(1) to disallow the objection: s 14ZYA(3) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.]

Higher Education Support Act 2003

Section 212-1 and clause 97 of Schedule 1A (149 of 2003) (170 of 2007)
Section 202F(1)(fa) and (fb) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (150 of 2003)

Section 190-15(1), 190-15(1A), 190-20(1), 190-20(1A)	The following decisions of the Commissioner of Taxation: 
-	to give a higher education provider a notice under s 190-15(1) informing the provider that the tax file number that a student notified to the provider has been cancelled or is not the student’s tax file number and that the student has no tax file number;
-	to give Open Universities Australia a notice under s 190-15(1A) informing Open Universities Australia that the tax file number that a student notified has been cancelled or is not the student’s tax file number and that the student has no tax file number;
-	to give a notice to a higher education provider under s 190-20(1) that a student’s application for a tax file number has been refused or a student’s tax file number has been cancelled;
-	to give a notice to Open Universities Australia under s 190-20(1A) that a student’s application for a tax file number has been refused or a student’s tax file number has been cancelled.	
Sections 209-5(3), 209-10(4)

	The following decisions that have been confirmed, varied or set aside on reconsideration by the Secretary of the Department of Education: 
-	to decide that s 36-22/36-20 does not apply to a person; 
-	to refuse to re-credit a person’s FEE-HELP balance under s 104-25(1) or 104-25(2).	
	The following decisions of the Commissioner of Taxation that have been confirmed, varied or set aside on reconsideration: 
-	to defer making an assessment or refuse to defer the making of an assessment under s 154-45; 
-	to amend the assessment or refuse to amend the assessment under s 154-50; 
-	to determine under s 157-20(1) whether a person is eligible for the HECS-HELP benefit for an income year; 
-	to determine under s 157-20(1) the amount of a person’s HECS-HELP benefit. 	
The following clauses of Schedule 1A: 95(3), 96(4)	The following decision that has been confirmed, varied or set aside on reconsideration by the Secretary of the Department of Education: 
-	to refuse to re-credit a person’s FEE-HELP balance under cl 46(2) of Schedule 1A.	

[Notes
1.	The lists of ‘reviewable decisions’ that may be reconsidered under the Act are set out in s 206 and cl 91 of Schedule 1A to the Act.  The following Acts introduced or have amended the list of reviewable decisions: 149 of 2003, 45 of 2004, 114 of 2004, 158 of 2005, 72 of 2007, 170 of 2007, 43 of 2008 and 104 of 2011.
2.	A person whose interests are affected by a reviewable decision may request reconsideration of that decision under s 209-10(1) or cl 96(1) of Schedule 1A.  A reviewer may reconsider a reviewable decision on its own motion under s 209-5(1) or cl 95(1) of Schedule 1A of the Act even if an application has been lodged with the Tribunal.
3.	Where a person has requested reconsideration of a reviewable decision under s 209-10(1) or cl 96(1) of Schedule 1A, the decision is taken to have been confirmed if the reviewer does not give notice of a decision within 45 days after receiving the person’s request: s 209-10(6) and cl 96(8) of Schedule 1A.]

Horse Disease Response Levy Collection Act 2011

Section 9(5) (116 of 2011)

Section 9(3)	The following decision of the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources that has been reconsidered by the Secretary: 
-	to remit all or part of an amount of late payment penalty.	

Horticultural Export Charge Regulations

Regulation 13A(1) (SR 41 of 1989)

Regulations 9A(4)(a), 9A(7)(a) 	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources: 
-	to refuse to grant an exemption from the requirement to lodge monthly returns in a year under reg 9A(4)(a); 
-	to refuse to continue to grant an exemption to lodge monthly returns for a year under reg 9A(7)(a).	

[Notes:  
1.	The Horticultural Export Charge Act 1987 was repealed on 1 July 1999 by the Primary Industries Levies and Charges (Consequential Amendments) Act 1999 (32 of 1999).  However, these Regulations will continue to have effect pursuant to cl 6 of Sch 10 to the Primary Industries (Customs) Charges Act 1999.]

Horticulture Marketing and Research and Development Services (Export Efficiency) Regulations 2002 

Regulation 16 (SR 284 of 2002)

Regulations 7(1), 9(3), 7(3), 10(4).	The following decisions made by Horticulture Australia Limited: 
-	to refuse to grant a licence under reg 7(1); 
-	to impose a condition  on a licence (other than a condition contained in a published document) under reg 7(3); 
-	to refuse to renew a licence under reg 9(3); 
-	to suspend a licence under reg 10(4)(a); 
-	to revoke a licence under reg 10(4)(b); 
-	to vary a licence under reg 10(4)(c) by omitting a kind of horticultural product pursuant to reg 10 (2)(b).	

I

Immigration (Guardianship of Children) Act 1946

Section 11A(6) (65 of 1985)

Sections 4AA, 11, 11A(3)(a)(ii)	The following decisions of the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection: 
-	to direct that a child shall be the Minister's ward under s 4AA; 
-	to refuse to exempt a child from the provisions of the Act under s 11; 
-	to refuse to extend period in which to seek reconsideration of a decision of a delegate of the Minister under ss 4AA or 11.	
Section 11A(4) 	The following decisions of a delegate of the Minister that have been confirmed, varied or set aside on reconsideration under s 11A(4): 
-	to direct that a child shall be the Minister's ward under s 4AA; 
-	to refuse to exempt a child from the provisions of the Act under s 11.	

Imported Food Charges (Collection) Act 2015

Section 19 (96 of 2015)

Section 12(2)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources:
1.	to suspend or revoke an imported food control instrument of a person under s 12(2).	
Section 17	The following decision of the internal reviewer: 
2.	to make a decision under s 17 that relates to a decision to suspend or revoke an imported food control instrument of a person under s 12(2). 	

[Notes:
-	This Act commenced on 30 June 2015: 96 of 2015].

Imported Food Control Act 1992

Section 42(11) (221 of 1992) (4 of 1999)

Section 42(5)
	The following decisions of an authorised officer that have been confirmed, varied or revoked by the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources on reconsideration: 
-	to issue a food control certificate under s 12 that states the relevant food is required to be inspected, or inspected and analysed; to issue an imported food inspection advice under s 14(1) identifying food as failing food and specifying the manner of dealing with that food; 
-	to refuse an application for a further imported food inspection advice under s 14(6); 
-	to issue a further imported food inspection advice under s 14(6) identifying food as failing food and specifying the manner of dealing with that food.
	
	The following decisions of the Secretary that have been confirmed, varied or revoked by the Secretary on reconsideration: 
-	to revoke a quality assurance certificate under s 19(3); 
-	to direct under s 20(13) that food control certificates should not be issued to an importer who has failed to comply with a notice under s 20(2), (3) or (4); 
-	to direct under s 36(8) that documentation not be issued in respect of food imported by a person who has failed to pay fees to the Commonwealth; 
-	to pay, or refuse to pay, compensation under s 39(1) for food which was destroyed as a result of a mistake of fact or law.	

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936

Decisions under this Act that are subject to merits review are reviewed in one of two distinct ways.  
•	In respect of some decisions, an application for review may be made directly with the Tribunal.  The entries below reflect this distinction.
•	In respect of other decisions, a person who is dissatisfied with the decision must object against that decision in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.  The Commissioner of Taxation must make a decision to allow, wholly or in part, or to disallow a taxation objection.  The Tribunal may only review the Commissioner’s decision on the objection.  

Decisions in respect of which an application for review may be made directly to the Tribunal	
Sections 202F, 251QA (78 of 1988) (97 of 1988) (153 of 1988) (56 of 1994) (85 of 1998) (101 of 2006) (114 of 2009) (75 of 2010)	
Sections 202BA, 202BE, 202CE(3), 202DF(3), 202DM(3), 202DR(4), 202EB(3), 202G(4)	The following decisions of the Commissioner of Taxation: 
•	to refuse to issue a tax file number under s 202BA;
•	to cancel a tax file number under s 202BE;
•	to give a notice to an employer under s 202CE(3) that an employee does not have a tax file number;
•	to give a notice to an investment body under s 202DF(3) that an employee does not have a tax file number;
•	to give notice to a financial institution under s 202DM(3) that a person does not have a tax file number;
•	to give a notice to a trustee under s 202DR(4) to the effect that a beneficiary does not have a tax file number;
•	to give a notice to a person under s 202EB(3) to the effect that the person is no longer entitled to an exemption under the section;
•	to exempt, or refuse to exempt, a person from compliance in supplying specified tax file information under s 202G(4);
•	to vary or revoke an exemption under s 202G(4).

[Notes:  
1.	An application for review of any of these decisions must be lodged with the Tribunal within 28 days after the decision is given to a person.
2.	Subsection 202F(1)(g) of the Act provides that application may be made to the Tribunal for review a decision stated by the regulations to be a reviewable decision for the purposes of that section.] 

Decisions to which Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 applies	
Section 14ZZ of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (216 of 1991) (34 of 1997)	
Section 14ZY(1) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953	The following decisions of the Commissioner of Taxation in relation to which an objection has been allowed, wholly or in part, or disallowed by the Commissioner under Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 	
	to make a determination that s 45C applies in relation to the whole, or a part, of certain capital benefits; 	s 45A(2) 
or s45B(3)	
	to make a determination that certain capital benefits were paid under a scheme for which a purpose, other than an incidental purpose, was to avoid franking debits arising in relation to the distribution from the company; 	s 45C(3)	
	to give an eligible company a written notice under s 73IA(1) specifying the amount of a tax offset allowable to the company 	s 73I;	
	a decision on a request for an amended assessment in respect of tax benefits and certain recouped expenditure 	s 82KL(8);	
	to give a notice specifying an amount of any trustee beneficiary non-disclosure tax that is payable 	s 102UR(1);	
	to refuse to issue a certificate under a provision in Div 11A of Part III; 	Div 11A of Part III	
	to specify a particular amount in a certificate relating to the issue price of certain securities; 	s 128AB	
	to make, or refuse to make, a determination that an amount should not have been included or shall not be included in the assessable income of the taxpayer 	s 136AF(5)	
	to make, or refuse to make, a determination that an amount should have been allowed or should be allowable as a deduction to the taxpayer 	s 136AF(1);	
	to make, or refuse to make, a determination under s 136AF(3) that an amount of withholding tax should not have become payable; 	s 136AF(5)	
	to give notice that a late lodgment penalty is payable; 	s 163A(3)	
	to refuse to remit the whole or any part of a late lodgment penalty 	s 163A(5);	
	to issue an assessment or an amended assessment under Part IV (other than an assessment that the taxpayer has no taxable income or that the taxpayer has an amount of taxable income and no tax is payable unless the taxpayer is seeking an increase in the taxpayer’s liability); 	Part IV	
	to determine that a franking debit or exempting debit of the company arises in respect of each dividend paid to a relevant taxpayer or that no franking credit benefit is to arise in respect of a dividend or a specified part of a dividend paid, or in respect of a distribution or a specified part of a distribution made, to a relevant taxpayer; 	s 177EA(5)	
	to determine that no credit is to arise in a head company’s franking account because of the joining entity becoming a subsidiary member of a consolidated group;	s 177EB(5)	
	to determine that the whole or a part of a capital loss incurred during a year of income was not incurred by the taxpayer during that year of income; 	s 177F(1)(c)	
	to determine that a taxpayer is subject to withholding tax under s 128B on the whole or a part of a tax benefit obtained that is covered by s 177CA;	s 177(2A)	
	a decision on a request to make a determination under s 177F(3) that an amount should not have been included or shall not be included in the assessable income of the taxpayer or that an amount should have been allowed or should be allowable as a deduction to the taxpayer; 	s 177F(6)	
	to give a notice under ss 271-90(1) or 271-90(2) of Sch 2F specifying the amount of any family trust distribution tax that the Commissioner has ascertained is payable under ss 271-15, 271-55, 271-60 or 271-65 of Sch 2F.	s 271-90(1) of Sch 2F
or s 271-90(2) of Sch 2F	

[Notes: 
1.	The following provisions of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 provide that a person may object against the decisions specified in the right-hand column in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: ss 45D(4), 73IA(2), 82KL(9), 102UR(5), 128P, 136AF(6), , 163A(7), 175A(1), 177EA(9), 177EB(9), 177F(2G), 177F(7), and 271-90(6) of Schedule 2F.
2.	The following Acts introduced, amended or repealed provisions specifying that a person may object against a decision in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 216 of 1991, 208 of 1992, 32 of 1993, 138 of 1994, 169 of 1995, 170 of 1995, 17 of 1998, 47 of 1998, 63 of 1998, 85 of 1998, 11 of 1999, 16 of 1999, 70 of 1999, 92 of 1999, 94 of 1999, 178 of 1999, 179 of 1999, 161 of 2005, 101 of 2006, 15 of 2007, 78 of 2007, 143 of 2007 and 164 of 2007.
3.	An application for review of an objection decision must be lodged with the Tribunal within 60 days after the person making the application is served with notice of the decision: s 14ZZC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
4.	If the Commissioner fails to make a decision on a taxation objection within 60 days after being given a written notice requiring the making of the objection decision, the Commissioner is deemed to have made a decision under s 14ZY(1) to disallow the objection: s 14ZYA(3) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
5.	The Tax Laws Amendment (Repeal of Inoperative Provisions) Act 2006 repealed a number of inoperative provisions as outlined above on 14 September 2006.  Item 7 of Schedule 6 to the Tax Laws Amendment (Repeal of Inoperative Provisions) Act 2006 provides that the repeal is to be disregarded for the purposes of making and amending assessments, and doing other things, in relation to a period ending before the repeal occurred.  A person may continue to exercise any right of review in relation to decisions made under the Act despite its repeal.
6.	The Tax Laws Amendment (2007 Measures No. 4) Act 2007 repealed ss 160AI, 160AJA and 160AL on 24 September 2007.  The application of these amendments is dealt with in items 222 and 224 of Schedule 1 to the amending Act.  Item 226 of Schedule 1 to the amending Act provides specifically that the repeal is to be disregarded for the purposes of making and amending assessments, and doing other things, in relation to a period ending before the repeal occurred.  A person may continue to exercise any right of review in relation to decisions made under the Act despite its repeal.
7.	The Tax Laws Amendment (2007 Measures No. 5) Act 2007 repealed Division 10BA on 1 July 2010: item 41 of Schedule 10.]

Decisions in respect of which an application for review may be made directly to the Tribunal	
Section 202F of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936	
Regulations 55(4), 55(7), 56(3)	The following decisions of the Commissioner of Taxation: 
-	to extend, or refuse to extend, under reg 55(4) the time for lodging a file number report by an investment body; 
-	to give, or refuse to give, a notice under reg 55(7) to an investment body to inform the body of a longer reporting period; 
-	to extend, or refuse to extend, under reg 56(3) the time for giving annual investment income reports; 
-	to vary or revoke a notice given under reg 55(4), 55(7) or 56(3).	

[Notes:  
1.	Regulation 57 provides that the decisions set out in the right-hand column above are reviewable decisions for the purposes of s 202F of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936.  The following Regulations introduced or have amended that provision: SR 1992 of 1990.
2.	An application for review of any of these decisions must be lodged with the Tribunal within 28 days after the  decision is given to a person.
3.	Part 6 (including regs 55 and 56) was repealed by SLI 39 of 2015 with effect from 1 July 2015].

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997

Similar to the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, decisions under this Act that are subject to merits review are reviewed in one of two distinct ways.  
-	In respect of some decisions, a person who is dissatisfied with the decision must object against that decision in the manner set out in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.  The Commissioner of Taxation will then make a decision to allow, wholly or in part, or to disallow the taxation objection.  The Tribunal may only review the Commissioner’s decision on the objection.  
-	In respect of other decisions, an application for review may be lodged directly with the Tribunal.  
The entries below reflect this distinction.

Decisions to which Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 applies	
Section 14ZZ of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (216 of 1991) (34 of 1997)	
Section 14ZY(1) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953	The following decisions of the Commissioner of Taxation in relation to which an objection has been allowed, wholly or in part, or disallowed by the Commissioner under Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 	
	Reviewable decision	Made under	
	to make or vary a personal services determination of an individual or an entity 	87-60 or 87-65	
	to revoke a personal services determination 	87-80	
	to give a company a notice specifying the amount of any untainting tax that is payable and the day on which that tax became or will become due and payable 	197-80(1)	
	to change or not to change the franking credits on a specified class of distributions 	202-85(3)	
	to permit or not to permit an entity to frank a distribution that departs from the benchmark rule 	203-55(1)	
	to determine that a specified franking debit arises in the franking account of an entity for a specified distribution or other benefit to a disadvantaged member 	204-30(3)(a)	
	to determine that a specified exempting debit arises in the exempting account of the entity, for a specified distribution or other benefit to a disadvantaged member 	204-30(3)(b)	
	to determine that no imputation benefit is to arise in respect of a distribution that is made to a favoured member and specified in the determination |	204-30(3)(c)	
	that the expenses are reasonable 	207-120(3)(b)	
	that it would be reasonable to treat the trust share amount as having been distributed to the beneficiary in the income year 	207-126(2)	
	that the interest is to be taken to be vested and indefeasible 	207-128cus(4)	
	giving the controller written notice stating that the controller is liable to pay an amount and specifying that amount 	207-130(1)(e)	
	that it is reasonable that the first entity be taken not to be such a controller of the second entity at the particular time 	207-130(8)(b)	
	that it would be unreasonable to apply subsection 207-132(2) or 207-132(3) 	207-132(4)	
	to make or not to make a franking assessment  	214-60	
	to cancel a company's New Zealand franking choice 	220-50(1)	
	to determine, or refuse to determine that Division 250 does not apply to a person and an asset at a particular time	250-45	
	to approve, or refuse to approve an alternative method for working out the disallowed capital allowance percentage for a person and an asset	250-150(5)	
	to determine, that all or part of your non-concessional contributions for a financial year  is to be disregarded or allocated instead for the purposes of another financial year specified in the determination	292-465(1)	
			
	to direct, or refuse to direct, that the value of your remaining superannuation interests is nil 	292-467	
	to make, or amend, an excess contributions tax assessment in relation to a person 	Subdiv 292-E or 292-F	
	to determine that an entity is no longer to be treated as a greenfields minerals explorer	418-185	
	that an entity is not required to comply with all or any part of the accounting standards for one or more income years 	820-960(4)	
	to give a notice specifying the amount of any Seasonal Labour Mobility Program withholding tax that is payable and the day on which that tax became due and payable	840-910(3)	
	that two or more related schemes do not give rise to a debt interest as it would be unreasonable	974-15(4)	
	relating to debt interest arising out of obligations owed by a number of entities 	974-60(3) or (4) or (5)	
	that a scheme gives rise to a debt interest in an entity 	974-65	
	that two or more related schemes do not give rise to an equity interest in a company as it would be unreasonable 	974-70(4)	
	that what would otherwise be a single scheme is to be treated for the purposes of Div 974 as two or more separate schemes or that the schemes are to be taken for the purposes of the Div to not be related schemes.	Div 974	

[Notes:
1.	The following provisions of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 provide that a person may object against the decisions specified in the right-hand column in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: ss 87-85, 197-80(5), 202-85(6), 203-55(7), 204-55, 207-136, 214-80, 220-50(3), 250-295(3), 292-245, 292-469, 820-965, 840-910(6) and 974-112.
2.	The following Acts introduced, amended or repealed provisions specifying that a person may object against a decision in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 38 of 1997, 179 of 1999, 86 of 2000, 162 of 2001, 163 of 2001, 48 of 2002, 16 of 2003, 67 of 2003, 95 of 2004, 23 of 2005, 80 of 2006, 9 of 2007, 164 of 2007, 58 of 2012,75 of 2012 and 21 of 2015.
3.	An application for review of an objection decision must be lodged with the Tribunal within 60 days after the person making the application is served with notice of the decision: s 14ZZC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
4.	If the Commissioner fails to make a decision on a taxation objection within 60 days after being given a written notice requiring the making of the objection decision, the Commissioner is deemed to have made a decision under s 14ZY(1) to disallow the objection: s 14ZYA(3) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.]

Decisions in respect of which an application for review may be made directly to the Tribunal:	
Sections 34-40, 40-675, 40-1010(7), 376-100, 376-255, 385-215, 396-110, 402-775 (121 of 1997) (76 of 2001) (16 of 1998) (27 of 2002) (164 of 2007) (38 of 2008) (42 of 2009)(132 of 2011)	
Sections 34-30(1)	The following decision of the Secretary of the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science: to grant or refuse to grant an application relating to the registration of the design of a non-compulsory uniform under s 34-30(1).
	
Section 40-670(1)	The following decision of the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources or an officer of that Department who has been authorized in writing by that Secretary to approve persons as farm consultants: to refuse to approve, or to revoke the approval of, a person as a farm consultant under s 40-670(1).
	
Section 40-1010(6)	The following decision of the Secretary of the Department of Environment: to give the Commissioner of Taxation a notice under s 40-1010(6) that the Secretary is satisfied that one or more of the conditions in s 40-1010(2) relating to expenditure for establishing trees in carbon sink forests have not been satisfied for the trees.
	
Section 376-15, 376-90
	The following decisions of the Minister administering the Film Licensed Investment Company Act 2005 (Minister for the Arts): to refuse an application for a certificate under s 376-15; to revoke a certificate under s 376-90.
	
Sections 376-20, 376-30; 376-45, 376-50; 376-245	The following decisions of the Minister administering the Film Licensed Investment Company Act 2005 (Minister for the Arts): to refuse under s 376-20 an application for a certificate for the location offset; to determine under s 376-30 the total of a company’s qualifying Australian production expenditure on a film for the purposes of the location offset; to refuse under s 376-45 an application for a certificate for the PDV offset; to determine under s 376-50 the total of a company’s qualifying Australian production expenditure for a film for the purposes of the PDV offset; to revoke under s 376-245 a certificate issued to a company for a film under s 376-20 or 376-45.
	
Sections 376-65, 376-75, 376-245	The following decisions of Screen Australia: to refuse under s 376-65 an application for a certificate for the producer offset; to determine under s 376-75 the total of a company’s qualifying Australian production expenditure on a film for the purposes of the producer offset; to revoke under s 376-245 a certificate issued to a company for a film under s 376-65.
	
Sections  385-190, 385-200	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources: to refuse an application for a Research Participation Certificate under s 385-190; to revoke a Research participation Certificate under 385-200.	
Section 396-40
	A decision of the Minister for Infrastructure and Regional Development  that a breach of a land transport facilities borrowing agreement is a material breach of the agreement by the lender or borrower, and not to vary the agreement in a way that would cause the breach to no longer be a breach under s 396-40.
	
Sections 402-760(1), 402-765(1), 402-770(1)	The following decisions of the Minister for Environment: to refuse to issue a certificate to a company under s 402-760(1) that a project is eligible for the urban water tax offset for an income year; to specify under s 402-765(1) a particular amount in a certificate issued to a company; to revoke under s 402-770(1) a certificate issued to a company.	

[Notes:  
1.	An application for review of any of these decisions must be lodged with the Tribunal within 28 days after the decision is given to a person.
2.	Division 376 of the Act was repealed and replaced on 25 September 2007 by the Tax Laws Amendment (2007 Measures No. 5) Act 2007.  Despite the repeal, that Division continues to apply in relation to films that commenced principal photography or production of an animated image before 8 May 2007 as if the repeal had not happened: item 92 of Schedule 10 to the amending Act.
3.	Subdivision 402-W which relates to urban water tax offset will be repealed on 1 July 2014: item 18 of Schedule 4 to the Tax Laws Amendment (2009 Measures No 2) Act 2009.  Despite the repeal, s 402-770 will continue to apply to a certificate that has been issued until the end of the period of 10 years starting on the day it was issued, enabling the Minister to revoke the certificate.  A company may apply to the Tribunal for review of such a decision despite the repeal of s 402-775: see item 19 of Schedule 4 to the Tax Laws Amendment (2009 Measures No 2) Act 2009.]

Income Tax (Transitional Provisions) Act 1997

Section 14ZZ of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (216 of 1991) (34 of 1997)

Section 14ZY(1) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 	The following decision of the Commissioner of Taxation in relation to which an objection has been allowed, wholly or in part, or disallowed by the Commissioner under Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 
-	to make a franking assessment in relation to a corporate tax entity under Division 214 of Part 3-6 of this Act.	

[Notes: 
1.	The following provision of the Act provides that a person may object against the decision specified in the right-hand column in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: s 214-90.
2.	The following Act introduced the provision specifying that a person may object against a decision in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 16 of 2003.
3.	An application for review of an objection decision must be lodged with the Tribunal within 60 days after the person making the application is served with notice of the decision: s 14ZZC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
4.	If the Commissioner fails to make a decision on a taxation objection within 60 days after being given a written notice requiring the making of the objection decision, the Commissioner is deemed to have made a decision under s 14ZY(1) to disallow the objection: s 14ZYA(3) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.]

Industrial Chemicals (Notification and Assessment) Act 1989

Section 102(1) (8 of 1990) (102 of 1992) (214 of 1992) (99 of 1997) (144 of 2001) (74 of 2003) (110 of 2004) (111 of 2009)(103 of 2011)

Sections 13A, 14(4), 15AA(7); 17(4), 18A(2), 19(7), 20AA(6), 21H(1), 21H(2), 21L, 21U(3), 21W(3), 21W(4), 21W(6),22F(4), 22H(1), 22H(5), 22H(6), 22J, 24(1), 24(3), 24(4), 27(1), 27(2), 27(4), 28(2), 30A(3), 30C(1), 33C, 37(2)(b), 40(6), 44(1)(d), 40F(3)(b), 44(2)(b), 58(3), 60E(5), 65(1), 65(2), 69(1), 73(6), 75(1), 79(a), 80G(2), 80KA(3), 80KB(4), 80Q(1), 80QA(1), 80QC(1), 80QC(3)
	The following decisions of the Director of National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme: 
-	to include or vary particulars in the Inventory in respect of a chemical under s 13A;
-	to include a chemical in the confidential section of the Australian Inventory of Chemical Substances under s 14(4);
-	a final decision to include, or not include, a chemical in the Inventory under s 15AA(7);
-	to treat a person as the holder of a confidence about a chemical under s 17(4);
-	to transfer a chemical to the confidential section of the Inventory under s 18A(2);
-	to transfer a chemical to each holder of a confidence under s 19(7);
-	to reject reasons why a chemical should not be removed from the Inventory under s 20AA(6);
-	to refuse an application for a commercial evaluation permit under s 21H(1) or 21H(2);
-	to impose, vary or revoke condition on a commercial evaluation permit under s 21L;
-	to refuse an application for a low volume chemicals permit under s 21U(3);
-	to impose, vary or revoke a condition on a low volume chemicals permit under s 21W(3) or 21W(4);
-	to cancel a low volume chemicals permit under s 21W(6);
-	to refuse an application for a controlled use permit in respect of a chemical under s 22F(4);
-	the condition of use to which a controlled use permit is subject under s 22H(1);
-	the conditions of use to which a controlled use permit is subject under s 22H(5), to impose, vary or revoke a further condition to a controlled use permit under s 22H(6);
-	to cancel a controlled use permit under s 22J;
-	to waive, or refuse to waive, under s 24(1) the requirement to include information about particular matters in a notification statement when applying for an assessment certificate for a new industrial chemical;
-	to vary, or refuse to vary, under s 24(3) the requirements in relation to a notification statement;
-	to waive, or refuse to waive, under s 24(4) requirements in relation to particular matters in a notification statement that are irrelevant or unnecessary for the assessment of the chemical;
-	to give an applicant written notice requirement more information under s 27(1) or 27(2);
-	to refuse to take the applicant as having complied with a notice to give more information under s 27(4);
-	to suspend the consideration of an application for the assessment of a new industrial chemical under s 28(2);
-	to grant, or refuse to grant, under s 30A(3) a permit to introduce a chemical before the assessment report is completed;
-	to confirm or revoke under s 30C(1) a decision to grant a permit under s 30A;
-	to refuse an application for self-assessed assessment certificate under s 33C;
-	to refuse to vary an assessment report under s 37(2)(b);
-	to vary, or refuse to vary, a full public report about a chemical under s 40(6);
-	to refuse to make variations to the modifications of an original assessment report under s 40F(3)(b);
-	a determination under s 44(1)(d) that the Director is not satisfied that the proposed use in Australia of a chemical that has been notified and assessed under an approved foreign scheme is not significantly different, that the amount of the chemical to be introduced is not significantly greater and that no variation is proposed in the method of manufacture that could increase the risk of adverse health effects or adverse environmental effects;
-	to refuse to adopt a report made under an approved foreign scheme under s 44(2)(b);
-	to require information that is relevant to the assessment of a priority existing chemical of the kind specified in a notice for the purposes of s 58(3)(g);
-	to refuse to vary a draft assessment report under s 60E(5);
-	to require the secondary notification of the chemical by persons named by notice in the Chemical Gazette under s 65(1);
-	to require the secondary notification of a chemical under s 65(2);
-	to require information to be given under s 69(1);
-	to revoke an assessment certificate under s 73(6);
-	to treat, or refuse to treat, information as exempt information for the purposes of the Act under s 75(1);
-	to disclose, or not to disclose, exempt information about a chemical to an inquirer under s 79(A);
-	to refuse an application for registration under s 80G(2);
-	to refuse renewal application under s 80KA(3);
-	to refuse late renewal application under s 80KB(4) ;
-	to allow, or refuse to allow, under s 80Q(1) a longer period within which to provide a written statement indicating the value of the relevant industrial chemicals introduced by the person in that year;
-	to issue an assessment under s 80QA(1) setting out the amount of charge that is payable;
-	to allow, or refuse to allow, under s 80QC(1) a longer period within which to seek reconsideration of an assessment issued under s 80QA(1);
-	a decision under 80QC(3) to confirm, vary or revoke an assessment issued under s 80QA(1).
	
Sections 30(1), 30(3), 30(5), 31(3), 31A(3), 31B(3), 44(5), 51(1), 57(6), 61(2), 67(1), 68(6), 68A(5)	The following decisions of the Minister for Health: 
1.	to grant, or refuse to grant, a permit under s 30(1) authorising the importation or the manufacture of the chemical before an assessment certificate is given;
2.	to determine under s 30 that it is, or is not, in the public interest to withhold publication of information which would otherwise appear in a notice in the Chemical Gazette;
3.	to impose conditions under s 30(5) on a permit authorising the importation or the manufacture of the chemical before an assessment certificate is given;
4.	to extend, or refuse to extend, the period for assessment and report in relation to an application for an assessment certificate for a new industrial chemical under s 31(3);
5.	to extend the 90 day period for assessment and reporting of an application for non-self-assessed assessment certificates under s 31A(3), 
6.	to extend the 28 day period for assessment and reporting of an application for a self-assessed assessment certificates under s 31B(3), 
7.	to extend, or refuse to extend, the period for the completion of reports in relation to an application for an assessment certificate for a new industrial chemical that has been notified and assessed under an approved foreign scheme under s 44(5);
8.	to declare that a chemical is a priority existing chemical under s 51(1);
9.	to extend, or refuse to extend, the period for assessment and report of a priority existing chemical under s 57(6);
10.	to give notice under s 61(2) prohibiting activity involving a priority existing chemical which the Minister has reasonable grounds for believing gives rise to an unacceptable risk of adverse health effects or adverse environmental effects;
11.	to suspend an assessment certificate or introduction permit or prohibit the importation and manufacture of a chemical where a person fails to give secondary notification of the chemical under s 67(1);
12.	to extend, or refuse to extend, under s 68(6) the period for assessment and report for the assessment of a chemical in respect of which a secondary notification has been given;
13.	to extend, or refuse to extend, under s 68A(5) the period for assessment and report in relation to an existing chemicals subject to secondary notification.	

[Notes:  
1.	A person may not make an application for review of a decision made under s 13A in respect of a decision to include or vary particulars in the Inventory in respect of a chemical if: 
1.	the person could have made or did make an application in respect of a refusal under s 37(2)(b) to vary an assessment report about the chemical; and 
2.	the variation sought by the person related to recommendations in the report that were the same as or similar to the particulars.]

Industrial Chemicals (Notification and Assessment) Regulations 1990

Regulation 17(1) (SR 29 of 1992) (SR 81 of 1995) (SR 358 of 1995) (SR 419 of 1997) (SR 58 of 2002) (SLI 86 of 2012)(SLI 101 of 2015) 

Regulations 14A(2), 15(1), 15(4), 16, 16A, 16B	The following decisions of the Director of National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme:
-	to remit, or refuse to remit, under reg 14A(2) the amount that is the difference between the amount paid and the amount of registration charge, if any, the person was liable to pay under s 80S of the Act;
-	to remit, or refuse to remit, under reg 15(1) any part or the whole of a fee paid in respect of an application, statement, nomination or notification;
-	to remit, or refuse to remit, under reg 15(4) the prescribed fee minus the screening fee;
-	to waive, or refuse to waive, wholly or partly, or to remit, or refuse to remit under reg 16, any fee that would otherwise be payable under s110(1)(f) of the Act;  
-	to waive, or refuse to waive, wholly or partly under reg 16A any fee that would otherwise be payable by a person under s 110(1)(s) of the Act;
-	to waive, or refuse to waive, wholly or partly, or to remit, or refuse to remit under reg 16B any late renewal penalty that would otherwise be payable under s 110A of the Act.	

[Notes:  
1.	SLI 101 of 2015 amended these Regulations to introduce regs 14A(2), 16 and 16B with effect from 1 July 2015.
2.	Subregulation 17(1) sets out the list of reviewable decisions.
3.	Subregulation 17(1) was repealed and substituted by the Industrial Chemicals (Notification and Assessment) Amendment (Fees and Charges) Regulation 2015 (F2015L00982), commencing 1 July 2015.] 

Industry Research and Development Act 1986

Section 30E, (66 of 1991) (224 of 1992) (78 of 1996)(93 of 2011)

Section 30D(2)	The following decisions of Innovation Australia that have been confirmed, varied or set aside and substituted on reconsideration: 
-	to register or refuse to register an entity for activities under s 27A(1);
-	a finding made when considering an application for registration of activities under s 27B;
-	to refuse to allow a further period for making an application  for registration of activities under s 27D(c);
-	to refuse to allow a further period for giving further information about an application for registration of activities under s 27E(2)(b);
-	to refuse to make a finding about a registration of activities under s 27F(4)(b);
-	to refuse to allow a further period for giving further information about an examination of a registration of activities under s 27H(2)(b);
-	a finding made a bout a registration of activities under s 27J(1);
-	to refuse to vary on application a registration of activities under s 27M(1);
-	to refuse to allow a further period for giving further information about an application for variation of a registration of activities under s 27E(2)(b);
-	to revoke a registration of activities under s 27N(1);
-	an advance finding, or a refusal to make an advance finding, about the nature of an activity under s 28A(1);
-	a finding or refusal to make a finding about an activity to be conducted outside of Australia under s 28C(1);
-	a finding or refusal to make a finding about particular technology under s 28E(1);
-	to refuse to allow a further period for giving further information about an application for an advance finding about the nature of an activity or a finding about an activity to be conducted outside Australia or a finding that technology is core technology under s 28H(2)(b);
-	to register, or refuse to register, an entity as a research service provider under s 29A(1);
-	to refuse to allow a further period for giving further information about an application for registration as a research service provider under s 29C(3);
-	to revoke a research service provider’s registration for not returning a completed form about continuing that registration under s 29E(2);
-	to refuse to vary on application a research service provider’s registration under s 29F(1); 
-	to refuse to allow a further period for giving further information about an application for variation of a research service provider’s registration under s 29C(3);
-	to vary a research service provider’s registration otherwise than on application under s 29G(1);
-	to revoke a research service provider’s registration under s 29H(1);
-	to refuse to allow a further period for making an application for review of a decision under s 30C(3).	

[Notes:  
1.	The list of decisions in relation to which a person may request reconsideration is set out in s 30A..  
2.	If Innovation Australia does not confirm, vary or set aside and substitute a decision before the end of the period of 90 days after the day on which the request to reconsider the decision was received, the decision is taken to have been confirmed at the end of that period: s 30D(3).  A person has 28 days from the day on which the decision is taken to have been confirmed to lodge an application for review with the AAT: s 30E(3). 
3.	Section 30E(4) of the Act provides that the hearing must take place in private.]

Insurance Acquisition and Takeovers Act 1991

Section 67(1) (6 of 1992) (37 of 2002)

Section 66(3)	The following decisions of the Treasurer that have been confirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
1.	any decision under Part 3 or 4; to allow, or refuse to allow, under s 66(1)(b) a further period within which to request reconsideration.	

[Notes:
-	The list of reviewable decisions in relation to which a person may request reconsideration is set out in s 4.  The following Acts introduced or have amended the list of reviewable decisions: 6 of 1992 and 37 of 2002.
-	If the Treasurer does not confirm, revoke or vary a decision before the end of the period of 21 days after the day on which the request to reconsider the decision was received, the decision is taken to have been confirmed at the end of that period: s 66(4).  A person has 28 days from the day on which the decision is taken to have been confirmed to lodge an application for review with the AAT: s 67(2). 
-	Section 67(7) of the Act provides that any hearing is to take place in private.
-	If a person requests reconsideration of a reviewable decision under s 66(1), s 41 of the AAT Act applies as if the making of the request were the making of an application to the Tribunal for review of that decision: s 67(3).  A person may seek an order relating to the implementation of the reviewable decision under s 41 of the AAT Act.]

Insurance Act 1973

Section 63(7) (31 of 1977) (54 of 1998)

Section 63(4)

	The following decisions of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority that have been confirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	to refuse to determine under s 7 that one or more provisions of this Act do not apply to a person;
-	to impose conditions on, or specify a period in, a determination made under s 7 in relation to a particular person;
-	to vary or revoke a determination made in relation to a particular person under s 7;
-	to refuse to authorise a body corporate to carry on an insurance business in Australia under s 12(2);
-	to impose conditions or additional conditions under s 13 on an insurer’s authorisation under s 12;
-	to vary under s 13 conditions imposed on an insurer’s s 12 authorisation;
-	to  revoke under s 15 a general insurer’s s 12 authorisation;
-	to give a direction under s 17(1);
-	to refuse to approve a proposed assignment under s 17(4);
-	to impose conditions on an approval under s 17;
-	to refuse a non-operating holding company (NOHC) authorisation under s 18(3);
-	to impose conditions or additional conditions under s 19 on a NOHC authorisation;
-	to vary under s 19 conditions imposed on a NOHC authorisation;
-	to revoke under s 21 a NOHC authorisation;
-	to direct a general insurer, authorised NOHC or corporate agent under s 27(2) that a director or senior manager of a general insurer, a senior manager or agent in Australia of a foreign general insurer, or a director or senior manager of an authorised NOHC be removed from the position;
-	to determine, vary or revoke under s 32 a standard referred to in s 32(1)(e);
-	to confirm or vary a delegate’s decision under s 49H(3) or (4);
-	to give a written direction under s 49R(1) to a body corporate that is a general insurer to end the appointment of a person as the auditor or actuary of the general insurer on the ground that the person does not meet one or more of the criteria for fitness and propriety set out in the prudential standards;
-	to give a written direction under s 49R(2) to a body corporate that is an authorised NOHC to end the appointment of a person as the auditor or actuary of the authorised NOHC on the ground that the person does not meet one or more of the criteria for fitness and propriety set out in the prudential standards;
-	to give a direction under s 104(1) as a result of the ground referred to in s 104(1)(a), (b), (c) or (d);
-	to make a determination under s 93(3) that s 93 is to cease to have effect;
-	to determine an amount or to vary such a determination under s 116A(5) or (6).	

[Notes:
1.	A person affected by a reviewable decision may request reconsideration of any decision to which Part VI of the Act applies.  The following provisions provide that Part VI of the Act applies to one or more decisions: 7(6), 12(6), 13(6), 15(7), 17(10), 18(6), 19(5), 21(7), 27(6), 32(7), 49H(5), 49R(11), 93(5), 104(10) and 116A(7).  
2.	The following Acts have introduced amended or repealed provisions which provide that Part VI applies to a particular decision: 119 of 2001, 37 of 2002, 154 of 2007 and 25 of 2008.
3.	If APRA does not confirm, revoke or vary a decision before the end of the period of 21 days after the day on which the request to reconsider the decision was received, the decision is taken to have been confirmed at the end of that period: s 63(5).  A person has 28 days from the day on which the decision is taken to have been confirmed to lodge an application for review with the AAT: s 63(8). 
4.	If a person requests reconsideration of a reviewable decision under s 63(2), s 41 of the AAT Act applies as if the making of the request were the making of an application to the Tribunal for review of that decision: s 63(9).  A person may seek an order relating to the implementation of the reviewable decision under s 41 of the AAT Act.]

Interactive Gambling Act 2001

Section 61 (84 of 2001)

Section 24, 27, 42, 56, 38	The following decisions of the Australian Communications and Media Authority: 
1.	to issue an internet service provider a standard access-prevention notice under s 24(1)(c); 
2.	to issue an internet service provider a special access-prevention notice under s 27;
3.	to refuse to register an industry code under s 38; 
4.	to issue, vary, or refuse to revoke, a direction given to an internet service provider under s 42 or 56.	

[Notes:  
1.	An application for the review of a decision made under s 24, 27, 42 or 56 may only be made by the internet service provider concerned.  An application for the review of a decision made under s 38 may only be made by the body or association that developed the code, pursuant to s 61(2) and 61(4) of the Act.]

Interstate Road Transport Act 1985

Section 51(6) (130 of 1985)

Section 51(4)	The following decisions of a Licensing/Registration Authority or a delegate of a Licensing/Registration Authority that have been reconsidered by the Minister: 
-	to register, or refuse to register, a motor vehicle or trailer under s 9; 
-	to suspend or cancel registration of a motor vehicle or trailer under s 11.
	
	The following decisions of a Licensing Authority that have been reconsidered by the Minister: 
-	to grant, or refuse to grant, an operator’s licence under s 26; 
-	to revoke, or refuse to revoke, a person’s disqualification under s 27(8); 
-	to declare a person to be an associate of a disqualified person under s 30; 
-	to cancel an operator’s licence under s 32(2).
	
	The following decision of a delegate of the Minister of Infrastructure and Regional Development that has been reconsidered by the Minister: 
•	to allow, or refuse to allow, a further period within which to request reconsideration of a decision under s 51(2).	

[Notes:  
1.	The list of decisions that may be reconsidered under the Act is set out in s 51(1).  The following Acts introduced or have amended this list of decisions: 130 of 1985.
2.	The Minister must reconsider the decision within 60 days of receipt of the request for reconsideration: s 51(4).]

Interstate Road Transport Regulations 1986

Regulation 14(6) (SR 11 of 1999)

Regulation 14(4)

	The following decision of the Minister for Infrastructure and Regional Development: 
•	to approve, or refuse to approve, maintenance management compliance assurance scheme under reg 14(4).	

J
Jervis Bay Territory Emergency Management Ordinance 2015

Section 23(5) (F2015L00774)

Section 23(4) 	The following decisions of the Minister for Infrastructure and Regional Development: 
•	a determination made under s 23(4) in relation to compensation for possession and use of a person’s property.	

[Notes:
1.	This Ordinance commenced on 2 June 2015: F2015L00774.
2.	This Ordinance will cease on 1 October 2025].

Judges' Pensions Act 1968

Section 17A (158 of 1981) (23 of 1992) (185 of 1992) (143 of 2012)

Sections 4AA(b), 4AB(2)(b), 4AB(5), 4AC(3)(d), 6(2AA), 8A(2), 8A(3), 13, 15(1), 15(3) 	The following decisions of the Minister for Finance: 
•	to determine under s 4AA(b) whether at the time of death of a deceased Judge a child was wholly or substantially dependent on the deceased Judge
•	to determine under s 4AB(2)(b) whether a person ordinarily lived with another person as that person’s husband or wife or partner on a permanent and bona fide domestic basis
•	to determine under s 4AB(5) whether a person would have been living with another person except for a period of temporary absence or absence because of special circumstances
•	to determine under s 4AC(3)(d) whether a person was wholly or substantially dependent upon a deceased Judge at the time of the death
•	to refuse to certify under s 6(2AA) that retirement of a Judge was due to permanent disability or infirmity
•	to refuse to direct under s 8A(2) that a pension which was cancelled on remarriage be restored
•	to refuse to direct under s 8A(3) that restoration of pension be backdated to a day before the application day
•	to pay, or refuse to pay, under s 13 orphans’ pension and apportion orphans’ pension where pension is payable in respect of 2 or more eligible children
•	to refuse to direct under s 15(1) that payment of children's pension be to a specified person
•	to refuse to direct under s 15(3) that pension be expended in specified manner.	
Sections 17AB(3)(b)(i), 17AB(4), 17AB(6)(b)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Finance: 
-	to determine the day on which a spouse became permanently incapacitated under s 17AB(3)(b)(i)
-	to determine that a spouse is unlikely to engage in gainful employment for which they are reasonably qualified under s 17AB(4)
-	to determine an individual or individuals to whom pension orders must be paid under s 17AB(6)(b).	

[Notes:
1.	The Tribunal’s jurisdiction under this Act was amended by the Judges and Governors-General Legislation Amendment (Family Law) Act 2012. These changes commenced on 15 March 2013.]

L

Lakes Ordinance 1976

Section 51

Sections 14(2), 19(1),  22(2), 25, 26(1), 26(2), 26(3), 29(1)	The following decision of the Minister under the Lakes Ordinance 1976:
5.	a determination made under s 14(2);
6.	to refuse to approve the anchoring of a buoy or the erection of a wharf or jetty under s 19(1);
7.	to impose conditions on an approval under s 19(1);
8.	to refuse to authorise or approve the conduct of a function under s 22(2);
9.	to impose conditions on an authority under s 22(2);
10.	to refuse to grant or renew a permit to moor a boat under s 25;
11.	to refuse to authorise the use of a power boat under s 26(1);
12.	to impose conditions on an authority under s 26(1);
13.	to impose further conditions, or to vary or revoke a condition  imposed, on an authority under s 26(2);
14.	to revoke an authority under s 26(3);
15.	to refuse to grant a permit to use a hovercraft under s 29(1);
16.	to impose conditions on the grant of a permit under s 29(1).	

[Notes:
1.	Section 5 of the National Land Ordinance 1989 gives effect to Lakes Ordinance 1976 with respect to National Land on and after ACT self-government day (11 May 1989).  Section 4 of the National Land Ordinance 1989 provides that, with the Attorney-General’s approval, the National Capital Authority is to manage National Land designated in writing by the Attorney-General as land required for the special purposes of Canberra as the National Capital]. 

Lands Acquisition Act 1989

Sections 28(1), 71(1), 81(1), 99(1), 107(1), 121(5) (15 of 1989)

Section 27	The following decision of the Minister for Finance that has been confirmed or varied on reconsideration under s 27(1): to declare under s 22(1) that the Minister is considering the acquisition by an acquiring authority of an interest in land for a public purpose.
	
Sections 70(2), 76(1), 98(2), 103(1), 121(2)	The following decisions of the Minister for Finance: 
-	to reject a claim for compensation under s 70(2); 
-	to make a final offer of compensation under s 76(1); 
-	to reject a claim for compensation under s 98(2) for the exercise of powers under Part III of the Act or failure to acquire; 
-	to make a final offer of compensation under s 103(1) for the exercise of powers under Part III of the Act or failure to acquire; 
-	to nominate an amount which represents market value of interest in land at time of offer under s 121(2).	

[Notes: 

1.	The Minister may include a statement in a pre-acquisition declaration made under s. 22 that the declaration is not subject to review by the Tribunal: s 22(6).
2.	If the Minister does not, within the period of 28 days after receiving an application for reconsideration of a declaration under s 22(1), make a decision confirming, revoking or varying the declaration, the Minister shall be regarded as having confirmed the declaration on the last day of the period: s 27(4).  The person who made the application may, by writing and before the end of the 28-day period, agree to an extension of that period.
3.	Sections 27, 29 and 41 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 do not apply in relation to an application for review of a decision made under s 27(1): s 29(2).  Only a person affected (within the meaning of s 22(10)) by a declaration may apply for review: s 28(1).  The time limit for applying for review of a decision under s 27(1) is 28 days after the declaration was confirmed or varied, or is to be regarded as having been confirmed or varied, as the case may be: s 28(4).  The Tribunal may, before the end of the 28-day period, agree to an extension of that period.
4.	If the Minister has not, within the period of 42 days after receiving a claim for compensation under s 67 or s 97, given the claimant notice of a decision under s 70 or s 98, the Minister is taken to have rejected the claim: s 70(3) and s 98(3).  The claimant may, by writing and before the end of the 42-day period, agree to an extension of that period: s 70(4) and s 98(4).
5.	If the Minister has not, within the period of 2 months after receiving a notice under s 75 or s 102 rejecting an offer of compensation, given the person notice under s 76(1) or s 103(1) making a final offer of compensation, the Minister is taken to have made a final offer of compensation: s 76(3) and s 103(3).
6.	Section 29 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 has been modified to provide that the time for lodging an application for review of a decision under ss 70(2), 76(1), 98(2) and 103(1) is 3 months: see ss 71(3), 81(3), 99(3) and 107(3).]

Law Officers Act 1964

Section 16(11) (120 of 1988)

Section 16(6)
	The following decision of the Attorney-General: 
-	to refuse to give a certificate under s 16(6) that a person is permanently disabled or infirm.	

Leases Ordinance 1918

Section 7

Sections 3AAA(1), 3AAA(3)	The following decisions of the Minister under the Leases Ordinance 1918:
-	a decision under s 3AAA(5) relating to an offer  referred to in s 3AAA(1);
-	a decision under s 3AAA(5) relating to an offer referred to in s 3AAA(3). 	

[Notes:
1.	Section 5 of the National Land Ordinance 1989 gives effect to the Leases Ordinance 1918 with respect to National Land on and after ACT self-government day (11 May 1989).  
2.	Section 4 of the National Land Ordinance 1989 provides that, with the Attorney-General’s approval, the National Capital Authority is to manage National Land designated in writing by the Attorney-General as land required for the special purposes of Canberra as the National Capital]. 

Leases (Special Purposes) Ordinance 1925 

Sections 5B(1) and 5BB(5)

Sections 5A(1), 5BB(2)	The following decisions of the National Capital Authority:  
-	a re-appraisement of the unimproved value of leased land under s 5A(1); to determine the value of improvements on land under s 5BB(2).	

[Notes: 

1.	Section 5 of the National Land Ordinance 1989 gives effect to the Leases (Special Purposes) Ordinance 1925 with respect to National Land on and after ACT self-government day (11 May 1989).  Section 4 of the National Land Ordinance 1989 provides that, with the Attorney-General’s approval, the National Capital Authority is to manage National Land designated in writing by the Attorney-General as land required for the special purposes of Canberra as the National Capital.]

Life Insurance Act 1995

Section 236(8) (4 of 1995) (54 of 1998)

Section 236(5)

	The following decisions of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority that have been confirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	to determine under s 7A(1) that any or all of certain provisions of the Act do not apply to a particular person
-	to make, or refuse, to make, a declaration under s 12(2)
-	to declare, or refuse to declare, under s 12A(1) that a company's insurance business or business relating to the payment of annuities is to be treated as if it were life insurance business
-	to declare, or refuse to declare, under s 12B(2) that a company's business consisting of the provision of eligible financial benefits is to be treated as if it were life insurance business
-	to make, or refuse to make, a declaration under s 14(5)
-	to make, or refuse to make, a declaration under s 15(4)
-	to determine under s 16C(2) that a body is a friendly society for the purposes of the Act
-	to vary or revoke under s 16C(3) a determination under s 16C(2)
-	a decision under s 16E in relation to whether a body corporate may assume or use the expression ‘friendly society’
-	to refuse to approve benefit fund rules for a benefit fund under s 16L(3)
-	to refuse to approve a proposed amendment of approved benefit fund rules under s 16Q(3)
-	to give a notice under s 16R(2) requiring a friendly society to propose an amendment of approved benefit fund rules
-	to determine, or refuse to approve an amendment, of approved benefit fund rules under s 16R(4)
-	to refuse to approve under s 16U(3) proposed amendments of the constitution of a company that are consequential on proposed benefit fund rules or an amendment of benefit funds rule
-	to give a notice under s 16V(2) requiring a company to propose consequential amendments to its constitution and submit them to APRA for approval
-	to refuse to approve consequential amendments to a company’s constitution under s 16V(4)
-	to determine consequential amendments to a company’s constitution under s 16V(5)
-	to refuse to register a company under s 21
-	to impose conditions on the registration of a company under s 22(1)
-	to vary a condition under s 22(3) or (4)
-	to refuse to revoke or vary a condition under s 22(4)
-	to cancel registration under s 26(2)
-	to refuse to cancel the registration of a company under s 27
-	to refuse an application for registration of a body corporate as a NOHC under s 28A
-	to impose conditions, or additional conditions, on a NOHC registration under 28B(1)(a)
-	to vary conditions imposed on a NOHC registration under s 28B(1)(b)
-	to revoke a NOHC registration under s 28C
-	 to refuse to give an approval under s 31(c)
-	to refuse to approve the giving of a mortgage or charge under s 40(1)
-	to impose conditions on an approval granted under s 40(1)
-	to refuse to approve under s 43(3)(c) investment of assets of a statutory fund in a related company that is not a subsidiary of the life company
-	to refuse to approve under s 48(8)(b) an owner of a policy referable to a statutory fund bringing an action against a director guilty of a breach of duty to the policy owner
-	to refuse to give an approval under the prudential standards referred to in s 52 relating to the restructure of statutory funds
-	to refuse to give an approval under the prudential standards referred to in s 53 relating to the termination of statutory funds
-	to refuse to approve under s 62(1)(c) the distribution or transfer of overseas policy owners’ retained profits
-	to refuse to approve under s 62(4) the distribution of shareholders’ retained profits
-	to refuse to approve under s 63(2) a distribution of shareholders’ capital in relation to a statutory fund
-	to refuse to give an approval under s 77(6)
-	to make a declaration under s 86 that a person is ineligible to hold an appointment as an auditor of a life company
-	to make a declaration under s 94A that a person is ineligible to hold an appointment as actuary of a life company
-	to give a direction to a life company under s 125A to end the appointment of a person as the auditor or appointed actuary of the company
-	to refuse under s 208 to suspend or vary a life company’s obligation to make payments
-	to make, vary or revoke a standard in relation to prudential matters to be complied with by one or more specified life companies under s 230A(1)(c)
-	to give a direction under s 230B as a result of the ground referred to in s 230B(1)(a), (b), (c) or (d).
	
	The following decisions of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission that have been confirmed or varied on reconsideration:
-	to give a direction under s 198(3)
-	a decision under s 216(10).
	
	The following decisions either of the APRA or the ASIC that have been confirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	to require a company to give APRA or ASIC certain information under s 131(1); 
-	to require a company to give APRA or ASIC records relating to the affairs of the company under s 132(1).	

[Notes:
1.	The list of ‘reviewable decisions’ that may be reconsidered under the Act is set out in s 236(1).  The following Acts introduced or have amended the list of reviewable decisions: 4 of 1995, 107 of 1997, 44 of 1999, 121 of 2001, 37 of 2002, 154 of 2007, 25 of 2008 and 75 of 2009.
2.	If APRA or ASIC do not confirm, revoke or vary a decision before the end of the period of 60 days after the day on which the request to reconsider the decision was received, the decision is taken to have been confirmed at the end of that period: s 236(6).  A person has 28 days from the day on which the decision is taken to have been confirmed to lodge an application for review with the AAT: s 236(9). 
3.	If a person requests reconsideration of a reviewable decision under s 236(2), s 41 of the AAT Act applies as if the making of the request were the making of an application to the Tribunal for review of that decision: s 236(10).  A person may seek an order relating to the implementation of the reviewable decision under s 41 of the AAT Act.]

Liquid Fuel Emergency Act 1984 

Section 44(6) (5 of 1984) (86 of 2007)

Section 44(4)
	The following decisions that have been affirmed or varied on reconsideration by the Minister for Industry, Innovation and Science: 
1.	to make or revoke an instrument under s 10(1) identifying a person or an organisation as a bulk customer of a particular relevant fuel industry corporation, or of a particular relevant person, in relation to a particular refined liquid petroleum product
2.	to make or revoke an instrument under s 11(1) identifying a person or organisation as an essential user of a particular refined liquid petroleum product in a particular State or Territory
3.	to direct under s 12(1) a relevant fuel industry corporation to maintain specified quantities of reserve supplies of a specified kind of liquid fuel or to accumulate specified quantities of reserve supplies of a specified kind of liquid fuel and to maintain such quantities of reserve supplies of liquid fuel of that kind at specified places in Australia
4.	to vary under s 12(8) a direction made under s 12(1); 
5.	to direct a corporation under s 13(6) to make amendments to their procedures and give the Minister particulars of the procedures amended;
6.	to allow, or refuse to allow, under s 44(2) a further period within which to request reconsideration of a  reviewable decision.	

[Notes:
1.	The list of decisions that are subject to reconsideration under this Act is set out in s 44(1).  The following Acts introduced or have amended the list of reviewable decisions: 5 of 1984 and 86 of 2007.] 

M

Major Sporting Events (Indicia and Images) Protection Act 2014

Section 31(3) (29 of 2014)

Section 31(1)	The following decision of the Customs CEO:
-	to refuse to allow a designated owner to make a late claim to the Customs CEO for the release of seized goods under s 31(1).	

Marine Order 6 (Marine radio qualifications) 2000

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013
Section 313 of the Navigation Act 2012 (Cth)

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
-	to grant, or not to grant, an exemption from a requirement of this order.	

[Notes: 
1.	The orders currently in force were most recently amended by F2013L00871 which commenced on 1 July 2013. 
2.	Section 6.1 of this Order provides that a person may apply, in accordance with the process set out in Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013, for an exemption from a requirement of this Order. A decision made in relation to such an application is a reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.] 

Marine Order 9 (Health – Medical fitness) 2010

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: any decision under this Order.	

[Notes: 
1.	Section 5 of this Order provides that a decision under this Order is taken to be a reviewable decision for the purposes of Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013, and therefore subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.]
2.	This Order was repealed by Marine Order 11 (Living and working conditions on vessels) 2015 with effect from 1 May 2015.   ]

Marine Order 11 (Living and working conditions on vessels) 2015 

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013 (F2015L00609)

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
A decision made under this Order, other than a decision under section 7 or 8 or 16 	

[Notes:
1.	This Order repealed Marine Order 11 (Living and working conditions on vessels) 2013 and commenced on 1 May 2015: F2015L00609.
2.	A decision under this Order, other than a decision under section 7 or 8 or 16, is taken to be a reviewable decision for section 17 of the Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013: section 9.]

Marine Order 12 (Construction – subdivision and stability, machinery and electrical installations) 2009

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
to grant, or not to grant an exemption to a requirement of the Order under s 5; to approve, or not approve the use of an equivalent under s 6. 	

[Notes: 
1.	The orders currently in force were most recently amended by F2013L00871 which commenced on 1 July 2013. 
2.	Section 10 of Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013 states that Division 3 of that Order, which relates to reconsideration and review of decisions, applies where a Marine Order requires an application to be made for approval for an equivalent to be fitted, used or carried in a vessel, an equivalent guideline, or for an exemption from the requirements of an Order.  A decision in relation to such an application is a reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.] 

Marine Order 15 (Construction – fire protection, fire detection and fire extinction) 2014

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
to grant, or not to grant an exemption to a requirement of these Orders under s 9; 
to approve, or not approve the use of an equivalent under s 10. 	

[Notes: 
1.	The orders currently in force were most recently amended by F2014L00607 which commenced on 1 July 2014. Marine Order 15 (Construction – fire protection, fire detection and fire extinction) 2014 repealed the previous 2009 Order. 
2.	Section 10 of this Order provides that a person may apply, in accordance with the process set out in Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013, for approval to use an equivalent.  A decision made in relation to such an application is a reviewable decisions that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.]

Marine Order 16 (Load Lines) 2014 

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013
Section 313 of the Navigation Act 2012 

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
to give or not to give an exemption of a vessel from a requirement of this Order under s 7 of the Order
to give or not to give approval to use an equivalent on a regulated Australian vessel under s 8 of the Order	
Section 313(1)(h) of the Navigation Act 2012	The following decisions of an issuing body:
-	to refuse to issue a safety certificate specified in s 10(1) of the Order under s 100 of the Navigation Act 2012	

[Notes: 
-	This Order commenced on 1 November 2014.]

Marine Order 17 (Liquefied gas carriers and chemical tankers) 2006

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013
Section 313 of the Navigation Act 2012 (Cth)

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
to grant, or not to grant an exemption to a ship from a requirement of these Orders under s 5; 
to approve, or not approve the use of an equivalent under s 5A; 
or any other decision made under this Order pursuant to s 6. 	

[Notes: 
1.	The orders currently in force were most recently amended by F2009C00020 which commenced on 1 January 2009. 
2.	Section 6 of this Order specifies that a decision under this Order, other than a decision under s 5 or 5A, is taken to a reviewable decision for section 17 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.
3.	Section 5.1 of this Order provides that a person may apply, in accordance with the process set out in Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013, for an exemption from a requirement of this Order. A decision made in relation to such an application is a reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.]

Marine Order 18 (Measures to enhance maritime safety) 2013

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
to grant, or not grant an exemption to a ship from a requirement of these Orders under s 10; 
to approve, or not approve the use of an equivalent under s 11. 	

[Notes: 
1.	Section 5.1 of this Order provides that a person may apply, in accordance with the process set out in Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013, for an exemption from a requirement of this Order. A decision made in relation to such an application is a reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.]

Marine Order 19 (Tonnage measurement) 2014

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013
Section 313 of Navigation Act 2012

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority:
to grant, or not to grant an exemption to a vessel mentioned in regulation 1(3) of Annex I of the Tonnage Convention from a requirement of the Order under s 7 of the Order. 	
Section 313(1)(v) of the Navigation Act 2012	The following decisions of an issuing body:
-	to issue, or not to issue an International Tonnage Certificate (1969) as specified in s9(1) of the Order under s 155 of the Navigation Act 2012;	

[Notes: 
1.	This Order commenced on 1 September 2014.]

Marine Order 21 (Safety of Navigation and Emergency Procedures) 2012

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
to grant, or not grant an exemption to a ship from a requirement of these Orders under s 10; 
to approve, or not approve the use of an equivalent under s 10; 
or any other decision made under this Order pursuant to s 11.	

[Notes: 
1.	The orders currently in force were most recently amended by F2013L02095 which will commence on 14 December 2013. 
2.	Section 11 of this Order specifies that a decision made under this Order, other than a decision under s 10, is taken to be a reviewable decision for section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.
3.	Section 10 of Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013 states that Division 3 of that Order, which relates to reconsideration and review of decisions, applies where a Marine Order requires an application to be made for approval for an equivalent to be fitted, used or carried in a vessel, an equivalent guideline, or for an exemption from the requirements of an Order. A decision in relation to such an application is a reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.] 

Marine Order 25 (Equipment - lifesaving) 2014

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
to exempt, or not to exempt a ship from a requirement of these Orders under s 7 of the Order; 
to approve, or not to approve the use of an equivalent under s 8 of the Order.	

[Notes: 
1.	This Order commenced on 1 December 2014.
2.	Section 7(3) of the Order provides that an exemption granted or continued under repealed Marine Order 25 (Equipment – lifesaving) 2009, and in force immediately before this Order came into force, is taken to have been granted or continued in force under this Order.
3.	Section 10 of Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013 states that Division 3 of that Order, which relates to reconsideration and review of decisions, applies where a Marine Order requires an application to be made for approval for an equivalent to be fitted, used or carried in a vessel, an equivalent guideline, or for an exemption from the requirements of an Order. A decision in relation to such an application is a reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.] 

Marine Order 27 (Radio equipment) 2009

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
to exempt, or not exempt, a vessel from a requirement of these Orders under s 5; 
to approve, or not approve, the use of an equivalent under s 6. 	

[Notes: 
1.	The orders currently in force were most recently amended by F2013L00871 which commenced on 1 July 2013. 
2.	Section 5.1A of this Order provides that a person may apply, in accordance with the process set out in Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013, for an exemption from a requirement of this Order. A decision made in relation to such an application is a reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.
3.	Section 6.1 of this Order provides that a person may apply, in accordance with the process set out in Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013, for approval to use an equivalent. A decision made in relation to such an application is a reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.]

Marine Order 28 (Operations standards and procedures) 2012

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
to approve, or not approve, an exception from minimum hours of rest under s 15 of these Orders.	

[Notes: 
1.	The orders currently in force were most recently amended by F2013L00871 which commenced on 1 July 2013. 
2.	Section 10 of Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013 states that Division 3 of that Order, which relates to reconsideration and review of decisions, applies where a Marine Order requires an application to be made for approval for an equivalent to be fitted, used or carried in a vessel, an equivalent guideline, or for an exemption from the requirements of an Order. A decision in relation to such an application is a reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.] 

Marine Order 30 (Prevention of collisions) 2009

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013
Section 5.2.1 of Marine Order 30 (Prevention of collisions) 2009

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
to issue, or not issue, a Certificate of Approval under s 6.2.1; 
to revoke, or not revoke, a Certificate of Approval under s 6.2.3; 
a determination made under s 7.6.	

1.	[Notes: 
2.	The orders currently in force were most recently amended by F2013L00871 which commenced on 1 July 2013. 
3.	Section 4 of this Order specifies that a decision made under this Order is taken to a reviewable decision for section 17 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.]

Marine Order 31 (Vessel surveys and certification) 2015

Section 313 of Navigation Act 2012

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions made by an issuing body:
1.	to issue, or not to issue a SOLAS certificate specified in s 14 of the Order under s 100 of the Navigation Act 2012
2.	to issue, or not to issue a non-SOLAS certificate specified in s 24 of the Order under s 100 of the Navigation Act 2012. 	

[Notes: 
-	This Order commenced on 16 February 2015.]

Marine Order 32 (Cargo handling equipment) 2011

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
to exempt, or not exempt, a ship from a requirement of these Orders under s  9.2; 
to approve, or not approve, the use of an equivalent under s 9.3.	

[Notes: ,	
1.	The orders currently in force were most recently amended by F2013L00871 which commenced on 1 July 2013. 
2.	Section 10 of Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013 states that Division 3 of that Order, which relates to reconsideration and review of decisions, applies where a Marine Order requires an application to be made for approval for an equivalent to be fitted, used or carried in a vessel, an equivalent guideline, or for an exemption from the requirements of an Order. A decision in relation to such an application is a reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.] 

Marine Order 33 (Cargo and cargo handling – grain) 2005

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
to exempt, or not exempt, a vessel from a requirement of these Orders under s 5; 
to approve, or not approve, the use of an equivalent under s 5A; 
or any other decision made under this Order pursuant to s 6.	

[Notes: 
1.	The orders currently in force were most recently amended by F2013L00871 which commenced on 1 July 2013. 
2.	Section 6 of this Order specifies that a decision made under this Order, other than a decision under s 5 or 5A, is taken to a reviewable decision for section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.
3.	Section 10 of Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013 states that Division 3 of that Order, which relates to reconsideration and review of decisions, applies where a Marine Order requires an application to be made for approval for an equivalent to be fitted, used or carried in a vessel, an equivalent guideline, or for an exemption from the requirements of an Order.] 

Marine Order 34 (Solid bulk cargoes) 2007

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
to exempt, or not exempt, a vessel from a requirement of this Order under s 5; 
or any other decision made under this Order pursuant to s 6.	

[Notes: 
1.	The orders currently in force were most recently amended by F2012C00816 which commenced on 7 November 2012. 
2.	Section 6 of this Order specifies that a decision made under this Order, other than a decision under s 5, is taken to a reviewable decision for section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.
3.	Section 10 of Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013 states that Division 3 of that Order, which relates to reconsideration and review of decisions, applies where a Marine Order requires an application to be made for an approval for an exemption from the requirements of an Order. 
4.	Section 17(4) of Marine Order 1(Administration) provides the Australian Maritime Safety Authority must notify the applicant of its reconsideration decision within 28 days of receiving the application for internal review.] 

Marine Order 35 (Additional safety measures for bulk carriers) 2014

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
to exempt, or not exempt, a vessel from a requirement of these Orders under s 8; 
to approve, or not approve, the use of an equivalent under s 9.	

[Notes: 
1.	This order was most recently amended by F2014L01004 which commenced on 1 August 2014. 
2.	Section 5.1 of this Order provides that a person may apply, in accordance with the process set out in Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013, for an exemption from a requirement of this Order. A decision made in relation to such an application is a reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.
3.	Section 6.1 of this Order provides that a person may apply, in accordance with the process set out in Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013, for approval to use an equivalent. A decision made in relation to such an application is a reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.] 

Marine Order 41 (Carriage of dangerous goods) 2009

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
to modify, or not modify, a requirement of these Orders under s 5; 
to exempt, or not exempt, a vessel from a requirement of these Orders under s 5A; 
or any other decision made under this Order pursuant to s 6.	

[Notes: 
1.	The orders currently in force were most recently amended by F2012C00204 which commenced on 1 January 2012. 
2.	Section 5.1 of this Order provides that a person may apply, in accordance with the process set out in Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013, for the modification of a requirement of this Order. A decision made in relation to such an application is a reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.]
3.	Section 6 of this Order specifies that a decision made under this Order, other than a decision under ss 5 or 5A, is taken to a reviewable decision for section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.
4.	Section 10 of Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013 states that Division 3 of that Order, which relates to reconsideration and review of decisions, applies where a Marine Order requires an application to be made for an approval for an equivalent guideline, or for an exemption from the requirements of an Order.] 

Marine Order 42 (Cargo, stowage and securing) 2014

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority:
to approve, or not approve the use of an equivalent under s 5.1; 
to exempt, or not exempt, a ship from a requirement of these Orders under s 5.2; 
to require additional precautions under s 1; 
to require additional information under s 12.2; 
and any other decision made under this Order under s 6.	

[Notes: 
1.	The orders currently in force are Marine Orders Part 42 of 2014, which commenced on 1 August 2014, repealing the earlier 2003 order.
2.	Section 6 of this Order specifies that a decision made under this Order, other than a decision under ss 5 or 5A, is taken to a reviewable decision for section 17 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.
3.	Section 10 of Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013 states that Division 3 of that Order, which relates to reconsideration and review of decisions, applies where a Marine Order requires an application to be made for an approval for an equivalent guideline, or for an exemption from the requirements of an Order.] 

Marine Order 43 (Cargo and cargo handling – livestock) 2006

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
1.	to modify, or not modify requirements for a vessel under s 5; 
2.	to approve, or not approve, the use of equivalents under s 5A;
3.	to make an order under s 7.3.1;
4.	to allow, or not allow, the dispensation of a livestock pen requirement under ss 21.4 and 24.4;
5.	to allow, or not allow,  the dispensation of a livestock pen requirement under ss 32.2 and 34.3.2;
6.	to prohibit or impose conditions on the loading of livestock on a vessel under inquiry under s 37.9;
7.	to give a direction to the owner or master of the vessel with additional precautions or conditions of carriage under s 38.1.	

[Notes: 
1.	The orders currently in force were most recently amended by F2013L00871 which commenced on 1 July 2013. 
2.	Section 5 of this Order provides that a person may apply, in accordance with the process set out in Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013, for the modification of a requirement of this order.  A decision made in relation to such an application is a reviewable decisions that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.
3.	Section 5A of this Order provides that a person may apply, in accordance with the process set out in Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013, for approval to use an equivalent.  A decision made in relation to such an application is a reviewable decisions that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.
4.	Section 6 of this Order specifies that a decision under subsections 7.3.1, 21.4, 24.4, 32.2, 34.3.2, 37.9, or 38.1 is taken to be a reviewable decision for section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.
5.	Section 10 of Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013 states that Division 3 of that Order, which relates to reconsideration and review of decisions, applies where a Marine Order requires an application to be made for an approval for an equivalent guideline, or for an exemption from the requirements of an Order.] 

Marine Order 44 (Safe containers) 2002

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: any decision under this order.

[Notes: 
1.	The orders currently in force were most recently amended by F2012C00067 which commenced on 15 January 2012.
2.	Section 6 of this Order specifies that a person affected by decision under this Order may apply to the General Manager, Ship Safety Division for a review of the decision in accordance with s 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.]

Marine Order 47 (Mobile offshore drilling units) 2012

Section 30.2
Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013
Section 313 of the Navigation Act 2012 (Cth)

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
to exempt, or not exempt, a MODU from a requirement of these Orders under s 10; 
to approve, or not approve, the use of an equivalent under s 11.	
Sections 100, 102 of the Navigation Act 2012 (Cth)	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
to refuse to issue a MODU certificate under s 29; 
to revoke, or not revoke, a MODU certificate under s 30. 	

[Notes: 
1.	The orders currently in force were most recently amended by F2013L00871 which commenced on 1 July 2013.
2.	Section 313 of the Navigation Act provides for review by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal of decisions made under sections 100 and 102 of the Act relating to safety certificates. 
3.	Section 10 of Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013 states that Division 3 of that Order, which relates to reconsideration and review of decisions, applies where a Marine Order requires an application to be made for an approval for an equivalent guideline, or for an exemption from the requirements of an Order.] 

Marine Order 49 (High-speed craft) 2015

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013
Section 313 of Navigation Act 2012

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority:
to issue or not to issue a permit to operate high-speed craft under s 23;
to vary, or not to vary a permit to operate high-speed craft under s 26; 
to revoke, or not to revoke a permit to operate high-speed craft under s 27
to give or not to give an exemption under s 7;
to approve or not to approve use of an equivalent under s 8. 	
Section 313(1)(m) of Navigation Act 2012	The following decisions of an issuing body:
1.	to refuse to issue a safety certificate specified in s 11(1) of the Order under s 100 of the Navigation Act.	

[Notes: 
1.	This Order commenced on 16 February 2015.
2.	Section 9 of the Order set out the reviewable decisions under the Order for the purposes of s 17 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.]

Marine Order 50 (Special purpose vessels) 2012

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013
Section 313 of the Navigation Act 2012 (Cth)

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
to exempt, or not exempt a vessel from a requirement of these Orders under s 9; 
to approve, or not approve use of an equivalent under s 10.	

[Notes: 
1.	The orders currently in force were most recently amended by F2013L00871 which commenced on 1 July 2013. 
2.	Section 9.1 of this Order provides that a person may apply, in accordance with the process set out in Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013, for an exemption of a requirement of this Order.  A decision made in relation to such an application is a reviewable decisions that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.
3.	Section 10.1 of this Order provides that a person may apply, in accordance with the process set out in Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013, for approval to use an equivalent.  A decision made in relation to such an application is a reviewable decisions that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.
4.	Section 10 of Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013 states that Division 3 of that Order, which relates to reconsideration and review of decisions, applies where a Marine Order requires an application to be made for an approval for an equivalent guideline, or for an exemption from the requirements of an Order. 
5.	Section 313 of the Navigation Act provides for review by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal of decisions made under s 100 of the Act relating to safety certificates.] 

Marine Order 51 (Fishing vessels) 1989

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
to exempt, or not exempt, a vessel from a requirement of these Orders under s 3; 
to approve, or not approve, the use of an equivalent under s 4.	

[Notes: 
1.	The orders currently in force were most recently amended by F2013L00871 which commenced on 1 July 2013. 
2.	Section 5.1 of this Order provides that a person may apply, in accordance with the process set out in Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013, for an exemption of a requirement of this Order.  A decision made in relation to such an application is a reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.
3.	Section 5A.1 of this Order provides that a person may apply, in accordance with the process set out in Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013, for approval to use an equivalent.  A decision made in relation to such an application is a reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.
4.	Section 5B of this Order specifies that a decisions made under s 10.1 is taken to be a reviewable decision for the purpose of s 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.
5.	Section 10 of Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013 states that Division 3 of that Order, which relates to reconsideration and review of decisions, applies where a Marine Order requires an application to be made for an approval for an equivalent guideline, or for an exemption from the requirements of an Order.] 

Marine Order 52 (Sailing vessels) 1999

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
to exempt, or not exempt, a vessel from a requirement of these Orders under s 5;
to approve, or not approve, the use of an equivalent under s 5A.	
Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
to specify, or not specify, requirements for manning a vessel under s 10.1.	

[Notes: 
1.	The orders currently in force were most recently amended by F2013L00871 which commenced on 1 July 2013.
2.	Section 5 of this Order provides that a person may apply, in accordance with the process set out in Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013, for an exemption from a requirement of this order.  A decision made in relation to such an application is a reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.
3.	Section 5A of this Order provides that a person may apply, in accordance with the process set out in Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013, for approval to use an equivalent. A decision made in relation to such an application is a reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.
4.	Section 5B of this Order specifies that a decision made under s 10.1 of this Order is taken to a reviewable decision for section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.
5.	Section 10 of Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013 states that Division 3 of that Order, which relates to reconsideration and review of decisions, applies where a Marine Order requires an application to be made for an approval for an equivalent guideline, or for an exemption from the requirements of an Order.] 

Marine Order 54 (Coastal pilotage) 2014

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
to refuse to issue a pilotage provider licence under subsection 10(3); 
to refuse to vary pilotage provider licence under subsection 15(6); 
to refuse to renew pilotage provider licence under subsection 17(3);
to take regulatory action against a person holding a pilotage provider licence under subsection 27(3);
to reject an application to approve a pilotage provider’s fatigue risk management plan under subsection 39(3);
to revoke approval of fatigue risk management plan under subsection 40(3);
to refuse to reissue pilot licence under subsection 48(3);
to refuse to renew pilot licence under subsection 54(3);
to take regulatory action against a licensed pilot under subsection 64(3);
to refuse to approve provision of pilotage training course under subsection 73(3);
to refuse to renew pilotage training course approval under subsection 77(3).	

[Notes: 
1.	The orders currently in force were most recently amended by F2014L00606 which commenced on 1 July 2014. 
2.	Section 5 of this Order provides that a decision under this Order is taken to be a reviewable decision for the purposes of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013 and there subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under that order.
3.	Section 116 provides that a decision mentioned in Sch 3 is taken to be a reviewable decision for section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.]

Marine Order 58 (International Safety Management Code) 2002

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
to exempt, or not exempt, a vessel from a requirement of these Orders under s 5; 
to approve, or not approve, the use of an equivalent under s 5A;
to issue, or not issue, a Document of Compliance under s 9.2;
to endorse, or not endorse the Document of Compliance under s 9.4.2;
to renew, or not renew, a Document of Compliance under s 9.5.2;
to endorse, or not endorse, the Safety Management Certificate under s 10.4.2;
to renew, or not renew, the Safety Management Certificate under s 10.5.2;
to issue, or not issue, an Interim Document of Compliance under s 11.1.1;
to extend, or not extend, the validity of an Interim Safety Management Certificate under s 11.2.3.	
Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: to revoke or vary the Document of Compliance under s 12.1.1.	

[Notes: 
1.	The orders currently in force were most recently amended by F2013L00871 which commenced on 1 July 2013. 
2.	Section 5.1 of this Order provides that a person may apply, in accordance with the process set out in Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013, for an exemption from a requirement of this Order. A decision made in relation to such an application is a reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.
3.	Section 5A.1 of this Order provides that a person may apply, in accordance with the process set out in Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013, for approval to use an equivalent.  A decision made in relation to such an application is a reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.
4.	Section 10 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013 states that Division 3 of that Order, which relates to reconsideration and review of decisions, applies where a Marine Order requires an application to be made for an approval for an equivalent guideline, or for an exemption from the requirements of an Order. 
5.	Section 6 of this Order specifies that a decision under subsection 9.2, 9.4.2, 9.5.2, 10.4.2, 10.5.2, 11.1.1, 11.2.3 or 12.1.1 of this Order is taken to be a reviewable decision for section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.]

Marine Order 59 (Offshore support vessel operations) 2011

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: to approve, or not approve, the use of an equivalent guideline under s 9.3.	

[Notes: 
1.	The Orders currently in force were most recently amended by F2013L00871 which commenced on 1 July 2013. 
2.	Section 10 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013 states that Division 3 of that Order, which relates to reconsideration and review of decisions, applies where a Marine Order requires an application to be made for an approval for an equivalent guideline, or for an exemption from the requirements of an Order.] 

Marine Order 60 (Floating offshore facilities) 2001

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
to exempt, or not exempt, a vessel  from a requirement of these Orders under s 5; 
to modify, or not modify, a vessel from a requirement of these Orders under s 6	
Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: any decision under this order, other than a decision under s 5 or 6.

[Notes: 
1.	The orders currently in force were most recently amended by F2013L00871 which commenced on 1 July 2013. 
2.	Section 5.1 of this Order provides that a person may apply, in accordance with the process set out in Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013, for an exemption from a requirement of this Order. A decision made in relation to such an application is a reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.
3.	Section 6.1 of this Order provides that a person may apply, in accordance with the process set out in Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013, for approval for a modification of a requirement of the Order.  A decision made in relation to such an application is a reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.
4.	Section 10 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013 states that Division 3 of that Order, which relates to reconsideration and review of decisions, applies where a Marine Order requires an application to be made for an approval for an equivalent guideline, or for an exemption from the requirements of an Order. 
5.	Section 6A of this Order specifies that a decision made under this Order, other than a decision under ss 5 or 6, is taken to a reviewable decision for section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.]

Marine Order 64 (Vessel traffic services) 2013

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
2.	to amend, an instrument of authority under s 13; 
3.	to renew, or not renew an authorisation under s 16; 
4.	to suspend or cancel an authorisation under s 17; 
5.	to amend a certificate of accreditation under s 25; 
6.	to renew, or not renew, a certificate of accreditation under s 28; 
7.	to suspend or cancel an accreditation under s 29.	

[Notes: 
1.	Section 7(3) of this Order varies the internal review process as set out in Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013 so that the person who reviews a reviewable decision is the person holding or occupying an office in the Australian Maritime Safety Authority to which the power to review the reviewable decision has been delegated.]

Marine Order 70 (Seafarer certification) 2014

Section 61
Section 313 of Navigation Act 2012 (Cth)

Section 60(2)	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
8.	to refuse or not refuse to revalidate a seafarer certificate under s 33(1); 
9.	to refuse or not refuse to revalidate an endorsement under s 33(1); 
10.	to refuse or not refuse to endorse a seafarer certificate under s 36(1); 
11.	to take regulatory action against a person under s 48(2); 
12.	to refuse or not refuse to approve provision of a training course under s 53(1); 
13.	to refuse or not refuse to renew a seafarer training course approval under s 53(1).	

[Notes:
1.	A list of reviewable decisions under Marine Orders 70 is set out in Schedule 1.
2.	The internal review process for Marine Order 70 is outlined in s 60 of this Order.
3.	Section 313 of the Navigation Act provides that decisions made under section 31 of that Act relating to seafarer certificates are reviewable decisions.]

Marine Order 91 (Marine pollution prevention – oil) 2014

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
-	to exempt, or not exempt, a vessel from a requirement of these Orders under s 7; 
-	to approve, or not approve, the use of an equivalent under s 8.	

[Notes: 
1.	Section 6.1 of this Order provides that a decision under this Order, other than a decision under section 5 or 5A, is taken to be a reviewable decision for the purposes of section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013 and therefore subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under that order.
2.	Section 10 of Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013 states that Division 3 of that Order, which relates to reconsideration and review of decisions, applies where a Marine Order requires an application to be made for an approval for an equivalent guideline, or for an exemption from the requirements of an Order.]

Marine Order 93 (Marine pollution prevention – Noxious liquid substances) 2014

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013
Section 313 of Navigation Act 2012 (Cth)

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
-	to exempt, or not exempt, a vessel from a requirement of these orders under s 8; 
-	to approve, or not approve, the use of an equivalent under s 9.	

[Notes: 
1.	Section 5.1 of this Order provides that a person may apply, in accordance with the process set out in Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013, for approval to use an equivalent.  A decision made in relation to such an application is a reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.
2.	Section 6 of this Order provides that a decision under this Order is taken to be a reviewable decision for the purposes of section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013 and therefore subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under that order.
3.	Section 10 of Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013 states that Division 3 of that Order, which relates to reconsideration and review of decisions, applies where a Marine Order requires an application to be made for an approval for an equivalent guideline, or for an exemption from the requirements of an Order.] 

Marine Order 96 (Marine pollution prevention – sewage) 2013

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
-	to approve, or not approve, a sewage treatment plant under s 9(a); 
-	to approve, or not approve, a sewage comminuting and disinfecting system under s 9(b); 
-	to approve, or not approve, a holding tank under s 9(c); 
-	to approve, or not approve, a sewage treatment plant under s 10(a); 
-	to approve, or not approve, a holding tank under s 10(b); 
-	to approve, or not approve, a discharge connection under s 11(2).	

[Notes: 
1.	Section 5.1 of this Order provides that a person may apply, in accordance with the process set out in Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013, for approval to use an equivalent.  A decision made in relation to such an application is a reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.
2.	Section 6 of this Order provides that a decision under this Order is taken to be a reviewable decision for the purposes of section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013 and therefore subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under that order.
3.	Section 8 of this Order specifies that a decision made under s 9 to 11 of this Order is taken to be a reviewable decision for s 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.]

Marine Order 97 (Marine pollution prevention – air pollution) 2013

Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
-	to approve, or not approve, the use of an equivalent under s 9.	

[Notes: 
1.	Section 10 of Marine Order 1(Administration) 2013 states that Division 3 of that Order, which relates to reconsideration and review of decisions, applies where a Marine Order requires an application to be made for an approval for an equivalent guideline, or for an exemption from the requirements of an Order.] 

Marine Order 502 (Vessel identifiers – national law) 2013	
Section 18 of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013

Section 17(3) of Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
-	to grant, or not grant, a unique identifier under s 6.	

[Notes:
1.	Section 6(2) provides that an application under this Order must be made in accordance with Marine Order 501 (Administration – national law) 2013. A decision in relation to such an application is a reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 501 (Administration – national law) 2013.]

Marine Order 503 (Certificates of survey – national law) 2013

Item 141 in Part 8 of Schedule 1 to the Marine Safety (Domestic Commercial Vessel) National Law Act 2012 (Cth)

Item 140(5) in Part 8 of Schedule 1 to the Marine Safety (Domestic Commercial Vessel) National Law Act 2012 (Cth)
 	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
-	to issue, or not issue, a certificate of survey under s 12; 
-	to vary, or not vary, a certificate of survey under s 16;
-	to suspend a certificate of survey under s 17; 
-	to revoke a certificate of survey under s 19.	

[Notes: 
1.	Section 9 of this Order provides that an application under this Order must be made in accordance with Marine Order 501 (Administration – national law) 2013.  A decision in relation to such an application is reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 501 (Administration – national law) 2013.
2.	Section 15 of Marine Order 501(Administration – national law) 2013 states that Division 4 of that Order, which relates to reconsideration and review of decisions, applies where the National Regulator does not make a decision about the issuance of a certificate or identifier within the time period mentioned in s 12 of that Marine Order. 
3.	Section 16(4) of Marine Order 501 (Administration – national law) provides that the National Regulator must notify the applicant of its reconsideration decision within 28 days of receiving the application for internal review.] 

Marine Order 504 (Certificates of operation – national law) 2013

Section 17 of Marine Order 501 (Administration – national law) 2013
Item 141 in Part 8 of Schedule 1 to the Marine Safety (Domestic Commercial Vessel) National Law Act 2012 (Cth)

Item 140(5) in Part 8 of Schedule 1 to the Marine Safety (Domestic Commercial Vessel) National Law Act 2012 (Cth)
 	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
	to refuse to issue a certificate of operation under s 10; 
	to vary, or not vary, a certificate of operation under s 14; 
	to suspend a certificate of operation under s 15; 
	to revoke a certificate of operation under s 17.	

[Notes: 
-	Section 9 of this Order provides that an application under this Order must be made in accordance with Marine Order 501 (Administration – national law) 2013.  A decision in relation to such an application is reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 501 (Administration – national law) 2013.
-	Section 15 of Marine Order 501(Administration – national law) 2013 states that decisions made by the National Regulator to issue an identifier or certificate or decide an application are reviewable decisions.]

Marine Order 505 (Certificates of competency – national law) 2013

Section 17 of Marine Order 501 (Administration – national law) 2013
Item 141 in Part 8 of Schedule 1 to the Marine Safety (Domestic Commercial Vessel) National Law Act 2012 (Cth)

Item 140(5) in Part 8 of Schedule 1 to the Marine Safety (Domestic Commercial Vessel) National Law Act 2012 (Cth)
 	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
	to refuse to issue a certificate of competency under s 10; 
	to endorse, or refuse to endorse, a certificate of competency under s 14; 
	to vary, or refuse to vary, a certificate of competency under s 17; 
	to refuse to suspend a certificate of operation under s 18.	
Section 16(3) of Marine Order 501 (Administration – national law) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
	to renew, or not renew, a certificate of competency under s 20.	

[Notes: 
-	Section 7 of this Order provides that an application under this Order must be made in accordance with Marine Order 501 (Administration – national law) 2013.  A decision in relation to such an application is reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 501 (Administration – national law) 2013.
-	Section 15 of Marine Order 501(Administration – national law) 2013 states that decisions made by the National Regulator to issue an identifier or certificate or decide an application are reviewable decisions.]

Marine Order 506 (Approval of training organisations – national law) 2013

Section 17 of Marine Order 501 (Administration – national law) 2013

Section 16(3) of Marine Order 501 (Administration – national law) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
	to approve, or not approve, an organisation as a training organisation under s 7; 
	to suspend, vary, or revoke the approval of an organisation as a training organisation under s 7.	

[Notes: 
-	Section 7 of this Order specifies that decisions of the National Regulator made under this Order are reviewable in accordance with the review process established under Marine Order 501 (Administration – national law) 2013. A decision in relation to such an application is reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 501 (Administration – national law) 2013.] 

Marine Order 507 (Load line certificates – national law) 2013

Section 17 of Marine Order 501 (Administration – national law) 2013

Section 16(3) of Marine Order 501 (Administration – national law) 2013	The following decisions that have been internally reviewed by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
	to issue, or not issue, a load line certificate under s 8; 
	to vary, or not vary, a load line certificate under s 12; 
	to suspend, or not suspend, a load line certificate under s 13; 
	to revoke a load line certificate under s 14.	

[Notes: 
-	Section 7 of this Order specifies that decisions made under this Order in relation to an application is reviewable in accordance with the review process established under Marine Order 501 (Administration – national law) 2013. A decision in relation to such an application is reviewable decision that is subject to internal review and then review by the AAT under Marine Order 501 (Administration – national law) 2013.] 

Marine Safety (Domestic Commercial Vessel) National Law Act 2012

Section 141 (21 of 2012)

Section 140(5)	The following decisions of the Australian Maritime Safety Authority that have been reconsidered by the Authority: 
-	to refuse to issue a certificate under s 38(1), 48(1) or 60(1); 
-	to refuse to issue a unique identifier under s 31(1); 
-	to impose a condition on a certificate under s 38(3)(b), 48(4)(b) or 60(3)(B); 
-	to refuse to vary a certificate under s 40(1), 50(1) or 62(1); 
-	to vary a certificate under s 40(2), 50(2) or 62(2); 
-	to refuse to suspend a certificate under s 41(1), 51(1) or 63(1); 
-	to suspend a certificate under s 41(2), 51(2) or 63(2); 
-	to refuse to revoke a certificate under s 42(1), 52(1) or 64(1); 
-	to revoke a certificate under s 42(2), 52(2) or 64(2); 
-	to refuse to recognise a certificate under s 73(1); 
-	to specify a condition under s 73(3); to detain a vessel under s 101(1); 
-	to give a direction under s 109(1); 
-	to issue a provisional improvement notice under s 110(1); 
-	to issue a prohibition notice under s 111(1); 
-	to refuse to grant an exemption, or to impose a condition on an exemption, under s 143, other than an exemption granted on the initiative of the Australian Maritime Safety Authority.	

[Notes:
-	The Tribunal’s jurisdiction under this Act commenced on 1 July 2013.
-	The list of ‘reviewable decisions’ that may be reconsidered under the Act is set out in s 139.]

Marine Safety (Domestic Commercial Vessel) National Law Regulation 2013

Section 49 (SLI 167 of 2014)

Sections 24(4), 28(4), 42(1), 42(7), 43(1), 44(1) 	The following decisions of the National Regulator: 
-	to refuse to accredit a person to perform the role if marine surveyor in one or more categories or surveying under s 24(4);
-	to refuse to renew an accreditation under s 28(4);
-	to vary an accreditation under s 42(1);
-	to refuse to vary an accreditation under s 42(7);
-	to suspend an accreditation under s 43(1);
-	to revoke an accreditation under s 44(1).	

[Notes:
1.	This Regulation commenced on 2 January 2015.
2.	The list of ‘reviewable decisions’ that may be reconsidered under the Regulations is set out in s 47.]

Maritime Transport and Offshore Facilities Security Act 2003

Section 201 (131 of 2003) (67 of 2005) (109 of 2006) (138 of 2008)

Sections 13(1), 14, 17B(1), 17C, 51(2), 51(4), 52A(5), 52A(7), 53, 55, 57, 58, 70(2), 70(4); 71A(4), 71A(6), 72, 74, 76, 77, 86, 100K(2), 100K(4), 100LA(5), 100LA(7), 100M, 100O, 100Q, 100R, 100ZC, 102, 106, 110, 113A	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development: 
	to declare that a particular port, or a part of a particular port, is a security regulated port under s 13(1);
	to designate a person as a port operator under s 14;
	to declare that one of the following is a security regulated offshore facility under s 17B(1) – an offshore facility, a part of an offshore facility, a group of offshore facilities, parts of a group of offshore facilities;
	to designate a person as an offshore facility operator under s 17C;
	to refuse to approve a maritime security plan under s 51(2) or (4) ;
	to refuse to approve a variation of a maritime security plan under s 52A(5) or (7);
	to refuse to approve a ship security plan under s 70(2) or (4);
	to refuse to approve a variation of a ship security plan under s 71A(4) or (6), to refuse to approve an offshore security plan under s 100K(2) or (4);
	to refuse to approve a variation of an offshore security plan under s 100LA(5) or (7);
	to direct a maritime industry participant or ship operator to vary a plan under ss 53, 72 or 100M;
	to direct a maritime industry participant or ship operator to revise a plan under s 55, 74 or 100O;
	to cancel the approval of a maritime security plan, a ship security plan or an offshore security plan under s 57, 58, 76, 77, 100Q or 100R;
	to refuse an interim ISSC under s 86 or 100ZC;
	to establish a port security zone under s 102; 
	to declare that a ship security zone is to operate around a security regulated ship under s 106; 
	to establish an on‑board security zone under s 110; 
	to establish an offshore security zone under s 113A.	

[Notes:
1.	The Secretary is deemed to have refused to approve a maritime security plan, a ship security plan or an offshore security plan if the Secretary does not approve, or refuse to approve, a plan within the consideration period as defined: see subs 51(4) and (7), 70(4) and (7) and 100K(4) and (7).  
2.	The Secretary is deemed to have refused to approve a variation of a maritime security plan, a ship security plan or an offshore security plan if the Secretary does not approve, or refuse to approve  a plan or variation within the consideration period as defined: see subs 52A(7) and (10), 71A(6) and (9) and 100LA (7) and (10).  
3.	The consideration period is defined as a period of 60 days commencing on the day a plan or request for variation is received extended by the time taken by an applicant to respond to any request for further information.]

Maritime Transport and Offshore Facilities Security Regulations 2003

Regulations 6.08Z and 12.01 (SLI 201 of 2005) (SLI 11 of 2009)

Regulation 6.08X

	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development that have been reconsidered by the Secretary under reg 6.08X: 
-	to refuse to exempt somebody from displaying a valid MSIC or a temporary MSIC in a maritime security zone, or part of such an area, under reg 6.07M(2);
-	to impose a condition on an exemption from displaying a valid MSIC or a temporary MSIC in a maritime security zone, or part of such an area, under reg 6.07M(5);
-	to refuse to authorise a person as an issuing body under reg 6.07P(2);
-	to impose a condition on an issuing body under reg 6.07P(5);
-	to refuse to exempt an issuing body from giving effect to its MSIC plan in a particular case or respect under reg 6.07R(6);
-	to impose a condition on an exemption under reg 6.07R(10);
-	to direct an issuing body to vary its MSIC plan under reg 6.07S(1);
-	to refuse to approve a variation of an issuing body’s MSIC plan under reg 6.07T(3);
-	to revoke an issuing body’s authorisation under reg 6.07W(4);
-	to authorise, or refuse to authorise, a person to perform the functions, or exercise the powers, of an issuing body under reg 6.07Z(2);
-	to authorise a person to perform the functions or exercise the powers of an issuing body subject to a condition under reg 6.07Z(5);
-	to refuse to approve the issue of an MSIC under reg 6.08F(3);
-	 to impose a condition on an MSIC under reg 6.08F(6);
-	that on the basis of a qualified security assessment a person has an adverse maritime security status under reg 6.08H(1);
-	to give an issuing body for an MSIC a direction under reg 6.08H(1)(b);
-	to direct an issuing body to suspend an MSIC under reg 6.08LE(1);
-	to refuse to set aside the cancellation of an MSIC under reg 6.08MB or 6.08MC;
-	to set aside the cancellation of an MSIC under reg 6.08MD.
	
Regulation 6.08X	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Attorney-General’s Department that have been reconsidered by the Secretary of the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development under reg 6.08X: to issue a disqualifying notice under reg 6.08D.
	
Regulation 6.08X

	The following decisions of an issuing body that have been reconsidered by the Secretary of the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development:
	to refuse to issue an MSIC to a person under reg 6.08C(1) or 6.08E; 
	to issue an MSIC subject to a condition under reg 6.08C(6); 
	to suspend an MSIC under ref 6.08LF; 
	to cancel an MSIC under reg 6.08M(1).
	
Regulation 6.85(3)	The following decision of the Secretary of the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development: 
-	to refuse to declare that a ship security zone is to operate around a security regulated ship under reg 6.85 (3).	

[Notes: 
1.	The decisions in relation to which a person may request reconsideration are set out in reg 6.08X(1), (2), (3), (4), (5) and (6).  The following instruments introduced or have amended these provisions: SLI 201 of 2005, SLI 372 of 2006 and SLI178 of 2010.
2.	If a person applies to the Secretary for reconsideration of a decision and the Secretary does not notify the person of his or her decision within 30 days after the application is made, the Secretary is taken to have refused to vary the original decision: reg 6.08Y.
3.	Regulation 6.08X(2) which provided that a person could apply for reconsideration of a decision of the Secretary of the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development that, on the basis of a qualified security assessment, a person has an adverse maritime security status was repealed on 1 December 2010: Maritime Transport and Offshore Facilities Security Amendment Regulations 2010 (No 1) 2010.  Review rights relating to an adverse or qualified security assessment are set out in the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.]

Marriage Act 1961

Section 34(1) (209 of 1976) (77 of 2002)

Sections 31, 33	The following decisions of a Registrar, including a Deputy Registrar:  
-	to refuse to register a person as a marriage celebrant under s 31; 
-	to remove the name of a person from a register under s 33.
	
Section 39J	The following decisions of the Registrar of Marriage Celebrants: 
-	not to register a person as a marriage celebrant (unless a ground for the decision was that the Registrar would breach s 39E by registering the person) or to suspend a person’s registration as a marriage celebrant; or to deregister a marriage celebrant (including deregistration as a result of non-payment of celebrant registration charge) under s 39J.	

Meat Export Charge Collection Act 1984

Section 12A(6) (65 of 1985)

Sections 9(2), 12A(3)(a)(ii)
	The following decisions of the Minister for Agriculture and Water Resources: 
-	to refuse to remit the whole or part of a penalty for non-payment of a charge; 
-	to extend, or refuse to extend, the period within which to make a request for reconsideration.
	
Section 12A(4) 	The following decision of an authorized officer that has been confirmed, varied or set aside by the Minister on reconsideration: 
-	to refuse to remit the whole or part of a penalty for non-payment of a charge.	

Medibank Private Sale Act 2006

Subitems 31(4) and 39(4) of Schedule 2 (160 of 2006)

Subitems 31(1), 39(2) and 39(3) of Schedule 2	The following decisions of the Minister for Finance: 
-	to give a stakeholder a written direction to cease holding a stake in a Medibank Private company within a specified time under subitem 31(1) of Schedule 4; 
-	to allow, or refuse to allow, a longer period within which a person’s interest in a share must be disregarded for the purposes of Part 4 of Schedule 2 to the Act.	

[Notes:
-	Part 4 of Schedule 2 to the Act, which includes item 31, will cease to have effect at the end of the period of 5 years beginning at the start of the designated sale day declared under s 3 of the Act.]

Medical Indemnity Act 2002

Sections 27(4), 34E(4), 34K(6), 34L(5), 34W(4), 34ZM(4), 37A(6), 62(6), 65(5), 66B(4) (132 of 2002) (121 of 2003) (17 of 2004) (77 of 2004)

Sections 27(3), 34E(1), 34K(1), 34L(1), 34W(3), 34ZM(3), 37A(5), 62(3), 65(4), 66(3)	The following decisions of the Chief  Executive Medicare: 
-	not to remit, or to remit only part of, an amount of late payment penalty for a medical defence organisation or insurer under subs 27(3);
-	to refuse to issue a qualifying claim certificate under subs 34E(1);
-	to revoke or vary a qualifying claim certificate under subs 34K(1);
-	to refuse an application for exceptional claims indemnity, or to pay a particular amount of exceptional claims indemnity under subs 34L(1);
-	not to remit or to remit only part of an amount of late payment penalty under subs 34(W)(3);
-	not to remit, or to remit only part of, an amount of late penalty under subs 34ZM(3);
-	not to accept a late application for an exceptional claims indemnity under subs 37A(5);
-	not to approve an application for deferral of the payment day for medical indemnity payment under subs 62(3);
-	not to remit, or to remit only part of, an amount of late payment penalty for a person under subs 65(4);
-	not to remit, or to remit only part of an amount of late payment penalty under subs 66B(3).	

Medical Indemnity (Prudential Supervision and Product Standards) Act 2003

Section 14 (37 of 2003)

Sections 13(3), 13(5)	The following decisions of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority: 
-	not to make a determination under subs 13(3); 
-	under subs 13(5) to revoke a determination made under subs 13(3).	

Midwife Professional Indemnity (Commonwealth Contribution) Scheme Act 2010

Sections 11(7), 15(6), 18(4), 28(4), 40(4), 57, 60(5) and 76(4) (30 of 2010)

Sections 11(1), 11(2), 15(1), 15(3), 18(1), 28(3), 40(3), 51, 56, 60(4), 76(3)

	The following decisions of the Chief Executive Medicare: 
-	to refuse to issue a qualifying claim certificate under s 11(1) or (2);
-	to revoke a qualifying claim certificate under s 15(1);
-	to vary a qualifying claim certificate under s 15(3);
-	to refuse an application for a Level 2 Commonwealth contribution or to pay a particular amount of Level 2 Commonwealth contribution under s 18(1);
-	to not remit, or to remit only part of, an amount of late payment penalty under s 28(3); 
-	to not remit, or to remit only part of, an amount of late payment penalty under s 40(3); 
-	to not issue an apportionment certificate under s 51; 
-	to specify a particular apportionment in an apportionment certificate under s 51;
-	 to revoke or vary an apportionment certificate under s 56; 
-	to not accept a late application for a Level 2 Commonwealth contribution under s 60(4); 
-	to not remit, or to remit only part of, an amount of late payment penalty under s 76(3). 	

Migration Act 1958

Sections 136, 306, 306AJ, 311F, 311M, 348, 414 and 500
(61 of 1981) (112 of 1983) (59 of 1989) (84 of 1992) (85 of 1992) (184 of 1992) (213 of 1992) (59 of 1993) (60 of 1994) (110 of 1995) (205 of 1997) (114 of 1998) (35 of 2002) (48 of 2004)(121 of 2011) (129 of 2014) (60 of 2015) 
General Division	
Sections 65, 109, 116, 134(1), 134(3A), 134(4), 200, 311H(1)	The following decisions of the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection: 
-	to refuse to grant a protection visa or to cancel a protection visa relying on Articles 1F, 32 or 33 of the Refugee Convention or s 36(2C)(a) or (b) of this Act ; 
-	to cancel a business visa under s 134(1); to cancel an investment-linked visa under s 134(3A); 
-	to cancel the business visa held by a person who is or was a member of the family unit of the holder of a cancelled business visa under s 134(4); 
-	to order the deportation of a non-citizen convicted of certain crimes; 
-	to refer a registered migration agent to the Migration Agents Registration Authority under s 306AC(1) where the agent has a high visa refusal rate in relation to a visa of a particular class; 
-	to refer a registered migration agent to the Migration Agents Registration Authority under s 306AGAA(8) for disciplinary action under s 306AGAC; 
-	to refer a former registered migration agent to the Migration Agent Registration Authority for disciplinary action under s 311H(1).	
Division 3 of Part 3, Sections 306AG(1), 306AGAC(1), 311A(1), 311L(1)	The following decisions of the Migration Agents Registration Authority: 
-	any decision made under Div 3 of Pt 3; 
-	to caution a migration agent or to suspend or cancel a migration agent’s registration under s 306AG(1) or 306AGAC(1); 
-	to bar a former registered migration agent from being a registered migration agent for a period of up to 5 years under s 311A(1) or 311L(1)	
Sections 501(1), 501(2); 501CA(4); 	The following decisions of a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection: 
-	to refuse to grant a visa under s 501(1), or to cancel a visa under s 501(2), on the basis that the non-citizen does not satisfy the delegate of the Minister that the person passes the character test.
-	a decision made under s 501CA(4) not to revoke a decision made under s 501(3A) (mandatory visa cancellation) to cancel a visa that has been granted to a person	
Migration and Refugee Division	
Part 5 reviewable decisions: Section 338	The following decisions of the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection:
1.	to refuse to grant a non-citizen a visa covered by s 338(2), 338(5), 338(6), 338(7);
2.	to refuse to grant a non-citizen a permanent visa covered by s 338(7A);
3.	to cancel a visa held by a non-citizen who is in the migration zone at the time of the cancellation unless the decision meets any of the descriptions in s 338(3);
4.	not to revoke the cancellation of a non-citizen’s visa under s 137L if the non-citizen was in the migration zone when the decision was made;
5.	to refuse to grant a bridging visa to a non-citizen who is in immigration detention because of that refusal;
6.	of a delegate of the Minister to cancel a bridging visa held by a non-citizen who is in immigration detention because of that cancellation; 
7.	as to the assessed score of an applicant for a visa under s 93 subject to the conditions in s 338(8).	
Part 7 reviewable decisions: Section 411	The following decisions:
-	a decision, made before 1 September 1994, that a non-citizen is not a refugee under the Refugee Convention as amended by the Refugees Protocol (other than such a decision made after a review by the Minister of an earlier decision that the person was not such a refugee);
-	a decision, made before 1 September 1994, to refuse to grant , or to cancel, a visa, or entry permit, a criterion for which is that the applicant for it is a non-citizen who has been determined to be a refugee under the Refugee Convention as amended by the Refugees Protocol (other than such a decision made under the Migration (Review) (1993) Regulations or repealed under Part 2A of the Migration (Review) Regulations;
-	to refuse to grant a protection visa, other than a decision that was made relying on s 5H(2) or 36(1B) or 36(1C) or 36(2C)(a) or 36(2C((b);
-	to cancel a protection visa, other than a decision that was made because of s 5H(2) or 36(1C) or an assessment made by ASIO that the holder of the visa is directly or indirectly a risk to security or s 36(2C)(a) or 36(2C)(b)	
[Notes:

1.	The Tribunal may not review a decision of the Minister under s 200 of the Act if the Minister has issued a conclusive certificate in relation to the person under s 502.
2.	An application for review of a decision of the Minister to refer an agent to the Migration Agents Registration Authority for disciplinary action under s 306AC(1) or 306AGAA(8) may only be made if the Authority decides to caution the agent or to suspend or cancel an agent’s registration under s 306AG(1) or 306AGAC(1): s 306AJ(2).  The standard time limits under s 29(1)(d) of the AAT Act do not apply to an application for review of a referral decision: s 306AJ(3).
3.	Any stay orders made by the Tribunal may be affected by the operation of 305A(2), 306AA, 306AK, 311C(1) and 311P(1) of the Act.
4.	Where a delegate of the Minister makes a decision under s 501 that relates to a person in Australia, the person must apply for review within 9 days of being notified of the decision.  An application for review must be accompanied by a copy of the decision and one copy of the documents provided to the person under s 501G of the Act.
5.	Section 501CA was introduced by 129 of 2014 commencing 11 December 2014. 
6.	Note at end of s 500(1): Decisions to refuse to grant a protection visa to fast track applicants are generally not reviewable by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. 
7.	60 of 2015 introduced Part 5 and Part 7 reviewable decisions with effect from 1 July 2015. 
8.	A decision is not a Part 5 reviewable decision if: (a) the Minister has issued a conclusive certificate under s 339 in relation to the decision; or (b) the decision is a Part 7 reviewable decision; or (c) the decision is to refuse to grant, or to cancel, a temporary safe haven visa; or (d) the decision is a fast track decision: Section 338(1).
9.	A decision is not a Part 7 reviewable decision if: (a) any decision to cancel a protection visa was made personally by the Minister; (b) decisions made in relation to a non-citizen who is not physically present in the migration zone when the decision is made; (c) decisions in relation to which the Minister has issued a conclusive certificate under s 411(3); or (d) fast track decisions: Section 411(2). 

Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 

Section 354(1) and (2) (51 of 2004)

Sections 50(1), 50(3), 52(1), 52(3) 	The following decisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission or the service chief of the Air Force Reserve, the Army Reserve, the Naval Reserve, the Permanent Navy, the Permanent Air Force or the Regular Army: 
1.	to determine under s 50(1) that, where a person is required to undergo an examination under s 45 and the person refuses or fails to undergo the examination or in any way obstructs the examination, the person’s right to compensation is suspended until the examination takes place; 
2.	to fail to make a determination under s 50(3) that a suspension under s 50(1) is terminated where a person gives to the rehabilitation authority within 14 days after the date fixed for an examination evidence of a reasonable excuse for the refusal or failure to undergo the examination or for obstructing the examination; 
3.	to determine under s 52(1) that, where a person is required to undertake a rehabilitation program under s 51and the person refuses or  fails to undertake the program, the person’s right to compensation is suspended until the person undertakes the rehabilitation program; 
4.	to fail to make a determination under s 52(3) that a suspension under s 50(1) is terminated where a person gives to the rehabilitation authority within 14 days after the date fixed for the starting a rehabilitation program evidence of a reasonable excuse for the refusal or failure to undertake the program.
	
Section 329(1), 329(3), 397(1), 397(3)	The following decisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission: 
1.	to determine under s 329(1) that, where a person is required to undergo an examination under s 328(2) and the person refuses or fails to undergo the examination or in any way obstructs the examination, the person’s right to compensation is suspended until the examination takes place; 
2.	to fail to make a determination under s 329(3) that a suspension under s 329(1) is terminated where a person gives to the Commission within 14 days after the date fixed for an examination evidence of a reasonable excuse for the refusal or failure to undergo the examination or for obstructing the examination; 
3.	to determine under s 397(1) that, where a plaintiff fails to comply with any reasonable requirement of the Commission, the person’s right to compensation is suspended until the person does so; 
4.	to fail to make a determination under s 397(3) that a suspension under s 397(1) is terminated where a person gives to the Commission within 14 days after the date fixed for complying with the requirement, the person gives to the Commission evidence of a reasonable excuse for the failure.
	
Section 348(1)
	The following decisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission or the service chief of the Air Force Reserve, the Army Reserve, the Naval Reserve, the Permanent Navy, the Permanent Air Force or the Regular Army: 
-	to vary, with the consent of the claimant, an original determination made by the Commission or that service chief that has been affirmed by the Veterans’ Review Board or a determination made by the Veterans’ Review Board in substitution for an original determination made by the Commission or that service chief where the claimant has made an application to the AAT for review of the determination made by the Board which has not been determined.
	
Sections 350(2)
	The following decisions that have been revoked, confirmed or varied by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission on reconsideration: 
-	any original determination of the Commission under the Act other than those determinations specified below; 
-	any determination of a service chief of the Air Force Reserve, the Army Reserve, the Naval Reserve, the Permanent Navy, the Permanent Air Force or the Regular Army under the Act that relates to rehabilitation for a person if the service chief is the rehabilitation authority of the person.
	
Part 4	The following decisions that have been affirmed, varied or set aside by the Veterans’ Review Board: 
-	any original determination of the Commission under the Act other than those determinations specified below; 
-	any determination of a service chief of the Air Force Reserve, the Army Reserve, the Naval Reserve, the Permanent Navy, the Permanent Air Force or the Regular Army under the Act that relate to rehabilitation for a person if the service chief is the rehabilitation authority of the person.	
[Notes:
-	This Act generally applies where an injury, disease or death relates to defence service rendered on or after 1 July 2004, and prior service where it continues after that date, and to treatment provided on or after, that date, and prior treatment where it continues on or after that date.
-	Where an ‘original determination’ has been made by the Commission or a service chief under the Act, the claimant may either request that the Commission reconsider the determination or apply to the Veterans’ Review Board for review of the determination: s 349 and 352.  ‘Original determination’ is defined in s 345(1) to mean any determination of the Commission under the Act other than those specified in s 345(2) or any determination of a service chief that relates to rehabilitation for a person if the service chief is the rehabilitation authority of the person.  The following determinations of the Commission are specified in s 345(2) and are not subject to reconsideration: 
-	a determination under s 50, 52, 67, 210, 212, 258, 272 or Part 3 of Chapter 6; 
-	a determination under s 315 or 415 to recover an overpayment but not as to the amount that should be recovered; 
-	a determination under s 316 to recover interest but not as to the amount that should be recovered; 
-	a determination under s 327 that s 271 or 280 applies to a person; 
-	a determination under s 329 or 397;
-	a determination under s 428 to write off a debt but not as to the amount that should be written off; 
-	a determination under s 429 to waive a debt but not as to the amount that should be waived; 
-	a determination that has been varied under s 348(1); 
-	a determination under s 349(6) (extending the period within which a request for reconsideration must be made); or 
-	a determination about the compensation to be provided under an education scheme.
-	A service chief may request that the Commission reconsider an original determination that relates to liability for a service injury, disease or death of a person who is or was a member of the Defence Force: s 349(4).
-	Application may be made to the Tribunal by the claimant, the relevant service chief or the Commission.
-	Where a decision has been reviewed by the Veterans’ Review Board or a determination has been varied under s 348(1), an application must be made within 3 months of notification of the decision or determination: s 355.  An extension of time to apply for review cannot be granted beyond 12 months after notification.  In relation to other reviewable decisions, application must be made within 60 days after notification of the determination: s 355.  There is no limit on extending the time for applying for review.
-	The Commission is a party to a proceeding for review of a VRB decision: s 355.]

Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act Education and Training Scheme 2004

Paragraph 8.2.8 (Instrument 2004 No M4, Gazette GN34, 25/08/04)

Paragraph 8.2.5	The following decision of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission that has been affirmed or set aside on reconsideration: to decline an application for benefit under the Scheme. 	

Motor Vehicle Compensation Scheme 

Paragraph 5.1.7 (F2015L01245)

Paragraph 5.1.1, 5.1.5	Any decision on reconsideration of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in respect of an application for compensation under the Scheme.	

[Notes:

1.	This scheme commenced on 12 August 2015: F2015L01245.]

Motor Vehicle Compensation Scheme 2004 (repealed)

Paragraph 5.1.7 (Instrument 2004 No M2)

Paragraph 5.1.1	The following decision of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission that has been affirmed or set aside on reconsideration: 
-	to determine an application for compensation under the Scheme.	

[Notes:

1.	The whole of this Scheme was repealed by the Motor Vehicle Compensation Scheme, taking effect from 12 August 2015 (F2015L01245).]

Motor Vehicle Standards Act 1989

Section 39(1) (65 of 1989) (11 of 1991) (95 of 1995) (8 of 1999) (155 of 2001)

Sections 10, 10A, 11, 13D, 13F, 14A, 15(2), 16, 16A, 19, 21B, 21C, 21D, 21E	The following decisions of the Minister for Infrastructure and Regional Development : 
-	to determine procedures and arrangements for the placement of plates on road vehicles or vehicle components under s 10;
-	to give, or refuse to give, written approval for identification plates to be placed on vehicles or components of a particular type under s 10A;
-	to cancel, suspend or vary a person's approval to place identification plates on road vehicles under s 11;
-	to refuse an application for approval, or, specify a condition for an approval under s 13D;
-	to vary, cancel, or suspend an approval under s 13F;
-	to approve, to approve with conditions or refuse to approve, the supply of a nonstandard vehicle that does not have an identification plate to the market under s 14A;
-	to approve, to approve subject to conditions, or to refuse to approve, the use of a nonstandard vehicle under subs 15(2);
-	to refuse an application for an approval, or, to specify a condition in an approval, under s 16;
-	to vary, cancel or suspend an approval under s 16A;
-	to approve, to approve subject to conditions, or to refuse to approve, the importation of a nonstandard road vehicle, a road vehicle that does not have an identification plate or a nonstandard prescribed vehicle component under s 19;
-	to refuse an application for an approval under s 21B;
-	to refuse to renew an approval under s 21C;
-	to specify a condition in an approval under s 21D;
-	to vary, cancel or suspend an approval under s 21E.	

[Notes:
1.	Section 39 of this Act also provides that an application for review may be made in relation the following decisions:
1.	a decision of the Minister under the regulations for the purposes of section 20: s 39(f);
2.	a decision of the Minister under the regulations or a determination to give or refuse an identification plate or an identification plate authority: s 39(g).]

Motor Vehicle Standards Regulations 1989

Sections 39(1)(f) and 39(1)(g) of Motor Vehicles Standards Act 1989 and 29(8) of the Regulations (65 of 1989) (SR 202 of 1989) (SR 222 of 1992) (SR 194 of 2000) (SR 350 of 2001)

Regulations 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 	The following decisions of the Minister for Infrastructure and Regional Development: 
-	to approve, to approve subject to conditions, or to refuse to approve, the importation of a nonstandard road vehicle or vehicle that does not have a compliance plate under reg 11;
-	to approve, or refuse to approve, the importation of a road vehicle under reg 12, 13 14, 15, 16, 17 or 18;
-	to revoke an approval to import a vehicle under reg 19.	
Regulation 29(3)(a)	A decision of the Minister for Infrastructure and Regional Development that has been affirmed on reconsideration: 
-	to refuse to enter a road vehicle on the Register under reg 23(3).	

Mutual Recognition Act 1992

Section 34 (198 of 1992)

Sections 20(2), 20(5), 22, 23	The following decisions of a local registration authority: 
-	to register, or refuse to register, a person under subs 20(2); 
-	to renew, or refuse to renew, a person’s registration under subs 20(2); 
-	to impose conditions on registration under subs 20(5); 
-	to postpone a person’s registration under s 21; to refuse registration under s 22; 
-	to grant registration subject to conditions under s 23.	

[Notes:
1.	A “local registration authority” of a State is defined as the person or authority in the State having the function conferred by legislation of registering persons in connection with their carrying on that occupation in the State.  This may be a State agency or a private sector organisation. 
2.	The Tribunal may order a party in proceedings before it to pay costs if the party has acted unreasonably: s 35.]

N

Narcotic Drugs Act 1967

Section 14A (176 of 1976)

Sections 9, 10	The following decisions of the Minister for Health:  
-	to refuse to grant a licence to manufacture a particular drug at particular premises under s 9; 
-	to specify particular conditions in a licence under s 9; 
-	to revoke a licence under s 10.
	
Section 12	The following decision of the Chief Executive Officer of Customs: 
-	to give directions with respect to security of premises and handling of narcotic materials under s 12.
	
Section 13
	The following decision of the Secretary of the Department of Health: 
-	to give directions in relation to the handling and labelling of drugs under s 13.	

National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 

Section 327 (134 of 2009)

Section 327(1)	Any decision of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission made under the Act other than those decisions specified in s 327(1)(a) to (i). 	

[Notes:  
1.	Section 327(1) provides that an application for review may be made to the Tribunal for any decision made by ASIC under the Act, or instruments made under the Act, other than the following decisions:
(a)	under s 109(3) (which deals with certain exemptions from, and modifications of, Chapter 2);  
(b)	under s 163(3) (which deals with certain exemptions from, and modifications of Chapter 3);
(c)	under s 241 (which deals with approved codes of conduct);
(d)	under Chapter 6, which deals with compliance and enforcement, except for a decision of ASIC 
(i) 	to make an order under s 300(1) (which deals with orders relating to credit contracts, mortgages, guarantees or consumer leases); or 
(ii) to make, or refuse to make, an order under s 301(1)(which deals with orders varying or revoking orders made under s 300);
(e) to make a determination under s 328(3) (which deals with determinations in relation to notice of reviewable decisions etc);
(f) under s 6(17) of the National Credit Code (which deals with the exclusion of provisions of credit from the application of the National Credit Code);
(g) under s 171(6) of the National Credit Code (which deals with the exclusion of consumer leases from the application of the National Credit Code);
(h) under s 203A(3) of the National Credit Code (which deals with certain exemptions from the National Credit Code); or
(i) under the National Consumer Credit Protection Regulations 2010, unless the regulations specify that an application may be made to the Tribunal for review.]

National Consumer Credit Protection Regulations 2010  

Section 327 of the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009

Regulation 12(3)(b)	The following decision of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission: 
-	to refuse to approve a guarantee that ensures payment of the obligations of a licensee to an extent that is adequate within the meaning of reg 12(1) under reg 12(3)(b).	

[Notes:  
1.	The note to reg 12(3) provides that, for paragraph (b), a decision to refuse to approve a guarantee is a reviewable decision under s 327 of the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009.]

National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013

Section 103 (20 of 2013)

Section 100(6)	The following decisions of the CEO of the National Disability Insurance Scheme Launch Transition Agency that have been reviewed internally: 
to determine that a person does not meet the access criteria under s 20(a), 21(3) or 26(2)(c);
-	to not specify a period under s 26(2)(b);
-	to revoke a person’s status as a participant under s 30;
-	to approve the statement of participant supports in a participant’s plan under s 33(2);
-	to not extend a grace period under s 40(2)(b);
-	not to review a participant’s plan  under s 48(2);
-	to refuse to approve a person or entity as a registered provider of supports under s 70;
-	to revoke an instrument approving a person or entity as a registered provider of supports under s 72;
-	to make, or not make, a determination in relation to a person under s 74(1)(b);
-	not to make a determination that s 74(1) and (2) do not apply to a child under s 74(4)(c);
-	to make, or not to make, a determination that a person has parental responsibility for a child under s 75(2) or 75(3);
-	to appoint a plan nominee under s 86;
-	to appoint a correspondence nominee under s 87;
-	to cancel or suspend, or not to cancel or suspend, the appointment of a nominee under s 89, 90 or 91;
-	to give a notice to require a person to take reasonable action to claim or obtain compensation under s 104;
-	to give a notice that the CEO proposes to recover an amount under s 111;
-	not to treat the whole or part of a compensation payment as not having been fixed by a judgement or settlement under s 116. 	

[Notes:
-	The Tribunal’s jurisdiction under this Act commenced on 1 July 2013.
-	A list of reviewable decisions is set out in s 99 of this Act. Section 99 was amended by No. 44 of 2013]

National Environment Protection Measures (Implementation) Act 1998

Section 34(1) (129 of 1998)

Section 23(1)	The following decision of the Minister for Environment: 
-	to become satisfied under s 23(1) about a matter mentioned in paragraph 23 (1) (a), (b) or (c).	

[Notes:  
-	Section 34(1) of the Act provides that application may be made to the Tribunal for review of any “reviewable decision” made under:
-	an applied provision of an applied State law;
-	an applied provision of a law of a State or Territory;
-	a provision of a regulation made for the purposes of Part 4 of the Act;
-	Part 5 of the Act.
-	The term “reviewable decision” is defined in s 34(2) to the effect that a decision under any of these provisions is reviewable only if the regulations provide that the particular decision or a decision of that kind is a reviewable decision.  Regulation 6 of the National Environment Protection Measures (Implementation) Regulations 1999 sets out decisions that are reviewable.]

National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007

Section 56 (175 of 2007) (87 of 2009) (84 of 2012)(83 of 2014)

Sections 11B, , 17, 18, 20, 22L, 22N, 22P, 25, 27, 54, 55, 75A	The following decisions of the Clean Energy Regulator: 
-	to cancel a nomination under s 11B;
-	to decide not to register a corporation under s 17;
-	to decide not to deregister a corporation under s 18;
-	to make a determination under s 20 that certain information is to be provided by a person;
-	to refuse to make a determination under s 20;
-	to refuse to issue a reporting transfer certificate under s 22L;
-	to refuse to give consent to the surrender of the reporting transfer certificate under s 22N;
-	to cancel a reporting transfer certificate under s 22P;
-	to refuse under s 25 an application that certain information not be published;
-	to refuse to disclose information under s 27;
-	to refuse under s 54(1) an application for a declaration that an activity or series of activities are a facility;
-	to declare under s 54(1)(b) that an activity or series of activities are a facility;
-	to refuse under s 55(1) an application for a declaration that a controlling corporation or another member of the corporation’s group has operational control of a facility;
-	to declare under s 55(1)(b) that a controlling corporation or another member of the corporation’s group has operational control of a facility;
-	to refuse to register an individual in the register of greenhouse and energy auditors kept under s 75A.	
The following decisions of the Clean Energy regulator are reviewable decisions with effect from 1 July 2016:	
	1.	to cancel a nomination under s 11C;
2.	to decide not to register a person under s 18AA;
3.	to refuse to make a determination under the safeguard rules;
4.	to make a determination under the safeguard rules;
5.	to refuse to make a declaration under the safeguard rules;
6.	to make a declaration under the safeguard rules;
7.	to refuse and application under s 54A;
8.	to declare a facility under s 54A(1)(b);
9.	to refuse an application under s 55A;
10.	to declare that a non-group entity has operational control of a facility under s 55A(1)(b)

[Notes:
1.	On 1 July 2014, the Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Act 2014 (83 of 2014) repealed section 11C.
2.	The Carbon Farming Initiative Amendment Act 2014 (119 of 2014) added additional reviewable decisions to s 56 with effect from 1 July 2016.]

National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Regulations 2008

Regulation 6.73 (SLI 378 of 2009)

Regulations 6.30, 6.31, 6.35, 6.37, 6.62, 6.71	The following decisions of the Clean Energy Regulator: 
-	to suspend the registration of a registered greenhouse and energy auditor under reg 6.30;
-	to refuse to suspend the registration of a registered greenhouse and energy auditor under reg 6.31;
-	to deregister a registered greenhouse and energy auditor under reg 6.35;
-	to refuse to deregister a registered greenhouse and energy auditor under reg 6.37;
-	to impose a condition on the registration of a registered greenhouse and energy auditor under reg 6.62;
-	to refuse an application for an exemption as provided for in reg 6.71. 	

[Notes: 
-	The following Regulations have introduced or amended the list of reviewable decisions: SLI 378 of 2009.]

National Health Act 1953

Sections 105AB and 105AD(2) (60 of 1976) (99 of 1976) (132 of 1978) (189 of 1978) (112 of 1982) (54 of 1983) (139 of 1983) (63 of 1984) (135 of 1984) (70 of 1985) (94 of 1986) (115 of 1986) (72 of 1987) (95 of 1989) (3 of 1990) (106 of 1990) (83 of 1991) (84 of 1991) (119 of 1991) (211 of 1991) (136 of 1992) (192 of 1992) (200 of 1992) (12 of 1994) (23 of 1994) (24 of 1995) (41 of 1995) (149 of 1995) (19 of 1998) (37 of 1998) (130 of 1999) (159 of 1999) (75 of 2000) (69 of 2003) (1 of 2004) (117 of 2004) (83 of 2006) (32 of 2007) (169 of 2007) (29 of 2010)(86 of 2011)

Sections 94, 95, 98AA(3), cl 10 of Schedule 2
	The following decisions of the Health Minister: 
-	to approve, or refuse to approve, a hospital authority for the purpose of its supplying pharmaceutical benefits to patients receiving treatment in or at the hospital of which it is the governing body or proprietor under s 94;
-	to suspend, further suspend or revoke the approval or authority of a  medical practitioner or a pharmacist or the approval of a dental practitioner as a participating dental practitioner under s 95;
-	to cancel the s 94 approval of an authority under s 98AA(3);
-	to refuse to make a determination that a person is to be treated as having had hospital cover on 1 July 2000 under clause 10 of Schedule 2.	
Sections 84AAD(2)(a), 84AAD(3)(a), 84AAH(2)(a), 
84AAH(3)(a), 
84AAL(2)(a), 84AAL(3)(a)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Health that have been affirmed on reconsideration by the Secretary: 
-	to not approve an optometrist under s 84AAB;
-	to suspend or revoke the approval of an optometrist under s 84AAC;
-	to not approve an eligible midwife to be an authorised midwife under s 84AAF;
-	to suspend or revoke an approval of an authorised midwife under s 84AAG;
-	to not approve an eligible nurse practitioner to be an authorised nurse practitioner under s 84AAJ;
-	to suspend or revoke an approval of an authorised nurse practitioner under s 84AAK.
	
Sections 84DA(1), 84E(1), 84K, 90, 91(1), 91(5), 91(12), 92, 98(3), 98(3A), 99AAA(6), 99AAC(4)
	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Health: 
-	to refuse to issue a safety net concession card to a person under s 84DA(1);
-	to refuse to issue an entitlement card to a person under s 84E(1);
-	to give a notice that the holder of a concession card or an entitlement card must deliver the card for cancellation under s 84K;
-	to reject an application for approval for the purpose of supplying pharmaceutical benefits under s 90;
-	to grant permission to an executor or administrator to supply pharmaceutical benefits from the pharmacy of a deceased approved pharmacist under s 91(1);
-	treating an application as having been withdrawn under s 91(5);
-	to revoke permission under s 91(12);
-	to approve, or refuse to approve, a medical practitioner for the purpose of supplying pharmaceutical benefits in a particular area under s 92;
-	to cancel a s 90 approval of a pharmacist under s 98(3);
-	to cancel a s 92 approval of a medical practitioner under s 98(3A);
-	to refuse to approve a claim for payment in relation to the supply of benefits under s 98AAA(6);
-	to declare, refuse to declare or revoke a declaration that an approved supplier is exempt from the operation of s 99AAC(4).	
Sections 99K(1)(b)(i), 99K(1)(b)(ii)	The following recommendations of the Australian Community Pharmacy Authority: 
-	that an applicant under s 90 not be approved under s 99K(1)(b)(i);
-	that an approval under s 90 should be subject to conditions under s 99K(1)(b)(ii).	

[Notes:  
-	The subsections of section 105AB list a number of reviewable decisions under this Act. Section 105AB(9) provides that application may be made for review of a decision of the Minister under s 68A(b
-	The Health Legislation Amendment (Pharmacy Location Arrangements) Act 2006 amended the Act on 1 July 2006 to provide that, where the Secretary has rejected an application for approval to supply pharmaceutical benefits on particular grounds, the pharmacist may request the Minister to substitute a decision approving the application: ss 90A and 90B.  The request cannot be made while proceedings are on foot in the Tribunal: s 90C.  If a pharmacist applies to the Minister to substitute a decision of the Secretary but the Minister declines to consider the request or refuses the request or is taken to have done so, the pharmacist may still apply for review of the Secretary’s decision.  The application must be made within 28 days after the day on which the pharmacist receives notice of the Minister’s decision: s 105AE.
-	If a person requests reconsideration of a decision of the Health Insurance Ombudsman to refuse to extend the time within which the person must provide records in relation to a complaint or investigation, the reconsideration must be made before the end of the 28th day on which the application for reconsideration was made: s 82ZVF(5).
-	Sections 14 and 15 of this Act provide for review of decisions about eligibility for the Continence Aids Payment Scheme 2010.  See the separate entry for that Scheme in this list.]

National Health (Pharmaceuticals and Vaccines - Cost Recovery) Regulations 2009

Regulation 6.5 (SLI 372 of 2009)

Reg 6.2(5)	A decision of the Secretary of the Department of Health that has been reviewed by the Secretary under reg 6.2(5).	

National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations 1960

Regulations 9AE, 9F (SR 319 of 1986) (SR 1 of 1991)

Regulations 9AB, 9AC, 9C, 9D
	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Health: 
-	to refuse to issue an additional concession card under reg. 9AB;
-	to refuse to issue a replacement concession card under reg. 9AC;
-	to refuse to issue an additional entitlement card under reg. 9C;
-	to refuse to issue a replacement entitlement card under reg. 9D.	

National Health Security Act 2007

Section 83 (174 of 2007)

Sections 38P(2), 45(2), 50(2), 53(3), 55A, 57(4), 57(4A), 59(2), 60AO(3)
	The following decisions made by the Secretary of the Department of Health Ageing personally: 
-	to give a direction to an entity under s 38P(2) requiring the entity to dispose of a biological agent suspected on the basis of testing in a laboratory of being a security-sensitive biological agent;
-	to give a direction to an entity under s 45(2), 50(2), 53(3), 57(4), 57(4A) or 60AO(3) requiring the entity to dispose of a security-sensitive biological agent;
-	to refuse an entity’s application for cancellation of its registration under s 55A;
-	to give a notice to an individual under s 59(2) directing the individual not to handle security-sensitive biological agents as specified in the notice.	
Section 82(4)	The following decisions of a delegate of the Secretary of the Department of Health that have been affirmed, varied or revoked on reconsideration:
	to give a direction to an entity under s 38P(2) requiring the entity to dispose of a biological agent suspected on the basis of testing in a laboratory of being a security-sensitive biological agent; 
-	to give a direction to an entity under s 45(2), 50(2), 53(3) or 57(4) requiring the entity to dispose of a security-sensitive biological agent;
-	to refuse an entity’s application for cancellation of its registration under s 55A;
-	to give a notice to an individual under s 59(2) directing the individual not to handle security-sensitive biological agents as specified in the notice.	

[Notes:
1.	The Tribunal’s jurisdiction under this Act was amended by the National Health Security Amendment Act 2012. The amendments commenced 31 March 2013.
2.	The list of reviewable decisions is set out in s 80 of the Act.  The following Act introduced or have amended the list of decisions: 174 of 2007, 100 of 2009 and 182 of 2012.]

National Library Regulations 1994

Regulation 22 (SR 329 of 1994)

Regulation 12(1)	The following decision of the Director-General: 
-	to direct a person not to re-enter library property under reg 12(1).	
Regulation 19(2)	The following decision of an authorised person: 
1.	to refuse access to, or use of, an item of library material under reg 19(2).	

National Measurement Act 1960

Section 19J (9 of 1999) (27 of 2004) (137 of 2008)

Sections 18JX, 18NB, 18NG, 18NI, 
18NJ, 18NL, 18NN, 18PB, 18PG, 18PG(3), 18PI, 18PJ, 18PM, 18PP, 18PQ, 18PR, 18PS, 18QC, 18RA, 18RA(3)(b), 18RA(4), 18RG	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science: 
-	to refuse to issue a permit under s 18JX;
-	to refuse an application by a person to be a servicing licensee under s 18NB;
-	to impose a condition on a servicing licence under s 18NG;
-	to amend a condition of a servicing licence under s 18NG(3);
-	to refuse an application to amend a condition of a servicing licence under s 18NI;
-	to refuse an application to amend a servicing licence because of a change in the partnership holding the licence under s 18NJ;
-	to refuse to renew a servicing licence under s 18NL;
-	to make an order in respect of a person under s 18NN;
-	to refuse an application by a person to be a public weighbridge licensee under s 18PB;
-	to impose a condition on a public weighbridge licence under s 18PG;
-	to amend a condition of a public weighbridge licence under s 18PG(3);
-	to refuse an application to amend a condition of a public weighbridge licence under s 18PI;
-	to refuse an application to amend a public weighbridge licence because of a change in the partnership holding the licence under s 18PJ;
-	to refuse to renew a public weighbridge licence under s 18PM;
-	to revoke a public weighbridge licence under s 18PP;
-	to make an order in respect of a person under s 18PQ, 18PR or 18PS;
-	to take disciplinary action against a servicing licensee or a public weighbridge licensee under s 18QC;
-	to refuse an application by a person to be a utility meter verifier under s 18RA;
-	to impose a condition on a utility meter verifier’s appointment under s 18RA(3)(b);
-	to vary or revoke a condition on a utility meter verifier’s appointment under s 18RA(4);
-	to take disciplinary action against a utility meter verifier under s 18RG.	

National Measurement Regulations 1999

Regulation 86 (SR 110 of 1999)

Regulation 85(5)	The following decisions of a verifying authority that have been reconsidered under reg 85(5): 
-	to refuse under reg 12(4) to proceed with an application for verification of a standard of measurement until the applicant complies with a notice to lodge additional information; 
-	to refuse to verify a standard of measurement under reg 13(1); 
-	not to verify an artefact until the applicant applies with a notice under reg 34B(4); 
-	not to verify an artefact under reg 34C(1).	
	The following decisions of a certifying authority that have been reconsidered under reg 85(5): 
1.	to refuse under reg 36(4) to proceed with an application for certification of a measuring instrument until the applicant complies with a notice to lodge additional information;
2.	to refuse to certify a measuring instrument or to issue a certificate for the instrument in a way not sought by the applicant under reg 37(1);
3.	to refuse under reg 46(4) to proceed with an application for certification of a reference material until the applicant complies with a notice to lodge additional information;
4.	to refuse under reg 47(3) to proceed with an application to vary the certification of a reference material until the applicant complies with a notice to lodge additional information;
5.	to refuse to certify a reference material or to issue a certificate for the material in a way not sought by the applicant under reg 48(1);
6.	to refuse to vary a certificate for a reference material or to vary a certificate in a way not sought by the applicant under reg 49(1).	
	The following decisions of an approving authority that have been reconsidered under reg 85(5): 
1.	to refuse under reg 58(4) to proceed with an application for approval of the pattern of a measuring instrument until the applicant complies with a notice to lodge additional information;
2.	to refuse under reg 59(3) to proceed with an application to vary the approval of the pattern of a measuring instrument until the applicant complies with a notice to lodge additional information;
3.	to refuse to approve the pattern of a measuring instrument or to give an approval in a way not sought by the applicant under reg 60(1);
4.	to refuse to vary an approval of the pattern of a measuring instrument or to vary an approval in a way not sought by the applicant under reg 61(1).
	
	The following decisions of the Chief Metrologist that have been reconsidered under reg 85(5): 
-	to refuse to permit a stated person to sign certificate of a stated kind for a verifying, certifying or approving authority under reg 71;
-	to cancel the permission of a person to sign certificate of a stated kind for a verifying, certifying or approving authority under reg 71;
-	to refuse to vary an appointment as a verifying or certifying authority or to vary an appointment in a way not sought by the applicant under reg 72(3);
-	to refuse to appoint a person as a verifying or certifying authority under reg 73(1);
-	to vary, cancel or withdraw an instrument or certificate under reg 82(3).	

[Notes:
1.	The list of decisions in relation to which a person may request reconsideration is set out in reg 85(1). The following instruments introduced or have amended this provision: SR 110 of 1999 and SLI 179 of 2010.]

National Rental Affordability Scheme Regulations 2008

Regulation 33(1) (SR 133 of 2009)

Regulations 22(1), 30(1)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Social Services : 
-	to revoke an allocation, other than a provisional allocation, in relation to an approved rental dwelling under reg 22(1); 
-	to determine under reg 30(1) that an error arose making an incentive for a particular allocation, to vary the incentive to correct the error, and where appropriate, recoup any overpayment.
	
Regulation 28(3)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Social Services that have been reconsidered under reg 28(3): 
1.	to determine reductions to be made from the amount of an incentive under reg 28(1).	

[Notes:
1.	Regulation 30(2) provides that an application for review of a decision under reg 28(1) may only be made after and an internal review of the decision under reg 28(3) has been requested and completed.  However, if the internal review has not been completed within 2 months after requesting the review, the person may apply to the Tribunal for review of the decision.]
2.	Amendment to insert ‘other than a provisional allocation’ in reg 22(1) was introduced by SLR 137 of 2014 and commenced 23 December 2014. 
3.	Balance of amendment to s 22(1) was also introduced by SLR 137 of 2014 and commenced on 23 September 2014. 

National Television Conversion Scheme 1999

Sections 62(5), 78(3), 80(7), 81(4), 125(4), 126(6), 127(6), 141(5), 157(3), 158A(7) and 158B(4) of the Scheme and cl 62(3) of Schedule 4 to the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (F2005B02166) (F2008L00981)

Sections 45(1)(b), 46(4), 47(4), 48(4), 62(4)(a), 78(2)(a), 80(3)(c), 81(2)(b), 125(1)(b), 126(4), 127(4), 128(4), 141(4)(a), 157(2)(a), 158A(3)(c), 158B(2)(b) 	The following decisions made by the Australian Communications and Media Authority: 
-	to decide under s 45(1)(b), 46(4) or 47(4) that there were no exceptional circumstances exist in relation to aspects of digital transmission;
-	to issue, or refuse to issue, a replacement transmitter licence to a national broadcaster under s 48(4);
-	to refuse to approve an application to transmit on a test basis under s 62(4)(a);
-	to refuse to approve an application for approval to transmit before the start of the simulcast period under s 78(2)(a);
-	to decide not to vary, renew or issue a transmitter licence under s 80(3)(c);
-	to decide not to vary the date of effect of a transmitter licence under s 81(2)(b);
-	to decide under s 125(1)(b), 126(4) or 127(4) that there were no exceptional circumstances exist in relation to aspects of digital transmission;
-	to issue, or refuse to issue, a replacement transmitter licence to a national broadcaster under s 128(4);
-	to refuse to approve an application to transmit on a test basis under s 141(4)(a);
-	to refuse to approve an application for approval to transmit before the start of the simulcast period under s 157(2)(a);
-	to decide not to vary, renew or issue a transmitter licence under s 158A(3)(c);
-	to decide not to vary the date of effect of a transmitter licence under s 158B(2)(b).	

[Notes:  
1.	This Instrument was made under cl 6(1) of Schedule 4 to the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 and commenced on 2 February 2000.
2.	Clause 62(3) of Schedule 4 to the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 confers jurisdiction on the Tribunal to review certain decisions made under the Scheme.  The Scheme also confers jurisdiction in respect of certain other decisions. 
3.	The list of reviewable decisions has been amended by the following instruments: National Television Conversion Scheme Variation 2003 (No. 1) and National Television Conversion Scheme Variation 2007 (No. 1).]

National Vocational Education and Training Regulator Act 2011

Section 203 (12 of 2011) (32 of 2015)

Sections 17(1), 17(5), 29(1), 29(2), 31(1), 31(1)(b), 33(1), 35A, 38(1), 36(2)(c), 39(1), 41(1), 42(2), 44(1), 48(1), 48(2), 51(1), 52(1), 36(2)(a), 63(2)(b), 55(1), 55(2), 56(1), 201(1), 216(4)
 
	Any decision on reconsideration by the National VET Regulator set out below:	
	A decision to grant an application for registration (including renewal of registration) as an NVR registered training organisation.	Section 17	
	A decision to reject an application for registration (including renewal of registration) as an NVR registered training organisation.	Section 17	
	A decision determining the period for which an NVR registered training organisation is registered.	Section 17	
	A decision to impose a condition on an NVR registered training organisation’s registration.	Section 29	
	A decision to vary a condition of an NVR registered training organisation’s registration.	Section 29	
	A decision not to determine a shorter period for making an application for renewal of registration as an NVR registered training organisation.	Section 31	
	A decision to change, or refuse to change, an NVR registered training organisation’s scope of registration.	Section 33	
	A decision to give a written direction to an NVR registered training organisation requiring the organisation to rectify a breach of a condition of the organisation’s registration.	Section 35A	
	A decision to give a written direction to an NVR registered training organisation requiring the organisation to notify its VET students, in writing, of a matter set out in the direction.	Section 36	
	A decision to shorten the period of an NVR registered training organisation’s registration.	Section 36	
	A decision to amend an NVR registered training organisation’s scope of registration.	Section 36	
	A decision to suspend all or part of an NVR registered training organisation’s scope of registration.	Section 38	
	A decision to cancel an NVR registered training organisation’s registration.	Section 39	
	A decision to defer making a decision to change an NVR registered training organisation’s scope of registration until the organisation addresses issues identified by the National VET Regulator.	Section 41	
	A decision not to allow an NVR registered training organisation’s registration to be withdrawn.	Section 42	
	A decision to grant an application for accreditation of a course (including renewal of accreditation) as a VET accredited course.	Section 44	
	A decision to reject an application for accreditation of a course (including renewal of accreditation) as a VET accredited course.	Section 44	
	A decision to impose a condition on the accreditation of a VET accredited course.	Section 48	
	A decision to vary a condition of the accreditation of a VET accredited course.	Section 48	
	A decision to amend a VET accredited course.	Section 51	
	A decision to cancel the accreditation of a VET accredited course.	Section 52	
	A decision to issue, or not issue, a VET qualification.	Section 55	
	A decision to issue, or not issue, a VET statement of attainment.	Section 55	
	A decision to cancel, or not cancel, a VET qualification.	Section 56	
	A decision to cancel, or not cancel, a VET statement of attainment.	Section 56	
	A decision to enter other matters on the National Register.	Section 216	
The following provisions have been repealed, taking effect 3 April 2015	
	Any of the decisions set out below that has been

-	made by a person other than a member of staff of the Regulator; or
-	affirmed or varied by the National VET Regulator under s 201(1):

-	to grant or reject an application for registration (including renewal of registration) as an NVR registered training organisation under s 17(1);
-	to determine the period for which an NVR registered training organisation is registered under s 17(5);
-	to impose a condition on an NVR Training organisation’s registration under s 29(1);
-	to vary a condition on an  NVR registered training organisation’s registration under s 29(2);
-	to renew or not renew an NVR registered training organisation’s registration under s 31(1);
-	to not determine a shorter period for making an application for renewal of registration as an NVR registered training organisation under s 31(1)(b);
-	to change or refuse to change the scope of an NVR registered training organisation’s registration under s 33(1);
-	to give a written direction to an NVR registered training organisation requiring the organisation to rectify a breach of a condition of the organisation’s registration under s 35A;
-	to give a written direction to a NVR registered training organisation under s 36(2)(a) or (b);
-	 to shorten the period of an NVR registered training organisation’s registration under s 36(2)(c);
-	to suspend all or part of an NVR registered training organisation’s scope of registration under 38(1);
-	to cancel an NVR registered training organisation’s registration under s 39(1);
-	to defer making a decision to change an NVR registered training organisation’s registration until issues identified by the Regulator are addressed under s 41(1);
-	to not allow an NVR registered training organisation’s registration to be withdrawn under s 42(2);
-	to grant or reject an application for accreditation of a course (including renewal of accreditation) as a VET accredited course under s 44(1);
-	to impose conditions on the accreditation of a VET accredited course under s 48(1);
-	to vary a condition on the accreditation of a VET  accredited courseunder s 48(2);
-	to amend a VET accredited course under s 51(1);
-	to cancel the accreditation of a VET accredited course under s 52(1);
-	to issue or not issue a VET qualification under s 55(1);
-	to issue or not issue a VET statement of attainment under s 55(2);
-	to cancel or not cancel a VET qualification or statement  of attainment under s 56(1);
-	to enter details on the register under s 216(4).	

[Notes:
-	The list of reviewable decisions is set out in s 199 of this Act. The following Acts have amended this list: 32 of 2015.
-	If a person applies to the Regulator for reconsideration of a decision and the Regulator does not notify the person of his or her decision within 90 after receiving the application, the Regulator is taken to have affirmed the original decision: s 202(2).
-	Item 24 of Schedule 1 to the National Vocational Education and Training Regulator (Transitional Provisions) Act 2011 provides that an application may be made to the Tribunal for review of any of the following decisions of the National Vet Regulator:
1.	a decision in accordance with  s 17 of the new law to register an organisation as an NVR registered training organisation under paragraph 7(1)(d), 8(1)(d), 9(1)(d) or 10(1)(d) of the Schedule;
2.	a decision in accordance with s 17 of the new law not to register an organisation as an NVR registered training organisation under paragraph 7(1)(e), 8(1)(e), 9(1)(e) or 10(1)(e) of the Schedule;
3.	a decision in accordance with  s 29(1) of the new law to impose a condition on an NVR registered training organisation’s registration under subitem 7(2), 8(2), 9(2), 10(2), 12(3), 13(3) or paragraph 5(1)(c) of the Schedule;
4.	a decision in accordance with  s 44 of the new law to accredit an a course as a VET accredited course under paragraph 18(1)(d) or 19(1)(d) of the Schedule;
5.	a decision in accordance with s 48(1) of the new law to impose a condition on a VET accredited course’s accreditation under subitem 16(2), 18(2) or 19(2) of the Schedule;
6.	a decision in accordance with s 33of the new law  to change an NVR registered training organisation’s scope of registration under paragraph 12(2)(d) or 13(2)(d) of the Schedule;
7.	a decision in accordance with s 33of the new law not to change an NVR registered training organisation’s scope of registration under paragraph 12(2)(e) or 13(2)(e) of the Schedule;
8.	a decision in accordance with s 42 of the new law to allow a registered training organisation to withdraw its registration under paragraph 14(2)(c) or 15(2)(c) of the Schedule;
9.	a decision in accordance with s 42 of the new law not to allow a registered training organisation to withdraw its registration under paragraph 14(2)(c) or 15(2)(c) of the Schedule
-	32 of 2015 repealed and substituted section 199 (reviewable decisions) and introduced s 35A with effect from 3 April 2015. 

National Vocational Education and Training Regulator (Transitional Provisions) Act 2011

Section 24 (13 of 2011)

Section 11(1), 20(1)	A decision by the National VET Regulator to determine a longer period within which the Regulator may make a decision on an application under s 11(1) or 20(1).	

Native Title (Prescribed Bodies Corporate) Regulations 1999

Regulation 25(4) (257 of 2011)

Regulation 23	The following decisions of the Registrar of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Corporations that have been reconsidered by the Registrar: an opinion, or a refusal to give an opinion, about fees charged for services, under reg 22.	
Regulation 25(3)	The following decision of the Registrar of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Corporations: to refuse to reconsider an opinion about fees charged for services under reg 25(3)	

[Notes:
1.	The relevant periods for when a reconsideration decision is to have been deemed to have been made by the Regulator are set out in reg 25.]

Native Title (Tribunal) Regulations 1993

Regulation 8A(4)

Section 8(d)	The following decisions of the Registrar not to waive an application fee under section 8(d).	

Navigation Act 2012

Sections 313(1), (2) and (3) (128 of 2012)

Sections 17, 19, 25, 31, 32, 33, 44, 45, 46, 51, 100, 101, 102, 132, 133, 134, 147, 155, 156, 157, 172, 191, 246, 248, 250, 306, 334	The following decisions of  the Australian Maritime Safety Authority or a recognised organisation: 
-	to refuse to make a declaration in relation to a vessel under s 17, 19 or 25;
-	to refuse to issue, or to impose a condition on, a seafarer certificate under s 31;
-	to vary, or refuse to vary, a seafarer certificate under s 32;
-	to revoke a seafarer certificate under s 33;
-	to refuse to issue, or to impose a condition on, a maritime labour certificate under s 44;
-	to vary, or refuse to vary, a maritime labour certificate under s 45;
-	to revoke a maritime labour certificate under s 46;
-	to determine the seafarers to be carried by a vessel under s 51;
-	to refuse to issue, or to impose a condition on, a  safety certificate under s 100;
-	to vary, or refuse to vary, a safety certificate under s 101;
-	to revoke a safety certificate under s 102;
-	to refuse to use, or to impose a condition on a pollution certificate under s 132;
-	to vary, or refuse to vary, a pollution certificate under s 133;
-	to revoke a pollution certificate under s 134;
-	to give a direction under s 147;
-	to refuse to issue, or to impose a condition on, a tonnage certificate under s 155;
-	to vary, or refuse to vary, a tonnage certificate under s 156;
-	to revoke a tonnage certificate under s 157;
-	 to refuse to grant, or to impose a condition on, an exemption under s 172;
-	 to give a notice under s 191;
-	to give a direction under s 246;
-	to detain a vessel under s 248;
-	to release a detained vessel subject to a condition under s 250;
-	to not accept, or to cancel, an undertaking under s 306;
-	to not exempt a vessel or a class of vessel under s 334	
Sections 249, 251	The following decisions of an officer of Customs: 
-	to release a detained vessel under s 249; 
-	to detain a vessel under s 251.	
Section 332	The following decision of the Minister for Infrastructure and Regional Development : not to exempt a vessel under s 332.	

[Notes:
1.	The Tribunal’s jurisdiction under this Act commenced on 1 July 2013.
2.	A ‘recognised organisation’ is defined as an organisation prescribed by the regulations for the purposes of this definition: s 14.]

Northern Prawn Fishery Management Plan 1995

Section 165(7) of the Fisheries Management Act 1991

Section 165(5) of the Fisheries Management Act 1991	The following decisions of the Australian Fisheries Management Authority that have been reconsidered under s 165(5) of the Fisheries Management Act 1991: 
-	to cancel a person’s registration as an eligible person for the grant of a statutory fishing right under cl 17(5).	

[Notes:  
1.	This Plan was made under subsection 17(1) of the Fisheries Management Act 1991.  Refer to the entry in this list for the Act for other relevant information. 
2.	Clause 30 of the Plan provides that s 165 of the Fisheries Management Act 1991 applies to the decisions specified in the right-hand column as if they were ‘relevant decisions’ within the meaning of that section.] 

North-west Commonwealth Marine Reserves Network Management Plan 2014-24

Regulation 14.16(8) of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2000

Part 4, Strategy 2, A7 and A8	The following decisions of the Director of National Parks that have been reconsidered by the Director: any decision about a permit or class approval made under Part 5.2	

[Notes:
1.	This Plan commenced on 1 July 2014.
2.	This Plan was made under s 370 of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.
3.	This Plan will cease to have effect on 30 June 2024.
4.	This Plan ceased to have any legal effect on 14 December 2013 when the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (Commonwealth Marine Reserves) Proclamation 2013 took effect and revoked the reserves this plan related to and declared new reserves for these areas.  Do not delete from list: see note in F2013L00428.]

Nuclear Non-Proliferation (Safeguards) Act 1987

Section 22(4) (8 of 1987)

Various sections, including s 18(1), 18(3), 18(7), 19(1), 73	The following decisions of the Minister for Foreign Affairs: 
-	to refuse to grant a permit under the Act;
-	to impose a condition or restriction on the grant of a permit under the Act;
-	to vary a permit under the Act;
-	to refuse to grant an authority to communicate information under s 18(1);
-	to impose a condition or restriction on the grant of an authority to communicate information under s 18(3);
-	to vary an authority to communicate information under s 18(7);
-	to revoke a permit or authority under s 19(1);
-	to give directions to be complied with by a permit or authority holder under s 73.	
Section 12(2)(b), 17(2)(b)	The following decisions of the Director of Safeguards: not to include a statement of the kind referred to in s 14(a), 14(b), 15, 16A(1), 16B(1) or 18(2) in a report in relation to an application for a permit or authority.
	
	Any decision of a person pursuant to a condition on the grant of a permit or of an authority under s 18 to refuse to approve or consent to the doing of an act or thing.	

[Notes:  
1.	The list of reviewable decisions is set out in ss 22(1) and (4) of the Act.  The following Act introduced or have amended the list of decisions: 8 of 1987 and 50 of 2007.
2.	The Minister may certify pursuant to s 22(5) that it is in the public interest that a decision that would otherwise be reviewable should be not be reviewable by the Tribunal.]
O

Occupational Health and Safety (Maritime Industry) (National Standards) Regulations 2003

Regulation 2.10 (SR 324 of 2003)

Clauses 1.02(1)(b), 1.03(1), 1.03(2), 1.04(2)(a), 2.04(1)(b), 2.05(2), 2.05(3), 2.06(2)(a) of Schedule 3	The following decisions of the Seacare Authority under Schedule 3: 
1.	to refuse to grant an exemption for the use of a hazardous substance under cl 1.02(1)(b);
2.	to refuse to grant an exemption for the use of chrysotile under cl 2.04(1)(b);
3.	to make an exemption for the use of a hazardous substance subject to conditions that promote the objects of Pt 2 of the Regulations under cl 1.03(1);
4.	to make an exemption for the use of chrysotile subject to conditions that promote the objects of Pt 2 of the Regulations under cl 2.05(2);
5.	to add a condition to, or vary or revoke a condition of, an exemption for the use of a hazardous substance under cl 1.03(2);
6.	to add a condition to, or vary or revoke a condition of, an exemption for the use of chrysotile under cl 2.05(3);
7.	to cancel an exemption for the use of a hazardous substance if the Authority is satisfied that continuing the exemption would be inconsistent with the objects of Pt 2 of the Regulations under cl 1.04(2)(a);
8.	to cancel an exemption for the use of chrysotile if the Authority is satisfied that continuing the exemption would be inconsistent with the objects of Pt 2 of the Regulations under cl 2.06(2)(a).	

Offshore Minerals Act 1994

Section 407(9) (28 of 1994)

Various sections and regulations including s 407(3) of this Act	Decisions of the Minister for Industry, Innovation and Science acting as Designated Authority for an external territory offshore area under the following enactments: 
1.	this Act including a decision under s 407(3) to extend, or refuse to extend, the period within which a person may apply for reconsideration of a decision of a delegate of the Designated Authority;
2.	the Exploration Licence Fees Act;
3.	the Mining Licence Fees Act;
4.	the Retention Licence Fees Act;
5.	the Works Licence Fees Act;
6.	the Registration Fees Act;
7.	the Royalty Act;
8.	the Exploration Licence User Charge Act;
9.	the Retention Licence User Charge Act;
10.	regulations made under this Act.
	
Section 407(5)	Decisions of a delegate of the Designated Authority under the following enactments that have been confirmed or revoked by the Minister for Industry, Innovation and Science acting as Designated Authority for an external territory offshore area on reconsideration: 
-	this Act; 
-	the Exploration Licence Fees Act; 
-	the Mining Licence Fees Act; 
-	the Retention Licence Fees Act; 
-	the Works Licence Fees Act; 
-	the Registration Fees Act; 
-	the Royalty Act; 
-	the Exploration Licence User Charge Act; 
-	the Retention Licence User Charge Act; 
-	regulations made under this Act.	

Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Act 2006

Sections 747 and 747A (14 of 2006)(112 of 2011)

Various sections;
cl  6 of Sch 5; cl 7(1) of Sch 5; cl 8 of Sch 5; cl  9(6) of Sch 5 	The following decisions of the Minister for Industry, Innovation and Science:
-	to make publicly known, or make available to a person, under cl 6 of Sch 5 information contained in or accompanying an application for grant or renewal of certain permits, leases, licences or authorities;
-	to make publicly known, or make available to a person, under cl 7(1) of Sch 5 certain information contained in a document relating to the seabed or subsoil or to petroleum in block;
-	to make publicly known, or make available to a person, under cl 8 of Sch 5 information contained in a document given to the Titles Administrator where the information is already publicly known or consent has been given by a permittee, lessee, licensee, or authority holder;
-	to allow, wholly or partly, or to disallow under cl 9(6) of Sch 5 an objection to the disclosure of information contained in a document relating to the seabed, subsoil or petroleum in a block that was given to the Titles Administrator more than 5 years ago.
	
Cl 9(10) of Sch 5	The following decision of the Titles Administrator for a state or the Northern Territory that has been reconsidered by the Minister for Industry, Innovation and Science: 
-	to allow, wholly or partly, or to disallow under cl 9(6) of Sch 5 an objection to the disclosure of information contained in a document relating to the seabed, subsoil or petroleum in a block that was given to the Titles Administrator more than 5 years ago.	

[Notes:
1.	The definition of decisions that are subject to reconsideration or review is set out in section 745. The following Acts have amended this provision: 112 of 2011.
2.	Application may be made to the AAT for review of reviewable decisions made by the responsible Commonwealth Minister, defined as the Minister responsible for administration of this Act or another Minister acting for and on behalf of that Minister: s 7.  The Minister can delegate his or her powers: s 778.  
3.	This Act also provides for the review of decisions made by the Titles Administrator, a delegate of the Minister or the Minister pursuant to regulations made under this Act or taken to have been made under this Act (in particular, regulations about the release of technical information relating to petroleum or greenhouse gas): ss 745,  745A.  See the particular entry for any regulations for further details. 
4.	Pursuant to item 38 of Schedule 6 to this Act, the provisions of this Act dealing with reconsideration and AAT review apply to any relevant or reviewable decisions made under the Petroleum (Submerged Lands) Act 1967 and regulations made under that Act.]

Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage (Resource Management and Administration) Regulations 2011

Sections 747 and 747A of the Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Act 2006 (14 of 2006)(112 of 2011)

Various regulations including reg 10.07(4)	The following decisions of the Minister for Industry, Innovation and Science: 
-	to allow or disallow an objection to the classification of documentary information under reg 10.07(4)	

[Notes:
1.	The definition of decisions under these regulations that are subject to reconsideration or review is set out in s 745 of the Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Act 2006.]

Ombudsman Act 1976

Sections 10A, 11 (181 of 1976) (61 of 1983) (199 of 1991)

	The Ombudsman may refer a specified question about the taking of an action, or the exercise of a power, to the Tribunal for an advisory opinion under s 10A.

The Ombudsman may recommend that the principal officer of a Department refer a specified question about the taking of an action, or the exercise of a power, to the Tribunal for an advisory opinion under s 11.	

[Notes: 
1.	This enactment provides for an advisory opinion and for a deemed application, not for review of a decision.]

Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Management Act 1989

Section 66 (7 of 1989) (46 of 1992) (124 of 1995) (126 of 2003)

Sections 16, 17, 18, 19A, 19B, 19C, 20, 28, 33, 40	The following decisions of the Minister for the Environment: 
-	to refuse to grant a licence under ss 16 or 17;
-	to impose, revoke or vary a condition under s 18;
-	to terminate a licence under s 19A;
-	to refuse to transfer a licence under s 19B;
-	to refuse to make an amendment under s 19C;
-	to cancel a licence under s 20;
-	to allocate or refuse to allocate a quota under s 28;
-	to vary or revoke a reserve HCFC quota under s 33;
-	to refuse to grant an exemption under s 40;
-	to specify an exemption condition under s 40;
-	to cancel an exemption under s 40.	

Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Management Regulations 1995

Regulation 3B, 6A, 73(4), 80(3), 125, 245 and 317 (SR 73 of 1999) (SR 16 of 2004) (SR 380 of 2004) (SR71 of 2005) (SLI 217 of 2007) (SLI 171 of 2009) (SLI 64 of 2010)(SLI 154 of 2014)

Regulations 3A(1), 3A(2), 3A(3), 3C(2), 3C(3), 3C(4), 73(1)(c), 80(2), 242(1), 242(2)(b)(i), 242(2)(b)(ii), 242(2)(b)(iii), 244(1)(a)	The following decisions of the Minister for the Environment: 
-	to refuse to grant a permit under reg 3A(1);
-	to grant a permit with a particular period of validity under reg 3A(2);
-	to revoke a permit under reg 3A(3);
-	to refuse under reg 3C(2) to waive the application fee for a controlled substances licence or a used substances licence;
-	to refuse under reg 3C(3) to waive the application fee for an essential uses licence;
-	to refuse under reg 3C(4) to waive the application fee for a controlled substances licence, a used substances licence or an essential uses licence;
-	;
-	to specify under reg 73(1)(c) equipment for which the Minister considers it would be impracticable for the importer or licence holder to comply with the ban and to remove or retrofit the equipment because it is incidental to the main import;
-	to refuse under reg 80(2) to waive the fee for applying for an exemption under s 40(1) of the Act;
-	to refuse to grant a feedstock permit under reg 242(1);
-	to grant a feedstock permit to use a particular amount of methyl bromide under reg 242(2)(b)(i);
-	to refuse to grant a feedstock permit to use methyl bromide to manufacture a particular chemical under reg 242(2)(b)(ii);
-	to grant a feedstock permit to buy a particular amount of methyl bromide from a particular supplier under reg 242(2)(b)(iii);
-	to cancel or suspend a feedstock permit under reg 244(1)(a).
	
Regulation 3AA(8)	The following decisions of the Minister for the Environment: 
-	to refuse to make an SGG notice under regulation 3AA(1); 
-	to vary or revoke an SGG notice under 3AA(6).	
Regulation 124(3)	The following decisions of the relevant authority or the Minister for the Environment that have been confirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	to refuse an application for an RAC industry permit under reg 121; 
-	to determine the period for which a permit is in force under reg 121; 
-	to impose a condition on a permit under reg 121.
	
Regulation 124(3)	The following decisions of the Minister for the Environment that have been confirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	to suspend or cancel an RAC industry permit under reg 123(1); 
-	that a thing that contributes to the grounds for a suspension of a permit is not remedied under reg 123(1A)
	
Regulation 316(3)	The following decisions of the Fire Protection Industry Board that have been confirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	to refuse an application for a fire protection industry permit under reg 313; 
-	to determine the period for which a  fire protection industry permit is in force under reg 313; 
-	to impose a condition on a fire protection industry permit.
	
Regulation 316(3)	The following decisions of the Minister for the Environment that have been confirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	to suspend or cancel a fire protection industry permit under reg 315(1); 
-	that a thing that contributes to the grounds for a suspension of a permit is not remedied under reg 315(1A).	

[Notes: 
-	The decisions relating to RAC industry permits in relation to which a person may apply for reconsideration are set out in reg 124(1).  The following instrument introduced this provision: SR 380 of 2004.
-	A relevant authority in relation to an RAC permit means the relevant Board appointed under s 120(2), or the Minister for the Environment: s110. A relevant Board, in relation to an RAC permit means the RAC Industry Board that granted the permit, or in relation to an application, the Board to which an application is made: s 110. 
-	If a person applies for reconsideration of a decision relating to an RAC industry permit under reg 124(1) and the relevant authority or Minister does not confirm, vary or reverse the decision within 60 days of receiving the application, the relevant authority or Minister is taken to have confirmed the decision: reg 124(7).
-	Before making a decision under reg 124(3) the relevant authority or Minister may request the applicant in writing to provide further information reasonably needed to make the decision: reg 124(4). If further information is requested the period starting on the day the written request was made and ending on the day the applicant gives the information is not to be counted for reg 124(7): reg 124(5). If the applicant does not provide the requested information before the thirtieth day after the written request is made, that day and each day after is to be counted: reg 124(6).
-	If a person applies for a feedstock permit under reg 241 and the Minister has not made a decision about the application 30 days after the application was made or any further information was sought, the Minister is taken to have refused the application.
-	The decisions relating to fire protection industry permits in relation to which a person may apply for reconsideration are set out in reg 316(1).  The following instrument introduced this provision: SR 71 of 2005.
-	If a person applies for reconsideration of a decision relating to a fire protection industry permit under reg 316(1) and the Board or Minister do not confirm, vary or reverse the decision within 60 days of receiving the application, the Board or Minister is taken to have confirmed the decision: reg 316(7).
-	Before making a decision under reg 316(3) the relevant authority or Minister may request the applicant in writing to provide further information reasonably needed to make the decision: reg 316(4). If further information is requested the period starting the day the written request was made and ending on the day the applicant gives the information is not to be counted for reg 316(7): reg 316(5). If the applicant does not provide the requested information before the thirtieth day after the written request is made, that day and each day after is to be counted: reg 316(6).
-	Reg 3C(5) was repealed on 4 November 2014: SLI 154 of 2014
-	Reg 73 commenced on 4 November 2014 and will be repealed at the end of 31 December 2019: SLI 154 of 2014. ] 

P

Paid Parental Leave Act 2010

Section  216, 224(1), 237(1)(104 of 2010)(60 of 2015) 

AAT first review	
Sections 203(4), 218, 205(1) 246(2)	The following decisions:
	a claimant decision (other than a decision listed in s 215(2)) that has been affirmed, varied or set aside and substituted by the  Secretary of the Department of Social Services or by an authorised review officer under s 203(4) or s 205(1);
	a claimant decision made personally by a PPL agency representative;
	an employer determination decision that has been affirmed, varied or set aside and substituted under s 205(1) by the Secretary or an authorised review officer;
	an employer funding amount decision that has been affirmed, varied or set aside and substituted under s 203(4) or s 205(1);
	an employer determination decision or an employer funding amount decision made personally by a PPL agency representative.	
AAT second review	
Section 237(1) 	A decision of the AAT under s 43(1) of the AAT Act on AAT first review in relation to an AAT reviewable claimant decision. 	

[Notes:
-	Act 60 of 2015 amended this Act to introduce AAT first and second review with effect from 1 July 2015. 
-	Section 206 defines a claimant decision as any decision under this Act other than:
(a)	a decision under Part 3‑2 (which deals with the payment of instalments by employer)
(b)	a decision under Part 3‑5 (which deals with employer determinations)
(c)	a decision under Part 4‑2 (which deals with compliance)
(d)	a decision under the Paid Parental Leave Rules, if the Rules state that s 206 does not apply to the decision
(e)	a decision under the regulations, if the regulations state that s 206 does not apply to the decision.
-	An employer determination decision is a decision of an officer under s 101 to make an employer determination: s 207(1). 
-	An employer funding amount decision is a decision of an officer under s 75 to pay a PPL funding amount to an employer: s 208(1)
-	An application by an employer for AAT first review of an AAT reviewable employer decision must be lodged within 14 days after the day on which the AAT reviewable employer decision was made: s 224(4)
-	Section 215(2) provides a list of claimant decisions that are not reviewable under AAT first review.
-	The  reviewable decision in section 246 was repealed by the Tribunals Amalgamation Act 2015 with effect from 1 July 2015: 60 of 2015.] 

Papua New Guinea (Members of the Forces Benefits) Regulations 1961

Regulation 21 (SLI 11 of 2010)

Regulations 7(2), 9(2), 12, 13, 16, 17, 18	The following decisions made by the Repatriation Commission or the Minister for Veterans’ Affairs: 
-	a decision that a person’s claim for a pension has been rejected or allowed subject to a condition under reg 7(2);
-	a determination of the percentage of the total incapacity rate payable to a member who is partially incapacitated;
-	under reg 9(2);
-	that a pension is no longer payable under reg 12 or 13;
-	a decision that travelling expenses, or travelling expenses of a particular amount or kind, not be provided to a member or an attendant under reg 16;
-	a decision that a member is not entitled to a gratuity, annuity, allowance or addition to a pension under reg 17;
-	a decision about the amount or rate of a gratuity, annuity, allowance or addition to a pension payable under reg 17;
-	a decision that a person is not eligible for the grant of educational and training facilities under reg 18.	

[Notes:
1.	Reviewable decisions under these regulations are made by the prescribed authority or the Minister.  Reg 4 provides that the Repatriation Commission is the prescribed authority.]

Papua New Guinea (Staffing Assistance) Act 1973 

Section 55G (69 of 1976)(58 of 2011) 

Sections 54(4A)(a), 54(4A)(b)	Decisions of the Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation or a delegate of the Corporation that have been confirmed or varied by the Corporation on reconsideration.	
Section 55B(1)(a)	 Decisions of the Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation or a delegate of the Corporation that have been confirmed or varied on reconsideration by a Reconsideration Advisory Committee.	
Sections 55F(1)(c), 55F(1)(d)	Decisions of the Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation or a delegate of the Corporation that have been confirmed or varied by the Corporation on reconsideration, following a recommendation of the Reconsideration Advisory Committee.	

[Notes:
-	Section 54(4) of the Act provides that after receiving a reconsideration request the CSC may: itself reconsider the decision; refer the decision to a Reconsideration Advisory Committee for reconsideration or; refer the decision to the Committee for it to make for a recommendation to the CSC in relation to the decision. 
-	Item 15(5) of Schedule 2 to the Superannuation Legislation (Consequential Amendments and Transitional    Provisions) Act 2011 provides an application may be made to the Tribunal for review of a decision made by the Commissioner of Superannuation, or a delegate of the Commissioner before 1 July 2011, provided the period for making an application for review has not ended.]

Parliamentary Contributory Superannuation Act 1948

Section 25(6) (19 of 1979) (37 of 1981)

Section 25(4)	Decisions of the Parliamentary Retiring Allowances Trust made under the Act and Regulations that have been confirmed or varied by the Trust on reconsideration.	

Patents Act 1990

Section 224 (83 of 1990) (100 of 1998) (140 of 2000) (160 of 2001) (35 of 2012)

Sections 10, 17, 32, 33, 52, 56(1)(b), 74(3), 103(2), 113, 137(3), 141(1)(b),  150(2), 151(2), 152(2), 152(3), 173, 215, 223	The following decisions of the Commissioner of Patents: 
-	to give an international application a filing date under the Patent Co-operation Treaty under s 10;
-	to give directions under s 17 about a dealing with the patent or an interest in it, the grant of licences under the patent or the exercise of a right under s 16;
-	to make a determination under s 32 in relation to the procedure to be followed in processing a patent application;
-	to grant a patent or petty patent to a person claiming interests in existing patents or petty patents under s 33;
-	to refuse to accept an application for an innovation patent under s 52;
-	to allow the inspection or production of documents under s 56(1)(b);;
-	to refuse to accept an application for an extension of the term of a patent under s 74(3);
-	to direct that the consent of a mortgagee or licensee is not necessary in relation to a proposed amendment under s 103(2);
-	to direct that a patent request proceed in the names other than the applicant under s 113;
-	to revoke a patent under s 137(3);
-	to consent to a withdrawal of an application under s 141(1)(b);
-	to restore, or refuse to restore, under s 150(2) an application that has lapsed under s 148;
-	to reinstate, or refuse to reinstate, an international application under s 151(2);
-	to take steps under s 152(2) to give effect to a certificate issued by the Director of Safeguards under s147;
-	to prohibit or restrict under s 152(3) the publication or communication of information about the subject matter of an application;
-	to prohibit or restrict under s 173 publication of information about the subject of applications or access to micro-organisms deposited for the purposes of s 41;
-	to grant a patent under s 215 to the legal representative of an applicant or nominated person who dies or to substitute the name in a patent where a patentee dies or, in the case of a body corporate, ceases to exist;
-	to extend, or refuse to extend, the time for doing required acts under s 223.
	
Sections 147(2), 147(3), 149, 152(1)
	The following decisions of the Director of Safeguards: 
-	to issue, or refuse to issue, a certificate that a specification contains "associated technology" information under s 147(2);
-	to include in a certificate the direction that an application should lapse or that the application should not be treated as an international application under s 147(3);
-	to revoke, or refuse to revoke, under s 149 a direction given under s 147;
-	to give a notice to the Commissioner of any prohibitions or restrictions on publication or communication of information in a specification under s 152(1).
	
Section 198	The following decision of the Designated Manager: to refuse to register / an individual as a patent attorney under s 198.	

[Notes:
-	The Tribunal’s jurisdiction under this Act was amended by the Intellectual Property Laws Amendment (Raising the Bar) Act 2012. These amendments took effect 15 April 2013.]

Patents Regulations 1991

Regulation 22.26(2) (SR 16 of 1995) (SR 45 of 1998) (SR 291 of 1998) (SR 345 of 1998) (SR 261 of 1999) (SLI 122 of 2008) (31 of 2013)

Regulations 3.24(1)(b), 3.25(2), 4.3(2)(b), 5.5(3), 5.6(3), 6.2(1)(b)(ii), 10.7(1)(a)(i), 10.7(1)(a)(ii), 10.7(1)(b), 10.7(2), 10.7(6), 13.4(3), 22.21(5)	The following decisions of the Commissioner of Patents: 
-	to make, or refuse to make, a request for a sample of a micro-organism or a statement of viability under reg 3.24(1)(b);
-	to comply with or refuse a request for a certificate authorising release of a sample of a micro-organism under reg 3.25(2);
-	to decide that a document is prescribed for the purposes of s 55(2) of the Act because the Commissioner has reasonable grounds to believe the document or information in the document should not be open to public inspection under reg 4.3(2)(b);
-	to dismiss opposition to grants and extensions of patents under reg 5.5(3);
-	to determine opposition under reg 5.6(3);
-	to direct, or refuse to direct, a later day than six months after publication for the end of a prescribed period for the grant of a standard patent under reg 6.2(1)(b)(ii);
-	to amend an entry in the Register for the purposes of correcting a clerical error or an obvious mistake under reg 10.7(1)(a)(i);
-	to amend an entry in the Register for the purposes of changing a name or address under reg 10.7(1)(a)(ii);
-	to amend a patent for the purposes of correcting a clerical error or obvious mistake under reg 10.7(1)(b);
-	to give notice to a person whose name is entered in the Register as having an interest in the patent that he or she proposes to amend a patent or an entry in the Register under reg 10.7(2);
-	to amend a patent or an entry on the Register to correct a clerical error or an obvious mistake under reg 10.7(6);
-	to lengthen, or refuse to lengthen, the prescribed period for the purpose of s 142(2)(e) of the Act under reg 13.4(3);
-	to protect or compensate, or refuse to protect or compensate, certain persons under reg 22.21(5).
	
Regulations
20.5, 20.7
	The following decisions of the Professional Standards Board for Patent and Trade Marks Attorneys: to decide under reg 20.5 that it is not satisfied that a person has a qualification mentioned in reg 20.6;
to decide under reg 20.7 that it is not satisfied that a person has a knowledge requirement mentioned in reg 20.8.
	
Regulations 20.28(1), 20.28(2),  20.28B, 20.29(3), 20.31, 20A.8	The following decisions of the Designated Manager: 
-	remove a patent attorney’s name from the Register of Patent Attorneys under reg 20A.8, 20.28(1) or (2);
-	to suspend, or end the suspension of, registration under reg 20.28B;;
-	to impose a condition on registration under reg 20.29(3);
-	to refuse to restore a patent attorney’s name to the Register of Patent Attorneys under reg 20.31.
	
Regulations 20.43, 20.44(1), 20.44(2), 20.44(4), 20.45(1), 20.45(2), 20.46, 20.47, 20A.18(1), 20A.18(2)	The following decisions of the Patent and Trade Marks Attorneys Disciplinary Tribunal: 
-	to find a registered patent attorney guilty under reg 20.43 of professional misconduct, of unsatisfactory professional conduct, of being unqualified at the time of registration or of obtaining his or her registration by fraud;
-	to cancel or suspend a registered patent attorney’s registration as a patent attorney under reg 20.44(1);,to impose under reg 20.44(2) conditions on a patent attorney’s return to the Register of Patent Attorneys after a cancellation has been lifted or a period of suspension has elapsed;
-	to cancel or suspend a patent attorney’s registration as a trade marks attorney under reg 20.44(4);
-	to suspend a registered patent attorney’s registration as a patent attorney or administer a public reprimand to the attorney under reg 20.45(1);
-	to impose under reg 20.45(2) conditions on a patent attorney’s return to the Register after a period of suspension has elapsed;
-	to reprimand a registered patent attorney or cancel his or her registration under reg 20.46;
-	to cancel the registration of a registered patent attorney under reg 20.47;
-	to cancel or suspend an attorney’s registration as an incorporated patent attorney under reg 20A.18(1);
-	to impose conditions on the attorney’s return to the Register under reg 20A.18(2).	

[Notes:
1.	The Tribunal’s jurisdiction under these regulations was amended by the Intellectual Property Legislation Amendment (Raising the Bar) Regulation 2013 (No.1). These amendments took effect on 15 April 2013.]

Personal Property Securities Act 2009

Section 191 (130 of 2009) 

Sections 150(1), 150(2), 170, 175, 176(1), 178(2), 181(1), 181(5), 184(1), 184(2), 186, 188, 334(2)	The following decisions made by the Registrar of Personal Property Securities: 
-	to refuse to register a financing statement under s 150(1);
-	to refuse to register a financing change statement under s 150(2);
-	to register a financing change statement to amend the register to end the effect of a registration under s 150(2);
-	to refuse to give a person access to the register to search for data under s 170;
-	to refuse to give a person a copy of a registered financing statement in relation to which the person is registered as a secured party, or of a verification statement, under s 175;
-	to refuse to give a person a report relating to registered data in relation to the person under s 176(1);
-	to register a financing change statement in accordance with an amendment demand under s 181(1);
-	to refuse to register a financing change statement in accordance with an amendment demand under s 181(1);
-	to register a financing change statement to remove data from the register under s 184(1)(a), (b) or (c);
-	that data removed from the register is not to be made available for search in the register under s 178(2), 181(5) or 184(2)(a);
-	to register a financing change statement to restore incorrectly removed data to the register under s 186;
-	to register a financing change statement to amend a registration to correct an error or omission made by the Registrar under s 188;
-	to register a financing change statement to remove migrated data from the register under s 334(2).	

Personally Controlled Electronic Health Records Act 2012

Section 97(8) (63 of 2012)

Section 97(6)	The following decisions that have been reconsidered by the Systems Operator: 
-	to determine that a person is or is not the authorised representative of a consumer under s 6;
-	to refuse to register a consumer under s 41;
-	to refuse to register a health provider organisation or to impose a condition on such a registration under s 44;
-	to refuse to register a person as a repository operator, a portal operator or a contracted service provider, or to impose a condition on such a registration under  s 49;
-	to refuse to specify a repository as a repository to which the registration of a repository relates under s 49;
-	to cancel or suspend the registration of a consumer or other entity under s 51;
-	to cancel or suspend the registration of a consumer or other entity, on request under s 51;
-	to vary the registration of a consumer or other entity on request under s 52;
-	to refuse to vary the registration of a consumer or other entity under s 52.	

[Notes:
The System Operator is defined as the Secretary of the Department, or a body established by a law and prescribed in the regulations to be the System Operator.]

Petroleum Excise (Prices) Act 1987

Section 12(6) (149 of 1987) 

Section 12(3)	The following decisions of the Treasurer or an authorised person that have been confirmed or revoked on reconsideration: 
-	to fix a transaction price under s 4(2);
-	to determine the final VOLWARE price for a month and an oil producing region under s 7(3);
-	to fix the transaction price for a transaction under s 7(6);
-	to amend a determination of the final VOLWARE price for a month and an oil producing region under s 7(9).
	
Section 12(3)	The following decisions of the Treasurer that have been confirmed or revoked on reconsideration: 
-	to refuse to declare a production area to be a limited production area under s 6(1B); 
-	to revoke a declaration that a production area is a limited production area under s 6(1E).	

[Notes:
1.	The list of ‘reviewable decisions’ in relation to which a person may request reconsideration is set out in s 4(1).  The following Acts introduced or have amended the list of reviewable decisions: 115 of 1988 and 79 of 1997.]

Petroleum Resource Rent Tax Assessment Act 1987

Section 20(12) (142 of 1987) 
Sections 14ZZ of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 

Sections 20(1), 20(8)
	The following decisions of the Treasurer: 
-	to issue, or refuse to issue, a certificate regarding combining of petroleum projects under s 20(1); 
-	to cancel a certificate under s 20(8).
	
Section 14ZY(1) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953
	The following decisions of the Commissioner of Taxation in relation to which an objection has been allowed, wholly or in part, or disallowed by the Commissioner under Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 
-	a decision under s 24(2) as to whether a transaction is a non-arm’s length transaction;
-	to transfer the expenditure that a person failed to transfer under s 45C(2);
-	to revoke a transfer of expenditure under s 45C(6);
-	to determine, or refuse to determine, that appropriate adjustments be made to the assessable receipts derived, or deductible expenditure incurred, by a person under s 53(1)(c);
-	to make an assessment of the amount of the taxable profit of any person in relation to a petroleum project, and of the tax payable on that amount under s 61, 62, 63 or 67;
-	not to remit an amount of instalment transfer interest charge under s 98D(1).	

[Notes:  
1.	The following provisions of the Act provide that a person may object against the decisions specified in the right-hand column in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: ss 45C(9); 53(4), 66 and 98D(3).  
2.	The following Acts introduced, amended or repealed these provisions: 142 of 1987, 80 of 1991, 216 of 1991, 179 of 1999, 41 of 2005 and 78 of 2006.
3.	Section 106A of the Act provides that a person may object against any decision made under the Act that is prescribed for the purposes of this section. The following provisions of the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax Assessment Regulations 2005 prescribe decisions under s 24(2) of this Act for the purposes of s 106A: reg 41.  The following regulations introduced, amended or repealed these provisions: SLI 329 of 2005.
4.	A person dissatisfied with any of the above decisions may object against them in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.  The Commissioner will then make an objection decision from which a person can apply for review to the Tribunal.
5.	An application for review of an objection decision must be lodged with the Tribunal within 60 days after the person making the application is served with notice of the decision: s 14ZZC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
6.	If the Commissioner fails to make a decision on a taxation objection within 60 days after being given a written notice requiring the making of the objection decision, the Commissioner is deemed to have made a decision under s 14ZY(1) to disallow the objection: s 14ZYA(3) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.]

Petroleum Resource Rent Tax Assessment Regulations 2005

Section 14ZZ of the Taxation Administration Act 1953

Section 14ZY(1) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953
	The following decisions of the Commissioner of Taxation in relation to which an objection has been allowed, wholly or in part, or disallowed by the Commissioner under Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 
-	a decision under reg 9(5) to substitute an estimate of the operating life of the operation or the total volume of project natural gas to be recovered during the life of the operation;
-	to determine under reg 19 that no comparable uncontrolled price exists;
-	to determine the project sales gas transfer price using the residual pricing method (RPM price) under reg 21;
-	to determine under reg 23(4) or 39(6) the market value of project liquid.	

[Notes:
1.	Section 106A of the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax Assessment Act 1987 provides that a person may object against any decision made under the Regulations that is prescribed for the purposes of this section. The following provisions of the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax Assessment Regulations 2005 prescribe decisions under these Regulations for the purposes of s 106A: reg 41.  The following regulations introduced, amended or repealed these provisions: SLI 329 of 2005. 
2.	A person dissatisfied with any of the above decisions may object against them in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.  The Commissioner will then make an objection decision from which a person can apply for review to the Tribunal.
3.	An application for review of an objection decision must be lodged with the Tribunal within 60 days after the person making the application is served with notice of the decision: s 14ZZC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
4.	If the Commissioner fails to make a decision on a taxation objection within 60 days after being given a written notice requiring the making of the objection decision, the Commissioner is deemed to have made a decision under s 14ZY(1) to disallow the objection: s 14ZYA(3) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.]

Pig Industry Act 2001

Subsection 39(3) (30 of 2001)

Subsection 39(2)	A decision of the Minister for Agriculture and Water Resources determining whether the transferring employee’s terms and conditions of employment, with the successor body (the pig industry services body) is equivalent to the terms and conditions of employment with the statutory authority with whom the person was employed.	

Plant Breeder’s Rights Act 1994

Section 77(1) (110 of 1994) (148 of 2002)

Sections 19(3), 19(7), 19(10), 19(11), 30, 31, 34(1), 37, 37(2B)(b), 38(4), 38(5), 39(2), 40(8)(b), 40, 41, 44, 50	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science: 
-	to licence, or refuse to licence, a person who applied in response to an invitation under s 19(8)(c) to sell propagating material of plants of a particular variety or to produce propagating material of plants of that variety for sale under s 19(3);
-	to decide under s 19(7) to exercise a power under s 19(3);
-	to make propagating material available under s 19(10);
-	to certify, or refuse to certify, that a particular plant variety has no direct use as a consumer product under s 19(11);
-	to accept or reject an application for plant breeder’s rights under s 30;
-	to vary, or refuse to vary, an application for plant breeder’s rights under s 31;
-	to refuse to extend the period for giving a detailed description of the plant variety to which the application applies under s 34(1);
-	to require a test growing under s 37;
-	not to proceed further with an application, objection or request for revocation under s 37(2B)(b);
-	a determination under s 38(4) that the Secretary is satisfied that the variety has a particular characteristic and is equivalent to a test growing of the variety in Australia;
-	a determination under s 38(5) that the Secretary is satisfied that it would take longer than 2 years to demonstrate that the variety has a particular characteristic;
-	to issue a notice of cessation of provisional protection under s 39(2);
-	to refuse to extend the period for rebutting the prima facie case of essential derivation under s 40(8)(b);
-	to issue a declaration of essential derivation under s 40;
-	to require a test growing under s 41;
-	to grant, or refuse to grant, plant breeder’s rights in a plant variety under s 44;
-	to revoke, or not to revoke, plant breeder’s rights in a plant variety or a declaration that a plant variety is essentially derived from another plant variety under s 50.
	
Section 21	The following decision of the Registrar: to amend or to refuse to amend the Register.
	
Section 49(2)
	A decision of the Minister under s 49(2) to impose such conditions on PBR that is to be granted or that has been granted as the Minister considers appropriate. 	

[Notes:  
1.	The Tribunal does not have power to extend the time for making an application to the Tribunal for review of a decision under this Act: s 77(2).]

Plant Breeder's Rights Regulations 1994

Regulations 3A(4), 5(5) (SR 83 of 1999)

Regulations 3A(1), 5(1), 5(2), 5(3)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science or an authorised person: 
-	to refuse to authorise an establishment to conduct a test growing of a plant variety under reg 3A(1);
-	to refuse to refund an amount paid in excess of a prescribed fee under reg 5(1);
-	to refuse to refund a fee for a service, or so much of a fee as is proportionate to the part of a service, that has not been provided under reg 5(2);
-	to refuse to remit an amount equal to an amount that could be refunded under reg 5(3).	

Pooled Development Funds Act 1992

Section 56(1) (100 of 1992)

Section 55(5) 

	The following decisions of the Innovation Australia that have been confirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	to refuse under s 14 to make a registration declaration in relation to a company;
-	to refuse under s 17 to approve a variation of an approved investment plan of a pooled development fund (“PDF”);
-	to refuse under s 20(1)(b), 20(2), 23(1), 24(2), 25(1) or 27 to give an approval in relation to an investment proposed to be made by a PDF;
-	to refuse under s 29(2)(b) to give an approval to a PDF entering into a transaction;
-	to refuse under s 31(1) to give an approval in relation to a person's shareholding in a PDF;
-	to refuse under s 32(1) to make in relation to a payment day of a PDF a determination for the purposes of para (a) of the definition of "investment period” or “required percentage” in s 32(1);
-	to give a person a direction under s 33(2), 34(1), 35(1) or 36(1);
-	to revoke under s 47 a registration declaration in relation to a company;
-	to refuse under s 52A to register an entity under Part 7A;
-	to revoke under s 52D a registration of an entity under Part 7A.	

[Notes:
1.	The list of decisions that are subject to reconsideration under the Act is set out in s 4(1).  The following Acts introduced or have amended that subsection: 100 of 1992, 102 of 1994 and 165 of 1999.
2.	If a person requests reconsideration of a decision and Innovation Australia does not confirm, vary or revoke the decision before the end of the period of 60 days after the day on which Innovation Australia receives the request, Innovation Australia is taken, at the end of that period, to have confirmed the decision: s 55(6).]

Premium Support (Medical Indemnity Provider) Scheme 2006

Section 47(7) (F2006L01959)

Section 47(5)

	The following decisions of the Medicare Australia CEO that have been reviewed by a reviewing officer: 
-	to refuse under s 13(2)(b) to approve a later date for payment of a UMP support payment;
-	a deemed decision under s 27(2) that a member is not an eligible member following a calculation by a contractor that the member is not eligible for an advance subsidy;
-	to determine under s 34 whether a contractor was entitled to receive on behalf of a member the amount of advance subsidy paid under the Scheme and if applicable, the amount of subsidy that the contractor was entitled to receive on behalf of the member;
-	a deemed decision under s 36(2) that a member is not an eligible member following a calculation by a contractor that the member is not eligible for an advance subsidy.
	
	The following decision of an authorised officer that has been reviewed by a reviewing officer: 
-	to determine under s 43(1) whether a contractor is eligible for an administration fee and, if so, the amount of the administration fee payable to a contractor;
-	to determine under s 46(a) that an administration fee was incorrectly paid.	

[Notes:  
1.	The Scheme instrument was made pursuant to the Medical Indemnity Act 2002.
2.	The list of reviewable decisions that may be reconsidered under the Act is set out in s 47(1).  The following instruments introduced or amended s 47(1): F2006L01959.]

Primary Industries (Customs) Charges Act 1999

Section 28(5) of the Primary Industries Levies and Charges Collection Act 1991 (11 of 1999)

Section 28(3) of the Primary Industries Levies and Charges Collection Act 1991	The following decision of the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources that has been affirmed, varied or revoked by the Minister for Agriculture and Water Resources on reconsideration: 
-	to determine under cl. 3(3)(a) of Sch 6 the declared value of a quantity of deer velvet exported from Australia.	

[Notes:	
-	Section 28(9)(e) of the Primary Industries Levies and Charges Collection Act 1991 provides that the decision referred to above is subject to review under that Act.]   

Primary Industries (Excise) Levies Act 1999

Section 28(5) of the Primary Industries Levies and Charges Collection Act 1991 (11 of 1999)

Section 28(3) of the Primary Industries Levies and Charges Collection Act 1991
	The following decision of the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources that has been affirmed, varied or revoked by the Minister for Agriculture and Water Resources on reconsideration: 
-	to determine under cl 5(2) of Sch 8 the declared value of a quantity of deer velvet used in the production of other goods	

[Notes:	
-	Section 28(9)(d) of the Primary Industries Levies and Charges Collection Act 1991 provides that the decision referred to above is subject to review under that Act.]   

Primary Industries Levies and Charges Collection Act 1991

Section 28(5) (25 of 1991)

Section 28(3)	The following decision of the Minister for Agriculture and Water Resources that has been affirmed, varied or revoked on reconsideration: 
-	to refuse to remit the whole or part of an amount of penalty under s 16.	

[Notes:	
-	The list of decisions that may be reconsidered under this Act is set out in s 28(9).  The following Acts introduced or have amended the list of relevant decisions: 25 of 1991, 32 of 1992, 32 of 1999 and 118 of 1999.]   

Primary Industries Levies and Charges Collection Regulations 1991

Clause 17 of Schedule 15; clause 17 of Schedule 16; clause 17 of Schedule 21; clauses 3.25, 4.21, 7.26, 8.10, 9.25, 11.25, 13.18, 14.26, 15.19, 17.19, 18.17, 19.20, 25.23, 26.19 and 27.21 of Schedule 22; clause 2.20 of Schedule 34; clause 19 of Schedule 35; clauses 1.18, 2.18, 3.22, 5.18, 9.26 and 10.21 of Schedule 37 (SR 238 of 2000) (SR 264 of 2000) (SR 346 of 2000) (SR 114 of 2001) (SR 108 of 2002) (SR 143 of 2003) (SR 222 of 2003) (SR 289 of 2003) (SLI 111 of 2006) (SLI 112 of 2006) (SLI 193 of 2006) (SLI 194 of 2006) (SLI 135 of 2007) (SLI 287 of 2007) (SLI 86 of 2008) (SLI 224 of 2008) (SLI 76 of 2009) (SLI 94 of 2010)(SLI 9 of 2011) (SLI 325 of 2012)

Clauses 13 and 14 of Schedule 15,
	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources under Schedule 15:  
-	to refuse to grant to a producer an exemption from lodging quarterly returns in relation to leviable logs under cl 13;
-	to refuse under cl 14 to continue an exemption from lodging quarterly returns for the following year in relation to leviable logs
	
Clauses 13 and 14 of Schedule 16
	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources under Schedule 16: 
-	to refuse to grant to a producer an exemption from lodging quarterly returns in relation to chargeable logs under cl 13;
-	to refuse under cl 14 to continue an exemption from lodging quarterly returns for the following year in relation to chargeable logs
	
Clauses 11C(1)(a) and 11D(1)(a) of Schedule 21	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources under Schedule 21: 
-	to refuse to grant to a person an exemption from lodging quarterly returns in relation to honey under cl 11C(1)(a);
-	to refuse under cl 11D(1)(a) to continue an exemption from lodging quarterly returns for the following year in relation to honey.	
The following clauses of Schedule 22: 
3.17(1)(a), 3.18(1)(a), 4.14(1)(a), 4.15(1)(a), 7.18(1)(a), 7.19(1)(a), 8.8C(1)(a), 8.8D(1)(a),
9.17(1)(a), 9.18(1)(a), 11.17(1)(a), 11.18(1)(a), 13.15(1)(a),13.16(1)(a), 14.19(1)(a), 14.20(1)(a), 15.15(1)(a), 15.16(1)(a), 17.15(1)(a), 17.16(1)(a), 18.8B(1)(a), 19.16(1)(a), 19.17(1)(a), 25.16(1)(a), 25.17(1)(a)
26.14(1)(a)
26.15(1)(a)
27.15(1)(a), 27.16(1)(a),
28.18(1)(a), 28.19(1)(a)
	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources under Schedule 22:  
-	to refuse to grant to a person an exemption from lodging quarterly returns in relation to apples and pears under cl 3.17(1)(a);
-	to refuse under cl 3.18(1)(a) to continue an exemption from lodging quarterly returns for the following year in relation to apples and pears;
-	to refuse to grant to a person an exemption from the requirement to lodge quarterly returns in relation to avocados under cl 4.14(1)(a);
-	to refuse under cl 4.15(1)(a) to continue an exemption from lodging quarterly returns for the following year in relation to avocados;
-	to refuse to grant an exemption from the requirement to lodge quarterly returns in relation to citrus under cl 7.18(1)(a);
-	to refuse under cl 7.19(1)(a) to continue an exemption from lodging quarterly returns for the following year in relation to citrus;
-	to refuse under cl 8.8C(1)(a) to grant an exemption from the requirement to lodge quarterly returns in relation to custard apples;
-	to refuse under cl 8.8D(1)(a) to continue an exemption from lodging quarterly returns in relation to custard apples;
-	to refuse to grant an exemption from the requirement to lodge monthly returns in relation to dried vine fruits under cl 9.17(1)(a);
-	to refuse under cl 9.18(1)(a) to continue an exemption from lodging monthly returns for the following year in relation to dried vine fruits;
-	to refuse to grant an exemption from the requirement to lodge quarterly returns in relation to nashi under cl 11.17(1)(a);
-	to refuse under cl 11.18(1)(a) to continue an exemption from lodging quarterly returns for the following year in relation to nashi;
-	to refuse to grant an exemption from lodging quarterly returns in relation to passionfruit under cl 13.15(1)(a);
-	to refuse to continue an exemption from lodging quarterly returns in relation to passionfruit under cl 13.16(1)(a);
-	to refuse to grant an exemption from the requirement to lodge quarterly returns in relation to potatoes under cl 14.19(1)(a);
-	to refuse under cl 14.20(1)(a) to continue an exemption from lodging quarterly returns for the following year in relation to potatoes;
-	to refuse to grant an exemption from the requirement to lodge quarterly returns in relation to stone fruit under cl 15.15(1)(a);
-	to refuse under cl 15.16(1)(a) to continue an exemption from lodging quarterly returns for the following year in relation to stone fruit;
-	to refuse to grant an exemption from the requirement to lodge quarterly returns in relation to vegetables under cl 17.15(1)(a);
-	to refuse under cl 17.16(1)(a) to continue an exemption from lodging quarterly returns for the following year in relation to vegetables;
-	to refuse to grant an approval to pay levy by an alternative payment method under cl 18.8B(1)(a);
-	to refuse to grant an exemption from the requirement to lodge quarterly returns in relation to hard onions under cl 19.16(1)(a);
-	to refuse under cl 19.17(1)(a) to continue an exemption from lodging quarterly returns for the following year in relation to hard onions;
-	to refuse to grant an exemption from the requirement to lodge quarterly returns in relation to rubus under cl 25.16(1)(a);
-	to refuse under cl 25.17(1)(a) to continue an exemption from lodging quarterly returns for the following year in relation to rubus;
-	to refuse to grant an exemption from the requirement to lodge quarterly returns in relation to turf under cl 26.14(1)(a);
-	to refuse under cl 26.15(1)(a) to continue an exemption from lodging quarterly returns for the following year in relation to turf;
-	to refuse under cl 27.15(1)(a) to grant an exemption from the requirement to lodge quarterly returns in relation to bananas;
-	to refuse under cl 27.16(1)(a) to continue an exemption from the requirement to lodge quarterly returns in relation to bananas;
-	to refuse under cl 28.18(1)(a) to grant an exemption from the requirement to lodge quarterly returns in relation to pineapples;
-	to refuse under cl 28.19(1)(a) to continue an exemption from the requirement to lodge quarterly returns in relation to pineapples.
	
Clauses 15(1)(a) and 16(1)(a) of Schedule 35	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources under Schedule 35: 
-	to refuse to grant an exemption from the requirement to lodge quarterly returns in relation to wine under cl 15(1)(a);
-	to refuse under cl 16(1)(a) to continue an exemption from lodging quarterly returns for the following year in relation to wine.
	
The following clauses of Schedule 37: 1.14(1)(a), 1.15(1)(a), 2.20(1)(a), 2.21(1)(a), 3.14(1)(a), 3.15(1)(a) 5.14(1)(a), 5.15(1)(a), 9.19, 9.20, 10.14(1)(a),  10.15(1)(a)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources under Schedule 37: 
-	to refuse to grant an exemption from the requirement to lodge monthly returns in relation to macropods under cl 1.14(1)(a);
-	to refuse under cl 1.15(1)(a) to continue an exemption from lodging quarterly returns for the following year in relation to macropods;
-	to refuse to grant an exemption from the requirement to lodge monthly returns in relation to wool under cl 2.20(1)(a);
-	to refuse under cl 2.21(1)(a) to continue an exemption from lodging monthly returns for the following year in relation to wool;
-	to refuse to grant an exemption from the requirement to lodge quarterly returns in relation to farmed prawns under cl 3.14(1)(a);
-	to refuse to continue an exemption from lodging quarterly returns for the following year in relation to farmed prawns under cl 3.15(1)(a) to refuse to grant an exemption from the requirement to lodge quarterly returns in relation to bees under cl 5.14(1)(a);
-	to refuse under cl 5.15(1)(a) to continue an exemption from lodging quarterly returns for the following year in relation to bees;
-	to refuse under clause 9.19 to grant an exemption from the requirement to lodge quarterly returns in relation to leviable logs;
-	to refuse under cl 9.20 to continue an exemption from lodging quarterly returns in relation to leviable logs for the following year;
-	to refuse to grant an exemption from lodging quarterly returns in relation to ginger under cl 10.14(1)(a);
-	to refuse to continue an exemption from lodging quarterly returns in relation to ginger under cl 10.15(1)(a).	

[Notes: 
1.	The Tribunal’s jurisdiction was amended by the Primary Industries Levies and Charges Collection Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 1) on 10 December 2012.]

Primary Industries Levies and Charges (National Residue Survey Levies) Regulations 1998

Regulations 23, 123 (SR 147 of 1998)

Regulations 14, 15, 114, 115	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources: 
-	to refuse to grant an exemption from the requirement to lodge quarterly returns under reg 14 or 114;
-	to refuse to continue an exemption under reg 15 or 115.	

Privacy Act 1988

Sections 96 (119 of 1988) (13 of 1994) (155 of 2000) (99 of 2006) (197 of 2012)

Sections 26H(1), 26S(1), 52(1), 52(1A), 73(1A), 95, 95A(2), 95A(4), 95A(6), 95AA(2)	The following decisions of the Privacy Commissioner: 
-	to not register an APP Code developed by an APP Code developer under s 26H(1);
-	to not register a CR code developed by a CR Code developer under s 26S(1);
-	to make a determination under s 52(1) or 52(1A);
-	to dismiss an application under s 73(1A);
-	to refuse under s 95 to approve National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) guidelines for protection of privacy by agencies in medical research;
-	to refuse under s 95A(2) to approve guidelines issued by the NHMRC or a prescribed authority that relate to the use and disclosure of health information for research, or the compilation or analysis of statistics, relevant to public health or public safety;
-	to refuse under s 95A(4) to approve guidelines issued by the NHMRC or a prescribed authority that relate to the collection of health information for (a) research, or the compilation or analysis of statistics, relevant to public health or public safety or (b) the management, funding or monitoring of a health service;
-	to revoke under s 95A(6) an approval of guidelines issued by the NHMRC or a prescribed authority;
-	to refuse under s 95AA(2) to approve guidelines issued by the NHMRC that relate to the use and disclosure of genetic information for the purposes of lessening or preventing a serious threat to life, health or safety of a genetic relative of the person to whom the genetic information relates. 	

[Notes:
1.	The Tribunal’s jurisdiction under this Act was amended by the Privacy Amendment (Enhancing Privacy Protection) Act 2012 and include reviewable decisions under ss 26H(1), 26S(1), 52(1), 51(1AA) and 73(1A). These amendments commence on 12 March 2014. Sections 61, 95(5), 95A(7) and 95AA(3) will be repealed as a result of these amendments, which relate to reviewable decisions under sections 52(1)(b)(iii), 52(3).]
 
Private Health Insurance Act 2007

Section 328-5 (31 of 2007) 

Sections 23-20, 23-35 	The following decisions of the Chief Executive Medicare: 
-	to reject an application for registration of a person in respect of a health insurance policy under s 23-20; 
-	to revoke a person’s registration in respect of a health insurance policy under s 23-35.
	
Section -25(4),  282-15(4)	The following decisions of the Chief Executive Medicare that have been affirmed on reconsideration: 
-	a decision that an amount is recoverable as a debt under s 282-1(1)(a) or (b); 
-	a decision that an amount is recoverable as a debt due to the Commonwealth under s 282-1(1)(h) in respect of a payment made to an individual; 
-	a decision under s 282-10(1) to set off a debt against an amount otherwise payable to a person (other than a private health insurer) or his or her estate.
	
Section 279-45(3)	The following decisions of the Chief Executive Medicare that have been affirmed, varied or revoked on reconsideration: 
-	to refuse under s 279-20(1) a claim by a private health insurer for reimbursement or pay only such part of the claim as he or she is satisfied is correct; 
-	to refuse under s 279-40(2) an application from a private health insurer for an additional amount or decide to pay only part of the additional amount sought.
	
Sections 121-5(6), 121-7(1)(b), 169-10(2), 206-1, 279-5, 307-25(3)	The following decisions of the Minister for Health: 
-	to refuse to make a declaration, or to revoke a declaration, that a facility is a hospital under s 121-5(6);
-	to specify a condition, in relation to a particular facility, to which a declaration that a facility is a hospital is subject under s 121-7(1)(b);
-	to direct a private health insurer not to make a change that it proposes to make to its rules under s 169-10(2);
-	to revoke a private health insurer’s status as a participating insurer under s 206-1;
-	to reject an application to become a participating insurer under s 279-5;
-	not to waive, or to waive only a part of, an amount of collapsed insurer levy or late payment penalty in respect of an amount of collapsed insurer levy under s 307-25(3).	
Sections 191-1(3), 197-1(3), 200-1, 307-20(1) or (2).	The following decisions of the Minister for Health or the Private Health Insurance Administration Council: 
-	to refuse under s 191-1(3) a request for a longer period for a private health insurer to respond to a request for an explanation;
-	to refuse under s 197-1(3) to consent to a private health insurer withdrawing or varying an undertaking;
-	to give a direction to a private health insurer under s 200-1;
-	not to waive, or to waive only a part of, an amount of late payment penalty (other than late payment penalty in respect of an amount of collapsed insurer levy) under s 307-20(1) or (2).
	
Sections  126-20(1), 126-42(5), 140-15(2),140-15(3), 140-15(6), 140-15(7), 140-20(8) or (9), 143-15(2), 143-15(3), 143-15(6), 143-15(7), 143-20(8), 143-20(9), 146-1(3), 146-5(3), 149-10, 160-1(5), 160-5(2), 163-15(1), 163-15(3), 166-20(1), 166-20(3), 166-25(3), 166-25(4)	The following decisions of the Private Health Insurance Administration Council: 
1.	to refuse an application for registration as a private health insurer under s 126-20(1);
2.	to grant an application, subject to terms and conditions, for registration as a private health insurer under s 126-20(1);
3.	to refuse an application for approval for a private health insurer to convert to being registered as a for profit insurer under s 126-42(5);
4.	to refuse to make a declaration that the solvency standard does not apply to a particular private health insurer under s 140-15(2);
5.	to impose conditions on a declaration that the solvency standard does not apply to a particular private health insurer under s 140-15(3);
6.	to refuse to revoke or vary a declaration that the solvency standard does not apply to a particular private health insurer under s 140-15(6) or (7);
7.	to refuse to revoke or vary conditions imposed on a declaration that the solvency standard does not apply to a particular private health insurer under s 140-15(6) or (7);
8.	to refuse to revoke or vary a solvency direction under s 140-20(8) or (9);
9.	to refuse to make a declaration that the capital adequacy standard does not apply to a particular private health insurer under s 143-15(2);
10.	to impose conditions on a declaration that the capital adequacy standard does not apply to a particular private health insurer under s 143-15(3);
11.	to refuse to revoke or vary a declaration that the capital adequacy standard does not apply to a particular private health insurer under s 143-15(6) or (7);
12.	to refuse to revoke or vary conditions imposed on a declaration that the capital adequacy standard does not apply to a particular private health insurer under s 143-15(6) or (7);
13.	to refuse to revoke or vary a capital adequacy direction under s 143-20(8) or (9);
14.	to refuse to approve a restructure of the health benefits funds of a private health insurer under s 146-1(3);
15.	to refuse to approve a transfer of the health benefits funds of one or more private health insurers under s 146-5(3);
16.	to refuse to approve a restructure of the health benefits funds of a private health insurer under s 149-10;
17.	to refuse to approve the appointment of a person as a private health insurer’s actuary under s 160-1(5);
18.	to declare under the Private Health Insurance (Insurer Obligations) Rules that a person is not eligible for appointment as a private health insurer’s actuary under s 160-5(2);
19.	to give a prudential direction to a private health insurer under s 163-15(1);
20.	to refuse to revoke a prudential direction under s 163-15(3);
21.	to disqualify a person from being, or acting as, a director or senior manager of a private health insurer under s 166-20(1);
22.	to refuse to revoke a disqualification of a disqualified person under s 166-20(3);
23.	to refuse to determine that a person is not a disqualified person under s 166-25(3);
24.	to specify conditions in a determination that a person is not a disqualified person under s 166-25(4);
25.	to specify additional conditions to which a determination that a person is not a disqualified person is to be subject under s 166-25(4);
26.	to vary conditions to which a determination that a person is not a disqualified person is to be subject under s 166-25(4);
27.	to revoke a determination that a person is not a disqualified person under s 166-25(8).	
Sections 241-40(3), 250-1(5)	The following decisions of the Private Health Insurance Ombudsman: 
-	to refuse to extend a period to report to the Private Health Insurance Ombudsman under s 241-40(3); 
-	to refuse to extend a period to give a record or information to the Private Health Insurance Ombudsman under s 250-1(5).	

[Notes:  
1.	If a person applies to the Chief Executive Medicare for reconsideration of one of the following decisions and the Chief Executive has not told the claimant of the decision on the reconsideration within 28 days after receiving the application, the CEO is taken to have affirmed the original decision: 
•	a decision under s 282-1(1)(a), (b) or (h) that an amount is recoverable as a debt due to the Commonwealth or a decision under s 282-10(1) to set off a debt against an amount otherwise payable to a person (other than a private health insurer) or his or her estate: s 282-15(8).
2.	If a private health insurer requests the Chief Executive Medicare under s 279-45(1) to reconsider a decision under s 279-20(1) or 279-40(2) and the Chief Executive has not notified the private health insurer of the decision on the reconsideration within 28 days after receiving the request, the Chief Executive is taken to have revoked the decision: s 279-45(6).
3.	If the Private Health Insurance Administration Council fails to make a decision on the following applications  or requests from a private health insurer within the timeframe specified, the Council is taken to have refused the application or request:
•	application for registration as a private health insurer – the later of 90 days after the application is made, 90 days after a copy of the applicant’s rules was given to the Secretary of the Department of Health or 90 days after the applicant gives requested information to the Council: s 126-30;
•	request to revoke or vary a declaration that the solvency standard does not apply to a particular private health insurer – 28 days after receiving the request: s 140-15(7);
•	request to revoke or vary conditions imposed on a declaration that the solvency standard does not apply to a particular private health insurer – 28 days after receiving the request: s 140-15(7);
•	request to revoke or vary a solvency direction – 28 days after receiving the request: s 140-20(9);
•	request to revoke or vary a declaration that the capital adequacy standard does not apply to a particular private health insurer – 28 days after receiving the request: s 143-15(7);
•	request to revoke or vary conditions imposed on a declaration that the capital adequacy standard does not apply to a particular private health insurer – 28 days after receiving the request: s 143-15(7);
•	request to revoke or vary a capital adequacy direction – 28 days after receiving the request: s 143-20(9);
•	application to approve a restructure of the health benefits funds of a private health insurer – the later of 90 days after the application is made or 90 days after the applicant gives requested information to the Council: s 149-15.]

Private Health Insurance (Prudential Supervision) Act 2015

Section 168(7) (85 of 2015)

Sections 15, 20, 27(3)(b)(ii), 32, 33, 37, 92, 96, 99, 115	The following decisions on reconsideration of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority:	
	-	to refuse an application for registration as a private health insurer;	Section 15	
	-	to grant an application, subject to terms and conditions, for registration as a private health insurer;	Section 15	
	-	to refuse an application for approval for a private health insurer to convert to being registered as a for profit insurer;	Section 20	
	-	to refuse to approve the crediting of an amount to a health benefits fund of a private health insurer under 	Section 27(3)(b)(ii);	
	-	to refuse to approve a restructure of the health benefits fund of a private health insurer  under;	Section 32	
	-	to refuse to approve a transfer of the health benefits of one or more private health insurers;	Section 33	
	-	to refuse to approve a termination of the health insurer funds of a private health insurer;	Section 37	
	-	to make, vary or revoke a prudential standard referred to in s 92(3)(c);	Section 92	
	-	to give a direction on a ground specified in s 96(1)(a), (b) or (c);	Section 96	
	-	to vary, or to refuse to vary or revoke, , a direction that was given under s 96 on a ground specified in s 96(1)(a), (b) or (c);	Section 99	
	-	to give a direction to terminate the appointment of a person as appointed actuary.	Section 115	

[Notes:
o	This Act commenced on 1 July 2015: 85 of 2015.
o	Section 122 notes that a person is not entitled to refuse or fail to comply with a requirement under the Act on the ground that it may make the person liable to a penalty by way of disqualification under section 120, despite anything in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975.]

Product Grants and Benefits Administration Act 2000 

Section 14ZZ of the Taxation Administration Act 1953

Section 14ZY(1) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953
	The following decisions of the Commissioner of Taxation that have been allowed, wholly or in part, or disallowed by the Commissioner under Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 
-	to refuse an application for registration under s 10;
-	to cancel registration under s 11;
-	to make an assessment of the amount of a grant or benefit under s 17;
-	to amend an assessment of the amount of a grant or benefit under s 20.	

[Notes:  
1.	This Act sets out the administrative provisions for the assessment and payment of grants and benefits available under the following Acts: Energy Grants (Cleaner Fuels) Scheme Act 2004, Energy Grants (Credits) Scheme Act 2003 and Product Stewardship (Oil) Act 2000.  The grants and benefits to which the Act applies are defined in s 8.
2.	Section 53(1) provides that, if a person is dissatisfied with a reviewable grant or benefit decision which is defined in s 53(2), they may object against the decision in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.  The following Acts introduced or have amended the list of reviewable decisions: 61 of 2000 and 73 of 2006.
3.	An application for review of an objection decision must be lodged with the Tribunal within 60 days after the person making the application is served with notice of the decision: s 14ZZC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
4.	If the Commissioner fails to make a decision on a taxation objection within 60 days after being given a written notice requiring the making of the objection decision, the Commissioner is deemed to have made a decision under s 14ZY(1) to disallow the objection: s 14ZYA(3) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
5.	The Energy Grants (Credits) Scheme Act 2003 will be repealed on 1 July 2012: item 23 of Schedule 3 to the Fuel Tax (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2006.  Section 8 of this Act will be amended to remove the reference to the Energy Grants (Credits) Scheme Act 2003: item 19 of Schedule 3 to the Fuel Tax (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2006.]

Product Stewardship Act 2011

Section 96(1) (76 of 2011)

Section 95(4)	The following decisions of an accrediting authority which have been reviewed by the Minister for the Environment: 
-	to refuse to accredit the voluntary arrangement in relation to a class of products or impose conditions on, cancel or refuse to cancel, the accreditation of the voluntary arrangement in relation to a class of products under s 13(2).	
Sections 18(6), 26, 28, 32(1), 33	The following decisions of the Minister for the Environment: 
-	to vary, refuse to vary or revoke a notice requiring a person to become a member of an approved co-regulatory arrangement under s 18(6);
-	to refuse to approve the co-regulatory arrangement in relation to a class of products under s 26; 
-	to cancel or refuse to cancel the approval of the co-regulatory  arrangement in relation to a class of products under s 28; 
-	to make a determination  that this Act has effect as if the person were a liable party under s 32(1); 
-	to refuse to consent to the appointment of a new administrator under s 33.	

[Notes:
A list of reviewable decisions and persons who may apply for review under this Act is set out in s 93.]

Product Stewardship (Voluntary Arrangements) Instrument 2012

Section 96(1) of the Product Stewardship Act 2011

Sections 2.03(1), 2.08(1), 2.10(1) 	The following decisions of the Minister for the Environment: 
-	to refuse to accredit a voluntary arrangement in relation to class of products under s 2.03(1); 
-	to impose conditions on the accreditation of a voluntary arrangement in relation to a class of products under s 2.08(1); 
-	to cancel, or refuse to cancel the accreditation of a voluntary arrangement under s 2.10(1).	

[Notes:
This instrument commenced 27 November 2012.]

Protection of Cultural Objects on Loan Act 2013

Section 18 (12 of 2013)

Sections 15, 16, 17	The following decisions of the Minister for the Arts: 
-	to refuse to approve a borrowing institution under s 15; 
-	to impose or vary a condition on the approval of a borrowing institution under s 16; 
-	to revoke an approval of a borrowing institution under s 17.	

[Notes:
This Act commenced on 14 September 2013].

Protection of Movable Cultural Heritage Act 1986

Section 48 (11 of 1986) (88 of 1990)

Sections 10(5)(a), 10(5)(b), 10A(6)(b), 10A(7)(b), 11(2), 12(3)(a), 12(3)(b), 12(5), 13(1)
	The following decisions of the Minister for the Arts: 
-	to impose a condition on a permit under s 10(5)(a);
-	to refuse to grant a permit or certificate under ss 10(5)(b);
-	to refuse to grant a permit under s 10A(6)(b);
-	to impose a condition on a permit under s 10A(7)(b);
-	to specify the period of effect for a permit under s 11(2);
-	to impose a condition on a certificate under s 12(3)(a);
-	to refuse to grant a certificate under s 12(3)(b);
-	to specify the period of effect for a certificate under s 12(5);
-	to impose a condition on a permit or certificate, to vary or revoke a condition on a permit or certificate, to vary the period of effect of a permit or certificate or to revoke a permit or certificate under s 13(1).	

Protection of the Sea (Civil Liability) Act 1981

Section 19 (31 of 1981) (39 of 1983)

Sections 16, 17(3)	The following decisions of the Minister for Infrastructure and Regional Development: 
-	to refuse to issue an insurance certificate under s 16(2); 
-	to cancel a certificate under s 17(3).	

Protection of the Sea (Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage) Act 2008

Section 24 (76 of 2008)

Sections 18(7), 22(1)	The following decisions of the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
-	to refuse to issue an insurance certificate under s 18(7); 
-	to cancel a certificate under s 22(1).	

Public Lending Right Act 1985

Section 20(8) (200 of 1985)

Section 20(5)
	Decisions of the Public Lending Committee in relation to a claim that have been confirmed, varied or substituted upon reconsideration.	
Q

Quality Agency Principles 2013

Section 2.70

Sections 2.68(1), 2.69(3)	The following decisions of the CEO of the Quality Agency, that have been confirmed, varied or set aside on reconsideration:
-	to refuse to accredit a commencing service under paragraph 2.7(1)(b);
-	to refuse to re-accredit an accredited service or a previously accredited service under paragraph 2.18(1)(b);
-	to decide the period of accreditation of an accredited service or previously accredited service  under paragraph 2.19(1)(a);
-	to revoke the accreditation of an accredited service under subsection 2.21(2) subparagraph 2.42(1)(a)(i);
-	to vary the period of accreditation of accredited service under paragraph 2.42(1)(b);
-	to cancel the registration of a person as a quality assessor under subsection 2.55(1);
-	to reject an objection to the appointment of a person to an assessment team under paragraph 2.61(4)(b).	

[Notes:
1.	The list of decisions which may be reconsidered under the Act is set out in s 2.66
2.	These principles were made under the Australian Aged Care Quality Agency Act 2013]

R

Radiocommunications Act 1992

Section 292 (174 of 1992) and Section 292A (108 of 2000)

Section 289(1)	The following decisions of the Australian Communications and Media Authority that have been affirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	to vary a spectrum licence under s 73;
-	to suspend a spectrum licence under s 75;
-	to cancel a spectrum licence under s 77;
-	to change the core conditions of a spectrum licence on its reissue under s 82;
-	to vary or cancel a spectrum licence under s 87;
-	to vary a spectrum licence under s 92(2)(b);
-	to refuse to issue an apparatus licence under s 100;
-	to refuse to issue a transmitter licence under s 101A;
-	to refuse to issue a datacasting transmitter licence under section 102B otherwise than because of a decision under paragraph 102B(b);
-	to include conditions in an apparatus licence under ss 107(1)(g), 108A(1)(f), 109(1)(f), 109A(1)(k) or 109B(1)(t);
-	a decision under s 111 concerning the conditions of an apparatus licence;
-	to give a direction under s 116(1) to revoke an authorisation under s 114;
-	to refuse to issue a certificate of proficiency under s 121;
-	to cancel a certificate of proficiency under s 124;
-	to suspend an apparatus licence under s 126;
-	to cancel an apparatus licence under s 128;
-	to refuse to renew an apparatus licence or to renew an apparatus licence with different conditions under s 130;
-	to refuse to transfer an apparatus licence under s 131AB otherwise than because of a decision under paragraph 131ACA(b);
-	to refuse to issue a provisional international broadcasting certificate under s 131AF;
-	to refuse to include details of a radiocommunications transmitter in the Register under s 145;
-	to refuse to correct the Register under s 153;
-	to refuse to issue a permit under s 167;
-	 a decision under s 168 about the conditions of a permit;
-	to give a notice under s 169(9);
-	to cancel a permit under s 171;
-	to refuse to give permission under s 174 to supply a non-standard device;
-	to refuse to give permission under ss 193(1) or 195(1) to use a transmitter;
-	to give directions under s 212 in relation to the settlement of an interference dispute;
-	to refuse to give to a person an accreditation under s 263;
-	to withdraw a person’s accreditation under s 264;
-	to make a pre-acquisition declaration under Pt 1 of the Sch.
	
Sections 102B(b), 106(6A), 114(3C), 128C(1), 128D, 131ACA(b)	The following decisions of the Australian Communications and Media Authority: 
-	to issue a datacasting transmitter licence under paragraph 102B(b);
-	under s 106(6A);
-	to give a direction under s 114(3C);
-	to give a direction to suspend a datacasting transmitter license under s 128C(1);
-	to cancel a datacasting transmitter license under s 128D;
-	to transfer a datacasting transmitter licence under paragraph 131ACA(b).	

[Notes: 
1.	The list of decisions which may be reconsidered under the Act is set out in s 285 of the Act.  The following Acts introduced or have amended the list of reviewable decisions: 174 of 1992, 32 of 1995, 59 of 1997, 119 of 1997, 108 of 2000, 172 of 2000 and 68 of 2007.
2.	If the ACMA fails to notify a person of its decision on a request for reconsideration within 90 days after receiving the application, the ACMA is taken to have affirmed the original decision: s 290(1).]

Radiocommunications (Spectrum Licence Allocation) Determination 2000

Clause 1A.29 

Clauses 1A.13, 1A.18, 1A.25
	The following decision of the Australian Communications and Media Authority: 
-	to designate an applicant as an “associated applicant” under cl 1A.13, 1A.18 or 1A.25.	

[Notes: 
1.	This determination was made under s 60 of the Radiocommunications Act 1992.
2.	Applications to the Tribunal must be made within 10 working days of being told of the decision.
3.	This determination will cease on 1 October 2015]

Radiocommunications (Spectrum Licence Allocation - 2 GHz Band) Determination 2000

Clause 1A.29 

Clauses 1A.13, 1A.18, 1A.25
	The following decision of the Australian Communications and Media Authority: to designate an applicant as an “associated applicant” under cl 1A.13, 1A.18 or 1A.25.	

[Notes: 
1.	This determination was made under s 60 of the Radiocommunications Act 1992.
2.	Applications to the Tribunal must be made within 10 working days of being told of the decision.]

Radiocommunications (Trading Rules for Spectrum Licences) Determination 2012

Section 10(1)

Section 8(2)	The following decision of the Australian Communications and Media Authority: to refuse to give written permission for a licensee to trade part of their licence under s 8(2).	

[Notes:
1.	This determination was made under s 88 of the Radiocommunications Act 1992.]

Radiocommunications Taxes Collection (Penalties on Unpaid Tax) Determination 2015

Section 16 (F2015L00179)

Section 14(1)(b)	The following decision of the Australian Communications and Media Authority: to confirm, vary or revoke a decision under s 10(1) to (a) remit all, or a part, of an amount of penalty interest payable by a person or (b) not to remit any part of an amount of penalty interest by a person.	

[Notes:
-	This Determination commenced on 24 February 2015.]

Registration of Deaths Abroad Act 1984

Section 27 (169 of 1984)

Sections 12, 13	The following decisions of a registering officer: 
-	to register, or refuse to register, a death under s 12, to register a death under s 13
	
Sections 19(4), 20(1), 20(3), 21(1), 21(3), 22(2), 22(3) 	The following decisions of the Registrar: 
1.	to refuse under s 19(4) to search in the index and the Register for an entry relating to a specified death or to provide a copy or an extract of a relevant entry;
2.	to cause particulars to be entered in the Register to correct an entry under s 20(1);
3.	to refuse an application made under s 20(3) to correct an entry under s 20(1);
4.	to cause particulars to be entered in a Certificate of Death Abroad under s 21(1);
5.	to refuse an application made under s 21(3) to correct a Certificate of Death Abroad under s 21(1);
6.	to cancel the registration of a death under s 22(2);
7.	to refuse an application made under s 22(3) to cancel registration of a death under s 22(1).	

Renewable Energy (Electricity) Act 2000

Sections 57(6), 60(a) and 66(5) (174 of 2000)

Section 57(3)	The following decision of the Renewable Energy Regulator: 
-	to refuse under s 57(3) a request from a liable entity to treat an objection as if it had been received within 60 days after the assessment was made;
-	to allow, wholly or in part, or disallow an objection against an assessment of a liable entity’s renewable energy certificate shortfall for the year.
 	
Section 58(1)	The following decision in relation to which an objection has been allowed, wholly or in part, or disallowed by the Renewable Energy Regulator: 
-	to issue under Division 2 of Part 5 of the Act an assessment or amended assessment of a liable entity’s renewable energy certificate shortfall for a year.
	
Section 66(3)	The following decisions of the Renewable Energy Regulator that have been confirmed, varied or set aside on reconsideration:  
-	to refuse to register a person under s 11;
-	 any decision made under s 12B in relation to an application under s 12A about provisional accreditation of a power station;
-	any decision under s 14 in relation to an application for accreditation of a power station;
-	 to refuse to accredit a power station under s 15;
-	to amend, or refuse to amend, an electricity generation return under section 20A;
-	 not to register a certificate under s 26;
-	 to suspend a person’s registration under s 30 or s 30A;
-	to refuse to approve a person as the nominated person for an accredited power station under s 30B;
-	to vary, or refuse to vary, under s 30C a determination as to which components are taken to be a power station for the purposes of the Act;
-	to suspend the accreditation of an accredited power station under s 30D or s 30E;
-	to vary the 1997 eligible renewable power baseline for an accredited power station under s 30F;
-	to vary the 2008 WCMG limit for an accredited power station under s 30G;
-	to refuse to determine an amount, or to determine an amount that is different from the proposed amount under s 38AF or 38AG;
-	to amend, or refuse to amend, an energy acquisition statement under s 45A or 45B;
-	to amend, or to refuse to amend, a partial exemption certificate under s 46C;
-	to assess a penalty charge under s 102;
-	not to remit, or to remit only a part of, penalty charge under s 103.	

[Notes:
1.	If the Renewable Energy Regulator fails to make a decision on an objection within 60 days after being given a written notice requiring the making of the objection decision, the Regulator is deemed to have made a decision under s 58(1) to disallow the objection: s 59(3).
2.	The list of reviewable decisions that are subject to reconsideration is set out in s 66(1) of the Act.  The following Acts have introduced or amended the list of reviewable decisions: 174 of 2000, 90 of 2006, 78 of 2009 and 69 of 2010.
3.	A table in s 66(1) sets out who may apply for reconsideration of the decisions specified above.
4.	The Renewable Energy Regulator is taken to have confirmed a decision if it does not give written notice of its reconsideration decision within 60 days of the request for reconsideration: s 66(4).]

Renewable Energy (Electricity) Amendment (Transitional Provision) Regulations 2010

Regulation 11(5) (SLI 322 of 2010)

Regulation 11(3)	The following decision of the Renewable Energy Regulator that has been confirmed, varied or set aside on reconsideration: 
1.	to determine under reg 10(1) that a contract is a contract to which subitem 7 (1) of Schedule 2 to the Renewable Energy (Electricity) Amendment Act 2010 applies and the annual transfer number for each year for the contract.	
[Notes:
1.	A party to a contract may ask the Regulator to reconsider a determination made under reg 10(1): reg 11(1).  The Regulator is taken to have made a decision confirming the determination under reg 11(3) if the Regulator does not give written notice of the Regulator’s decision under reg 11(3) within 60 days of the request: reg 11(4).]

Renewable Energy (Electricity) Regulations 2001

Regulation 49(5) (SLI 320 of 2010)

Regulation 19BA, 19BC, 47(2)	The following decisions of the Renewable Energy Regulator that have been confirmed, varied or set aside on reconsideration: 
-	to determine the number of certificates that may be created for a solar water heater under reg 19BA;
-	to make or vary a determination about a solar water heater in relation to a request made under reg 19BC;
-	to declare that a person is not eligible to design and install small generation units under reg 47(2).	

[Notes:
1.	The Parties who may apply for review are set out in the table at reg 49(1).
2.	The Regulator is taken to have made a decision confirming the original decision if the Regulator does not give written notice of the Regulator’s decision under reg 49(3) to the party within 60 days after the party gives the request to the Minister: reg 49(4)(a). The Regulator’s decision is taken to have been made immediately after the end of the 60 days: reg 49(4)(b).]

Resale Royalty Right for Visual Artists Act 2009

Section 49 (125 of 2009)

Sections 35(2), 36(1)	The following decisions of the Minister for the Arts: 
-	to appoint a body to be the collecting society under s 35(2);
-	to refuse to appoint a body to be the collecting society under s 35(2);
-	to revoke the appointment of a body as the collecting society in the circumstances to which s 36 applies because of paragraph 36(1)(a). 	

Research Involving Human Embryos Act 2002

Section 32(1) and 45(1) (145 of 2002) (172 of 2006)

Sections 21(2), 23(1), 24(4), 24(8), 25(1), 26(1), 26(2) 	The following decisions of the National Health and Medical Research Council  Licensing Committee: 
1.	to refuse to issue a licence authorising use of excess ART embryos, use of excess human eggs or the creation or use of any other embryo under s 21(2);
2.	a decision in respect of the period throughout which a licence is to be in force under s 23(1);
3.	to specify a licence condition under s 24(4);
4.	to modify guidelines relating to proper consent in respect of a licence under s 24(8);
5.	to vary, or refuse to vary, a licence under s 25(1);
6.	to suspend or revoke a licence under s 26(1);
7.	to revoke a licence under s 26(2);
8.	any decision made in the performance of a function or the exercise of a power conferred by a corresponding State law if the law under which the decision was made provides for review by the Tribunal and the decision is declared by the regulations to be a reviewable State decision for the purposes of s 45.	

[Notes:
1.	Section 31 of the Act sets out who may apply for review of the decisions noted above.
2.	In relation to the Tribunal’s review power under s 45, there are currently no decisions declared by the regulations to be reviewable State decisions.]

Retirement Savings Accounts Act 1997

Section 189(7) (61 of 1997) (54 of 1998)

Section 189(4)
	The following decisions of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority that have been confirmed or varied upon reconsideration: 
-	to treat an application as having been withdrawn under s 24(2);
-	to refuse an application for approval under s 26(2);
-	to specify conditions in an instrument of approval under s 26(4);
-	to treat an application as having been withdrawn under s 28(4);
-	to vary the approval of an RSA institution under ss 29 or 30;
-	to refuse to vary the approval of an RSA institution under s 29.	
	The following decisions either of APRA or ASIC that have been confirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
1.	to give or vary a direction under s 45F or 45G;
2.	to make an exemption under s 174;
3.	to make a declaration under s 177;
4.	to revoke an exemption or declaration under s 179;
5.	to give a direction under s 182;
6.	to refuse to revoke a direction under s 182.	

[Notes:
1.	The list of ‘reviewable decisions’ that may be reconsidered under the Act is set out in s 16.  The following Acts introduced or have amended the list of reviewable decisions: 61 of 1997, 121 of 2001, 123 of 2001, 25 of 2008 and 91 of 2012.
2.	If APRA or ASIC do not confirm, revoke or vary a decision before the end of the period of 60 days after the day on which the request to reconsider the decision was received, the decision is taken to have been confirmed at the end of that period: s 189(5).  A person has 28 days from the day on which the decision is taken to have been confirmed to lodge an application for review with the AAT: s 189(8). 
3.	If a person requests reconsideration of a reviewable decision under s 189(1), s 41 of the AAT Act applies as if the making of the request were the making of an application to the Tribunal for review of that decision: s 189(9).  A person may seek an order relating to the implementation of the reviewable decision under s 41 of the AAT Act.]

Retirement Savings Accounts Regulations 1997

Regulation 6.03 (SR 116 of 1997)

Regulation 6.02(3)	The following decisions of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority that have been confirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	to determine a form of consent under para (b) of the definition of consent under reg 4.30 or 4A.27 (8). 	

[Notes:  
-	The list of ‘reviewable decisions’ that may be reconsidered under the Regulations is set out in reg 1.03(1).  The following Regulations introduced or have amended the list of reviewable decisions: SR 116 of 1997 and SR 352 of 2002.
-	If a person seeks reconsideration of a decision and APRA does not confirm, vary or revoke the decision before the end of the period of 60 days after the day on which APRA received the request, APRA is taken to have confirmed the decision at the end of that period: reg 6.02(4).]

Roads and Public Places Ordinance 1937

Section 15G

Sections 15(C)(1)(b), 15F, 15E	The following decisions of the Minister under the Roads and Public Places Ordinance 1937:
1.	to refuse to grant a permit under s 15(C)(1)(b);
2.	to cancel a permit under s 15F;
3.	to impose a condition under s 15E subject to which a permit is granted.	

[Notes:
1.	Section 5 of the National Land Ordinance 1989 gives effect to the Roads and Public Places Ordinance 1937 with respect to National Land on and after ACT self-government day (11 May 1989).  
2.	Section 4 of the National Land Ordinance 1989 provides that, with the Attorney-General’s approval, the National Capital Authority is to manage National Land designated in writing by the Attorney-General as land required for the special purposes of Canberra as the National Capital]. 
S

Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988

Sections 34R, 64(1), 67(7) (75 of 1988) (264 of 1992) (144 of 2001)

Sections 34F(2)(a), 34H(1)(d), 34L(2)(a), 34Q, 34P(c)
	The following decisions of Comcare: 
-	to refuse an application for approval of a person as a rehabilitation program provider under s 34, including ss 34F(2)(a) and 34H(1)(d); 
-	to refuse an application for renewal of the approval of a person as a rehabilitation program provider under s 34, including s 34L(2)(a);
-	to revoke an approval of a person as a rehabilitation program provider under s 34, including s 34Q;
-	a decision to impose particular conditions under s 34P(c) on the grant of an approval of a person as a rehabilitation program provider.	
Section 38(4)	The following decisions of a rehabilitation authority that have been affirmed, varied or revoked by Comcare on reconsideration: 
-	a decision under s 36 in relation to the assessment of an employees' capability of undertaking a rehabilitation program; 
-	a decision under s 37 in relation to the provision of a rehabilitation program.	
Section 62(3)	The following decision of a determining authority: 
-	to allow, or refuse to allow, 
-	a person a further period within which to request reconsideration of a determination under s 62(3).	
Section 62(5)	Determinations, decisions or requirements of a determining authority under ss 8, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 21A, 22, 24, 25, 27, 29, 30, 31, 34, 36, 37, 39, 114B(5)(a) or under Div 3 of Pt X that have been affirmed, varied or revoked by the determination authority on reconsideration.	
Sections 67(3), 67(4)
	The following decisions of a determining authority: to make a declaration under ss 67(3) or 67(4) that the responsible authority is not liable to reimburse the claimant for costs reasonably incurred in connection with that proceeding.	

[Notes:  
1.	An application for review may be lodged by: 
•	a claimant; 
•	if the decision affects the Commonwealth or a Commonwealth authority, the Commonwealth, or,  the Commonwealth authority, respectively; 
•	if the decision affects a corporation that holds a licence under Pt VIII, the licensed corporation: s 64(1).  
This is despite s 27 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975: s 64(3).
2.	Section 65(4) of the Act modifies the time for lodging an application for review with the Tribunal.  An application for review of a decision made under ss 38(4), 62(3) or 62(5) must be lodged within 60 days of receiving the decision.
3.	From 1 July 2004, compensation for members of the Defence Force is provided under the Military, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 for injuries, aggravation of an injury or disease contracted on or after that date.  From that date the Military, Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission (MRCC) replaces Comcare as a party to any proceedings under this Act in respect of ADF members ]

Sanctions Principles 2014

Section 85-8 of the Aged Care Act 1997

Sections 85-5(4) or 85-5(5) of the Aged Care Act 1997	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Health that have been confirmed, varied or set aside on reconsideration: to refuse to approve a proposed appointment under s 8(1) and s 11(6).	

Sea Installations Act 1987

Section 75 (102 of 1987)

Sections 51(4)(c), 55(1)
	The following decisions of the Minister for the Environment: 
-	a decision for the purposes of s 51(4)(c);
-	to give a direction under ss 55(1). 	
Sections 62(1)(g), 62(7)	The following decisions of an inspector: 
-	to direct that an installation be left undisturbed for a specified period under s 62(1)(g);
-	to take possession of, or take a sample of, a structure, plant, substance or thing and remove it from the installation under s 62(7).	

[Notes:
1.	ss 17, 24, 25, 28, 34, 35, 37, 40, 54, 55(2), 70 and 78 were repealed by Omnibus Repeal Day (Autumn 2014) Act 2014 (109 of 2014), with effect from 17 October 2014.] 

Seafarers Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1992

Sections 74, 80, 88(1), 91(6) (234 of 1992)

Sections 72(1)(b), 73(2)(c), 73A(1)(b), 79(1)(b)	The following decisions of the Seafarers Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Authority: 
-	to refuse to allow an employer a further period under s 72(1)(b) within which to determine a claim for compensation in relation to an injury resulting in death;
-	to refuse to allow an employer a further period under s 73(2)(c) within which to determine a claim for compensation in relation to an injury resulting in an employee being incapacitated for work, the loss of, or damage, to property used by an employee or the cost of medical treatment for an injury;
-	to refuse to allow an employer a further period under s 73A(1)(b) within which to determine a claim for compensation in relation to injuries resulting in permanent impairment;
-	to refuse to allow an employer a further period under s 79(1)(b) within which to reconsider a determination.
	
Section 78(3)(b)	The following decision of an employer: to allow, or refuse to allow, a person a further period within which to request reconsideration of a determination under s 78(3)(b).
	
Section 78(6)
	The following determinations, decisions or requirements of an employer that have been affirmed, varied or revoked by the employer on reconsideration: 
-	to determine the amount of normal weekly earnings payable under s 13;
-	to determine whether compensation is payable in respect of an injury under s 26;
-	to determine whether compensation is payable in respect of property loss or damage under s 27;
-	to determine whether compensation is payable in respect of medical and related expenses under s 28;
-	to determine whether compensation is payable in respect of an injury that results in an employee’s death under s 29;
-	to determine whether compensation is payable in respect of an employee’s funeral expenses under s 30;
-	to determine whether compensation is payable in respect of an injury resulting in incapacity for work under s 31;
-	to determine whether compensation is payable in respect of an injury resulting in incapacity where an employee is in receipt of a superannuation pension under s 33;
-	to determine whether compensation is payable in respect of an injury resulting in incapacity where an employee is in receipt of a lump sum benefit under s 34;
-	to determine whether compensation is payable in respect of an injury resulting in incapacity where an employee is in receipt of a rolled-over lump sum benefit under ss 35 or 36;
-	to determine whether compensation is payable where an employee is maintained in hospital under s 37;
-	to determine whether compensation is payable in respect of an injury resulting in permanent impairment under s 39;
-	to make an interim determination under s 40 of the degree of permanent impairment and assess an amount of compensation payable pending a final determination;
-	to make a determination as to the compensation payable in respect of non-economic loss under s 41;
-	to determine whether compensation is payable in respect of household services and attendant care services under s 43;
-	to determine that liability to make weekly payments be redeemed by payment of a lump sum under s 44;
-	to determine whether compensation is payable after payment of a lump sum under s 45;
-	a decision in relation to the assessment of an employee’s capability of undertaking rehabilitation programs under s 49;
-	a decision in relation to the provision of rehabilitation programs under s 50;
-	to determine whether compensation is payable in respect of certain alterations under s 51;
-	to require an employee to undergo a medical examination under s 66;
-	to require an employee to give information under s 126.
	
Sections 91(3), 91(4)	The following decisions of an employer: to make a declaration under ss 91(3) or 91(4) that the employer is not liable to reimburse the claimant for costs reasonably incurred in connection with that proceeding.	

[Notes:  
1.	Section 89(3) of the Act modifies the time for lodging an application for review with the Tribunal of certain decisions  A person must lodge an application for review of a decision made under ss 72(1)(b), 73(2)(c), 73A(1)(b), 78(3)(b) or 78(6) within 60 days of receiving the decision.
2.	If an employer has not determined a request for reconsideration within 60 days after receiving the request or such further period as is allowed under s 79, the employer is taken to have made a decision to affirm the primary decision: s 79(6).]

Sex Discrimination Act 1984

Sections 45 (4 of 1984) (179 of 1992) (133 of 1999)

Section 44

	The following decisions of the Australian Human Rights Commission: 
1.	to refuse to grant an exemption or further exemption from the operation of a provision in Div 1 or 2 of Pt II of the Act.	

Shipping Reform (Tax Incentives) Act 2012

Section 24 (53 of 2012)

Sections 8, 8(1), 9(3), 13, 14(1), 17
	The following decisions of the Minister for Infrastructure and Regional Development: 
-	to refuse to issue a certificate under s 8(1);
-	to determine matters set out in a certificate under s 8;
-	to make or refuse to make a determination under s 9(3);
-	to vary or revoke a certificate under s 13;
-	to refuse to give a notice under s 14(1);
-	to vary or revoke a notice under s 17.	

[Notes:
The Minister may delegate any of all of his or her powers under this Act: s 27]

Shipping Registration Act 1981

Section 78 (8 of 1981) (39 of 1983) (16 of 1984) (78 of 1990)

Sections 10(2), 21(5), 22(4), 22(6), 22A(1), 22A(2), 22A(4), 22A(6), 27(3), 65(4), 87(1), 88(3), 89
	The following decisions of the Registrar: 
-	to determine the method by which to measure length of a ship under s 10(2);
-	to extend, or refuse to extend, the period of effect of a provisional certificate under ss 21(5) or 22(4);
-	to grant, or refuse to grant, a further provisional registration certificate under s 22(6);
-	to grant, or refuse to grant, a provisional registration certificate under ss 22A(1) or 22A(2);
-	to extend, or refuse to extend, the period of effect of a provisional certificate under ss 22A(4);
-	to grant, or refuse to grant a further provisional registration certificate under s 22A(6);
-	to disallow the name of a ship under s 27(3);
-	to extend, or refuse to extend, the period of effect of a provisional certificate under ss 65(4);
-	a decision in relation to the transfer of registration under s 87(1);
-	to refuse to accept an instrument or document under s 88(3);
-	a decision in relation to an application under previous law under s 89.
	
Section 22(1)	The following decision of a proper officer: 
-	to grant, or refuse to grant, a provisional registration certificate under s 22(1).
	
Sections 23(1), 58(2A) , 92(4)	The following decisions of the Australian Maritime Safety Authority: 
-	to direct, or refuse to direct, the Registrar to grant a temporary pass under s 23(1);
-	to give the Registrar directions with respect to the closure of the registration relating to a ship or any entry or amendment to an entry under s 58(2A);
-	to direct that the registration relating to a ship be closed under s 92(4).	

Small Superannuation Accounts Act 1995

Section 83 (52 of 1995)

Section 82(4)	Any decision of the Commissioner of Taxation under this Act (other than a decision made under Div 2, 3 or 4 of Pt 6 or a decision relating to the approval of a form) that has been confirmed or varied on reconsideration.	

[Notes:
1.	The definition of ‘reviewable decision’ for the purposes of this Act is set out in s 81.  The following Acts introduced or have amended the definition: 52 of 1995.
2.	If the Commissioner of Taxation does not confirm, revoke or vary a decision before the end of the period of 60 days after the day on which the Commissioner received the request to reconsider the decision, the Commissioner is taken to have confirmed the decision at the end of that period: s 82(5).  A person has 28 days from the day on which the decision is taken to have been confirmed to lodge an application for review with the AAT: s 84(1). 
3.	If a person requests reconsideration of a reviewable decision under s 82(1), s 41 of the AAT Act applies as if the making of the request were the making of an application to the Tribunal for review of that decision: s 84(2).  A person may seek an order relating to the implementation of the reviewable decision under s 41 of the AAT Act.] 

Social Security Act 1991

Section 142(1), 179(1) of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999 (191 of 1999)(60 of 2015)
Section 1061ZZFM (106 of 2000)

AAT first review	
Sections 126(3), 135(1) of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999
	1.	A decision of the Secretary, the Chief Executive Centrelink or an authorised review officer made under section 126 of 135 of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999, including an employment pathway plan decision and a section 525B decision.
2.	Any decision under this Act made by the Secretary or the Chief Executive Centrelink.	
AAT second review	
Section 142(1)	A decision of the AAT on AAT first review made under s 43(1) of the AAT Act. 	
Sections 1061ZZFJ, 1061ZZFK	The following decisions made by the Commissioner of Taxation under this Act: 
-	to delay or refuse to delay the making of an assessment made under s 1061ZZFH, under s 1061ZZFJ;
-	to refuse to amend an assessment made under s 1061ZZFH, under s 1061ZZFK.	

[Notes:  
1.	Section 1061PAAD states that Part 4 of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999 does not apply to a decision under Part 2.24, Division 2 in relation to the Australian Government Disaster Recovery Payment (inserted by Financial Framework Legislation Amendment Act (No. 2) 2013 (53 of 2013)
2.	Act 60 of 2015 amended the Act to introduce AAT first and second review with effect from 1 July 2015.
3.	Section 140A of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999 provides that “employment pathway plan decision” means any of the following:
1.	a decision under s 501A to the extent that it relates to the terms of a Parenting Payment Employment Path that is in force;
2.	a decision under s 544B to the extent to which it relates to the terms of a Youth Allowance Employment Pathway Plan that is in force;
3.	a decision under s 606 to the extent that it relates to the terms of  Newstart Employment Pathway Plan that is in force;
4.	a decision under s 731M to the extent that it relates to the terms of a Special Benefit Employment Pathway Plan that is in force. 
4.	Section 140A of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999 provides that “section 525B decision” means a decision under s 525B of the 1991 Act (as previously in force) to the extent that it is related to the terms of a Job Search Activity Agreement that was previously in force.
5.	Section 142 of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999 sets out the decisions to which application may be made for AAT first review.
6.	Section 144 of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999 sets out the list of non-reviewable decisions
7.	Section 180 sets out the application and modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975.]

Social Security (Administration) Act 1999

Section 142(1), 179(1) (191 of 1999)(60 of 2015) 

AAT first review	
Section 126(3), 135(1) 	Any decision:
-	of the Secretary of the Department of Social Services, the Chief Executive Centrelink or an authorised review officer made under ss 126 or 135; or
-	a decision under this Act made personally by the Secretary or the Chief Executive Centrelink, 
except a non-reviewable decision set out in s 144.	
AAT second review	
Section 179(1) 	A decision of the AAT on AAT first review made under s 43(1) of the AAT Act. 	

[Notes:  
-	Act 60 of 2015 amended the Act to introduce first and second AAT review with effect from 1 July 2015.
-	The standard 28-day time limit for lodging a review application does not apply in respect of applications for AAT first review of decisions under this Act: s 147 (60 of 2015)
-	The review provisions in this Act also apply to decisions under:
-	the Farm Household Support Act 2014 and schemes made under that Act;
-	s 44-24 of the Aged Care Act 1997 by the Secretary, or by a person to whom the Secretary has sub-delegated power under s 96-2(7) of that Act;
-	s 5A, 5B, 5C, 5D, 5DA, 5DB, 5E, 5EA or 5EB of the Health Insurance Act 1973;
-	the A New Tax System (Bonuses for Older Australians) Act 1999 relating to a claim for a bonus payment;
-	ss 1.5 and 2.2(3) of the Adult Disability Assessment Determination 1999;
-	ss 1.6 and 2.2(3) of the Child Disability Assessment Determination 1999.]

Social Security and Veterans’ Affairs Legislation Amendment (One-Off Payments and Other 2007 Budget Measures) Act 2007

Clause 5(2) of Schedule 5 (66 of 2007)

Cl 5(1) of Sch 5	A decision of the Repatriation Commission under cl 5(1) of Schedule 5 regarding a claim for compensation.	

[Notes:  
1.	The eligibility for compensation payment is outlined in cl 2 of Sch 5.]

Social Security (International Agreements) Act 1999

Section 179(1) of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999 (191 of 1999)

Section 149 of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999	Decisions of an officer under this Act that have been reviewed by the Secretary administering the relevant part of the Act, the CEO of Centrelink or an authorised review officer and then by the Social Security Appeals Tribunal.

Social Security (Pension Valuation Factor) Determination 1998

Section 8(4) (S468, 18/9/98)

Section 8(3)	The following decision of the Minister for Social Services: 
-	to determine the appropriate pension valuation factor that applies to a person under s 8(3)	

[Notes:  
1.	This determination was made under the Social Security Act 1991.]

South-east Commonwealth Marine Reserves Network Management Plan 2013-23

Regulation 14.16(8) of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2000

Part 4, Strategy 2, A7 and A8	The following decisions of the Director of National Parks that have been reconsidered by the Director: 
-	any decision about a permit or class approval made under Part 5.2	

[Notes:
-	This Plan commenced on 1 July 2013.
-	This Plan was made under s 370 of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.
-	This Plan will cease to have effect on 30 June 2023.]

Southern Bluefin Tuna Fishery Management Plan 1995

Section 165(7) of the Fisheries Management Act 1991

Section 165(5) of the Fisheries Management Act 1991	The following decisions of the Australian Fisheries Management Authority that have been reconsidered under s 165(5) of the Fisheries Management Act 1991: 
-	to determine under subcl 14.2 that a person has not demonstrated to the satisfaction of AFMA that there are exceptional extenuating circumstances that caused an application to be made to after the period specified in para 14.1(a);
-	to determine under subcl 15.5 that a person has not demonstrated to the satisfaction of AFMA that there are exceptional extenuating circumstances that caused an application to be made to after the period specified in para 15.3(b) 	

[Notes:  
1.	This Plan was made under subsection 17(1) of the Fisheries Management Act 1991.  Refer to the entry in this list for the Act for other relevant information.
2.	Clause 32 of the Plan provides that s 165 of the Fisheries Management Act 1991 applies to the decisions specified in the right-hand column as if they were ‘relevant decisions’ within the meaning of that section.]

Southern Squid Jig Fishery Management Plan 2005

Section 165(7) of the Fisheries Management Act 1991

Section 165(5) of the Fisheries Management Act 1991	The following decisions of the Australian Fisheries Management Authority that have been reconsidered under s 165(5) of the Fisheries Management Act 1991: a decision about the conversion factor for a type of non-standard squid jigging machine under cl 14 (1). 	

[Notes:  
1.	This Plan was made under subsection 17(1) of the Fisheries Management Act 1991.  Refer to the entry in this list for the Act for other relevant information.
2.	Clause 14(5) of the Plan provides that s 165 of the Fisheries Management Act 1991 applies to the decision specified in the right-hand column as if it were a ‘relevant decisions’ within the meaning of that section.]

Space Activities Act 1998

Section 61 (123 of 1998) (100 of 2002)

Sections 8A, 18, 19, 22(1), 25(1), 26(1), 28(1)(b), 28(3), 31(1), 34(1), 35(1), 36(1)(b), 36(3), 38(1), 41(1), 43(1), 43(5), 46(1), 46A(3)	The following decisions of the Minister: 
-	to refuse to make a declaration under s 8A;
-	to vary or revoke a declaration under s 8A;
-	to refuse to grant or vary a space licence under s 18;
-	to vary or revoke a space licence under s 18;
-	to impose a particular condition or conditions on a space licence under s 19;
-	to transfer, or refuse to transfer, a space licence under s 22(1);
-	to suspend a space licence under s 25(1);
-	to refuse to grant or vary a launch permit under s 26(1);
-	to vary or revoke a launch permit under s 26(1);
-	to impose a particular condition or conditions on a launch permit under s 28(1)(b);
-	to refuse to extend, or further extend, the period for which a launch permit remains in force under s 28(3);
-	to transfer, or refuse to transfer, a launch permit under s 31(1);
-	to suspend a launch permit under s 34(1);
-	to refuse to grant or vary an overseas launch certificate under s 35(1);
-	to vary or revoke an overseas launch certificate under s 35(1);
-	to impose a particular condition or conditions on an overseas launch certificate under s 36(1)(b);
-	to refuse to extend, or further extend, the period for which an overseas launch certificate remains in force under s 36(3);
-	to transfer, or refuse to transfer, an overseas launch certificate under s 38(1);
-	to suspend an overseas launch certificate under s 41(1);
-	to refuse to give or vary an authorisation under s 43(1);
-	to vary, revoke or suspend an authorisation under s 43(1);
-	to impose a particular condition or conditions on an authorisation under s 43(5);
-	to refuse to grant or vary an exemption certificate under s 46(1);
-	to vary or revoke an exemption certificate under s 46(1);
-	to refuse to extend, or further extend, the period for which an exemption certificate remains in force under s 46A(3).	

Space Activities Regulations 2001

Regulation 11.02 (SR 186 of 2001) (SR 33 of 2003)

Regulations
2.04 (6), 3.02 (2)	The following decisions of the Minister:  
-	in relation to space license conditions, to direct the revision of specified plans including, the program management plan, the flight test plan, the technology security plan, or the environmental plan under reg 2.04 (6);
-	in relation to launch permit conditions, to direct the revision of specified plans, including the program management plan, technology security plan, flight safety plan, or the environmental plan under reg 3.02 (2).
	
Regulations 2.06A (4) (b) (ii), 2.06B (4) (b) (ii), 2.08A (4) (b) (ii)	The following decisions of the Minister to refuse to grant permission to provide certain documents: 
-	in relation to an application for the transfer of a space licence, where a technical recognition instrument exists in relation to a launch facility that is relevant to that application, under reg. 2.06A (4) (b) (ii);
-	in relation to an application for the transfer of a space licence, where a technical recognition instrument exists in relation to a launch vehicle or a kind of launch vehicle, or a particular part of a launch vehicle or kind of launch vehicle, that is relevant to that application, under reg. 2.06B (4) (b) (ii);
-	in relation to an application for the transfer of a space licence, where a technical recognition instrument exists in relation to a launch facility that is relevant to that application, under reg. 2.08A (4) (b) (ii).
	
Regulations 10.02 (b), 10.03 (1) (b), 10.03 (2) (b), 10.03 (3)	A decision by an investigator to allow an amount under regs 10.02 (b), 10.03 (1) (b), 10.03 (2) (b), or 10.03 (3), relating to the costs and expenses for an investigation into any accident or incident.

Stronger Futures in the Northern Territory Act 2012

Sections 31, 110 (100 of 2012)

Sections 12(4), 12(5), 13(3), 13(4), 17(1), 17(6), 23(1), 24(1)	The following decisions of the Minister for Indigenous Affairs: 
-	a determination about what is not authorised by a NT licence under s 12(4);
-	a determination about the conditions of a NT licence under s 12(5);
-	a determination about what is not authorised by a NT permit under s 13(3);
-	a determination about the conditions of a NT permit under s 13(4);
-	a determination to refuse to approve an alcohol management plan under s 17(1);
-	a determination to refuse to make a determination in relation to an application for approval of an alcohol management plan under s 17(6);
-	a determination to refuse to approve a variation of an alcohol management plan under s 23(1);
-	a determination to revoke an approval of an alcohol management plan under s 24(1).	
Section 14(1)	The following decision of the NT Licensing Commission: 
-	a determination about posting a notice about alcohol offences in an alcohol protected area under s 14(1).	
Sections 41(1), 45(1), 52(1), 58(1), 59(1), 62(1), 65(1)	The following decisions of the Secretary of  the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet: 
-	a determination that a community store licence is required in relation to a community store under s 41(1);
-	a determination to refuse to grant a community store licence under s 45(1);
-	a determination to impose conditions on a community store licence under s 52(1);
-	a determination to refuse to vary a community store licence under s 58(1);
-	a determination to revoke a community store licence under s 59(1);
-	a determination that an owner of a community store is required to be registered under the CATSI Act under s 62(1);
-	a determination to revoke a community store licence under s 65(1). 	

[Notes:
•	This Act ceases to have effect on 16 July 2022: s 118(1).]

Student Assistance Act 1973

Sections 12ZQ, 308H 311(1), 320(1) (72 of 1984) (171 of 1989) (138 of 1992) (183 of 1994) (45 of 1998)(60 of 2015) 

AAT first review	
Section 306 	Decisions of an officer under the Act relating to the Student Financial Supplement Scheme or the recovery of amounts paid under a current or former special educational assistance scheme that have been reviewed by the Secretary of the Department of Social Services, or an authorised review officer, and the decision has been affirmed, varied or set aside under s 306. 	
AAT second review	
	Decisions made by the AAT under s 43(1) of the AAT Act on AAT first review.	
AAT single review	
Sections 12ZP(1), 12ZP(2), 308D, 308F	The following decisions of the Commissioner of Taxation: 
-	to defer, or refuse to defer, the making of an assessment of accumulated FS debt under s 12ZP(1);
-	to refuse to amend an assessment of accumulated FS debt under s 12ZP(2);
-	to defer, or refuse to defer, the making of an assessment of a person’s accumulated ABSTUDY student start-up loan (SSL) debt under s 10K;
-	to amend or refuse to amend an assessment under s 10L.	

[Notes:  
1.	The Social Security Legislation Amendment (Youth Allowance Consequential and Related Measures) Act 1998 amended Part 6 of this Act to provide that the Secretary may raise and recover an overpayment in respect of an amount of AUSTUDY or Student Financial Supplement as it related to AUSTUDY paid prior to 1 July 1998 that should not have been paid.  Item 134 of Schedule 11 to the amending Act provides that a person may seek review of any such decision as if the amendments had not occurred.
2.	Act 60 of 2015 amended this Act to introduce AAT first and second review with effect from 1 July 2015
3.	An application for AAT first review must be made within 3 months or such longer period as the AAT allows after the original decision was affirmed, varied or set aside by the Secretary or authorised review officer.  Section 29(1)(d) of the AAT Act does not apply: s 312.
4.	Section 41(2) of the AAT Act does not apply for AAT first review applications: s 313.
5.	The AAT cannot review a decision under s 305, 314, 343 or 345.]

Student Identifiers Act 2014

Section 13 (36 of 2014)

Sections 10, 12	The following decisions of the Registrar: 
-	to refuse to assign an identifier to the individual under section 10; 
-	to revoke a student identifier of the individual, or assign a new identifier to the individual under section 12.	

[Notes:
1.	Section 13(2) states that section 13(1) has effect despite section 27(1) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975.]

Subsidy Principles 2014

Sections 27(1), 31(1), 59(1), 77(1), 81(1) (F2014L00862)
Section 85-8 of the Aged Care Act 1997 (112 of 1997)

Sections 25(3), 29(3), 52(1), 53(1), 53(5)(a), 75(3), 79(3)	The following decisions of the Secretary, Department of Health:
1.	to refuse to make a determination under s 25(3) or s 75(3) that a care recipient is eligible for an oxygen supplement;
2.	to refuse to make a determination under s 29(3) or s 79(3) that a care recipient is eligible for an enteral feeding supplement;
3.	to refuse to make a determination in relation to residential care service under s 52(1) or s 53(1) ;
4.	a decision under s 53(5)(a) that the Secretary is not satisfied as referred to in s 53(1)(b) in relation to a refurbished service.	

[Notes:
(i)	These Principles were made under section 96-1 of the Aged Care Act 1997.
(ii)	These Principles will cease on 1 October 2024].

Superannuation Act 1922

Section 133B (58 of 2011)

Sections 127(5)(a), 127(5)(b)	Decisions of the Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation or a delegate of the Corporation under this Act that have been confirmed or varied by the Corporation on reconsideration.	
Section  130(1)(a)	 Decisions of the Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation or a delegate of the Corporation under this Act that have been confirmed or varied on reconsideration by a Reconsideration Advisory Committee.	
Sections 133A(1)(c), 133A(1)(d)	Decisions of the Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation or a delegate of the Corporation under this Act that have been confirmed or varied by the Corporation on reconsideration, following a recommendation of the Reconsideration Advisory Committee.	

[Notes:
-	Section 127(4) of the Act provides that after receiving a reconsideration request the CSC may: itself reconsider the decision; refer the decision to a Reconsideration Advisory Committee for reconsideration or; refer the decision to the Committee for it to make for a recommendation to the CSC in relation to the decision. 
-	Item 15(7) of Schedule 2 to the Superannuation Legislation (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Act 2011 provides that despite the repeal of s 154 of the Superannuation Act 1976 an application may be made to the Tribunal for review of a decision made by the Commissioner of Superannuation, or a delegate of the Commissioner under that Act, the Superannuation  Act 1922 or regulations made under either if those Acts before 1 July 2011, provided the period for making an application for review has not ended.]

Superannuation Contributions Tax (Assessment and Collection) Act 1997

Section 24 and Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (70 of 1997) (11 of 1999)

Section 14ZY(1) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953	The following decision of the Commissioner of Taxation: 
-	to make an assessment of liability to pay superannuation contributions surcharge.	

[Notes:  

1.	Section 24 provides that, if a member is dissatisfied with the Commissioner’s assessment in so far as it is based on the calculation of the member’s adjusted taxable income, the member or a superannuation provider may object against it in respect of that calculation in the way set out in Pt IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.  The Tribunal may only review a decision to allow, wholly or in part, or to disallow a taxation objection.  
2.	An application for review of an objection decision must be lodged with the Tribunal within 60 days after the person making the application is served with notice of the decision: s 14ZZC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
3.	If the Commissioner fails to make a decision on a taxation objection within 60 days after being given a written notice requiring the making of the objection decision, the Commissioner is deemed to have made a decision under s 14ZY(1) to disallow the objection: s 14ZYA(3) of the  Taxation Administration Act 1953.]

Superannuation Contributions Tax (Members of Constitutionally Protected Superannuation Funds) Assessment and Collection Act 1997

Section 20 and Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (184 of 1997) (11 of 1999)

Section 14ZY(1) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953	The following decision of the Commissioner of Taxation: 
to make an assessment of liability to pay superannuation contributions surcharge under s 14.	

[Notes:  

1.	Section 20 provides that, if a member is dissatisfied with the Commissioner’s assessment under s 14 in so far as it is based on the calculation of the member’s adjusted taxable income, the member may object against it in respect of that calculation in the way set out in Pt IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.  The Tribunal may only review a decision to allow, wholly or in part, or to disallow a taxation objection. 
2.	An application for review of an objection decision must be lodged with the Tribunal within 60 days after the person making the application is served with notice of the decision: s 14ZZC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
3.	If the Commissioner fails to make a decision on a taxation objection within 60 days after being given a written notice requiring the making of the objection decision, the Commissioner is deemed to have made a decision under s 14ZY(1) to disallow the objection: s 14ZYA(3) of the  Taxation Administration Act 1953.]

Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992

Section 14ZZ of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (216 of 1991) (34 of 1997)

Section 14ZY(1) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.	The following decisions of the Commissioner of Taxation in relation to which an objection has been allowed, wholly or in part, or disallowed by the Commissioner under Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 
-	to give, or refuse to give, under s 15C(4) a certificate of coverage for an international social security agreement;
-	 to vary, to refuse to vary or to revoke under s 15C(6) a certificate of coverage for an international social security agreement;
-	to make an assessment of an employer’s superannuation guarantee shortfall for the year and of the superannuation guarantee charge payable on the shortfall under s 36(1) or 37(1). 	
 
[Notes:  
1.	The following provisions of the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 provide that a person may object against the decisions specified in the right-hand column in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: ss 15C(7) and 42.
2.	The following Acts introduced, amended or repealed provisions specifying that a person may object against a decision in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 111 of 1992, 179 of 1999 and 15 of 2007.
3.	A person dissatisfied with any of the above decisions may object against them in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.  The Commissioner will then make an objection decision from which a person can apply for review to the Tribunal.
4.	An application for review of an objection decision must be lodged with the Tribunal within 60 days after the person making the application is served with notice of the decision: s 14ZZC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
5.	If the Commissioner fails to make a decision on a taxation objection within 60 days after being given a written notice requiring the making of the objection decision, the Commissioner is deemed to have made a decision under s 14ZY(1) to disallow the objection: s 14ZYA(3) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.]

Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993

Section 344(8) (78 of 1993) (54 of 1998)

Section 344(4)	The following decisions of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority that have been confirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	to make a declaration under s 18(6) or (7);
-	to make a declaration under s 18(7) subject to conditions under s 18(7A);
-	to revoke a declaration that a superannuation fund is not a public offer superannuation fund under s 18(7C);
-	to revoke a declaration under s 18(10);
-	to treat an application for an RSE licence as having been withdrawn under s 29CA(2);
-	to refuse an application for an RSE licence under s 29D(2);
-	to impose additional conditions on an RSE licence under s 29EA(1);
-	to treat an application for variation of an RSE licence so that it is an RSE licence of a different class as having been withdrawn under s 29FA(2);
-	to treat an application for variation or revocation of a condition imposed on an RSE licence as having been withdrawn under s 29FA(2);
-	to refuse to vary an RSE licence so that it is an RSE licence of a different class under s 29FC(1);
-	to refuse to vary or revoke any conditions imposed on an RSE licence under s 29FC(1);
-	to vary or revoke any conditions imposed on an RSE licence under s 29FD(1);
-	to cancel an RSE licence under s 29G(1);
-	to refuse an application for registration of a registrable superannuation entity under s 29M(2);
-	to cancel the registration of a registrable superannuation entity under s 29N(2);
-	to refuse to authorise an RSE licensee to offer a class of beneficial interest in a regulated superannuation fund as a MySuper product under s 29T(2);
-	to cancel an authority to offer a class of beneficial interest in a regulated superannuation fund as a MySuper product under s 29U(1);
-	to determine, vary or revoke a prudential standard referred to in s 34C(1)(e) or (f);
-	to refuse to grant an arrangement approval under s 92;
-	to revoke an arrangement approval under s 92;
-	to approve or not approve a higher percentage under ss 93A(2) or (3);
-	to specify conditions to which an approval is subject under s 93A(4);
-	to vary an approval under s 93A(5);
-	to refuse to approve a borrowing under s 95(2);
-	to refuse to waive a requirement under s 117(6);
-	to allow, or refuse to allow, a longer period under ss 123(2)(b) (ii) or 123(3)(c)(ii);
-	to give a written direction under s 131AA(1) to the trustee or trustees of a superannuation entity, that is not a self managed superannuation fund, to end the appointment of a person as the approved auditor or actuary of the entity, other than on the ground that an approved auditor is disqualified under s 131;
-	to refuse to authorise an RSE licensee to operate a regulated superannuation fund as an eligible rollover fund under s 242F(2);
-	to cancel an authority to operate a regulated superannuation fund as an eligible rollover fund under s 242J(1);
-	to refuse to give a notice under s 342(2) in relation to a fund;
-	to give a notice under s 342(6) in relation to a fund.
	
	The following decisions either of APRA, ASIC or the Commissioner of Taxation that have been confirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	to give or vary a direction under s 34P or 34Q;
-	to refuse to give approval under s 35A(2)(b);
-	to give an approval subject to conditions under s 35A(2A);
-	to give a notice under s 40;
-	to refuse to give a notice under s 40;
-	to allow, or refuse to allow, under s 42(1AA)(b) a longer period than 60 days from the date a superannuation fund came into existence to comply with ss 19(2) to 19(4);
-	to treat, or refuse to treat, under s 42(1AA)(c)(ii) a fund as if it had satisfied the Act and regulations where the trustee contravened the Act or regulations in relation to the entity in the pre-lodgment period;
-	to allow, or refuse to allow, under s 42(1AC)(b) a longer period than 28 days to rectify non-compliance with one or more of the requirements under ss 19(2) to 19(4) of the Act from the date of the notice from the Commissioner informing the trustee of the non-compliance;
-	to treat, or refuse to treat, under s 42(1AC)(d)(ii) a fund as if it had satisfied the Act and regulations where the trustee contravened the Act or regulations in relation to the entity in the rectification period;
-	to allow, or refuse to allow, s 50(1) of the Act to apply in relation to a superannuation fund under s 50(1)(c);
-	to refuse to give an approval under s 62(1)(b)(v);
-	to give a direction under s 63;
-	to refuse to revoke a direction under s 63;
-	to make a determination under s 70A(1);
-	to refuse to revoke a determination under s 70A(1);
-	to refuse to make a determination under s 71(1)(e);
-	to revoke a determination under s 71(1)(e);
-	to make a determination under s 71(4);
-	to refuse to revoke a determination under s 71(4);
-	to refuse an application to registration as an approved SMSF Auditor under s 128B;
-	to impose or vary conditions, or additional conditions, on a person’s registration as an approved SMSF auditor under s 128D(1)(a);
-	to refuse an application to vary or revoke conditions, or additional conditions, imposed on a person’s registration as an approved SMSF auditor under s 128D(1)(b);
-	to cancel a person’s registration as an approved SMSF auditor under s 128E(2);
-	to refuse an application to waive the payment of the whole or a part of a fee under s 128L(4);
-	to make a disqualification or suspension order under s 130F(2);
-	to refuse an application to revoke a disqualification or suspension order under s 130F(8);
-	to suspend or remove a trustee of a superannuation entity under s 133;
-	to give a written notice to a trustee directing the person to do, or not to do, one or more specified acts or things under s 141;
-	to make an exemption under s 328 that applies to a particular person or a particular group of individual trustees;
-	to make a declaration under s 332 that applies to a particular person or a particular group of individual trustees;
-	to vary or revoke an exemption or declaration under s 335 that applies to a particular person or a particular group of individual trustees;
-	to extend, or not to extend, a period within which a particular filled-up form is to be given to the authorised recipient under s 347A(9).
	
	The following decisions of the Commissioner of Taxation that have been confirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	to disqualify an individual under ss 126A(1), (2) or (3);
-	to refuse to revoke the disqualification of an individual under s 126A(5);
-	to refuse to allow a longer period than 14 days to make an application for waiver under s 126B(4);
-	to refuse to make a declaration waiving an applicant's status as a disqualified person under s 126D(3);
-	to refuse under s 126F(3) to waive, in whole or in part, the requirement to pay an amount under s 126F(2);
-	to make a disqualification order under s 131;
-	to refuse to revoke a disqualification order under s 131.	

[Notes:
1.	The list of ‘reviewable decisions’ that may be reconsidered under the Act is set out in s 10(1).  The following Acts introduced or have amended the list of reviewable decisions: 78 of 1993, 144 of 1995, 169 of 1995, 160 of 2001, 123 of 2001, 53 of 2004, 154 of 2007, 25 of 2008, 91 of 2012, 117 of 2012, 158 of 2012,162 of 2012 and 61 of 2013.
2.	If APRA, ASIC or the Commissioner of Taxation do not confirm, revoke or vary a decision before the end of the period of 60 days after the day on which they received the request to reconsider the decision, they are taken to have confirmed the decision at the end of that period: s 344(5).  A person has 28 days from the day on which the decision is taken to have been confirmed to lodge an application for review with the AAT: s 344(9). 
3.	The only persons taken to be affected by a reviewable decision (other than a reviewable decision covered by paras (dd), (de), (df), (dg), (dl), (dm), (dn), (q), (qa), (qb), (r), (ra), (rb), (s) or (t) of the definition of "reviewable decision" in s 10) are trustees of superannuation entities: s 344(12).
4.	If a person requests reconsideration of a reviewable decision under s 344(1), s 41 of the AAT Act applies as if the making of the request were the making of an application to the Tribunal for review of that decision: s 344(10).  A person may seek an order relating to the implementation of the reviewable decision under s 41 of the AAT Act.]

Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations 1994

Regulation 13.26 (SR 344 of 1996)

Regulations 13.25(3)	The following decisions of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority that have been confirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	to refuse under reg 1.05(2)(c) to approve a sum payable as benefit;
-	to refuse under reg 4.08A(2)(e) to approve an arrangement for management and control of a fund;
-	to refuse to suspend or vary an obligation of a trustee under reg 6.37(6);
-	to refuse to approve a proposed element of an actuarial basis for calculation of value A under reg 12.05(5) or (6);
-	to refuse to approve a proposed assumption or element of an actuarial basis for calculation of value B under reg 12.06(5);
-	to specify under reg 12.08 a day on or before which an application is to be made;
-	to refuse to approve an application to transfer a PJFC under reg 12.12(2) or 12.13(2);
-	to revoke under reg 12.14 an approval of an application to transfer a PJFC.
	
Regulations 13.25(3)	The following decisions of the Regulator that have been confirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	to refuse under reg 1.06(2)(c) to approve a sum payable as benefit;
-	to refuse to approve the use of a factor under reg 1.08(2);
-	to not determine the form of consent under reg 4.12(2)(b), 6.27B(b) or 7A.16(8)(b);
-	to refuse under reg 7A.03K(2)(b) or 7A.13(7)(b) to allow a longer period to pay a lump sum;
-	to refuse under reg 7A.12(4)(a)(ii) to allow a longer period for rolling over or transferring transferable benefits;
-	to refuse under reg 7A.16(3)(b) to allow a longer period to allocate, rollover or transfer non-member spouse entitlements;
-	to give a direction to a trustee to obtain a new or a replacement funding and solvency certificate under reg 9.09(1A);
-	to refuse under reg 9.24(2) to approve an actuary’s recommendation for an accumulation fund;
-	to refuse under reg 9.44(2) to approve an actuary’s recommendation for an accumulation fund;
-	to refuse to consent to an alteration of accrued benefits under reg 13.16(2)(a)(ii) or (d)(ii).	

[Notes:  
1.	The list of decisions under these regulations that are subject to reconsideration are set out in the definition of ‘reviewable decisions’ in reg 1.03(1).  The following regulations introduced or have amended this list: SR 344 of 1996; SR 117 of 1997; SR 83 of 1998 and SR 353 of 2001; SLI 343 of 2007 and SLI 71 of 2009.
2.	Regulations 13.25 and 13.26 refer to the Regulator which is defined in s 10(1) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 to mean either the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (“APRA”), the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (“ASIC”) or the Commissioner of Taxation.
3.	Regulation 13.25(4) provides that, if the Regulator does not confirm, vary or revoke a reviewable decision before the end of the period of 60 days after the day on which the Regulator received a request for reconsideration, the Regulator is taken to have confirmed the decision under reg 13.25(3) at the end of that period.]

Superannuation (Self Managed Superannuation Funds) Taxation Act 1987

Section 16(6) (97 of 1987) (61 of 1990) (55 of 1991) (208 of 1992) (7 of 1993) (84 of 1993) (54 of 1998) (121 of 1999)

Section 16(3)

	The following decision of the Commissioner of Taxation that has been confirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	not to remit, or to remit only part of, an amount of levy under s 15DF.	

[Notes:  
1.	The definition of ‘reviewable decision’ for the purposes of this Act is set out in s 3(1).
2.	Section 16(9) requires that any hearing take place in private.
3.	If a person requests reconsideration of a reviewable decision under s 16(1), s 41 of the AAT Act applies as if the making of the request were the making of an application to the Tribunal for review of that decision: s 16(8).  A person may seek an order relating to the implementation of the reviewable decision under s 41 of the AAT Act.]

Superannuation (Unclaimed Money and Lost Members) Act 1999 

Section 14ZZ of the Taxation Administration Act 1953

Section 14ZY(1) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953
	The following decisions of the Commissioner of Taxation that have been allowed, wholly or in part, or disallowed by the Commissioner under Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 
-	any decision made or notice given by the Commissioner in the administration of Division 2, 4 or 5 of Part 3A of the Superannuation (Unclaimed Money and Lost Members) Act 1999.	

[Notes:  
1.	Section 20P of the Superannuation (Unclaimed Money and Lost Members) Act 1999 provides that a person who is dissatisfied with a notice given, or a decision made, by the Commissioner in the administration of Division 2, 4 or 5 of Part 3A may object against the notice or decision in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.  The Commissioner will then make an objection decision from which a person can apply for review to the Tribunal.
2.	The note to section 20P gives the following examples of decisions made by the Commissioner in the administration of divisions 4 and 5 of Part 3A of this Act: 
(a)	decisions that the conditions exist for him or her to make a payment under section 20H, revoke (under section 20J) a notice given under section 20C or make a refund under section 20K; and
(b)	refusal of an application mentioned in section 20H; and
(c)	decisions about recovery under section 20L of an overpayment under section 20H.
3.	The following Acts introduced or have amended section 20P: 151 of 2008.
4.	An application for review of an objection decision must be lodged with the Tribunal within 60 days after the person making the application is served with notice of the decision: s 14ZZC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
5.	If the Commissioner fails to make a decision on a taxation objection within 60 days after being given a written notice requiring the making of the objection decision, the Commissioner is deemed to have made a decision under s 14ZY(1) to disallow the objection: s 14ZYA(3) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.]

Sydney Airport Curfew Act 1995

Section 12(7) (134 of 1995)

Section 12(4)	A decision of the Secretary of the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development to refuse to grant an approval for movements during curfew shoulder periods.	

Sydney Harbour Federation Trust Regulations 2001

Regulations 25(7), 37(6) (SR 296 of 2001)

Regulations 25(5), 25(6), 37(1)	The following decisions of the Sydney Harbour Federation Trust:  
-	to grant a licence or permit subject to conditions under reg 25(5);
-	to refuse to grant a licence or permit under reg 25(6);
-	to make an order under reg 37(1) to any person engaged in promoting, conducting or carrying out an activity on Trust land.	

T

Tax Agent Services Act 2009

Sections 70-10 (13 of 2009)

Sections 20-25, 20-30(3), 20-40, 20-50(1), 30-20, 30-25, 30-30, 40-5, 40-10, 40-15, 40-25, 60-125(4)

	The following decisions of the Tax Practitioners Board: 
-	to reject an application for registration (including renewal of registration) under s 20-25;
-	to specify a condition to which registration is subject under s 20-25;
-	to require professional indemnity insurance under s 20-30(3);
-	to refuse to vary a condition to which registration is subject under s 20-40;
-	not to determine a shorter period for making a renewal application under s 20-50(1);
-	to make an order or to specify a time period in respect of an order under s 30-20;
-	to suspend registration (including a decision as to the length of the suspension) under s 30-25;
-	to terminate registration under s 30-30, 40-5, 40-10 or 40-15;
-	to determine a period during which an application for registration may not be made under s 40-25;
-	to extend the period of time within which an investigation is to be completed under s 60-125(4).	

Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009

Regulation 6A (SLI 273 of 2010)(SLI 115 of 2014)

Regulations 4C, 4D, 4G, 5B, 5E, 5H, 5L

	The following decisions of the Tax Practitioners Board: 
-	not to recognise an organisation as a recognised BAS agent association under reg 4C or 4D; 
-	to terminate a recognised BAS agent association’s recognition under reg 4G; 
-	not to recognise an organisation as a recognised tax agent association under reg 5B; 
-	to terminate a recognised tax agent association’s recognition under reg 5E; 
-	not to recognise an organisation as a recognised tax (financial) adviser association under reg 5H; 
-	to terminate a recognised tax (financial) adviser association’s recognition under reg 5L. 	

[Notes:
1.	On 29 October 2010, the Tax Agent Services Amendment Regulations 2010 (No. 1) repealed and substituted the provisions of the Regulations dealing with the recognition of professional associations as recognised BAS agent associations or recognised tax agent associations.] 
2.	On 23 July 2014, the Tax Agent Services Amendment (Tax (Financial) Advisers) Regulation 2014(SLI 115 of 2014) amended the regulations to prescribe the registration requirements for financial planners registered as tax (financial) advisers.

Taxation Administration Act 1953

Decisions made under other enactments that are reviewable under Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953

This Act governs merits review of most decisions of the Commissioner of Taxation under Commonwealth taxation laws. The Acts and Regulations set out below provide that a person dissatisfied with particular decisions may object against those decisions in the manner set out in Pt IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.  An application may be made to the Tribunal under s 14ZZ of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 for review of a decision to allow, wholly or in part, or to disallow a taxation objection under s 14ZY(1).

-	A New Tax System (Australian Business Number) Act 1999
-	A New Tax System (Bonuses for Older Australians) Act 1999
-	A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999
-	A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Regulations 1999
-	A New Tax System (Wine Equalisation Tax) Act 1999
-	Customs (Prohibited Imports) Regulations 1956
-	Excise Act 1901
-	Excise Regulations 1925
-	Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986
-	Income Tax Assessment Act 1936
-	Income Tax Regulations 1936
-	Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
-	Income Tax (Transitional Provisions) Act 1997
-	Minerals Resource Rent Tax Act 2012
-	Petroleum Resource Rent Tax Assessment Act 1987
-	Product Grants and Benefits Administration Act 2000 
-	Superannuation Contributions Tax (Assessment and Collection) Act 1997
-	Superannuation Contributions Tax (Members of Constitutionally Protected Superannuation Funds) Assessment and Collection Act 1997
-	Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992
-	Superannuation (Unclaimed Money and Lost Members) Act 1999
-	Termination Payments Tax (Assessment and Collection) Act 1997
-	Trust Recoupment Tax Assessment Act 1985

Refer to entries for the above enactments for a list of the reviewable decisions.

Reviewable decisions made under this Act

Decisions under this Act that are subject to merits review are reviewed in one of two distinct ways.  In respect of some decisions, a person who is dissatisfied with the decision must object against that decision in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.  The Tribunal may only review a decision to allow, wholly or in part, or to disallow a taxation objection.  In respect of other decisions, an application for review may be lodged directly with the Tribunal.  The entries below reflect this distinction.

Decisions to which Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 applies
	
Section 14ZZ of the Taxation Administration Act 1953
	
Sections 14ZY(1)	The following decisions of the Commissioner of Taxation in relation to which an objection has been allowed, wholly or in part, or disallowed by the Commissioner under Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 	
	Reviewable decision	Section decision made under 	
	to retain a refund 	s 8AAZLGA(1)	
	not to grant an exemption from withholding obligations in relation to sections 12-315 and 12-317 of Sch 1	s 12-319(1) of Sch 1	
	not to give a certificate exempting an entity from notifying the Commissioner about a natural resource payment 	s 12-335(1) of Sch 1	
	to revoke or vary a certificate	s 12-335(3) of Sch 1	
	to refuse to determine that a large withholder is a medium withholder or a small withholder for a particular month or particular months	s 16-110(1) of Sch 1	
	to refuse to determine that a medium withholder is a small withholder for a particular month or particular months 	s 16-110(1) of Sch 1	
	to revoke a determination	s 16-110(1) of Sch 1	
	to vary a determination for a particular month or particular months	s 16-110(1) of Sch 1	
	to determine that a small withholder is a medium withholder or a large withholder for a particular month or particular months	s 16-115(1) of Sch 1	
	to determine that a medium withholder is a large withholder	s 16-115(1) of Sch 1	
	not to revoke a determination	s 16-115(1) of Sch 1	
	not to vary a determination for a particular month or particular months	s 16-115(1) of Sch 1	
	not to refund an amount	s 18-70 of Sch 1	
	not to refund an amount	s 18-80 of Sch 1	
	to reduce the amount of PAYG withholding non-compliance tax an individual must pay	s 18-130 of Sch 1	
	to give a notice	s 18-140 of Sch 1	
	to give a notice entitling an individual to a credit 	s 18-170 of Sch 1
or s 18-175 of Sch 1	
	to make or amend an excess non-concessional contributions determination 	s 97-25(1) or 97-25(3) of Sch 1 	
	to make an assessment of the net amount of GST for a tax period 	s 105-5(1)(a) of Sch 1	
	to make an assessment of the net fuel amount for a tax period or fuel tax return period	s 105-5(1)(b) of Sch 1	
	to make an assessment of the amount of GST, wine tax or luxury car tax payable on an importation of goods	s 105-5(2) of Sch 1	
	to amend an assessment; 	s 105-5 of Sch 1 and s 105-25 of Sch 1	
	not to refund an amount	s 105-65 of Sch 1	
	to amend  an assessment of an assessable amount	s 155-35 of Sch  1	
	to make an assessment of an outstanding tax-related liability in relation to an administered estate	s 260-140(4) of Sch 1	
	to determine the total amount of outstanding tax-related liabilities in relation to an unadministered estate	s 260-145(2)	
	not to remit under s 280-160 of Schedule 1 all or part of an amount of shortfall interest charge that a person is liable to pay on an additional amount of income tax if the amount of the charge that was not remitted is more than 20% of the additional amount of income tax; 	s 280-160 of Sch 1	
	to refuse to remit all or part of an administrative penalty imposed under Part 4-25 of Sch 1 or a penalty imposed on an entity by Subdivision 162D of the GST Act provided that the amount of penalty payable after the refusal is more than 2 penalty units; 	s 298-20(1) of Sch 1	
	to make an assessment of the amount of an administrative penalty under Division 284 of Sch 1; 	s 298-30(1) of Sch 1	
	to release or not release, in whole or in part, an individual from particular taxation liabilities on the grounds of serious hardship  or a trustee of the estate of a deceased individual from particular taxation liabilities on the grounds that the dependants of the deceased individual would suffer serious hardship	s 340-5 of Sch 1	
	to fail to make a private ruling after an applicant has given the Commissioner a written notice under s 359-50(1) of Sch 1 requiring him or her to make the ruling; 	s 359-35 of Sch 1	
	to make a private ruling unless there is an assessment for the income year or other accounting period to which the ruling relates or the ruling relates to withholding tax or mining withholding tax; 	s 359-35	
	to refuse to endorse a charity or other entity 	s 426-25 of Sch 1	
	to revoke an entity’s endorsement;	s 426-55 of Sch 1	
	to suspend a trustee of an ancillary fund	s 426-125(1) of Sch 1	
	to change the time the suspension of a trustee ends	s 426-125(4) of Sch 1	
	to remove a trustee of an ancillary fund.	s 426-125(6) of Sch 1	

[Notes
1.	The following provisions of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 provide that a person may object against the decisions specified in the right-hand column in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: ss 8AAZLGA(6), 18-190 of Schedule 1, 20-80 of Schedule 1, 105-40(1) of Schedule 1,  155-90 of Schedule 1; 260-140(5) of Schedule 1, 260-145(5) of Schedule 1, 280-170 of Schedule 1, 298-20(3) of Schedule 1, 298-30(2) of Schedule 1, 340-5(7) of Schedule 1, 359-50(3) of Schedule 1, 359-60 of Schedule 1, 426-35 of Schedule 1, 426-60 of Schedule 1 and 426-125(8) of Schedule 1.  
2.	The following Acts introduced, amended or repealed provisions specifying that a person may object against a decision in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953: 216 of 1991, 101 of 1992, 56 of 1999, 178 of 1999, 179 of 1999, 91 of 2000, 66 of 2003, 67 of 2003, 95 of 2004, 75 of 2005, 161 of 2005, 73 of 2006, 88 of 2009, 39 of 2012, 75 of 2012, 99 of 2012 and 21 of 2015. 
3.	An application for review of an objection decision must be lodged with the Tribunal within 60 days after the person making the application is served with notice of the decision: s 14ZZC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
4.	If the Commissioner fails to make a decision on a taxation objection within 60 days after being given a written notice requiring the making of the objection decision, the Commissioner is deemed to have made a decision under s 14ZY(1) to disallow the objection: s 14ZYA(3) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.  In relation to an objection under s 359-30(2) of Schedule 1 against the Commissioner’s failure to make a private ruling, if the Commissioner has not made an objection decision by the end of 60 days after the day on which the taxation objection was lodged or the day on which an extension of time to lodge the objection was granted, the Commissioner is deemed to have made a decision to disallow the objection: s 14ZYB(2) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
5.	For the purposes of s 298-20 of Schedule 1, the value of a penalty unit is specified in s 4AA of the Crimes Act 1914 and is currently $110.]

•	Decision in respect of which an application for review may be made directly to the Tribunal

Sections 14Y and 14ZX(4) (123 of 1984) (112 of 1986) (216 of 1991)

Sections 14T, 14U, 14ZX(1)
	The following decisions of the Commissioner of Taxation: 
-	to refuse to vary or revoke a departure prohibition order under s 14T;
-	to issue, or refuse to issue, a certificate authorizing the person to depart from Australia for a foreign country on or before the seventh day after a day specified in the certificate under s 14U;
-	to refuse under s 14ZX(1) to deal with an objection as if it had been lodged within the time limit.	

[Notes:
1.	An application for review of any of these decisions must be lodged with the Tribunal within 28 days after the decision is given to a person.]

Taxation Administration Regulations 1976

Regulation 33(4) (SR 73 of 2000)(repealed)

Regulation 33(1)	The following decision of the Commissioner of Taxation: 
-	to disapprove the authorisation of certain persons to sign certain documents under reg 33(1).	

[Notes:
-	Reg 33 was  repealed by SLI 39 of 2015 with effect from 1 July 2015.]

Telecommunications Act 1997

Section 562 (47 of 1997)

Section 559(1)
	The following decisions of the Australian Communications and Media Authority that have been affirmed or varied by the Authority on reconsideration: 
1.	to refuse to grant a carrier licence under s 56, 58 or 59 (other than a decision made in compliance with s 56A or 58A);
2.	to give, or vary, a direction or to refuse to revoke a direction under s 69;
3.	to cancel a carrier licence under s 72;
4.	to remit, or refuse to remit, part or all of a late payment penalty under s 73(6);
5.	to refuse to make a nominated carrier declaration under s 81;
6.	to revoke a nominated carrier declaration under s 83;
7.	to give, or vary, a direction or to refuse to revoke a direction in relation to the service provider rules under s 102;
8.	to refuse to register an industry code under s 117;
9.	to give, or vary, a direction or to refuse to revoke a direction to comply with a code under s 121;
10.	to refuse to make a declaration in relation to the pre-selection mechanism under s 352;
11.	to refuse to make a declaration in relation to calling line identification under s 356;
12.	to refuse to issue a connection permit under s 394;
13.	to make a declaration in relation to the duration of connection permits under s 397;
14.	to specify, impose, vary or revoke a condition of a connection permit under s 398(1)(c) or 398(3);
15.	to cancel a connection permit under s 402;
16.	to refuse to grant a cabling licence under s 427;
17.	to specify, impose, vary or revoke a condition of a cabling licence under s 432;
18.	to cancel a cabling licence under s 438;
19.	to remit, or refuse to remit, the whole or part of a late payment penalty under s 468(6);
20.	a decision in relation to the withdrawal of numbers under s 468(10);
21.	to cancel a facility installation permit under clause 34 of Schedule 3;
22.	to give, or vary, a direction or to refuse to revoke a direction to do or refrain from doing a thing in relation to the carrying out of an installation and/or the facility under clause 55 of Schedule 3;
23.	to refuse to grant, or grant subject to conditions, a protection zone installation permit under clause 56 of Schedule 3A;
24.	to refuse to extend the duration of a protection zone installation permit under clause 61 of Schedule 3A;
25.	to suspend or cancel a protection zone installation permit under clause 62 of Schedule 3A;
26.	to refuse to grant, or grant subject to conditions, a non-protection zone installation permit under clause 69 of Schedule 3A;
27.	to refuse to extend the duration of a non-protection zone installation permit under clause 76 of Schedule 3A;
28.	to suspend or cancel a non-protection zone installation permit under clause 77 of Schedule 3A.	

[Notes: 
1.	The list of decisions which may be reconsidered under the Act is set out in clause 1 of Schedule 4 to the Act.  The following Acts introduced or have amended the list of reviewable decisions: 52 of 1999, 140 of 2002, 35 of 2004, 104 of 2005, 155 of 2006, 44 of 2012 and 109 of 2014.
2.	Subitems 1(xa) and (xb) of Schedule 4 specify two decisions that may be made under clause 5 in Schedule 1 of the Act. Clause 5 of Schedule 1 was repealed on 24 September 2005.
3.	Clause 55 of Schedule 3 was repealed by the Omnibus Repeal Day (Autumn 2014) Act (109 of 2014) with effect from 16 October 2014.
4.	This Act also sets out the review mechanism for the following decisions:
-	a decision about the remission of the whole or part of an amount of late payment penalty under an instrument made pursuant to s 73(4) of the Act: subitem 1(d) of Schedule 4 to the Act;
-	a decision of an administrative character made under a service provider determination that has been made pursuant to s 99(1) of the Act: subitem 1(g) of Schedule 4 to the Act;
-	certain decisions under the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999: subitems 1(ja), (repealed by the Omnibus Repeal Day (Autumn 2014) Act (109 of 2014) with effect from 16 October 2014) (k), (l) and (m);
-	certain decisions made under the integrated public number database scheme made pursuant to s 295A of the Act: subitems 1(ma), (mb), (mc) and (md) of Schedule 4 to the Act;
-	a decision about the remission of the whole or part of an amount of late payment penalty under an instrument made pursuant to s 486(4) of the Act: subitem 1(w) of Schedule 4 to the Act.  
-	a decision about the remission of the whole or party of a late payment penalty under s 121(3) of the Telecommunications Universal Service Management Agency Act 2012: subitem 1(jb) of Schedule 4 of the Act.
See the separate entries for the Act and relevant instruments for further information. 
5.	If the ACMA fails to notify a person of its decision on a request for reconsideration within 90 days after receiving the application or the receipt of further information that it has requested, the ACMA is taken to have refused the application: s 560(1)]

Telecommunications (Annual Numbering Charge – Late Payment Penalty) Determination 2000

Section 562 of the Telecommunications Act 1997

Section 559(1) of the Telecommunications Act 1997
	The following decisions of the Australian Communications and Media Authority that have been affirmed or varied by the Authority on reconsideration: 
-	to refuse to remit all or part of an amount of late payment penalty under s 9(1).	

[Notes:
1.	Decisions about the remission of the whole or a part of an amount of late payment penalty made under a determination made by the ACMA under s 468(4) of the Telecommunications Act 1997 are subject to review in accordance with the review provisions of that Act: see subitem 1(w) of Schedule 4 to the Telecommunications Act 1997. A person affected by a decision listed above in the right-hand column may request that ACMA reconsider the decision.  
2.	If the ACMA fails to notify a person of its decision on a request for reconsideration within 90 days after receiving the application or the receipt of further information that it has requested, the ACMA is taken to have refused the application: s 556(3).
3.	This Determination repealed by the Telecommunications (Collection of Numbering Charges) Determination 2014, with effect from 1 April 2015: F2014L01783.]

Telecommunications (Collection of Numbering Charges) Determination 2014

Section 562 of the Telecommunications Act 1997

Section 559(1) of the Telecommunications Act 1997
	The following decisions of the Australian Communications and Media Authority that have been affirmed or varied by the Authority on reconsideration: 
-	to refuse to remit all or part of an amount of late payment penalty under s 9(1).	

[Notes:
-	Decisions about the remission of the whole or a part of an amount of late payment penalty made under a determination made by the ACMA under s 468(4) of the Telecommunications Act 1997 are subject to review in accordance with the review provisions of that Act: see subitem 1(w) of Schedule 4 to the Telecommunications Act 1997. A person affected by a decision listed above in the right-hand column may request that ACMA reconsider the decision.  
-	If the ACMA fails to notify a person of its decision on a request for reconsideration within 90 days after receiving the application or the receipt of further information that it has requested, the ACMA is taken to have refused the application: s 556(3).
-	This Determination replaced and continued the arrangements for the Telecommunications (Annual Numbering Charge – Late Payment Penalty) Determination 2000, with effect from 1 April 2015: F2014L01783.]

Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999

Section 562 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 (52 of 1999)(142 of 2000)(109 of 2014)(38 of 2015)

Section 559(1) of the Telecommunications Act 1997
	The following decisions of the Australian Communications and Media Authority that have been affirmed or varied by the Authority on reconsideration: 
-	to refuse to remit late payment penalty under s 23D(3);
-	to refuse to remit late payment penalty under s 70 (3);
-	to refuse to make a declaration exempting a specified carrier or eligible carriage service provider from entering into a Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman (TIO) scheme under s 129;
-	to give a direction to join a TIO scheme under s 130.	

[Notes: 
1.	The list of decisions under this Act which may be reconsidered is set out in subitems 1(ja), (k), (l) and (m) of Schedule 4 to the Telecommunications Act 1997.  The review provisions of the Telecommunications Act 1997 apply to the review of these decisions.  The following Acts introduced or have amended the list of reviewable decisions: 52 of 1999,142 of 2000, 109 of 2014 and 38 of 2015.
2.	If the ACMA fails to notify a person of its decision on a request for reconsideration within 90 days after receiving the application or the receipt of further information that it has requested, the ACMA is taken to have refused the application: s 556(3).
3.	Section 101A was repealed by the Omnibus Repeal Day (Autumn 2014) Act 2014 (109 of 2014), with effect from 16 October 2014).
4.	Section 23D was repealed and replaced by s 70 by the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Deregulation) Act 2015 commencing 1 July 2015: No 38 of 2015.]

Telecommunications (Eligible Revenue) Determination 2015

Section 39 (F2015L00842)

Sections 9(2), 10(3), 13(4), 15(5), 17(3), 20(1), 30(1), 32(1), 33, 36(3)	Any declaration made under this determination, which includes the following decisions of the Australian Communications and Media Authority to:
make a declaration under s 9(2);
-	declare that a specified amount is an inter-person input payment of a participating person, or declared related party or consolidated related party under s 10(3);
-	declare that a specified amount of revenue is bundled revenue under s 13(4);
-	make a declaration under s 15(5); 
-	make a declaration under s 17(3);
-	declare that a specified amount is part of a specified participating person’s gross telecommunications sales revenue for an eligible revenue period under s 20(1);
-	make a declaration under s 30(1);
-	 make a declaration under s 32(1);
-	declare that a specific amount of gross telecommunications sales revenue of one or more specified participating persons may be deducted under s 33;
-	to make a declaration under s 36(3). 	

[Notes:
-	This Determination commenced on 19 June 2015: F2015L00842.
-	This Determination will cease on 1 October 2025]. 

Telecommunications (Freephone and Local Rate Numbers) Allocation Determination 2007 (No.1)

Section 5.1 (F2007L01427)

Sections 2.3, 3.7, 3.8, 4.3	The following decisions of the Australian Communications and Media Authority: 
-	to cancel an allocation application under s 2.3(7);
-	to revoke or suspend a registered person’s registration or to exclude a bidder from participating in an auction under s 3.7;
-	to suspend or cancel an auction under s 3.8(1);
-	to specify a particular further period in which a successful bidder must pay the eligible amount or to treat a bidder as having ceased to be the successful bidder under s 4.3(1)(b)(i).	

[Notes
1.	This Determination has been revoked by the Telecommunications Numbering Plan (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Arrangements) Instrument 2015 (No. 1) with effect from 1 October 2015.  Transitional arrangements are provided for at item 6.]

Telecommunications Integrated Public Number Database Scheme 2007

Section 562 of the Telecommunications Act 1997

Section 559(1) of the Telecommunications Act 1997
	The following decisions of the Australian Communications and Media Authority that have been affirmed or varied by the Authority on reconsideration: 
1.	to refuse to grant under s 3.3(3)a provisional authorisation for a person to use and disclose customer data to publish and maintain a public number database;
2.	to specify under s 3.5(7) other conditions to which a provisional authorisation is subject;
3.	to refuse to grant under s 3.10(4) a final authorisation for a public number directory publisher to use and disclose customer data to publish and maintain a public number database;
4.	to specify under s 3.12(18) other conditions to which a final authorisation is subject;
5.	to refuse to grant under s 4.3(3) an authorisation for a person to use and disclose customer data for purposes connected with the conduct of research;
6.	to specify under s 4.6(18) other conditions to which a research authorisation is subject;
7.	to revoke under s 5.1(1) an authorisation granted to a public number directory publisher;
8.	to revoke under s 5.4(1) an authorisation granted to a researcher.	

[Notes:
1.	Decisions made under the integrated public number database scheme to refuse to grant a person an authorisation, to impose conditions on the grant of an authorisation, to vary or revoke an authorisation or that are specified in an instrument made under s 295Q are subject to review in accordance with the review provisions of that Act: see subitems 1(ma), (mb), (mc) and (md) of Schedule 4 to the Telecommunications Act 1997. A person affected by a decision listed above in the right-hand column may request that ACMA reconsider the decision.  
2.	If the ACMA fails to notify a person of its decision on a request for reconsideration within 90 days after receiving the application or the receipt of further information that it has requested, the ACMA is taken to have refused the application: s 556(3).]

Telecommunications Numbering Plan 1997

Section 12.9 

Section 12.6(1)
	The following decisions of the Australian Communications and Media Authority that have been affirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	to refuse under s 3.8C(2)(b)(ii) to allow a carriage service provider to make an objection after the end of the period mentioned in s 3.8C(2)(b)(i);
-	to refuse to create a standard zone unit under s 3.8D(1);
-	to refuse to approve a request to rezone numbers so that they are appropriate for use in a proposed standard zone unit under s 3.8G(1);
-	to refuse to approve an implementation operation plan submitted by a carriage service provider under s 3.12B(9);
-	to direct a carriage service provider under s 3.12C(1) to amend the provider’s approved implementation operation plan or to replace the provider’s approved implementation operation plan;
-	to decide under s 3.12C(8) that the ACMA is not satisfied that a carriage service provider has complied with a direction given under s 3.12C(1);
-	to refuse under s 3.12D(8) to approve an amendment of an implementation operation plan submitted by a carriage service provider or a replacement implementation operation plan submitted by a carriage service provider;
-	to withdraw a freephone number or a local rate number under s 3.93(3), 3.95(2) or 3.96(2);
-	to refuse to allocate an international signalling point code under s 5A.9(1);
-	to refuse to extend a period under s 5A.15(3);
-	to refuse permission to use an international signalling point code to perform a new function under s 5A.18(3)(b);
-	to withdraw an international signalling point code under s 5A.27(2)(a);
-	to allocate a number if there is more than 1 request for the number under s 6.22(4);
-	to allocate fewer numbers than the unit size under s 6.24(5);
-	to allocate a number with effect from, or until, a particular date under s 6.26(1);
-	to extend, or make permanent, an allocation of a number under s 6.26(3);
-	to allocate a number subject to conditions (general) under s 6.27(1);
-	to allocate a number subject to a condition about an information program under s 6.28(2);
-	to approve or refuse a routine application for allocation of a number under s 6.29(1);
-	to approve or refuse a complex application for allocation of a number under s 6.30(1);
-	to refuse an application to vary an allocation of numbers under s 6.33;
-	to approve a transfer of a number under s 7.11(6);
-	to refuse an application for approval to surrender numbers under s 7.17(4) or (6);
-	to withdraw numbers under s 7.20(1), 7.21(1), 7.23(4) or 7.24(1);
-	to allow a carriage service provider to recover and replace a number under s 10.5(2);
-	to grant an exemption from an obligation in Chapter 10 under s 10.18(2);
-	to grant an exemption for a carriage service provider or class of carriage service providers under s 11.19(1).	

[Notes:  
1.	This Plan has been made pursuant to s 455(1) of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
2.	The list of decisions in relation to which a request for reconsideration may be made are set out in Schedule 11 to the Plan.  The following instruments introduced or have amended the list of decision subject to reconsideration: 1 of 1998, 2 of 1999, 1 of 2000, 6 of 2000, 1 of 2003, 4 of 2003, 5 of 2003, 1 of 2004, 3 of 2004, 5 of 2004, 8 of 2004, 9 of 2004, 1 of 2007 and 2 of 2011.
3.	If a person applies for reconsideration of a decision under s 12.5(1) and the ACMA has not notified the person of its decision on reconsideration within 65 working days after receiving the application for reconsideration, the ACMA is taken to have made a decision affirming the original decision: s 12.7.
4.	This Plan is repealed by the Telecommunications Numbering Plan 2015 on a single day to be fixed by the ACMA by legislative instrument or otherwise by 1 October 2015.]

Telecommunications Numbering Plan 2015

Section 131 (F2015L00319)

Sections 34(4), 35(3), 36(1), 36(4), 48(7), 51(7), 53(1), 60, 61(3), 61(4), 64(1), 68(2), 68(4), 85(1), 89(1), 91(1), 92(1), 93(1), 94(1), 98(3), 104(4), 118(1) 
	The following decisions of the Australian Communications and Media Authority that have been affirmed, varied or revoked on internal review: 
-	not to approve an operation plan under s 34(4);
-	not to approve an amendment of an operation plan or a replacement operation plan  under s 35(3);
-	to direct a carriage service provider to amend or replace an approved operation plan under s 36(1);
-	a decision under s 36(4) that a carriage service provider has not complied with a direction;
-	not to approve an application for allocation of an international signalling point code under s 48(7);
-	not to approve an application for allocation of a mobile network code under s 51(7);
-	to withdraw an international signalling point code or a mobile network code under s 53(1);
-	a decision under s 60 not to approve an application for allocation of a carriage service provider identification code because of the ground in s 60(3);
-	to allocate under s 61(3) a number subject to a condition;
-	to allocate under s 61(4) a number with effect from, or until, a particular date;
-	not to approve an application for allocation of a number under s 64(1);
-	to allocate under s 68(2) a number subject to a condition;
-	to allocate under s 68(4) a number with effect from, or until, a particular date;
-	to cancel the enhanced rights of use for a smartnumber under s 85(1);
-	not to approve an application to surrender a number under s 89(1);
-	to withdraw a number under s 91(1);
-	to withdraw a number under s 92(1);
-	to withdraw a number under s 93(1);
-	to withdraw a number under s 94(1);
-	not to approve recall and replacement of a number under s 98(3);
-	not to grant an exemption under s 104(4);
-	not to grant an exemption under s 118(1). 	

[Notes:
1.	This Plan was registered on 19 March 2015 and will commence on a date to be fixed by the ACMA by legislative instrument, or by 1 October 2015.
2.	Section 127 lists the reviewable decisions].

Telecommunications (Service Provider – Identity Checks for Prepaid Mobile Carriage Services) Determination 2013

Section 562 of the Telecommunications Act 1997

Section 559(1) of the Telecommunications Act 1997	The following decisions of the Australian Communications and Media Authority that have been affirmed or varied by the authority on reconsideration: 
-	to approve or refuse to approve a compliance plan under s 6.4;
-	to approve, or not approve a proposed amendment to a compliance plan under s 6.5;
-	to revoke an approved compliance plan under s 6.8.	

Telecommunications Service Provider (Mobile Premium Services) Determination 2010 (No.1)

Section 562 of the Telecommunications Act 1997

Section 559(1) of the Telecommunications Act 1997	The following decisions of the Australian Communications and Media Authority that have been affirmed or varied upon reconsideration: 
-	to give a notice about non-compliance with the Determination and steps to be taken by the mobile carriage service provider under cl 13(2).	

[Notes
1.	Decisions of an administrative character made under a service provider determination made by the ACMA under s 99(1) of the Telecommunications Act 1997 are subject to review in accordance with the review provisions of that Act: see subitem 1(g) of Schedule 4 to the Telecommunications Act 1997. A person affected by a decision listed above in the right-hand column may request that ACMA reconsider the decision.  
2.	If the ACMA fails to notify a person of its decision on a request for reconsideration within 90 days after receiving the application or the receipt of further information that it has requested, the ACMA is taken to have refused the application: s 556(3).]

Telecommunications Service Provider (Mobile Premium Services) Determination 2010 (No. 2)

Section 562 of the Telecommunications Act 1997

Section 559(1) of the Telecommunications Act 1997	The following decisions of the Australian Communications and Media Authority that have been affirmed or varied upon reconsideration: 
-	to make, suspend, vary or revoke a do not bill order under cl 3.4;
-	to make, vary or give an interim do not bill order under cl 3.9. 	

[Notes
1.	Decisions of an administrative character made under a service provider determination made by the ACMA under s 99(1) of the Telecommunications Act 1997 are subject to review in accordance with the review provisions of that Act: see subitem 1(g) of Schedule 4 to the Telecommunications Act 1997. A person affected by a decision listed above in the right-hand column may request that ACMA reconsider the decision.  
2.	If the ACMA fails to notify a person of its decision on a request for reconsideration within 90 days after receiving the application or the receipt of further information that it has requested, the ACMA is taken to have refused the application: s 556(3).]

Telecommunications Universal Service Management Agency Act 2012 (repealed)

Section 562 of the Telecommunications Act 1997

Section 559(1) of the Telecommunications Act 1997	The following decision of the Australian Communications and Media Authority that have been affirmed or varied by the Authority on reconsideration: to remit the whole or party of a late payment penalty under s 121(3).	

[Notes: 
1.	The list of decisions under this Act which may be reconsidered is set out in subitems 1(jb) of Schedule 4 to the Telecommunications Act 1997.  The review provisions of the Telecommunications Act 1997 apply to the review of this decision.  
2.	If the ACMA fails to notify a person of its decision on a request for reconsideration within 90 days after receiving the application or the receipt of further information that it has requested, the ACMA is taken to have refused the application: s 556(3).
3.	This Act was repealed by 38 of 2015 with effect from 1 July 2015].

Telecommunications Universal Service Management Agency (Eligible Revenue) Determination 2013

Section 39 

Sections 9(2), 10(3), 13(4), 15(5), 17(3), 20(1), 20(2), 30(1), 32(1), 33, 36(3) of the Determination	The following decisions of the Australian Communications and Media Authority: 
-	to declare a specified amount or value of a benefit or service as non-telecommunications sales revenue under s 9(2); 
-	to declare that a specified amount is an inter-person input payment  under s 10(3); 
-	to declare that a specified amount of revenue is bundled revenue under s 13(4); 
-	to declare that the whole, a specified proportion, or a proportion worked out in a specified way of a declared party’s sales revenue is not part of the participating person’s initial sales revenue under s 15(5); 
-	to declare that the value of a benefit or service, the specified proportion of the value of a benefit or service, or the proportion of the value of a benefit or service that is worked out in a specified way is telecommunications sales revenue under s 17(3); 
-	to declare that a specified amount is part of a specified participating person’s gross telecommunications sales revenue for an eligible revenue period under s 20(1); 
-	to declare that the value of a specified benefit or service is part of a specified participating person’s gross telecommunications sales revenue for an eligible revenue period under s 20(2); 
-	to declare that a specified amount paid or payable is an input amount under s 30(1); 
-	to declare that one or more specified participating persons are not entitled to deduct a specified amount or payment (under Part 4) under s 32(1); 
-	to declare that a specified amount of gross communications sales revenue of one or more specified participating persons may be deducted under s 33; 
-	to declare that the eligible revenue of a specified participating person is to be attributed in a specific way when the revenue is being worked out by the person as a member of a group under s 36(3).	

Television Licence Fees Regulations 1990

Regulation 19(5) (SR 448 of 1992) (SR 277 of 2000) (SR 336 of 2002)

Regulation 19(2)	The following decision of the Australian Communications and Media Authority: 
•	to suspend the entitlement of a regional licensee or remote licensee to a digital conversion rebate for the financial year under reg 19(2).	

Telstra Corporation Act 1991

Section 8CA (81 of 1996)

Section 8BM and cl. 9(2), 9(3) of the Schedule	The following decisions of the Minister for Communications and the Arts: 
•	to issue a direction under s 8BM that a person cease holding a particular ownership stake in Telstra shares that has been acquired through an anti-avoidance scheme; 
•	to allow, or refuse to allow, under cl. 9(2) or 9(3) of the Schedule a longer period during which a person’s interest in a share in Telstra must be disregarded.	

Temperate East Commonwealth Marine Reserves Network Management Plan 2014-24

Regulation 14.16(8) of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2000

Part 4, Strategy 2, A7 and A8	The following decisions of the Director of National Parks that have been reconsidered by the Director: any decision about a permit or class approval made under Part 5.2	

[Notes:
•	This Plan commenced 1 July 2014.
•	This Plan was made under s 370 of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.
•	This Plan will cease to have effect on 30 June 2024.
•	This Plan ceased to have any legal effect on 14 December 2013 when the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (Commonwealth Marine Reserves) Proclamation 2013 took effect and revoked the reserves this plan related to and declared new reserves for these areas.  Do not delete from list: see note in F2013L00421.]

Termination Payments Tax (Assessment and Collection) Act 1997

Section 15 and Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (73 of 1997) (11 of 1999)

Section 14ZY of the Tax Administration Act 1953	The following decision of the Commissioner of Taxation: 
-	to make an assessment of a person’s liability to pay termination payment surcharge.	

[Notes:  
1.	Section 15 provides that, if a taxpayer is dissatisfied with the Commissioner’s assessment, the taxpayer may object against it in respect of that calculation in the way set out in Pt IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
2.	A person who is dissatisfied with a decision under s 15 must object against that decision in the manner set out in Pt IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.  The Tribunal may only review a decision to allow, wholly or in part, or to disallow a taxation objection. 
3.	An application for review of an objection decision must be lodged with the Tribunal within 60 days after the person making the application is served with notice of the decision: s 14ZZC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
4.	If the Commissioner fails to make a decision on a taxation objection within 60 days after being given a written notice requiring the making of the objection decision, the Commissioner is deemed to have made a decision under s 14ZY(1) to disallow the objection: s 14ZYA(3) of the  Taxation Administration Act 1953.]

Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011

Section 187(73 of 2011)

Sections  19(1)(a),
21, 21(3), 32(1), 32(2), 36, 38, 41, 43, 49(3), 53(1), 53(2), 56,  99, 100, 101, 185(2), 198(4)	Any of the decisions set out below that has been:

-	made by a person other than a delegate of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency; or
-	affirmed, varied or  revoked on reconsideration by the Agency under s 185(2):

-	to determine that an application for registration in a particular provider category is inappropriate under s 19(1)(a);
-	to determine that it would be appropriate for an application for registration to be in a particular provider category when that provider category differs from that sought by the applicant under s 19(1)(a);
-	to extend the time within which the Agency may decide an application for registration under s 21(3);
-	to register, or not register an applicant for registration in a particular provider category under s 21;
-	to impose a condition on a registration under s 32(1);
-	to vary a condition imposed on a registration under s 32(2);
-	to refuse to renew a registration under s 36;
-	to change the category in which a registered higher education provider is registered under s 38;
-	to refuse to authorise a registered higher education provider to self-accredit one or more courses of study under s 41;
-	to reject an application to withdraw a registration under s 43;
-	to extend the time within which the Agency may decide an application for accreditation under s 49(3);
-	to reject an application  for accreditation under s 49;
-	to impose a condition on an accreditation under s 53(1);
-	to vary a condition imposed on an accreditation under s 53(2);
-	to refuse to renew an accreditation under s 56;
-	to shorten the period of an accreditation under s 99;
-	to cancel an accreditation under s 99;
-	to shorten the period of a registration under s 100;
-	to cancel a registration under s 101;
-	to enter details on the Register under s 198(4).	

[Notes:
1. A list of reviewable decisions is set out in s 183 of this Act.
2. If a person applies to the Agency for reconsideration of a decision and the Agency does not notify the person of his or her decision within 90 after receiving the application, the Agency is taken to have affirmed the original decision: s 186(2).
3. The Tribunal’s jurisdiction to review reconsideration decisions under s 187(b) includes any decision made by the Agency in substitution of one it has revoked: s 185(2)(b).]

Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Act 2011

Section 187 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011

Items 3(3), 5(1), 10(3), 16(3), 17, 27, 22(1) of Schedule 3	The following decisions of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency: 
-	a determination about the provider category in which a higher education provider will be registered under items 3(3), 5(1), 10(3) and 16(3) of Schedule 3;
-	to not lift a suspension of a higher education provider’s registration under item 8(1) of Schedule 3;
-	to determine that a higher education provider cannot self-accredit one or more courses of study under items 10(3) and 16(3) of Schedule 3;
-	to refuse to waive all or part of a fee under  items 17 or 27 of Schedule 3;
-	to not lift a suspension of the accreditation of a course of study under item 22(1) of  Schedule 3.	
 
[Notes:
•	The note to item 31 of Schedule 3 states that Part 10 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act allows review of TESQA’s decisions under that Act that relate to this Schedule. For example, internal and Tribunal review could be sought of a decision under s 32 of that Act to impose a condition on an automatic registration arising under Part 2 of Schedule 3.]

Textile, Clothing and Footwear Post-2005 Strategic Investment Program Scheme 2005

Section 7.2(6)

Section 7.2(2)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science that has been confirmed or varied on reconsideration: any decision under the Scheme that affects an entity other than:
-	a decision arising from the application of s 6.13, 6.14, 6.20, 6.23 or 6.24 in relation to the entitlement to be paid a grant, or to the amount of a grant;
-	a decision arising from the application of s 5.8, 5.15 or 5.16 in relation to the eligibility for a regular advance of a grant, or to the amount of a regular advance.	

[Notes:  
1.	This Scheme is made under the Textile, Clothing and Footwear Strategic Investment Program Act 1999.
2.	If the Secretary does not confirm, revoke or vary the decision before the end of the period of 30 days after the day on which the Secretary receives the request, the Secretary is taken, at the end of that period, to have confirmed the decision: s 7.2(3).
3.	If a person requests reconsideration of a reviewable decision under s 7.1(1), s 41 of the AAT Act applies as if the making of the request were the making of an application to the Tribunal for review of that decision: see s 22(4) of the Textile, Clothing and Footwear Strategic Investment Program Act 1999.  A person may seek an order relating to the implementation of the reviewable decision under s 41 of the AAT Act.
4.	This Scheme ceases on 1 October 2015.]

Textile, Clothing and Footwear Strategic Investment Program Scheme 1999

Section 88(6) 

Section 88(2)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science that have been confirmed or varied on reconsideration: 
-	any decision under the Scheme that affects an entity other than:
-	a decision arising from the application of s 64, 65, 66, 72, 78, 79, 80, 85A or 85B in relation to the entitlement to be paid a grant, or to the amount of a grant;
-	a decision arising from the application of s 51M, 51N, 51O, 51R, 51S, 51T or 51ZD in relation to the eligibility for a regular advance of a grant, or to the amount of a regular advance.	

[Notes:  
1.	This Scheme was made under the Textile, Clothing and Footwear Strategic Investment Program Act 1999.  
2.	The definition of the decisions in relation to which a request for reconsideration may be made is set out in s 87.
3.	If the Secretary does not confirm, revoke or vary a decision before the end of the period of 30 days after the day on which the Secretary receives a request for reconsideration, the Secretary is taken, at the end of that period, to have confirmed the decision: s 88(3).
4.	On 14 April 2010, the Textile, Clothing and Footwear Strategic Investment Program Amendment (Building Innovative Capability) Act 2010 (43 of 2010) renamed the principal Act the Textile, Clothing and Footwear Investment and Innovation Programs Act 1999.   At the same time, the provisions in the Act relating to this Scheme (Part 2 of the Act) were repealed.  Item 47 of Schedule 1 to the amending Act provides that the repeal does not affect the operation of Parts 5 and 6 of that Act in respect of the Scheme.  Parts 5 and 6 of the Act relate to the recovery of scheme debts and offences under the Act.]

Therapeutic Goods Act 1989

Sections 60(8) (21 of 1990) (76 of 1993)

Section 60(3)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Health or a delegate of the Secretary that have been confirmed or revoked by the Minister for Health on reconsideration: 
-	to declare that therapeutic goods are not therapeutic devices under s 3(1);
-	to declare that particular goods or classes of goods are, or are not, therapeutic goods or when used, advertised or presented for supply in a particular way are, or are not, therapeutic goods under s 7(1);
-	to substitute a decision for a decision made by the operation of a computer program under s 7C(3);
-	to refuse to send to a person a copy of the entry in the Register for particular therapeutic goods under s 9C;
-	to vary an entry or other information in the Register under s 9D;
-	 to remove entries from the Register under s9F;
-	to refuse to grant a consent to import therapeutic goods into Australia, to supply therapeutic goods for use in Australia or to export therapeutic goods from Australia under s 14 or 14A;
-	any decision under Part 3-2 relating to the registration and listing of therapeutic goods;
-	any decision under Part 3-2A relating to the regulation of biologicals;
-	any decision under Part 3-3 relating to the manufacture of therapeutic goods;
-	to declare under s 41BD(3) that a particular instrument, apparatus, appliance, material or other article, or that a particular class of instruments, apparatus, appliances, materials or other articles, are not, for the purposes of this Act, medical devices;
-	any decision under Part 4-4 relating to conformity assessment certificates;
-	any decision under Part 4-5 relating to including medical devices on the Register other than a decision under s 41FH relating to selecting applications for auditing or a decision about which aspects of the matters referred to in s 41FI(a) and (b) to consider in auditing an application under Subdiv C of Div 1 of Part 4-5;
-	any decision under Part 4-6 relating to suspension and cancellation from the Register;
-	any decision under Part 4-7 relating to exempting medical devices from inclusion in the Register;
-	any decision under Part 4-8 relating to obtaining information;
-	any decision under Part 4-9 relating to public notification and recovery of medical devices;
-	to refuse to grant a consent to import medical devices into Australia, to supply medical devices for use in Australia or to export medical devices from Australia under s 41MA or 41MAA;
-	any decision relating to the approval, or withdrawal of approval, for the use of a restricted representation under s 42DF or 42DI;
-	any decision relating to the variation of conditions of a restricted representation under 42DH.	

[Notes:  
-	The list of “initial decisions” that may be reconsidered under the Act is set out in s 60(1).  The following Acts introduced or have amended the list of reviewable decisions: 21 of 1990, 24 of 2002, 39 of 2003, 39 of 2006, 76 of 2009, 54 of 2010, and 4 of 2014.
-	Subsection 60(2) provides that, for the avoidance of doubt, the following decisions are not initial decisions for the purposes of the Act: a proposal to suspend a conformity assessment certificate under s 41EM; a proposal to revoke a conformity assessment certificate under s 41ET; a proposal to suspend a kind of medical device from the Register under s 41GA; or a proposal to cancel the entry of a kind of medical device on the Register under s 41GN.
-	Section 6B of the Act provides that application may be made to the Tribunal for review of a decision made by the Secretary in the performance of a function, or the exercise of a power, conferred by a “corresponding State law” if the law under which the decision is made provides for review by the AAT and the decision is declared by the regulations to be a reviewable decision for the purposes of this section.  Corresponding State law is defined in s 3(1) of the Act to be a law of a state or territory declared by the regulations to correspond to this Act.  While a number of NSW, Tasmanian and Victorian Acts and Regulations have been declared to be corresponding State laws under reg 3 of the Therapeutic Goods Regulations 1990, no decisions have been declared under the regulations to be reviewable decisions for the purposes of s 6B of the Act.]

Therapeutic Goods (Medical Devices) Regulations 2002

Regulation 10.7(9) (SR 236 of 2002)

Regulation 10.7(4)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Health, that have been reconsidered by the Minister for Health: 
-	to suspend or revoke a conformity assessment certificate under reg. 4.10(2);
-	to conduct an abridged assessment of a device under reg. 9.4(2)(a);
-	to approve, in relation to a kind of medical device, the payment of an assessment fee by instalments under reg. 9.5(1).	

[Notes:
1.	The list of decisions that are subject to reconsideration under these Regulations is set out in reg 10.7(1).  The following Regulations introduced or have amended the list of decisions subject to reconsideration: SR 236 of 2002.
2.	If a person requests reconsideration and does not receive notice of the Minister’s decision within 60 days after making the request, the Minister is taken to have confirmed the initial decision: reg 10.7(6).]

Therapeutic Goods Regulations 1990

Regulations 5P, 43AAI, 48(8) (SR 394 of 1990) (SR 400 of 1997) (SR 48 of 2000) (SLI 301 of 2003) (SLI 141 of 2009)

Regulations 5M(4), 48(3)

	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Health that have been confirmed or revoked by the Minister on reconsideration: 
1.	to approve or refuse to approve an advertisement under reg 5G(1);
2.	to approve an advertisement subject to conditions under reg 5G(4);
3.	to vary a condition of approval of an approved advertisement under reg 5K(1);
4.	to withdraw approval of an approved advertisement under reg 5L(1) or (2);
5.	to order a person under reg 9(1) to withdraw an advertisement or generic information, publish a retraction, publish a correction, recover any advertisement or generic information that is still in circulation, destroy the advertisement or generic information or withdraw a particular claim or representation made by the advertisement or generic information and not use that claim or representation in any other advertisement or generic information;
6.	to cancel the registration or listing of therapeutic goods under reg 10A(7);
7.	to assign, or refuse to assign, to therapeutic goods or grouped therapeutic goods a registration or listing number that is not assigned to other therapeutic goods or grouped therapeutic goods under reg 10C(3), (4), (5) or (6);
8.	to cancel the entry in the Register in relation to a kind of device under reg 10F(7) as a result of becoming aware that he or she has not been informed of a change in the name of a person in relation to whom the kind of device is included in the Register under Chapter 4 of the Act;
9.	to cancel the entry in the Register in relation to a biological under reg 10H(9);
10.	to refuse to designate a drug as an orphan drug under reg 16J(3);
11.	to cancel under reg 22(8) a licence to manufacture or produce therapeutic goods;
12.	to refuse to waive the charge for the financial year under 43AAH(4)(b);
13.	to waive or reduce, or refuse to waive or reduce, a fee under reg 45;
14.	to allow, or refuse to allow, a fee payable under item 6 or 7 in Schedule 9 to be paid in instalments under reg 45AA.
	
Regulations 43AAD(1)(a), 43AAF(1)(a), 43AAH(1)(a)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Health: 
1.	to grant, or refuse to grant, under reg 43AAD(1)(a) an exemption from liability to pay an annual registration charge, the annual listing charge or the annual charge for inclusion of a therapeutic good in the Register on the ground that the turnover of that good for the applicable financial year is a low value turnover;
2.	to decide under reg 43AAF(1)(a) whether the actual turnover of a therapeutic good was a low turnover;
3.	to decide under reg 43AAH(1)(a) whether the turnover of a therapeutic good for the applicable financial year was a low value turnover.	

[Notes:
1.	The list of decisions that are subject to reconsideration under these regulations are set out in regs 5M(1) and 48(1).  The following regulations introduced or have amended this list: SR 394 of 1990; SR 332 of 1992; SR 430 of 1992; SR 192 of 1995; SR 399 of 1997; SR 400 of 1997; SR 48 of 2000; SR 234 of 2002; SLI 301 of 2003, SLI 141 of 2009 and SLI 30 of 2011.
2.	If a person requests reconsideration of a decision under reg 9(1), 10A(7), 10C(3), (4), (5) or (6), 10F(7), 16J(3), 22(8), 45 or 45AA and does not receive notice of the Minister’s decision within 60 days after making the request, the Minister is taken to have confirmed the original decision: reg 48(4).
3.	Regulation 43AAI was repealed by the Therapeutic Goods Legislation Amendment (Annual Charges Exemption) Rregulation 2015 (SLI 75 of 2015), which repealed the right to appeal decisions made under regulations 43AAD(1)(a), 43AAF(1)(a), 43AAH(1)(a), taking effect from 1 July 2015.]

Tobacco Advertising Prohibition Act 1992

Section 30 (218 of 1992)

Sections 9(5), 17(2), 18(2), 18(3)	The following decisions of the Minister for Health: 
-	to give a notice under s 9(5) excluding an advertisement from the definition of tobacco advertisement;
-	to specify under s 17(2) that tobacco advertising would not be permitted in the periodical even if it is imported and not principally intended for the Australian market;
-	to permit the publication of tobacco advertisements in association with specified sporting or cultural events of international significance under s 18(2);
-	to impose conditions on the publication of tobacco advertisements in association with specified sporting or cultural events of international significance under s 18(3).	

Trade Marks Act 1995

Sections 99A(2), 136B(3), 175(5), 178(5), 180(4), 180A(4), 224(7), 228A(7) (119 of 1995) (100 of 1998) (99 of 2001) (35 of 2012)

Sections 175(2), 178(2), 180(1), 180A	The following decisions of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission: 
-	to refuse to issue a certificate under s 175(2);
-	to approve, or not to approve, a variation of the rules under s 178(2);
-	to refuse to give consent for the assignment of a registered certification trade mark under s 180(1);
-	to refuse to give consent for the assignment of an unregistered certification trade make under s 180A.
	
Sections 99A (1), 224(1), 224(2), 224(3)	The following decisions of the Registrar: 
-	to dismiss an opposition under s 99A(1);
-	not to extend time for the doing of a relevant act under s 224(1), 224(2) or 224(3).
	
Section 228A(4)	The following decision of the Designated Manager: 
1.	to refuse to register an individual as a trade marks attorney under s 228A(4).	
Section 136B(1)	The following decision of the Customs CEO: 
2.	to refuse to allow a late claim for the release of seized goods under s 136B(1).	

[Notes:
1.	The Tribunal’s jurisdiction under this Act was amended by the Intellectual Property Laws Amendment (Raising the Bar) Act 2012. These amendments commenced on 15 April 2013.
2.	In relation to section 224, a “relevant act” is defined in s 224(8) to mean any act (other than a prescribed act) done in relation to a trade mark, the filing of any document (other than a prescribed document) or any proceedings (other than court proceedings).]

Trade Marks Regulations 1995

Regulation 21.35, 5.8(6), 17A.34B(6) (SR 346 of 1998) (SLI 122 of 2008)(SLI 31 of 2013)

Regulations 20.5, 20.7
	The following decision of the Professional Standards Board for Patent and Trade Marks Attorneys: 
-	to decide under reg 20.5 that it is not satisfied that a person has a qualification mentioned in reg 20.6; 
-	to decide under reg 20.7 that it is not satisfied that a person has a knowledge requirement mentioned in reg 20.8.
	
Regulations 20.28(1), 20.28(2), 20.29(3), 20.31 of the Patents Regulations 1991	The following decisions of the Designated Manager: 
-	to remove a patent attorney’s name from the Register of Patent Attorneys under reg 20.28(1) or (2);
-	to impose a condition on registration under reg 20.29(3) to refuse to restore a patent attorney’s name to the Register under reg 20.31.
	
Regulations 20.14B, 20A.8	The following decisions of the Designated Manager: 
-	to suspend, or end the suspension of a registered trademarks attorney under reg 20.14B;  
-	to remove the name of a incorporated trade marks attorney from the Register under reg 20A.8.	
Regulations 20.43, 20.44(1), 20.44(2), 20.44(4), 20.45(1), 20.45(2), 20.46, 20.47 of the Patents Regulations 1991	The following decisions of the Patent and Trade Marks Attorneys Disciplinary Tribunal: 
-	to find a registered patent attorney guilty under reg 20.43 of professional misconduct, of unsatisfactory professional conduct, of being unqualified at the time of registration or of obtaining his or her registration by fraud;
-	to cancel or suspend a registered patent attorney’s registration as a patent attorney under reg 20.44(1);
-	to impose under reg 20.44(2) conditions on a patent attorney’s return to the Register after a cancellation has been lifted or a period of suspension has elapsed;
-	to cancel or suspend a patent attorney’s registration as a trade marks attorney under reg 20.44(4);
-	to suspend a registered patent attorney’s registration as a patent attorney or administer a public reprimand to the attorney under reg 20.45(1);
-	to impose under reg 20.45(2) conditions on a patent attorney’s return to the Register after a period of suspension has elapsed;
-	to reprimand a registered patent attorney or cancel his or her registration under reg 20.46;
-	to cancel the registration of a registered patent attorney under reg 20.47.	
Regulation 20A.18(1), 20A.18(2)	The following decision of the Patent and Trade Marks Attorneys Disciplinary Tribunal: 
-	to cancel or suspend an attorney’s registration as an incorporated trade marks attorney under reg 20A.18;
-	to impose conditions on an attorney’s return to the Register under reg 20A.18(2)	
Regulations 5.8(4), 17A.34B(4)	The following decisions of the Registrar: 
-	to dismiss the opposition  or delete material from the statement of grounds and particulars under reg 5.8(4) or 17A.34B(4)	

[Notes:  
1.	The Tribunal’s jurisdiction under these regulations was amended by the Intellectual Property Legislation Amendment (Raising the Bar) Regulation 2013 (No.1). These amendments commenced on 15 April 2013.
2.	Regulations 20.14 and 20.15 of the Trade Marks Regulations 1995 provide that Parts 5, 6, 7 and 8 of Chapter 20 of the Patents Regulations 1991, which deal with registration and discipline of registered patent attorneys, apply to trade marks attorneys as if the references to a patent attorney were references to a trade marks attorney.] 

Trade Practices (Consumer Product Information Standards) (Cosmetics) Regulations 1991

Regulation 8(1) (SR 327 of 1991)

Regulation 7	Decision of the Treasurer in relation to product ingredients.	

Trade Support Loans Act 2014

Section 86 (81 of 2014)

Sections 81(3), 85(1)	The following decisions of the Commissioner of Taxation and the Secretary of the Department of Education and Training that have been internally reviewed;
-	to affirm, vary, or set aside and substitute a new decision under s 81(3); 
-	to affirm, vary, or set aside and substitute a new decision under s 85(1).
	
[Notes:
1.	Subsection 77(1) states that a decision under section 50 or 51 is a reviewable Commissioner decision.
2.	Subsection 77(1) states that a decision under the Act that is not a reviewable Commissioner decision, referred to in s 202F of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936; or a decision under s 88 is a reviewable Secretary decision)

Tradespersons’ Rights Regulation Act 1946

Section 51A(7) (109 of 1993)

Section 51A(5)	Decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Industry made under the Regulations to waive or defer payment of fees in particular cases or classes of cases.	

[Notes:
1.	The list of trades to which the Act applies was amended by SR 187 of 2013. SR 187 of 2013 also repealed the Tradespersons’ Rights Regulations that were made on 19 August 1992.These changes commenced 1 July 2013.]

Tradex Scheme Act 1999

Section 40 (185 of 1999) (18 of 2008)

Section 39(5)	The following decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science that have been reconsidered: 
-	to refuse wholly or partly under s 11 an application for a tradex order; 
-	to refuse wholly or partly under s 13 an application for the variation of a tradex order; to suspend a tradex order under s 17; 
-	to revoke a tradex order under s 19 or 19A. 	

[Notes:
1.	The list of decisions that are subject to reconsideration under the Act is set out in ss 39(1) and (2) of the Act.  The following Acts introduced or have amended the list of decisions subject to reconsideration: 185 of 1999 and 18 of 2008.
2.	If the Secretary fails to make a decision on the reconsideration within 28 days after the day on which the application for reconsideration was lodged, the Secretary is taken to have made a decision to affirm the original decision: s 39(7).]

Trans-Tasman Mutual Recognition Act 1997

Section 33 (190 of 1997)

Sections 19(2), 19(5), 21, 22, 25(5), 26(4), 26(5)	The following decisions of a local registration authority of an Australian jurisdiction: 
-	to grant registration to a person under s 19(2);
-	to renew the registration of a person under s 19(2);
-	to grant registration subject to conditions under s 19(5);
-	to postpone the grant of registration under s 21;
-	to refuse the grant of registration under s 22;
-	to cancel a person’s deemed registration under s 25(5);
-	to waive, or refuse to waive any conditions or undertakings applying to a person’s registration in New Zealand under s 26(4);
-	to impose conditions during a period of deemed registration under s 26(5).	

[Notes:  
1.	A "local registration authority" of an Australian jurisdiction is defined as the person or authority in the jurisdiction having the function conferred by legislation of registering persons in connection with their carrying on that occupation in the jurisdiction.]

Trust Recoupment Tax Assessment Act 1985

Section 4(1) and Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (9 of 1985) (216 of 1991)

Various sections	Decisions of the Commissioner of Taxation relating to the assessment and collection of trust recoupment tax and penalty tax.	

[Notes:  
1.	Section 4(1) of this Act provides that ss 6 (other than the definition of "spouse" in subs (1)) and 7A, Part II, s 21, Part IV, Div 1 of Part VI, and Parts VII and VIII of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 and regulations made under that Act apply for the purposes of the assessment and collection of trust recoupment tax and penalty tax in like manner as those provisions apply for the purposes of the assessment and collection of income tax under the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936.  Section 4(2) provides that a reference in this Act to a provision of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 is to be read as a reference to that provision in its application for the purposes of this Act in accordance with s 4(1).
2.	A person who is dissatisfied with a decision noted in this entry must object against that decision in the manner set out in Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.  The Tribunal may only review a decision to allow, wholly or in part, or to disallow a taxation objection. 
3.	An application for review of an objection decision must be lodged with the Tribunal within 60 days after the person making the application is served with notice of the decision: s 14ZZC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
4.	If the Commissioner fails to make a decision on a taxation objection within 60 days after being given a written notice requiring the making of the objection decision, the Commissioner is deemed to have made a decision under s 14ZY(1) to disallow the objection: s 14ZYA(3) of the  Taxation Administration Act 1953.]

V

Venture Capital Act 2002

Section 29-15(1) (137 of 2002)

Section 29-10(4)	The following decisions of the Innovation Australia that have been confirmed or varied upon reconsideration under s 29-10(4): 
-	to refuse to allow under s 9-4 a partner’s committed capital in a partnership to exceed 30% of the partnership’s committed capital;
-	to allow, or refuse to allow, under s 9-10(3) a longer period for the purposes of s 9-10(1)(b) for repayment of a permitted loan;
-	to refuse under s 13-1 to register a limited partnership as a venture capital limited partnership (VCLP), an early stage venture capital limited partnership (ESVCLP) or an Australian venture capital fund of funds (AFOF) under Part 2;
-	to refuse under s 13-5 to register conditionally a limited partnership as a VCLP, an ESVCLP or an AFOF;
-	to revoke under s 17-1, 17-5 or 17-10 a registration under Part 2;
-	to determine under s 17-1(2) a period within which an investment registration requirement must be met;
-	to refuse under s 21-5 to register an entity as an eligible venture capital investor under Part 3;
-	to revoke under s 21-25 an entity's registration under Part 3;
-	to determine, or refuse to determine, under s 25-5 a shorter period during which a company or unit trust must meet the requirements of s 118-425(2)(b) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997;
-	to refuse to make a determination under s 25-10 or 25-15.	

[Notes:  
1.	The list of decisions that are subject to reconsideration under s 29-10 of the Act is set out in s 29-1. The following Acts introduced or have amended the list of decisions subject to reconsideration: 137 of 2002; 105 of 2004; and 78 of 2007.Innovation Australia has 60 days to review the decision after receiving the request for reconsideration.  If it fails to confirm, revoke or vary the decision then it will be taken to have confirmed the decision pursuant to ss 29-10(4) and (5) of the Act.]

Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986

Sections 155A(1), 175(1), 175(1A), 175(2), 175(2AAAA), 175(2AAA), 175(2AA), 175(4) and 175(5) (27 of 1986) (78 of 1987) (130 of 1987) (2 of 1991) (73 of 1991) (157 of 1997) (157 of 2000) (102 of 2001) (48 of 2008) (74 of 2014)

Sections 57B, 79U, 93ZB, 115(3), 116D(2), 118ZU 	The following decisions which have been affirmed or set aside by the Repatriation Commission on reconsideration: 
-	a decision in relation to a claim for a qualifying service determination under s 35B; 
-	a decision in relation to a claim for service pension or income support supplement; 
-	a decision in relation to a request under s 52Y; 
-	a decision cancelling or suspending a service pension or income support supplement; 
-	a decision terminating the suspension of a service pension or income support supplement; 
-	a decision reducing or increasing the rate of a service pension or income support supplement; 
-	a decision refusing an application for an increase in the rate of a service pension or income support supplement; 
-	a decision in relation to an advance payment of service pension or income support supplement; 
-	a decision under Part IIIAB in relation to pension bonus except for decisions under ss 45TE, 45TG, 45TO or 45UK(1)(b); 
-	a decision that a person is not eligible for the advance payment of an amount of pension under s 79I(1); 
-	a decision in relation to the claim for a pharmaceutical benefits card under s 93Z; 
-	a decision in respect of an application for clothing allowance, bereavement payment under s 98AA, funeral benefits, decoration allowance, Victoria Cross allowance, recreation transport allowance, temporary incapacity allowance or loss of earnings allowance under s 115(3); 
-	a decision that a person fails to fall within a class of persons, a member of which is an “eligible child of a veteran” under s 116D(2); 
-	a decision that a person is not entitled to a seniors health card under s 118ZG; 
-	a decision that a person has ceased to be entitled to a senior health card under s 118ZN.	
Section 13AG	A decision of the Repatriation Commission made under s 13AG that a person is not a reinstated pensioner.
	
Section 139	The following decisions of the Veterans’ Review Board: to affirm, vary, or set aside a decision of the Repatriation Commission under s 139.	
Sections 155(4), 155(7), 155(8)	The following decisions of the Principal Member of the Veterans’ Review Board: to dismiss an application if the applicant fails to appear in person, or by a representative at a directions hearing or alternative dispute resolution process under s 155(4); to dismiss a non reviewable decision under s 155(7); to dismiss an application if the applicant fails to proceed with the application or comply with a direction related to the application within a reasonable time under s 155(8).	

[Notes:  
1.	The following provisions set out the decisions in relation to which a person may request reconsideration under the Act: ss 57, 79T(1), 115(1), 116D(1) and 118ZS. The following Acts introduced or have amended these provisions: 78 of 1994, 157 of 1997, 67 of 1998, 157 of 2000, 48 of 2008 and 95 of 2011.
2.	Section 176(4) of the Act modifies the time limit for lodging an application for review with the Tribunal.  A person must lodge an application for review of a decision under ss 13AG, 57B, 79U, 115(3), 116D(2), 118ZU or 139 within 3 months after the day on which the person received the reviewable decision.
3.	The Tribunal cannot extend the time for lodging an application for review to a date more than 12 months after the person received the reviewable decision: s 176(4) of the Act.
4.	The review provisions of Social Security Act 1991 apply in relation to decisions to recover recoverable amount under s 205(2) and to give a notice under s 205A. See section 205B.
5.	The review provisions in the Act also apply to decisions relating to a claim for a bonus payment under the A New Tax System (Bonuses for Older Australians) Act 1999.
6.	Despite the repeal of section 115(1)(f) this section will continue to apply on and after the commencement of Act 95 of 2011 in relation to applications for temporary incapacity allowance made before, on or after that commencement.]
7.	Act 74 of 2014 amended ss 139 and 155 of this Act with effect from 28 July 2014.

Veterans’ Entitlements (Clarke Review) Act 2004

Section 8 (100 of 2004)

Section 7	A decision of the Commission under s 7 relating to a claim that an applicant is dissatisfied with.	

[Notes: 
1.	Section 8 of the Act provides the AAT with jurisdiction to review a decision of the Commissioner made under s 7 relating to a claim. An application for review is made directly to the AAT rather than via the Veterans’ Review Board.]

Veterans’ Entitlements Regulations 1986

Regulation 9AL (SR 372 of 1997)

Regulations 9AG, 9AI	The following decisions of the Repatriation Commission that have been affirmed or set aside on reconsideration: 
-	to request the repayment of an amount equal to an amount of travelling expenses which has been calculated under regs 9, 9AD or 9AE and paid as a result of the person giving information to the Commission which was false or misleading in a material particular;
-	to pay a particular amount of travelling expenses calculated in accordance with regs 9 or 9AE;
-	to refuse to authorise the payment of travelling expenses or request the person to repay the amount of an advance where the person has not given the Commission written evidence of the expenses within 3 months after a request from the Commission to do so under reg 9AF.	

[Notes:  
1.	An application for review must be lodged within 3 months after the day on which the person was notified of the Commission’s decision: reg. 9AL(2).
2.	Regulation 18 of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Regulations 2004 (SR 156 of 2004) provides that a reference to “the Commission” in Veterans’ Entitlements Regulations 9AG, 9AI and 9AL is also a reference to the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission.]

Veterans' Entitlements (Rehabilitation Allowance) Regulations

Regulation 10(1) (SR 107 of 1994) (SR 341 of 1994)

Regulations 5(a)(ii), 7, 8	The following decisions of the Repatriation Commission: 
-	to approve, or refuse to approve, a vocational rehabilitation program under reg. 5(a)(ii);
-	 to assess under reg. 7 the circumstances of a person referred to in regulation 5 and work out how much the person's income was reduced because he or she, or the veteran on whom he or she is dependent, became ineligible for payment of a pension or allowance, or eligible only for payment at a lower rate, as a result of undertaking the program of rehabilitation;
-	to decide the amount of rehabilitation allowance to be paid to a person under reg 8.	

[Notes:  
1.	Regulation 10(2) modifies the time limit for lodging an application for review of a decision under regs 7 and 8.  If a person has not applied to the Veterans' Review Board for review of a decision to reduce the person's income, an application for review under regs 7 or 8 must be lodged within 28 days after the last day on which a person could apply to the Veterans' Review Board for review of that decision.  If a person has applied to the Veterans' Review Board for review of a decision to reduce the person's income, an application for review of a decision under regs 7 or 8 must be lodged within 28 days after the day on which the Veterans' Review Board decides or otherwise disposes of that application for review.
2.	These Regulations will sunset on 1 October 2018]

Veterans’ Entitlements (Special Assistance — Motorcycle Purchase) Regulations 2001

Regulation 19(1) (SR 209 of 2001)

Regulation 17(1)	A decision of the Repatriation Commission under reg. 17 which affirms or set asides on reconsideration, a decision in relation to an application for a motorcycle benefit under reg 10.	

[Notes:  
1.	Pursuant to regulation 19(2) the application must be made within 3 months after the day when the person seeking review was given a record of the decision under reg 18(1)(b).]

Veterans’ Entitlements (Special Assistance) Regulations 1999

Regulation 26(1) (SR 319 of 1999)

Regulation 24	The following decisions of the Repatriation Commission that have been affirmed or set aside on reconsideration: to accept or reject a claim for a crisis payment under Part 4.	

[Notes:
1. 	Pursuant to reg 26(2) the application must be made within 3 months after the day when the person seeking review was given a record of the decision in accordance with reg 25(1)(b).
2.	These Regulations will sunset on 1 April 2019.]

Veterans’ Vocational Rehabilitation Scheme

Section 5.3.1 (Legislative Instrument 1997 No. 5 - F2005B01424)

Section 5.2.6	Any decision of the Repatriation Commission under the Scheme that has been affirmed or set aside on reconsideration.	

[Notes:  
-	This scheme was made under s 115B(1) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986.
-	Section 5.3.3 modifies the time limit for lodging an application for review with the Tribunal.  A person must lodge an application for review within 3 months after the day on which the person received the reviewable decision.  The Tribunal cannot extend the time for lodging an application for review to a date more than 12 months after the person received the reviewable decision.]

W

Water Act 2007

Sections 77(7), 83(8) (137 of 2007)

Sections 77(3)(a)(ii), 77(3)(b), 83(8)
	The following determinations of the Minister for the Environment: 
-	to determine under s 77(3)(a)(ii) the amount of the payment to be made under s 77 to an entitlement holder in relation to a diversion limit reduction;
-	to determine under s 77(3)(b) that a payment is not to be made under s 77 to an entitlement holder in relation to a diversion limit reduction;
-	to determine under s 83(5)(a)(ii) the amount of the payment to be made under s 83 to an entitlement holder in relation to a change to the Basin Plan;
-	to determine under s 83(5)(b) that a payment is not to be made under s 83 to an entitlement holder in relation to a change to the Basin Plan.	

Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (Cth)

Section 72(1) (4 of 2005)

Sections 26, 29, 31 or  71(4)	The following decisions that have been made by the Regulator personally or on internal review: 
-	to refuse to register, or to cancel or suspend the registration of, a WELS product under s 26(1)	

[Notes:
1.	The Tribunal’s jurisdiction was amended by the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Amendment (Scheme Enhancements) Act 2012 (108 of 2012). These changes commenced on 22 January 2013.
2.	The list of decisions made under this Act that are subject to internal review is set out in s 69(1).  The following Acts introduced or have amended this list of decisions: 4 of 2005,108 of 2012 and 64 of 2013.
3.	Despite s 27(1) of the AAT Act an application for review may only by the ‘affected person’ concerned: s 72(2). ‘Affected person’ is defined in ss 69 (2),(3) and (4).
4.	Application may also be made to the Tribunal for review of any decision made by the Regulator in the performance of a function or the exercise of a power conferred by a corresponding State-Territory law provided that: 
-	the law under which the decision was made provides for review by the Tribunal; and 
-	the decision is declared by the regulations to be a reviewable State-Territory decision for the purposes of this section: s 17.  
5.	Regulation 4 of the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Regulations 2005 provides that any decision made by the Secretary in the performance of a function or the exercise of a power conferred by a corresponding State-Territory law is a reviewable State-Territory decision if the law under which the decision is made provides for review by the Tribunal. 
6.	The following laws have been declared to be corresponding State-Territory laws by the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Declaration 2005 and provide for the Tribunal to review decisions made by the Regulator:
1.	Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (ACT);
2.	Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (Qld);
3.	Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (Tas);
4.	Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (Vic);
5.	Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2006 (NT);
6.	Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2006 (WA);
7.	Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards (New South Wales) Act 2005 (NSW).
7.	See the separate entries for each of these Acts.]

Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (ACT)

Section 17(1) of the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (Cth) and section 72(1)

Sections 26, 29, 31 or  71(4)	The following decisions that have been made by the Regulator personally or on internal review: 
-	to refuse to register, or to cancel or suspend the registration of, a WELS product under s 26(1) 	

[Notes
-	The Tribunal’s jurisdiction was amended by the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Amendment (Scheme Enhancements) Act 2012 (108 of 2012). These changes commenced on 22 January 2013.
-	Pursuant to section 17(1) of the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (Cth), application may be made to the Tribunal for review of any decision made by the Regulator in the performance of a function or the exercise of a power conferred by a corresponding State-Territory law provided that: 
1.	the law under which the decision was made provides for review by the Tribunal; and 
2.	the decision is declared by the regulations to be a reviewable State-Territory decision for the purposes of this section: s 17.  
-	The Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (ACT) is a corresponding State-Territory law: Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Declaration 2005 (Cth).  Pursuant to reg 4 of the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Regulations 2005 (Cth), any decision made by the Secretary in the performance of a function or the exercise of a power conferred by a corresponding State-Territory law is a reviewable State-Territory decision if the law under which the decision is made provides for review by the Tribunal.
-	The Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (ACT) provides that the decisions set out above are reviewable by the Tribunal.  The list of decisions that are that are subject to internal review is set out in s 69(1).]

Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (Qld)

Section 17(1) of the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (Cth) and section 72(1)

Sections 26, 29, 31 or  71(4)	The following decisions that have been made by the Regulator personally or on internal review: 
-	to refuse to register, or to cancel or suspend the registration of, a WELS product under s 26(1)\	

[Notes
-	The Tribunal’s jurisdiction was amended by the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Amendment (Scheme Enhancements) Act 2012 (108 of 2012). These changes commenced on 22 January 2013.
-	Pursuant to section 17(1) of the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (Cth), application may be made to the Tribunal for review of any decision made by Regulator in the performance of a function or the exercise of a power conferred by a corresponding State-Territory law provided that: 
1.	the law under which the decision was made provides for review by the Tribunal; and 
2.	the decision is declared by the regulations to be a reviewable State-Territory decision for the purposes of this section: s 17.  
-	The Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (Qld) is a corresponding State-Territory law: Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Declaration 2005 (Cth).  Pursuant to reg 4 of the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Regulations 2005 (Cth), any decision made by the Secretary in the performance of a function or the exercise of a power conferred by a corresponding State-Territory law is a reviewable State-Territory decision if the law under which the decision is made provides for review by the Tribunal.
-	The Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (Qld) provides that the decisions set out above are reviewable by the Tribunal.  The list of decisions that are subject to internal review is set out in s 69(1).]

Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (Tas)

Section 17(1) of the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (Cth) and section 72(1)

Sections 26, 29, 31 or  71(4)	The following decisions that have been made by the Regulator personally or on internal review: 
-	to refuse to register, or to cancel or suspend the registration of, a WELS product under s 26(1) 	

[Notes
-	The Tribunal’s jurisdiction was amended by the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Amendment (Scheme Enhancements) Act 2012 (108 of 2012). These changes commenced on 22 January 2013.
-	Pursuant to section 17(1) of the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (Cth), application may be made to the Tribunal for review of any decision made by the Regulator in the performance of a function or the exercise of a power conferred by a corresponding State-Territory law provided that: 
1.	the law under which the decision was made provides for review by the Tribunal; and 
2.	the decision is declared by the regulations to be a reviewable State-Territory decision for the purposes of this section: s 17.  
-	The Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (Tas) is a corresponding State-Territory law: Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Declaration 2005 (Cth).  Pursuant to reg 4 of the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Regulations 2005 (Cth), any decision made by the Secretary in the performance of a function or the exercise of a power conferred by a corresponding State-Territory law is a reviewable State-Territory decision if the law under which the decision is made provides for review by the Tribunal.
-	The Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (Tas) provides that the decisions set out above are reviewable by the Tribunal.  The list of decisions that are subject to internal review is set out in s 69(1).]

Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (Vic)

Section 17(1) of the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (Cth) and section 72(1)

Sections 26, 29, 31 or  71(4)	The following decisions that have been made by the Regulator personally or on internal review: 
-	to refuse to register, or to cancel or suspend the registration of, a WELS product under s 26(1) 	

[Notes
-	The Tribunal’s jurisdiction was amended by the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Amendment (Scheme Enhancements) Act 2012 (108 of 2012). These changes commenced on 22 January 2013.
-	Pursuant to section 17(1) of the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (Cth), application may be made to the Tribunal for review of any decision made by the Regulator in the performance of a function or the exercise of a power conferred by a corresponding State-Territory law provided that: 
1.	the law under which the decision was made provides for review by the Tribunal; and 
2.	the decision is declared by the regulations to be a reviewable State-Territory decision for the purposes of this section: s 17.  
-	The Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (Vic) is a corresponding State-Territory law: Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Declaration 2005 (Cth).  Pursuant to reg 4 of the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Regulations 2005 (Cth), any decision made by the Secretary in the performance of a function or the exercise of a power conferred by a corresponding State-Territory law is a reviewable State-Territory decision if the law under which the decision is made provides for review by the Tribunal.
-	The Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (Vic) provides that the decisions set out above are reviewable by the Tribunal.  The list of decisions that are subject to internal review is set out in s 69(1).]

Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2006 (NT)

Section 17(1) of the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (Cth) and section 72(1)

Sections 26, 29, 31 or  71(4)	The following decisions that have been made by the Regulator personally or on internal review: 
-	to refuse to register, or to cancel or suspend the registration of, a WELS product under s 26(1) 	

[Notes
1.	The Tribunal’s jurisdiction was amended by the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Amendment (Scheme Enhancements) Act 2012 (108 of 2012). These changes commenced on 22 January 2013.
2.	Pursuant to section 17(1) of the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (Cth), application may be made to the Tribunal for review of any decision made by the Regulator in the performance of a function or the exercise of a power conferred by a corresponding State-Territory law provided that: 
-	the law under which the decision was made provides for review by the Tribunal; and 
-	the decision is declared by the regulations to be a reviewable State-Territory decision for the purposes of this section: s 17.  
3.	The Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (NT) is a corresponding State-Territory law: Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Declaration 2005 (Cth).  Pursuant to reg 4 of the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Regulations 2005 (Cth), any decision made by the Secretary in the performance of a function or the exercise of a power conferred by a corresponding State-Territory law is a reviewable State-Territory decision if the law under which the decision is made provides for review by the Tribunal.
4.	The Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (NT) provides that the decisions set out above are reviewable by the Tribunal.  The list of decisions that are reviewable by the Tribunal is set out in s 69(1).]

Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2006 (WA)

Section 17(1) of the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (Cth) and section 72(1)

Sections 26, 29, 31 or  71(4)	The following decisions that have been made by the Regulator personally or on internal review: 
-	to refuse to register, or to cancel or suspend the registration of, a WELS product under s 26(1) 	

[Notes
•	The Tribunal’s jurisdiction was amended by the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Amendment (Scheme Enhancements) Act 2012 (108 of 2012). These changes commenced on 22 January 2013.
•	Pursuant to section 17(1) of the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (Cth), application may be made to the Tribunal for review of any decision made by the Regulator in the performance of a function or the exercise of a power conferred by a corresponding State-Territory law provided that: 
•	the law under which the decision was made provides for review by the Tribunal; and 
•	the decision is declared by the regulations to be a reviewable State-Territory decision for the purposes of this section: s 17.  
•	The Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2006 (WA) is a corresponding State-Territory law: Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Declaration 2005 (Cth).  Pursuant to reg 4 of the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Regulations 2005 (Cth), any decision made by the Secretary in the performance of a function or the exercise of a power conferred by a corresponding State-Territory law is a reviewable State-Territory decision if the law under which the decision is made provides for review by the Tribunal.
•	The Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2006 (WA) provides that the decisions set out above are reviewable by the Tribunal.  The list of decisions that are subject to internal review is set out in s 69(1).]

Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Determination 2013

Section 72(1) of the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005

Sections 10(4), 11(2), 14(1)	The following decisions that have been made by the Regulator personally or on internal review: 
-	to refuse to waive or refund an application fee under s 10(4); 
-	to refuse to register a WELS product under s 11(2); 
-	to cancel or suspend the registration of a WELS product under s 14(1).	

[Notes:
1.	This Determination was made under ss 18, 19 and 26 of the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005. It commenced 22 January 2013.
2.	Section 69 of the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 provides that decisions to refuse to register a WELS product or to suspend or cancel the registration of a WELS product made under the scheme are reviewable decisions for the purposes of the Act
3.	Section 17(1) provides that a decision to waive or refund the application fee under subsection 10(4) is a reviewable decision for the purposes of Part 11 of the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005.]

Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards (New South Wales) Act 2006 (NSW)

Section 14(1) and sections 17(1) and 72(1) of the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (Cth)

Sections 26, 29, 31 or  71(4)	The following decisions that have been made by the Regulator personally or on internal review: 
-	to refuse to register, or to cancel or suspend the registration of, a WELS product under s 26(1)	

[Notes
-	The Tribunal’s jurisdiction was amended by the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Amendment (Scheme Enhancements) Act 2012 (108 of 2012). These changes commenced on 22 January 2013.
-	Pursuant to section 17(1) of the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005 (Cth), application may be made to the Tribunal for review of any decision made by the Regulator in the performance of a function or the exercise of a power conferred by a corresponding State-Territory law provided that: 
1.	the law under which the decision was made provides for review by the Tribunal; and 
2.	the decision is declared by the regulations to be a reviewable State-Territory decision for the purposes of this section: s 17.  
-	The Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards (New South Wales) Act 2005 (NSW) is a corresponding State-Territory law: Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Declaration 2005 (Cth).  Pursuant to reg 4 of the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Regulations 2005 (Cth), any decision made by the Secretary in the performance of a function or the exercise of a power conferred by a corresponding State-Territory law is a reviewable State-Territory decision if the law under which the decision is made provides for review by the Tribunal.
-	The Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards (New South Wales) Act 2005 (NSW) provides that the Commonwealth Act applies as a law of NSW.  The Secretary and other authorities and officers have the same functions and powers under the applied provisions as they have under the Commonwealth Act.  Section 14 provides that the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 applies as a law of NSW to any matter arising in relation to the applied provisions.]

Wine Australia Corporation Act 1980
-	See entry for Australian Grape and Wine Authority Act 2013

Wine Australia Corporation Regulations 1981
See entry for Australian Grape and Wine Authority Regulations 1981

Work Health and Safety Regulations 2011

Regulation 683(1) (SLI 262 of 2011)

Regulation 680(2)	The following decisions of Comcare which have been reconsidered by Comcare: 
-	to refuse to grant a high risk work licence under reg 89 or 91;
-	to impose a condition when granting or renewing a licence under reg 91A;
-	to refuse to issue a replacement high risk work licence document under reg 98;
-	to refuse to renew a high risk work licence under reg 104;
-	to suspend, cancel or vary conditions of a high risk work licence under reg 106(1);
-	to disqualify a licence holder from applying for another licence under reg 106(2);
-	to refuse to register a plant design under reg 256 or 257;
-	to impose a condition on the registration of a plant design under reg 258;
-	to refuse to register an item of plant under reg 269 or 270;
-	to impose a condition on the grant or renewal of  the  registration of an item of plant under reg 271;
-	to refuse to renew the registration of an item of plant under reg 279;
-	to amend a registration on the initiative of the Comcare under reg 283(1);
-	to refuse to amend a registration on application, or to make a different amendment, under reg 284;
-	to refuse to issue a replacement registration document under reg 288;
-	to cancel registration under reg 288B
-	to refuse to issue a general construction induction training card, or a replacement general construction induction training card, under reg 322;
-	 to cancel a general construction induction training card under reg 323;
-	to refuse to grant authorisation to use, handle or store a prohibited or restricted carcinogen under reg 384;
-	to cancel an authorisation to use, handle or store a prohibited or restricted carcinogen under reg 386;
-	to determine that a process is a lead process under reg 393;
-	to determine a different frequency for biological monitoring of workers at a workplace, or class of workers, carrying out lead risk work under reg 407	
Regulations 541, 542, 543, 544, 580, 584, 589, 590, 594, 598, 600, 601, 602(1), 602(2), 684, 686, 688, 691, 696, 697	The following decisions of Comcare: 
-	to determine, or not to determine, on making an inquiry, a facility to be a major hazard facility under reg 541;
-	 to determine a facility is a major hazard facility under reg 542;
-	to determine the suitability of the operator of a major hazard facility under reg  543;
-	to impose a condition on a determination that a facility is a major hazard facility under reg 544;
-	to refuse to grant a major hazard facility licence under reg 580;
-	to impose conditions on the grant, or renewal, of a major hazard facility licence under reg 584;
-	to amend, on its own initiative, a major hazard facility licence reg 589;
-	to refuse to amend a major hazard facility licence on application, or make a different amendment, under reg 590;
-	to refuse to issue a replacement major hazard facility licence under reg 594;
-	to refuse to renew a major hazard facility licence under reg 598;
-	to refuse, on application, to transfer a major hazard facility licence under reg 600;
-	to refuse, on application, to cancel a  major hazard facility licence under reg 601;
-	to suspend or cancel major hazard facility licence under reg 602(1);
-	to disqualify a licence holder from applying for another major hazard licence under reg 602(2);
-	to refuse to exempt  a person or a class of persons from compliance with any of these Regulations under reg 684;
-	to refuse to exempt a person from a requirement to hold a high risk work licence under reg 686;
-	to refuse to exempt, on application, the operator of a major hazard facility from compliance with any of these Regulations under reg 688;
-	to impose conditions on the grant of an exemption under reg 691;
-	to refuse to grant an exemption under reg 696;
-	to amend, or cancel,  an exemption granted on application under reg 697. 	

[Notes:
-	Regulation 683 states a person may apply to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for external review of a reviewable decision made by the regulator under Chapter 9 or Part 11.2 or a a decision made on internal review.
-	A list of reviewable decisions and persons who may make an application for review is set out in reg 676.
-	For reconsideration decisions, where Comcare has not varied or set aside a decision within 14 days after receiving the application for review, the decision is taken to have been affirmed:  reg 680(2).
-	The time limit for applications for internal review is within 28 days after the day on which the decision first came to the eligible person’s notice or any longer time allowed by Comcare: reg 678(1). The exception to this is for decisions made under regs 89, 256 or 269 which provide that an application may be made within 28 days after the 120 day period referred to in these provisions or any longer time allowed by Comcare: reg 678(2).
-	The time limit for applications made to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal is 28 days after the day on which the decision first came to the person’s notice or any longer time the Administrative Appeals Tribunal allows: reg 683(2).]