AAT Bulletin
Issue No. 10/2019                      11 March 2019
The AAT Bulletin is a weekly publication containing information about recently published decisions and appeals against decisions in the AAT’s General, Freedom of Information, National Disability Insurance Scheme, Security, Small Business Taxation Division; Taxation & Commercial and Veterans’ Appeals Divisions. The Bulletin also regularly includes a sample of decisions recently published in the AAT’s Migration & Refugee Division and Social Services & Child Support Division. It occasionally includes information on legislative changes that affect the AAT.
It is recommended that the Bulletin be read on-line. This has the advantage of allowing the reader to use hyperlinks to access the full text of cases and other internet sites mentioned in the Bulletin.
The AAT does not make any representation or warranty about the accuracy, reliability, currency or completeness of any material contained in this Bulletin or on any linked site. While the AAT makes every effort to ensure that the material in the Bulletin is accurate and up-to-date, you should exercise your own independent skill and judgement before you rely on it. Information contained in this Bulletin is not legal advice and is intended as a general guide only.  You should rely on your own advice or refer to the full cases and legislation in relation to any proceedings.
Enquiries regarding this publication may be directed to aatweb@aat.gov.au.

Contents
AAT Recent Decisions
Child Support
Citizenship
Compensation
Migration
National Disability Insurance Scheme
Practice and Procedure
Refugee
Social Security
Taxation
Veterans' Affairs
Appeals
Appeals lodged
Appeals finalised
Statements of Principles
New Statements of Principles
Amended Statements of Principles
Statements of Principles to be revoked

AAT Recent Decisions
This section of the Bulletin provides information about all decisions recently published in the AAT’s General, Freedom of Information, National Disability Insurance Scheme, Security, Taxation & Commercial and Veterans’ Appeals. This list also includes selected child support decisions published by the Social Services & Child Support Division and examples of recent decisions published by the Migration & Refugee Division.  Only AAT decisions that have been published on AustLII have been included.  Full copies of the decisions can be accessed through the hyperlinks provided below.
Child Support
Cowell and Child Support Registrar (Child support) [2019] AATA 262 (7 January 2019); W Budiselik, Member
CHILD SUPPORT – percentage of care – whether there was a change to the likely pattern of care – no change to the cost percentages – discretion exercised to revoke existing percentage of care determinations and make new determinations – decision under review affirmed
Langer and Clayton (Child support) [2019] AATA 259 (8 January 2019); P Noonan, Member
CHILD SUPPORT – departure determination – special needs of the child – cost of maintaining the child is significantly affected – financial resources of both parents – decision under review set aside and substituted
Cowie and Brelsford (Child support) [2019] AATA 258 (11 January 2019); K Millar, Member
CHILD SUPPORT – departure determination – costs of education – manner expected by both parents – cost of maintaining the children are significantly affected – costs relating to special needs of the child – financial resources of both parents – decision to make a departure determination – decision under review set aside and substituted
Lunn and Lunn (Child support) [2019] AATA 261 (14 January 2019); R Ellis, Senior Member
CHILD SUPPORT – non-agency payment – whether payment made to a third party in lieu of child support – intention of both parents – decision under review set aside and substituted
Metcalfe and Slocombe (Child support) [2019] AATA 260 (15 January 2019); Y Webb, Member
CHILD SUPPORT – percentage of care – whether there was a change to the likely pattern of care – existing percentage of care determinations revoked and new determinations made - decision under review set aside and substituted
CHILD SUPPORT – date of effect of objection decision – whether there special circumstances that prevented the objection being lodged in time – special circumstances exist – decision under review set aside and substituted

Citizenship
Kadir Muhamad and Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (Citizenship) [2019] AATA 351 (8 March 2109); C Puplick AM, Senior Member
CITIZENSHIP – citizenship test exemption – whether the applicant suffered from a permanent or enduring physical or mental incapacity – decision affirmed
Compensation
Tregear and Australian National University (Compensation) [2019] AATA 316 (1 March 2109); Deputy President A G Melick AO SC
COMPENSATION – Whether the Applicant was incapacitated for performing his substantive role as Head of the School of Music (SoM) as at 26 June 2015 and to the date of his separation on 30 August 2015 – whether the Applicant remained incapacitated for the role as Head of the SoM beyond his separation from the ANU on 30 August 2015 – Applicant did not make an absolute recovery from his ‘adjustment reaction with mixed emotional features’ – whether it was reasonable within the meaning of s 19(4)(f) of the Safety Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (the Act) for the Applicant not to continue in the role of the Head of the SoM – whether the Applicant was ever offered the position to be created and called the Director of Music and, if so, whether it was reasonable within the meaning of s 19(4)(f) of the Act for the Applicant not to accept that role – Applicant entitled for incapacity payments in accordance with s 19(2) of the Act –  reviewable decision set aside and remitted
Migration
Barron and Minister for Home Affairs (Migration) [2019] AATA 315 (4 March 2019); Senior Member B J Illingworth
MIGRATION – mandatory cancellation of applicant’s visa – applicant has substantial criminal record – whether discretion to revoke mandatory cancellation should be exercised – primary considerations – other considerations – decision under review affirmed
CJQP and Minister for Home Affairs  (Migration) [2019] AATA 332 (5 March 2019); Senior Member T Tavoularis
MIGRATION - non-revocation of mandatory cancellation of Class BB Subclass 155 Five Year Resident Return visa – expedited matter – where visa was cancelled under s 501(3A) – applicant does not pass character test – 12 month imprisonment – whether discretion in s 501CA to revoke mandatory cancellation should be exercised – considerations in Direction No 79 – consideration in Direction No 75 – decision under review affirmed
Davids (Migration) [2019] AATA 280 (16 January 2019); J Clarke, Member
MIGRATION – Child (Residence) (Class BT) – Subclass 802 (Child) – applicant over 18 – adopted by paternal grandparents – former carer died – financially supported by adoptive parents – credible witnesses – ministerial intervention referral – decision under review affirmed

FGHG and Minister for Home Affairs (Migration) [2019] AATA 329 (6 March 2019); Mr A Maryniak QC, Member
MIGRATION – mandatory cancellation of a Class UK Subclass 820 Partner (Temporary) visa – applicant concedes he does not pass the character test – serious and violent criminal offence – Ministerial Direction no. 79 – primary and other considerations – whether mandatory cancellation should be revoked – protection of the Australian community – low risk of violent recidivism – best interests of minor children – expectations of the Australian community – weight to be given to the primary and other considerations – decision under review revoked
Igbolekwu (Migration) [2019] AATA 327 (13 February 2019); Deputy President J Redfern (Presiding) and C Huntly, Member
MIGRATION – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) Subclass 500 visa – cancellation under s.116(1)(g) of the Migration Act 1958 – whether the prescribed ground in r.2.43(1)(o) of the Migration Regulations 1994 applies – visa cancelled following investigation into the circumstances surrounding the grant – consideration of the expressions ‘reasonably suspects’, ‘as a result of’ and ‘fraudulent conduct’ – insufficient evidence of a causal connection between the fraudulent conduct and the granting of the visa – ground for cancellation not established – decision set aside and substituted
Moustafa (Migration) [2019] AATA 267 (15 January 2019); H Claringbold, Member
MIGRATION – Prospective Marriage (Temporary) (Class TO) – Subclass 300 (Prospective Marriage) – Tribunal notified of marriage – taken to have applied for other partner visas – decision under review remitted for reconsideration
Ocares Rojas (Migration) [2019] AATA 191 (18 January 2019); M Bishop, Member
MIGRATION – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) – Subclass 500 (Student) – genuine temporary entrant – sequential and continuing course enrolment – good academic progress – course valuable to career progression – compliance with visa conditions – family and community ties with Chile – decision under review remitted for reconsideration
VJSG and Minister for Home Affairs (Migration) [2019] AATA 345 (25 January 2019); Deputy President P Britten-Jones
IMMIGRATION – Mandatory cancellation of visa – Request for revocation of cancellation – Character test – Substantial criminal record over long period – Sentence of imprisonment of 12 months or more – Protection of the Australian community – Best interests of minor children – Expectations of the Australian community – Domestic violence – Other considerations – Strong ties to Australia – Warning given as to consequences of re-offending – Decision under review affirmed.
VPKY and Minister for Home Affairs (Migration) [2019] AATA 352 (8 March 2019); The Hon M Groom, Senior Member
MIGRATION – substantial criminal record - drug trafficking - mandatory cancellation – Direction 79 – five year resident return visa – citizen of the United Kingdom – Applicant lived in Australia for 50 years – fails the character test – whether another reason the mandatory cancellation should be revoked – decision affirmed

VSGP and Minister for Home Affairs (Migration) [2019] AATA 334 (1 March 2019); Senior Member T Tavoularis
MIGRATION – non-revocation of mandatory cancellation of Refugee visa (class XB sub-class 200) – expedited matter – where visa was cancelled under s 501(3A) – applicant does not pass character test – 12 month imprisonment – whether discretion in s 501CA to revoke mandatory cancellation should be exercised – considerations in Direction No 79 decision under review affirmed
1900181 (Migration) [2019] AATA 318 (14 January 2019); S Baker, Member
MIGRATION – Bridging E (Class WE) visa – Subclass 050 (Bridging (General)) – abide by conditions imposed on the visa – risk to the community – assaults and property damage charges – period in rehabilitiation – mental health issues – support mechanisms in the community – decision under review affirmed
National Disability Insurance Scheme
Ters and National Disability Insurance Agency [2019] AATA 312 (23 January 2019); Senior Member J C Kelly
NATIONAL DISABILITY INSURANCE SCHEME – characterisation of decision made by Chief Executive Officer – whether decision to not review plan or decision to approve the statement of participant supports – decision not to review plan – misconceived application to Tribunal –application dismissed
Practice and Procedure
Chemcert Training Group and Australian Skills Quality Authority [2019] AATA 313 (4 March 2019); C Puplick AM, Senior Member
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to stay decision of Australian Skills Quality Authority – registered training organisation – where applicant failed to lodge application for renewal of registration  more than 90 days before registration was due to expire – decision not to determine shorter period for making an application for renewal of registration – registration date elapsed – training organisation no longer registered – whether stay of decision can be granted in light of circumstances – practical effect of granting stay considered –   prospects of success – consequences for Applicant – public interest – consequences for parties – whether review would be rendered nugatory – stay application granted
Menzies Institute of Technology and Australian Skills Quality Authority [2019] AATA 343 (12 February 2019); Member K. Parker
PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – application to stay decisions not to renew registrations of a vocational education and training organisation – whether stay conditions should be imposed – stay granted subject to conditions which included a prohibition on new enrolments – substantive hearing expedited

Skilled Education Australia Pty Limited and Australian Skills Quality Authority [2019] AATA 317 (4 March 2019); Senior Member A Poljak
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to stay decision of Australian Skills Quality Authority – registered training organisation – decision to cancel registration – factors relevant to the granting of a stay – prospects of success – reputational damage – cancellation decision already in effect – insufficient evidence of financial impact – stay application refused
Townshend and Migration Agents Registration Authority [2019] AATA 340 (14 February 2019); Mr A. Maryniak QC, Member
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for order staying the decision of the Respondent – Whether to grant order – Weighing of relevant considerations – Application refused
Watterson and Visionstream Pty Ltd [2019] AATA 335 (25 February 2019); Member A Ward & Member D Ben-Tovim  
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION – Application for disqualification of legal representatives – Restriction of disclosure of evidence – inadvertent provision of restricted order to other party in contravention of order – hearing procedure – ability of legal advisors to continue to represent the applicant – hearing of application conducted in private
VETiS Consulting Services Pty Ltd and Australian Skills Quality Authority [2019] AATA 241 (7 March 2019); Senior Member A Poljak
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to stay decision of Australian Skills Quality Authority – registered training organisation – decision to cancel registration – factors relevant to the granting of a stay – compliance history – prospects of success – consequences for applicant if stay not granted – applicant financially dependent on registration – reputational damage – public interest – impact on school students if substantive application affirmed – protection of Australia’s reputation in the VET sector – need to maintain confidence in the regulatory framework – public interest considerations outweigh consequences for applicant – stay application refused
Refugee
1605363 (Refugee) [2019] AATA 224 (17 January 2019); A Grant, Member
REFUGEE – protection visa – Pakistan – particular social group – Turi Shia – father’s high profile in the community – death threats from extremist groups – family unable to relocate in Pakistan – adverse profile – person educated in a Western Country – claims supported by country information – decision under review remitted for reconsideration
1712068 (Refugee) [2019] AATA 223 (25 January 2019); D Dragovic, Senior Member
REFUGEE – protection visa – Iran – Federal Court remittal – religion – Christian convert – family connection to the Baha-i-faith – Bahai relative executed – Green movement supporter – lack of evidence – status as a failed asylum seeker – westernised Iranian – Christian convert – mental condition – PTSD – adequate health care – decision under review affirmed
1617104 (Refugee) [2019] AATA 321 (4 February 2019); S Lucas, Member
REFUGEE – protection visa – India – political opinion – Aam Aadmi Party – Shiromani Akhali Dal – property dispute – injured by sword – credibility issues – decision under review affirmed
1814425 (Refugee) [2019] AATA 324 (8 February 2019); M McAdam, Member
REFUGEE – cancellation – protection visa – Iran – imputed religion – attendance of house church – claimed profile of interest to the Basij – providing incorrect answers in visa application – returned to Iran despite claimed fears – non-compliance as described in s 107 notice – correctness of answers pertains to subjective fears at the time of application – decision under review set aside
1716824 (Refugee) [2019] AATA 344 (20 February 2019); L Hardy, Member
REFUGEE – protection visa – Pakistan – Federal Circuit Court remittal – member of Awami National Party – involvement with NGO activities – opposed to Taliban’s policies – no real risk of significant harm in the reasonably foreseeable future – decision under review affirmed
Social Security
Blake and Secretary, Department of Social Services (Social services second review) [2019] AATA 330 (6 March 2019); Senior Member C Puplick AM
SOCIAL SECURITY – Disability Support Pension – applicant’s impairments total twenty points or more under the Impairment Tables – fibromyalgia – type II bipolar disorder – no continuing inability to work at date of claim – decision affirmed
Holland and Secretary, Department of Social Services (Social services second review) [2019] AATA 339 (6 March 2019); Mr C Edwardes, Member
SOCIAL SECURITY – compensation – motor vehicle accident - consent judgement – compensation preclusion period applied – Disability Support Pension (DSP) payment – straitened financial circumstances – ill health – other factors – evidence does not support special circumstances – decision affirmed
Johnson and Secretary, Department of Social Services (Social services second review) [2019] AATA 328 (4 March 2019); Mr G Hallwood, Member
Extension of time – Reasons for delay – Strength of applicant’s case – Utility of application for Applicant – Date of effect of determination under s 107 of Social Security (Administration) Act 1999 – Alternative avenues
Knight and Secretary, Department of Social Services (Social services second review) [2019] AATA 311 (1 March 2019); D Grigg, Member
SOCIAL SECURITY – Rent Assistance – whether eligible – whether can be paid rent assistance from a date earlier than the date of the review request – decision under review affirmed
Lynch and Secretary, Department of Social Services (Social services second review) [2019] AATA 331 (6 March 2019); Ms D Mitchell, Member
SOCIAL SECURITY – disability support pension – DSP – whether medical conditions fully diagnosed, fully treated and fully stabilised – whether 20 points or more under the impairment tables during the relevant period – decision under review affirmed

Synnes and Secretary, Department of Social Services (Social services second review) [2019] AATA 338 (6 March 2019); Ms K Parker, Member
Catchwords – family tax benefits – whether reconciliation conditions were met – late lodgement of applicant’s partner’s tax returns – whether special circumstances prevented timely lodgement – whether time for lodgement should be extended – applicant’s partner experienced mental health issues – martial issues also a factor – decision affirmed
Taxation
Kort and Commissioner of Taxation (Taxation) [2019] AATA 336 (7 March 2019); Senior Member R. Pintos-Lopez
TAXATION – capital gains tax – whether there is a CGT exemption – private ruling settlement sum provisions – settlement release agreement – whether sum relating directly to compensation – whether compensation for the taxation consequences of the receipt of a lump sum instead of payments on a monthly basis – total permanent disability payment as capital in nature – decision set aside
Wainwright and Commissioner of Taxation (Taxation) [2019] AATA 333 (5 March 2019); Deputy President RI Hanger QC
TAXATION – self managed superannuation fund – superannuation funds accessed before conditions of release met – superannuation funds used to meet personal expenses – benefits received not included in income tax return – whether benefits to be assessed in the year that they were received – administrative penalty and shortfall interest charges – whether Commissioner should have exercised his discretion to not include benefits in assessable income – unreasonable for the Commissioner to include a benefit in the Applicant’s assessable income – decision under review affirmed – decision under review set aside and substituted
Veterans' Affairs
Greentree and Repatriation Commission (Veterans’ entitlements) [2019] AATA 314 (1 March 2019); Deputy President J Sosso
VETERANS’ AFFAIRS – claim for war widow’s pension – veteran deceased – Statement of Principles No 9 of 2013 – Adenocarcinoma of the Kidney – inhaling respirable  asbestos fibres – whether inhalation of respirable asbestos fibres in an open environment for at least 3,000 hours before clinical onset – was contributed to in a material degree – hypothesis raised is reasonable – hypothesis fits the Statement of Principles – facts not disproved beyond reasonable doubt – decision under review set aside

Appeals
This section of the Bulletin provides information about appeals that have been lodged or finalised against decisions in the AAT’s General, Freedom of Information, National Disability Insurance Scheme, Security, Taxation & Commercial and Veterans’ Appeals Divisions.  Information is only included about appeals relating to AAT decisions that have been published on AustLII.  Full copies of the decisions can be accessed through the hyperlinks provided below.  
Appeals lodged
CASE NAME	AAT reference	
Productivity Partners Pty Ltd and Australian Skills Quality Authority	[2018] AATA 4878	
MNLR and Minister for Home Affairs	[2019] AATA 61	
Nguyen and Minister for Immigration and Border Protection	[2018] AATA 4664	
Warren and Secretary, Department of Jobs and Small Business	[2019] AATA 95	
Appeals finalised
None finalised			

Statements of Principles
This section of the Bulletin provides information on recent developments in relation to Statements of Principles made by the Repatriation Medical Authority for the purposes of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. 
New Statements of Principles
The AAT has been advised that the Repatriation Medical Authority has made the following new Statements of Principles, which take effect from 25 March 2019:
Acute Articular Cartilage Tear (Balance of Probabilities) – No. 22 of 2019
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00234
Acute Articular Cartilage Tear (Reasonable Hypothesis) – No. 21 of 2019
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00233
Acute Meniscal Tear of the Knee (Balance of Probabilities) – No. 26 of 2019
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00247
Acute Meniscal Tear of the Knee (Reasonable Hypothesis) – No. 25 of 2019
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00246
Alzheimer Disease (Balance of Probabilities) – No. 34 of 2019
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00239
Alzheimer Disease (Reasonable Hypothesis) – No. 33 of 2019
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00240
Blepharitis (Balance of Probabilities) – No. 30 of 2019 
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00252
Blepharitis (Reasonable Hypothesis) – No. 29 of 2019
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00251
Chronic Insomnia Disorder (Balance of Probabilities) – No. 38 of 2019
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00230
Chronis Insomnia Disorder (Reasonable Hypothesis) – No. 37 of 2019
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00228
Chronic Pruritus Ani (Balance of Probabilities) – No. 32 of 2019
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00256
Chronic Pruritus Ani (Reasonable Hypothesis) – No. 31 of 2019
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00254
Dental Malocclusion (Balance of Probabilities) – No. 20 of 2019
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00225
Dental Malocclusion (Reasonable Hypothesis) – No. 19 of 2019
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00224
De Quervain Tendinopathy (Balance of Probabilities) – No. 42 of 2019
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00241
De Quervain Tendinopathy (Reasonable Hypothesis) – No. 41 of 2019
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00242
Methaemoglobinaemia (Balance of Probabilities) – No. 18 of 2019
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00223
Methaemoglobinaemia (Reasonable Hypothesis) – No. 17 of 2019
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00222
Neurocognitive Disorder With Lewy Bodies (Balance of Probabilities) – No. 36 of 2019
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00231
Neurocognitive Disorder With Lewy Bodies (Reasonable Hypothesis – No. 35 of 2019
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00229
Pilonidal Sinus (Balance of Probabilities) – No. 28 of 2019
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00249
Pilonidal Sinus (Reasonable Hypothesis) – No. 27 of 2019
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00248
Sinus Barotrauma (Balance of Probabilities) – No. 24 of 2019
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00237
Sinus Barotrauma (Reasonable Hypothesis) – No. 23 of 2019
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00235
Trigger Finger (Balance of Probabilities) – No. 40 of 2019
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00238
Trigger Finger (Reasonable Hypothesis) – No. 39 of 2019
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00227

Amended Statements of Principles
The AAT has been advised that the Repatriation Medical Authority has made amendments to the following Statements of Principles. The amendments take effect from 25 March 2019: 
Subdural Haumatoma – No. 44 of 2019
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00253
Subdural Haumatoma – No. 43 of 2019
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00245
Statements of Principles to be revoked	
The AAT has been advised that the following Statements of Principles determined by the Repatriation Medical Authority will be revoked on 25 March 2019:
Acute Articular Cartilage Tear – No. 54 of 2010 
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2010L01667
Acute Articular Cartilage Tear - No. 53 of 2010
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2010L01666
Acute Meniscal Tear of the Knee – No. 56 of 2010
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2010L01669
Acute Meniscal Tear of the Knee – No. 55 of 2010 
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2010L01668
Alzheimer-type dementia – No. 23 of 2010
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2014C00072
Alzheimer-type dementia – No. 22 of 2010
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2017C00820
Blepharitis – No. 64 of 2010
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2010L02303
Blepharitis – No. 63 of 2010
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2010L02302
Chronic Pruritus Ani – No. 76 of 2010
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2010L02315

Chronic Pruritus Ani – No. 75 of 2010
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2010L02314
Dental Malocclusion – No. 18 of 2011
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2011L00499
Dental Malocclusion – No. 17 of 2011
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2011L00489
Methaemoglobinaemia – No. 48 of 2010
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2010L01661
Methaemoglobinaemia – No. 47 of 2010
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2010L01660
Pilonidal Sinus – No. 72 of 2010
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2010L02311
Pilonidal Sinus - No. 71 of 2010
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2010L02310
Sinus Barotrauma – No. 50 of 2010
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2017C00075
Sinus Barotrauma – No. 49 of 2010
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2017C00074

© Commonwealth of Australia 2016

With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms and any third party material, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence.  Content from this publication should be attributed as: Administrative Appeals Tribunal, AAT Bulletin.
To the extent that copyright subsists in third party material, it remains with the original owner and permission may be required to reuse the material.
The terms under which the Coat of Arms can be used are detailed on the following website: http://www.itsanhonour.gov.au/coat-arms/. 
Enquiries regarding the licence are welcome at aatweb@aat.gov.au. 
This licence is limited to the AAT Bulletin and does not extend to the full text of AAT decisions.  Separate licence terms for AAT decisions can be found on AustLII.